sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Vavrycuk, Vaclav

Normalized to: Vavrycuk, V.

5 article(s) in total.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1909.05102  [pdf] - 1961009
Universe opacity and Type Ia supernova dimming
Comments: 6 pages, 4 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1902.10524
Submitted: 2019-09-09, last modified: 2019-09-12
In this paper, I revoke a debate about an origin of Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) dimming. I argue that except for a commonly accepted accelerating expansion of the Universe, a conceivable alternative for explaining this observation is universe opacity caused by light extinction by intergalactic dust, even though it is commonly assumed that this effect is negligible. Using data of the Union2.1 SN Ia compilation, I find that the standard $\Lambda$CDM model and the opaque universe model fit the SN Ia measurements at redshifts $z < 1.4$ comparably well. The optimum solution for the opaque universe model is characterized by the B-band intergalactic opacity $\lambda_B = 0.10 \pm 0.03 \, \mathrm{Gpc}^{-1}$ and the Hubble constant $H_0 = 68.0 \pm 2.5 \, \mathrm{km\,s^{-1}\, Mpc^{-1}}$. The intergalactic opacity is higher than that obtained from independent observations but still within acceptable limits. This result emphasizes that the issue of the accelerating expansion of the Universe as the origin of the SN Ia dimming is not yet definitely resolved. Obviously, the opaque universe model as an alternative to the $\Lambda$CDM model is attractive, because it avoids puzzles and controversies associated with dark energy and the accelerating expansion.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1804.06875  [pdf] - 1673101
Universe opacity and CMB
Comments: 21 pages, 14 figures
Submitted: 2018-04-18
A cosmological model, in which the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is a thermal radiation of intergalactic dust instead of a relic radiation of the Big Bang, is revived and revisited. The model suggests that a virtually transparent local Universe becomes considerably opaque at redshifts $z > 2-3$. Such opacity is hardly to be detected in the Type Ia supernova data, but confirmed using quasar data. The opacity steeply increases with redshift because of a high proper density of intergalactic dust in the previous epochs. The temperature of intergalactic dust increases as $(1+z)$ and exactly compensates the change of wavelengths due to redshift, so that the dust radiation looks apparently like the radiation of the blackbody with a single temperature. The predicted dust temperature is $T^{D} = 2.776 \, \mathrm{K}$, which differs from the CMB temperature by 1.9\% only, and the predicted ratio between the total CMB and EBL intensities is 13.4 which is close to 12.5 obtained from observations. The CMB temperature fluctuations are caused by EBL fluctuations produced by galaxy clusters and voids in the Universe. The polarization anomalies of the CMB correlated with temperature anisotropies are caused by the polarized thermal emission of needle-shaped conducting dust grains aligned by large-scale magnetic fields around clusters and voids. A strong decline of the luminosity density for $z > 4$ is interpreted as the result of high opacity of the Universe rather than of a decline of the global stellar mass density at high redshifts.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1706.04771  [pdf] - 1584722
Missing dust signature in the cosmic microwave background
Comments: 5 pages, 4 figures
Submitted: 2017-06-15
I examine a possible spectral distortion of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) due to its absorption by galactic and intergalactic dust. I show that even subtle intergalactic opacity of $1 \times 10^{-7}\, \mathrm{mag}\, h\, \mathrm{Gpc}^{-1}$ at the CMB wavelengths in the local Universe causes non-negligible CMB absorption and decline of the CMB intensity because the opacity steeply increases with redshift. The CMB should be distorted even during the epoch of the Universe defined by redshifts $z < 10$. For this epoch, the maximum spectral distortion of the CMB is at least $20 \times 10^{-22} \,\mathrm{Wm}^{-2}\, \mathrm{Hz}^{-1}\, \mathrm{sr}^{-1}$ at 300 GHz being well above the sensitivity of the COBE/FIRAS, WMAP or Planck flux measurements. If dust mass is considered to be redshift dependent with noticeable dust abundance at redshifts 2-4, the predicted CMB distortion is even higher. The CMB would be distorted also in a perfectly transparent universe due to dust in galaxies but this effect is lower by one order than that due to intergalactic opacity. The fact that the distortion of the CMB by dust is not observed is intriguing and questions either opacity and extinction law measurements or validity of the current model of the Universe.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1611.01753  [pdf] - 1516892
Universe opacity and EBL
Comments: 12 pages, 9 figures, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2016)
Submitted: 2016-11-06, last modified: 2016-11-18
The observed extragalactic background light (EBL) is affected by light attenuation due to absorption of light by galactic and intergalactic dust in the Universe. Even galactic opacity of 10-20 percent and minute universe intergalactic opacity of $0.01\,\mathrm{mag}\,h\,\mathrm{Gpc}^{-1}$ at the local Universe have a significant impact on the EBL because obscuration of galaxies and density of intergalactic dust increase with redshift as $\left(1+z\right)^3$. Consequently, intergalactic opacity increases and the Universe becomes considerably opaque at $z > 3$. Adopting realistic values for galactic and intergalactic opacity, the estimates of the EBL for the expanding dusty universe are close to observations. The luminosity density evolution fits well measurements. The model reproduces a steep increase of the luminosity density at $z<2$, its maximum at $z=2-3$, and its decrease at higher redshifts. The increase of the luminosity density at low $z$ is not produced by the evolution of the star formation rate but by the fact that the Universe occupied a smaller volume in previous epochs. The decline of the luminosity density at high $z$ originates in the opacity of the Universe. The calculated bolometric EBL ranges from 100 to 200 $\mathrm{n W m}^{-2}\mathrm{sr}^{-1}$ and is within the limits of 40 and 200 $\mathrm{n W m}^{-2}\mathrm{sr}^{-1}$ of current EBL observations. The model predicts 98\% of the EBL coming from radiation of galaxies at $z<3.5$. Accounting for light extinction by intergalactic dust implies that the Universe was probably more opaque than dark for $z>3.5$.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1605.08085  [pdf] - 1413181
Impact of galactic and intergalactic dust on the stellar EBL
Comments: 9 pages, 3 figures
Submitted: 2016-05-25
Current theories assume that the low intensity of the stellar extragalactic background light (stellar EBL) is caused primarily by finite age of the Universe because the finite age limits the number of photons pumped into the space by galaxies and thus the sky is dark in the night. We oppose this opinion and show that two main factors are responsible for the extremely low intensity of the observed stellar EBL: (1) a low mean surface brightness of galaxies, which causes a low luminosity density in the local Universe, and (2) light extinction due to absorption by galactic and intergalactic dust. Dust produces a partial opacity of galaxies and of the Universe. The galactic opacity reduces the intensity of light from more distant background galaxies obscured by foreground galaxies. The effective extinction AV for light passing through a galaxy is 0.2 mag. This causes that distant background galaxies do not contribute to the EBL significantly. In addition, light of distant galaxies is dimmed due to absorption by intergalactic dust. Even a minute intergalactic opacity of 1x10^(-2) mag per Gpc is high enough to produce significant effects on the EBL. The absorbed starlight heats up the galactic and intergalactic dust and is further re-radiated at the IR, FIR and micro-wave spectrum. Assuming static infinite universe with no galactic and intergalactic dust, the stellar EBL should be as high as the surface brightness of stars. However, if dust is considered, the predicted stellar EBL is about 290 nWm^(-2)sr^(-1), which is only 5 times higher than the observed value. Hence, the presence of dust has higher impact on the EBL than currently assumed. In the expanding universe, the calculated value of the EBL is further decreased, because the obscuration effect and intergalactic absorption become more pronounced at high redshifts when the matter was concentrated at smaller volume than at present.