Normalized to: Vavrycuk, V.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.05102 [pdf] - 1961009
Universe opacity and Type Ia supernova dimming
Submitted: 2019-09-09, last modified: 2019-09-12
In this paper, I revoke a debate about an origin of Type Ia supernova (SN Ia)
dimming. I argue that except for a commonly accepted accelerating expansion of
the Universe, a conceivable alternative for explaining this observation is
universe opacity caused by light extinction by intergalactic dust, even though
it is commonly assumed that this effect is negligible. Using data of the
Union2.1 SN Ia compilation, I find that the standard $\Lambda$CDM model and the
opaque universe model fit the SN Ia measurements at redshifts $z < 1.4$
comparably well. The optimum solution for the opaque universe model is
characterized by the B-band intergalactic opacity $\lambda_B = 0.10 \pm 0.03 \,
\mathrm{Gpc}^{-1}$ and the Hubble constant $H_0 = 68.0 \pm 2.5 \,
\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}\, Mpc^{-1}}$. The intergalactic opacity is higher than that
obtained from independent observations but still within acceptable limits. This
result emphasizes that the issue of the accelerating expansion of the Universe
as the origin of the SN Ia dimming is not yet definitely resolved. Obviously,
the opaque universe model as an alternative to the $\Lambda$CDM model is
attractive, because it avoids puzzles and controversies associated with dark
energy and the accelerating expansion.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.06875 [pdf] - 1673101
Universe opacity and CMB
Submitted: 2018-04-18
A cosmological model, in which the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is a
thermal radiation of intergalactic dust instead of a relic radiation of the Big
Bang, is revived and revisited. The model suggests that a virtually transparent
local Universe becomes considerably opaque at redshifts $z > 2-3$. Such opacity
is hardly to be detected in the Type Ia supernova data, but confirmed using
quasar data. The opacity steeply increases with redshift because of a high
proper density of intergalactic dust in the previous epochs. The temperature of
intergalactic dust increases as $(1+z)$ and exactly compensates the change of
wavelengths due to redshift, so that the dust radiation looks apparently like
the radiation of the blackbody with a single temperature. The predicted dust
temperature is $T^{D} = 2.776 \, \mathrm{K}$, which differs from the CMB
temperature by 1.9\% only, and the predicted ratio between the total CMB and
EBL intensities is 13.4 which is close to 12.5 obtained from observations. The
CMB temperature fluctuations are caused by EBL fluctuations produced by galaxy
clusters and voids in the Universe. The polarization anomalies of the CMB
correlated with temperature anisotropies are caused by the polarized thermal
emission of needle-shaped conducting dust grains aligned by large-scale
magnetic fields around clusters and voids. A strong decline of the luminosity
density for $z > 4$ is interpreted as the result of high opacity of the
Universe rather than of a decline of the global stellar mass density at high
redshifts.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.04771 [pdf] - 1584722
Missing dust signature in the cosmic microwave background
Submitted: 2017-06-15
I examine a possible spectral distortion of the Cosmic Microwave Background
(CMB) due to its absorption by galactic and intergalactic dust. I show that
even subtle intergalactic opacity of $1 \times 10^{-7}\, \mathrm{mag}\, h\,
\mathrm{Gpc}^{-1}$ at the CMB wavelengths in the local Universe causes
non-negligible CMB absorption and decline of the CMB intensity because the
opacity steeply increases with redshift. The CMB should be distorted even
during the epoch of the Universe defined by redshifts $z < 10$. For this epoch,
the maximum spectral distortion of the CMB is at least $20 \times 10^{-22}
\,\mathrm{Wm}^{-2}\, \mathrm{Hz}^{-1}\, \mathrm{sr}^{-1}$ at 300 GHz being well
above the sensitivity of the COBE/FIRAS, WMAP or Planck flux measurements. If
dust mass is considered to be redshift dependent with noticeable dust abundance
at redshifts 2-4, the predicted CMB distortion is even higher. The CMB would be
distorted also in a perfectly transparent universe due to dust in galaxies but
this effect is lower by one order than that due to intergalactic opacity. The
fact that the distortion of the CMB by dust is not observed is intriguing and
questions either opacity and extinction law measurements or validity of the
current model of the Universe.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.01753 [pdf] - 1516892
Universe opacity and EBL
Submitted: 2016-11-06, last modified: 2016-11-18
The observed extragalactic background light (EBL) is affected by light
attenuation due to absorption of light by galactic and intergalactic dust in
the Universe. Even galactic opacity of 10-20 percent and minute universe
intergalactic opacity of $0.01\,\mathrm{mag}\,h\,\mathrm{Gpc}^{-1}$ at the
local Universe have a significant impact on the EBL because obscuration of
galaxies and density of intergalactic dust increase with redshift as
$\left(1+z\right)^3$. Consequently, intergalactic opacity increases and the
Universe becomes considerably opaque at $z > 3$. Adopting realistic values for
galactic and intergalactic opacity, the estimates of the EBL for the expanding
dusty universe are close to observations. The luminosity density evolution fits
well measurements. The model reproduces a steep increase of the luminosity
density at $z<2$, its maximum at $z=2-3$, and its decrease at higher redshifts.
The increase of the luminosity density at low $z$ is not produced by the
evolution of the star formation rate but by the fact that the Universe occupied
a smaller volume in previous epochs. The decline of the luminosity density at
high $z$ originates in the opacity of the Universe. The calculated bolometric
EBL ranges from 100 to 200 $\mathrm{n W m}^{-2}\mathrm{sr}^{-1}$ and is within
the limits of 40 and 200 $\mathrm{n W m}^{-2}\mathrm{sr}^{-1}$ of current EBL
observations. The model predicts 98\% of the EBL coming from radiation of
galaxies at $z<3.5$. Accounting for light extinction by intergalactic dust
implies that the Universe was probably more opaque than dark for $z>3.5$.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.08085 [pdf] - 1413181
Impact of galactic and intergalactic dust on the stellar EBL
Submitted: 2016-05-25
Current theories assume that the low intensity of the stellar extragalactic
background light (stellar EBL) is caused primarily by finite age of the
Universe because the finite age limits the number of photons pumped into the
space by galaxies and thus the sky is dark in the night. We oppose this opinion
and show that two main factors are responsible for the extremely low intensity
of the observed stellar EBL: (1) a low mean surface brightness of galaxies,
which causes a low luminosity density in the local Universe, and (2) light
extinction due to absorption by galactic and intergalactic dust. Dust produces
a partial opacity of galaxies and of the Universe. The galactic opacity reduces
the intensity of light from more distant background galaxies obscured by
foreground galaxies. The effective extinction AV for light passing through a
galaxy is 0.2 mag. This causes that distant background galaxies do not
contribute to the EBL significantly. In addition, light of distant galaxies is
dimmed due to absorption by intergalactic dust. Even a minute intergalactic
opacity of 1x10^(-2) mag per Gpc is high enough to produce significant effects
on the EBL. The absorbed starlight heats up the galactic and intergalactic dust
and is further re-radiated at the IR, FIR and micro-wave spectrum. Assuming
static infinite universe with no galactic and intergalactic dust, the stellar
EBL should be as high as the surface brightness of stars. However, if dust is
considered, the predicted stellar EBL is about 290 nWm^(-2)sr^(-1), which is
only 5 times higher than the observed value. Hence, the presence of dust has
higher impact on the EBL than currently assumed. In the expanding universe, the
calculated value of the EBL is further decreased, because the obscuration
effect and intergalactic absorption become more pronounced at high redshifts
when the matter was concentrated at smaller volume than at present.