Normalized to: Vay, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.03400 [pdf] - 2025504
Investigation of light ion fusion reactions with plasma discharges
Schenkel, T.;
Persaud, A.;
Wang, H.;
Seidl, P. A.;
MacFadyen, R.;
Nelson, C.;
Waldron, W. L.;
Vay, J. -L.;
Deblonde, G.;
Wen, B.;
Chiang, Y. -M.;
MacLeod, B. P.;
Ji, Q.
Submitted: 2019-05-08, last modified: 2019-05-24
The scaling of reaction yields in light ion fusion to low reaction energies
is important for our understanding of stellar fuel chains and the development
of future energy technologies. Experiments become progressively more
challenging at lower reaction energies due to the exponential drop of fusion
cross sections below the Coulomb barrier. We report on experiments where
deuterium-deuterium (D-D) fusion reactions are studied in a pulsed plasma in
the glow discharge regime using a benchtop apparatus. We model plasma
conditions using particle-in-cell codes. Advantages of this approach are
relatively high peak ion currents and current densities (0.1 to several A/cm^2)
that can be applied to metal wire cathodes for several days. We detect neutrons
from D-D reactions with scintillator-based detectors. For palladium targets, we
find neutron yields as a function of cathode voltage that are over 100 times
higher than yields expected for bare nuclei fusion at ion energies below 2 keV
(center of mass frame). A possible explanation is a correction to the ion
energy due to an electron screening potential of 1000+/-250 eV, which increases
the probability for tunneling through the repulsive Coulomb barrier. Our
compact, robust setup enables parametric studies of this effect at relatively
low reaction energies.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.09303 [pdf] - 1391884
ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review Report
Habib, Salman;
Roser, Robert;
Gerber, Richard;
Antypas, Katie;
Riley, Katherine;
Williams, Tim;
Wells, Jack;
Straatsma, Tjerk;
Almgren, A.;
Amundson, J.;
Bailey, S.;
Bard, D.;
Bloom, K.;
Bockelman, B.;
Borgland, A.;
Borrill, J.;
Boughezal, R.;
Brower, R.;
Cowan, B.;
Finkel, H.;
Frontiere, N.;
Fuess, S.;
Ge, L.;
Gnedin, N.;
Gottlieb, S.;
Gutsche, O.;
Han, T.;
Heitmann, K.;
Hoeche, S.;
Ko, K.;
Kononenko, O.;
LeCompte, T.;
Li, Z.;
Lukic, Z.;
Mori, W.;
Nugent, P.;
Ng, C. -K.;
Oleynik, G.;
O'Shea, B.;
Padmanabhan, N.;
Petravick, D.;
Petriello, F. J.;
Power, J.;
Qiang, J.;
Reina, L.;
Rizzo, T. J.;
Ryne, R.;
Schram, M.;
Spentzouris, P.;
Toussaint, D.;
Vay, J. -L.;
Viren, B.;
Wurthwein, F.;
Xiao, L.
Submitted: 2016-03-30, last modified: 2016-03-31
This draft report summarizes and details the findings, results, and
recommendations derived from the ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review meeting
held in June, 2015. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Larger, more
capable computing and data facilities are needed to support HEP science goals
in all three frontiers: Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic. The expected scale of
the demand at the 2025 timescale is at least two orders of magnitude -- and in
some cases greater -- than that available currently. 2) The growth rate of data
produced by simulations is overwhelming the current ability, of both facilities
and researchers, to store and analyze it. Additional resources and new
techniques for data analysis are urgently needed. 3) Data rates and volumes
from HEP experimental facilities are also straining the ability to store and
analyze large and complex data volumes. Appropriately configured
leadership-class facilities can play a transformational role in enabling
scientific discovery from these datasets. 4) A close integration of HPC
simulation and data analysis will aid greatly in interpreting results from HEP
experiments. Such an integration will minimize data movement and facilitate
interdependent workflows. 5) Long-range planning between HEP and ASCR will be
required to meet HEP's research needs. To best use ASCR HPC resources the
experimental HEP program needs a) an established long-term plan for access to
ASCR computational and data resources, b) an ability to map workflows onto HPC
resources, c) the ability for ASCR facilities to accommodate workflows run by
collaborations that can have thousands of individual members, d) to transition
codes to the next-generation HPC platforms that will be available at ASCR
facilities, e) to build up and train a workforce capable of developing and
using simulations and analysis to support HEP scientific research on
next-generation systems.