Normalized to: Van Diepen, G.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.01399 [pdf] - 2042494
A bright, high rotation-measure FRB that skewers the M33 halo
Connor, Liam;
van Leeuwen, Joeri;
Oostrum, L. C.;
Petroff, E.;
Maan, Yogesh;
Adams, E. A. K.;
Attema, J. J.;
Bast, J. E.;
Boersma, O. M.;
Dénes, H.;
Gardenier, D. W.;
Hargreaves, J. E.;
Kooistra, E.;
Pastor-Marazuela, I.;
Schulz, R.;
Sclocco, A.;
Smits, R.;
Straal, S. M.;
van der Schuur, D.;
Vohl, Dany;
Adebahr, B.;
de Blok, W. J. G.;
van Cappellen, W. A.;
Coolen, A. H. W. M.;
Damstra, S.;
van Diepen, G. N. J.;
Frank, B. S.;
Hess, K. M.;
Hut, B.;
Loose, G. Marcel;
Lucero, D. M.;
Mika, Á.;
Moss, V. A.;
Mulder, H.;
Oosterloo, T. A.;
Ruiter, M.;
Vedantham, H.;
Vermaas, N. J.;
Wijnholds, S. J.;
Ziemke, J.
Submitted: 2020-02-04
We report the detection of a bright fast radio burst, FRB\,191108, with
Apertif on the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT). The interferometer
allows us to localise the FRB to a narrow $5\arcsec\times7\arcmin$ ellipse by
employing both multibeam information within the Apertif phased-array feed (PAF)
beam pattern, and across different tied-array beams. The resulting sight line
passes close to Local Group galaxy M33, with an impact parameter of only
18\,kpc with respect to the core. It also traverses the much larger
circumgalactic medium of M31, the Andromeda Galaxy. We find that the shared
plasma of the Local Group galaxies could contribute $\sim$10\% of its
dispersion measure of 588\,pc\,cm$^{-3}$, but not detectable scintillation,
temporal scattering, or significant Faraday rotation in this case. FRB\,191108
has a Faraday rotation measure of +474\,$\pm\,3$\,rad\,m$^{-2}$, which is too
large to be explained by either the Milky Way or the intergalactic medium. This
indicates a dense local magneto-ionic environment in the source host
galaxy---as has been argued for other FRBs. We found no accompanying persistent
radio sources in the Apertif imaging survey data.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.12217 [pdf] - 2061637
Repeating fast radio bursts with WSRT/Apertif
Oostrum, L. C.;
Maan, Y.;
van Leeuwen, J.;
Connor, L.;
Petroff, E.;
Attema, J. J.;
Bast, J. E.;
Gardenier, D. W.;
Hargreaves, J. E.;
Kooistra, E.;
van der Schuur, D.;
Sclocco, A.;
Smits, R.;
Straal, S. M.;
ter Veen, S.;
Vohl, D.;
Adams, E. A. K.;
Adebahr, B.;
de Blok, W. J. G.;
Brink, R. H. van den;
van Cappellen, W. A.;
Coolen, A. H. W. M.;
Damstra, S.;
van Diepen, G. N. J.;
Frank, B. S.;
Hess, K. M.;
van der Hulst, J. M.;
Hut, B.;
Ivashina, M. V.;
Loose, G. M.;
Lucero, D. M.;
Mika, Á.;
Morganti, R. H.;
Moss, V. A.;
Mulder, H.;
Norden, M. J.;
Oosterloo, T. A.;
Orrú, E.;
de Reijer, J. P. R.;
Ruiter, M.;
Vermaas, N. J.;
Wijnholds, S. J.;
Ziemke, J.
Submitted: 2019-12-27, last modified: 2020-01-28
Repeating fast radio bursts (FRBs) present excellent opportunities to
identify FRB progenitors and host environments, as well as decipher the
underlying emission mechanism. Detailed studies of repeating FRBs might also
hold clues to the origin of FRBs as a population. We aim to detect the first
two repeating FRBs: FRB 121102 (R1) and FRB 180814.J0422+73 (R2), and
characterise their repeat statistics. We also want to significantly improve the
sky localisation of R2. We use the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope to
conduct extensive follow-up of these two repeating FRBs. The new phased-array
feed system, Apertif, allows covering the entire sky position uncertainty of R2
with fine spatial resolution in one pointing. We characterise the energy
distribution and the clustering of detected R1 bursts. We detected 30 bursts
from R1. Our measurements indicate a dispersion measure of 563.5(2) pc
cm$^{-3}$, suggesting a significant increase in DM over the past few years. We
place an upper limit of 8% on the linear polarisation fraction of the brightest
burst. We did not detect any bursts from R2. A single power-law might not fit
the R1 burst energy distribution across the full energy range or widely
separated detections. Our observations provide improved constraints on the
clustering of R1 bursts. Our stringent upper limits on the linear polarisation
fraction imply a significant depolarisation, either intrinsic to the emission
mechanism or caused by the intervening medium, at 1400 MHz that is not observed
at higher frequencies. The non-detection of any bursts from R2 implies either a
highly clustered nature of the bursts, a steep spectral index, or a combination
of both. Alternatively, R2 has turned off completely, either permanently or for
an extended period of time.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.01594 [pdf] - 1399729
A large light-mass component of cosmic rays at 10^{17} - 10^{17.5} eV
from radio observations
Buitink, S.;
Corstanje, A.;
Falcke, H.;
Hörandel, J. R.;
Huege, T.;
Nelles, A.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rossetto, L.;
Schellart, P .;
Scholten, O.;
ter Veen, S.;
Thoudam, S.;
Trinh, T. N. G.;
Anderson, J.;
Asgekar, A.;
Avruch, I. M.;
Bell, M. E.;
Bentum, M. J.;
Bernardi, G.;
Best, P.;
Bonafede, A.;
Breitling, F.;
Broderick, J. W.;
Brouw, W. N.;
Brüggen, M.;
Butcher, H. R.;
Carbone, D.;
Ciardi, B.;
Conway, J. E.;
de Gasperin, F.;
de Geus, E.;
Deller, A.;
Dettmar, R. -J.;
van Diepen, G.;
Duscha, S.;
Eislöffel, J.;
Engels, D.;
Enriquez, J. E.;
Fallows, R. A.;
Fender, R.;
Ferrari, C.;
Frieswijk, W.;
Garrett, M. A.;
Griessmeier, J. M.;
Gunst, A. W.;
van Haarlem, M. P.;
Hassall, T. E.;
Heald, G.;
Hessels, J. W. T.;
Hoeft, M.;
Horneffer, A.;
Iacobelli, M.;
Intema, H.;
Juette, E.;
Karastergiou, A.;
Kondratiev, V. I.;
Kramer, M.;
Kuniyoshi, M.;
Kuper, G.;
van Leeuwen, J.;
Loose, G. M.;
Maat, P.;
Mann, G.;
Markoff, S.;
McFadden, R.;
McKay-Bukowski, D.;
McKean, J. P.;
Mevius, M.;
Mulcahy, D. D.;
Munk, H.;
Norden, M. J.;
Orru, E.;
Paas, H.;
Pandey-Pommier, M.;
Pandey, V. N.;
Pietka, M.;
Pizzo, R.;
Polatidis, A. G.;
Reich, W.;
Röttgering, H. J. A.;
Scaife, A. M. M.;
Schwarz, D. J.;
Serylak, M.;
Sluman, J.;
Smirnov, O.;
Stappers, B. W.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Stewart, A.;
Swinbank, J.;
Tagger, M.;
Tang, Y.;
Tasse, C.;
Toribio, M. C.;
Vermeulen, R.;
Vocks, C.;
Vogt, C.;
van Weeren, R. J.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.;
Wijnholds, S. J.;
Wise, M. W.;
Wucknitz, O.;
Yatawatta, S.;
Zarka, P.;
Zensus, J. A.
Submitted: 2016-03-04, last modified: 2016-05-01
Cosmic rays are the highest energy particles found in nature. Measurements of
the mass composition of cosmic rays between 10^{17} eV and 10^{18} eV are
essential to understand whether this energy range is dominated by Galactic or
extragalactic sources. It has also been proposed that the astrophysical
neutrino signal comes from accelerators capable of producing cosmic rays of
these energies. Cosmic rays initiate cascades of secondary particles (air
showers) in the atmosphere and their masses are inferred from measurements of
the atmospheric depth of the shower maximum, Xmax, or the composition of shower
particles reaching the ground. Current measurements suffer from either low
precision, or a low duty cycle and a high energy threshold. Radio detection of
cosmic rays is a rapidly developing technique, suitable for determination of
Xmax with a duty cycle of in principle nearly 100%. The radiation is generated
by the separation of relativistic charged particles in the geomagnetic field
and a negative charge excess in the shower front. Here we report radio
measurements of Xmax with a mean precision of 16 g/cm^2 between
10^{17}-10^{17.5} eV. Because of the high resolution in $Xmax we can determine
the mass spectrum and find a mixed composition, containing a light mass
fraction of ~80%. Unless the extragalactic component becomes significant
already below 10^{17.5} eV, our measurements indicate an additional Galactic
component dominating at this energy range.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.3550 [pdf] - 1166656
LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray
van Haarlem, M. P.;
Wise, M. W.;
Gunst, A. W.;
Heald, G.;
McKean, J. P.;
Hessels, J. W. T.;
de Bruyn, A. G.;
Nijboer, R.;
Swinbank, J.;
Fallows, R.;
Brentjens, M.;
Nelles, A.;
Beck, R.;
Falcke, H.;
Fender, R.;
Hörandel, J.;
Koopmans, L. V. E.;
Mann, G.;
Miley, G.;
Röttgering, H.;
Stappers, B. W.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.;
Zaroubi, S.;
Akker, M. van den;
Alexov, A.;
Anderson, J.;
Anderson, K.;
van Ardenne, A.;
Arts, M.;
Asgekar, A.;
Avruch, I. M.;
Batejat, F.;
Bähren, L.;
Bell, M. E.;
Bell, M. R.;
van Bemmel, I.;
Bennema, P.;
Bentum, M. J.;
Bernardi, G.;
Best, P.;
Bîrzan, L.;
Bonafede, A.;
Boonstra, A. -J.;
Braun, R.;
Bregman, J.;
Breitling, F.;
van de Brink, R. H.;
Broderick, J.;
Broekema, P. C.;
Brouw, W. N.;
Brüggen, M.;
Butcher, H. R.;
van Cappellen, W.;
Ciardi, B.;
Coenen, T.;
Conway, J.;
Coolen, A.;
Corstanje, A.;
Damstra, S.;
Davies, O.;
Deller, A. T.;
Dettmar, R. -J.;
van Diepen, G.;
Dijkstra, K.;
Donker, P.;
Doorduin, A.;
Dromer, J.;
Drost, M.;
van Duin, A.;
Eislöffel, J.;
van Enst, J.;
Ferrari, C.;
Frieswijk, W.;
Gankema, H.;
Garrett, M. A.;
de Gasperin, F.;
Gerbers, M.;
de Geus, E.;
Grießmeier, J. -M.;
Grit, T.;
Gruppen, P.;
Hamaker, J. P.;
Hassall, T.;
Hoeft, M.;
Holties, H.;
Horneffer, A.;
van der Horst, A.;
van Houwelingen, A.;
Huijgen, A.;
Iacobelli, M.;
Intema, H.;
Jackson, N.;
Jelic, V.;
de Jong, A.;
Juette, E.;
Kant, D.;
Karastergiou, A.;
Koers, A.;
Kollen, H.;
Kondratiev, V. I.;
Kooistra, E.;
Koopman, Y.;
Koster, A.;
Kuniyoshi, M.;
Kramer, M.;
Kuper, G.;
Lambropoulos, P.;
Law, C.;
van Leeuwen, J.;
Lemaitre, J.;
Loose, M.;
Maat, P.;
Macario, G.;
Markoff, S.;
Masters, J.;
McKay-Bukowski, D.;
Meijering, H.;
Meulman, H.;
Mevius, M.;
Middelberg, E.;
Millenaar, R.;
Miller-Jones, J. C. A.;
Mohan, R. N.;
Mol, J. D.;
Morawietz, J.;
Morganti, R.;
Mulcahy, D. D.;
Mulder, E.;
Munk, H.;
Nieuwenhuis, L.;
van Nieuwpoort, R.;
Noordam, J. E.;
Norden, M.;
Noutsos, A.;
Offringa, A. R.;
Olofsson, H.;
Omar, A.;
Orrú, E.;
Overeem, R.;
Paas, H.;
Pandey-Pommier, M.;
Pandey, V. N.;
Pizzo, R.;
Polatidis, A.;
Rafferty, D.;
Rawlings, S.;
Reich, W.;
de Reijer, J. -P.;
Reitsma, J.;
Renting, A.;
Riemers, P.;
Rol, E.;
Romein, J. W.;
Roosjen, J.;
Ruiter, M.;
Scaife, A.;
van der Schaaf, K.;
Scheers, B.;
Schellart, P.;
Schoenmakers, A.;
Schoonderbeek, G.;
Serylak, M.;
Shulevski, A.;
Sluman, J.;
Smirnov, O.;
Sobey, C.;
Spreeuw, H.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Sterks, C. G. M.;
Stiepel, H. -J.;
Stuurwold, K.;
Tagger, M.;
Tang, Y.;
Tasse, C.;
Thomas, I.;
Thoudam, S.;
Toribio, M. C.;
van der Tol, B.;
Usov, O.;
van Veelen, M.;
van der Veen, A. -J.;
ter Veen, S.;
Verbiest, J. P. W.;
Vermeulen, R.;
Vermaas, N.;
Vocks, C.;
Vogt, C.;
de Vos, M.;
van der Wal, E.;
van Weeren, R.;
Weggemans, H.;
Weltevrede, P.;
White, S.;
Wijnholds, S. J.;
Wilhelmsson, T.;
Wucknitz, O.;
Yatawatta, S.;
Zarka, P.;
Zensus, A.;
van Zwieten, J.
Submitted: 2013-05-15, last modified: 2013-05-19
LOFAR, the LOw-Frequency ARray, is a new-generation radio interferometer
constructed in the north of the Netherlands and across europe. Utilizing a
novel phased-array design, LOFAR covers the largely unexplored low-frequency
range from 10-240 MHz and provides a number of unique observing capabilities.
Spreading out from a core located near the village of Exloo in the northeast of
the Netherlands, a total of 40 LOFAR stations are nearing completion. A further
five stations have been deployed throughout Germany, and one station has been
built in each of France, Sweden, and the UK. Digital beam-forming techniques
make the LOFAR system agile and allow for rapid repointing of the telescope as
well as the potential for multiple simultaneous observations. With its dense
core array and long interferometric baselines, LOFAR achieves unparalleled
sensitivity and angular resolution in the low-frequency radio regime. The LOFAR
facilities are jointly operated by the International LOFAR Telescope (ILT)
foundation, as an observatory open to the global astronomical community. LOFAR
is one of the first radio observatories to feature automated processing
pipelines to deliver fully calibrated science products to its user community.
LOFAR's new capabilities, techniques and modus operandi make it an important
pathfinder for the Square Kilometre Array (SKA). We give an overview of the
LOFAR instrument, its major hardware and software components, and the core
science objectives that have driven its design. In addition, we present a
selection of new results from the commissioning phase of this new radio
observatory.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1212.6178 [pdf] - 1158703
Applying full polarization A-Projection to very wide field of view
instruments: An imager for LOFAR
Submitted: 2012-12-26
The aimed high sensitivities and large fields of view of the new generation
of interferometers impose to reach high dynamic range of order $\sim$1:$10^6$
to 1:$10^8$ in the case of the Square Kilometer Array. The main problem is the
calibration and correction of the Direction Dependent Effects (DDE) that can
affect the electro-magnetic field (antenna beams, ionosphere, Faraday rotation,
etc.). As shown earlier the A-Projection is a fast and accurate algorithm that
can potentially correct for any given DDE in the imaging step. With its very
wide field of view, low operating frequency ($\sim30-250$ MHz), long baselines,
and complex station-dependent beam patterns, the Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) is
certainly the most complex SKA precursor. In this paper we present a few
implementations of A-Projection applied to LOFAR that can deal with non-unitary
station beams and non-diagonal Mueller matrices. The algorithm is designed to
correct for all the DDE, including individual antenna, projection of the
dipoles on the sky, beam forming and ionospheric effects. We describe a few
important algorithmic optimizations related to LOFAR's architecture allowing us
to build a fast imager. Based on simulated datasets we show that A-Projection
can give dramatic dynamic range improvement for both phased array beams and
ionospheric effects. We will use this algorithm for the construction of the
deepest extragalactic surveys, comprising hundreds of days of integration.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.0393 [pdf] - 571396
The LOFAR radio environment
Offringa, A. R.;
de Bruyn, A. G.;
Zaroubi, S.;
van Diepen, G.;
Martinez-Ruby, O.;
Labropoulos, P.;
Brentjens, M. A.;
Ciardi, B.;
Daiboo, S.;
Harker, G.;
Jelic, V.;
Kazemi, S.;
Koopmans, L. V. E.;
Mellema, G.;
Pandey, V. N.;
Pizzo, R. F.;
Schaye, J.;
Vedantham, H.;
Veligatla, V.;
Wijnholds, S. J.;
Yatawatta, S.;
Zarka, P.;
Alexov, A.;
Anderson, J.;
Asgekar, A.;
Avruch, M.;
Beck, R.;
Bell, M.;
Bell, M. R.;
Bentum, M.;
Bernardi, G.;
Best, P.;
Birzan, L.;
Bonafede, A.;
Breitling, F.;
Broderick, J. W.;
Bruggen, M.;
Butcher, H.;
Conway, J.;
de Vos, M.;
Dettmar, R. J.;
Eisloeffel, J.;
Falcke, H.;
Fender, R.;
Frieswijk, W.;
Gerbers, M.;
Griessmeier, J. M.;
Gunst, A. W.;
Hassall, T. E.;
Heald, G.;
Hessels, J.;
Hoeft, M.;
Horneffer, A.;
Karastergiou, A.;
Kondratiev, V.;
Koopman, Y.;
Kuniyoshi, M.;
Kuper, G.;
Maat, P.;
Mann, G.;
McKean, J.;
Meulman, H.;
Mevius, M.;
Mol, J. D.;
Nijboer, R.;
Noordam, J.;
Norden, M.;
Paas, H.;
Pandey, M.;
Pizzo, R.;
Polatidis, A.;
Rafferty, D.;
Rawlings, S.;
Reich, W.;
Rottgering, H. J. A.;
Schoenmakers, A. P.;
Sluman, J.;
Smirnov, O.;
Sobey, C.;
Stappers, B.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Swinbank, J.;
Tagger, M.;
Tang, Y.;
Tasse, C.;
van Ardenne, A.;
van Cappellen, W.;
van Duin, A. P.;
van Haarlem, M.;
van Leeuwen, J.;
van Weeren, R. J.;
Vermeulen, R.;
Vocks, C.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.;
Wise, M.;
Wucknitz, O.
Submitted: 2012-10-01
Aims: This paper discusses the spectral occupancy for performing radio
astronomy with the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR), with a focus on imaging
observations. Methods: We have analysed the radio-frequency interference (RFI)
situation in two 24-h surveys with Dutch LOFAR stations, covering 30-78 MHz
with low-band antennas and 115-163 MHz with high-band antennas. This is a
subset of the full frequency range of LOFAR. The surveys have been observed
with a 0.76 kHz / 1 s resolution. Results: We measured the RFI occupancy in the
low and high frequency sets to be 1.8% and 3.2% respectively. These values are
found to be representative values for the LOFAR radio environment. Between day
and night, there is no significant difference in the radio environment. We find
that lowering the current observational time and frequency resolutions of LOFAR
results in a slight loss of flagging accuracy. At LOFAR's nominal resolution of
0.76 kHz and 1 s, the false-positives rate is about 0.5%. This rate increases
approximately linearly when decreasing the data frequency resolution.
Conclusions: Currently, by using an automated RFI detection strategy, the LOFAR
radio environment poses no perceivable problems for sensitive observing. It
remains to be seen if this is still true for very deep observations that
integrate over tens of nights, but the situation looks promising. Reasons for
the low impact of RFI are the high spectral and time resolution of LOFAR;
accurate detection methods; strong filters and high receiver linearity; and the
proximity of the antennas to the ground. We discuss some strategies that can be
used once low-level RFI starts to become apparent. It is important that the
frequency range of LOFAR remains free of broadband interference, such as DAB
stations and windmills.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.5745 [pdf] - 1521895
Optimized Trigger for Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic-Ray and Neutrino
Observations with the Low Frequency Radio Array
Singh, K.;
Mevius, M.;
Scholten, O.;
Anderson, J. M.;
van Ardenne, A.;
Arts, M.;
Avruch, M.;
Asgekar, A.;
Bell, M.;
Bennema, P.;
Bentum, M.;
Bernadi, G.;
Best, P.;
Boonstra, A. -J.;
Bregman, J.;
van de Brink, R.;
Broekema, C.;
Brouw, W.;
Brueggen, M.;
Buitink, S.;
Butcher, H.;
van Cappellen, W.;
Ciardi, B.;
Coolen, A.;
Damstra, S.;
Dettmar, R.;
van Diepen, G.;
Dijkstra, K.;
Donker, P.;
Doorduin, A.;
Drost, M.;
van Duin, A.;
Eisloeffel, J.;
Falcke, H.;
Garrett, M.;
Gerbers, M.;
Griessmeier, J.;
Grit, T.;
Gruppen, P.;
Gunst, A.;
van Haarlem, M.;
Hoeft, M.;
Holties, H.;
Horandel, J.;
Horneffer, L. A.;
Huijgen, A.;
James, C.;
de Jong, A.;
Kant, D.;
Kooistra, E.;
Koopman, Y.;
Koopmans, L.;
Kuper, G.;
Lambropoulos, P.;
van Leeuwen, J.;
Loose, M.;
Maat, P.;
Mallary, C.;
McFadden, R.;
Meulman, H.;
Mol, J. -D.;
Morawietz, J.;
Mulder, E.;
Munk, H.;
Nieuwenhuis, L.;
Nijboer, R.;
Norden, M.;
Noordam, J.;
Overeem, R.;
Paas, H.;
Pandey, V. N.;
Pandey-Pommier, M.;
Pizzo, R.;
Polatidis, A.;
Reich, W.;
de Reijer, J.;
Renting, A.;
Riemers, P.;
Roettgering, H.;
Romein, J.;
Roosjen, J.;
Ruiter, M.;
Schoenmakers, A.;
Schoonderbeek, G.;
Sluman, J.;
Smirnov, O.;
Stappers, B.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Stiepel, H.;
Stuurwold, K.;
Tagger, M.;
Tang, Y.;
ter Veen, S.;
Vermeulen, R.;
de Vos, M.;
Vogt, C.;
van der Wal, E.;
Weggemans, H.;
Wijnholds, S.;
Wise, M.;
Wucknitz, O.;
Yattawatta, S.;
van Zwieten, J.
Submitted: 2011-08-29
When an ultra-high energy neutrino or cosmic ray strikes the Lunar surface a
radio-frequency pulse is emitted. We plan to use the LOFAR radio telescope to
detect these pulses. In this work we propose an efficient trigger
implementation for LOFAR optimized for the observation of short radio pulses.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1106.1041 [pdf] - 1934606
LOFAR: Early imaging results from commissioning for Cygnus A
McKean, John;
Ker, Louise;
van Weeren, Reinout J.;
Batejat, Fabien;
Birzan, Laura;
Bonafede, Annalisa;
Conway, John;
De Gasperin, Francesco;
Ferrari, Chiara;
Heald, George;
Jackson, Neal;
Macario, Giulia;
Orrù, Emanuela;
Pizzo, Roberto;
Rafferty, David;
Rottgering, Huub;
Shulevski, Aleksandar;
Tasse, Cyril;
van der Tol, Sebastiaan;
van Bemmel, Ilse;
van Diepen, Ger;
van Zwieten, Joris E.
Submitted: 2011-06-06
The Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) will operate between 10 and 250 MHz, and will
observe the low frequency Universe to an unprecedented sensitivity and angular
resolution. The construction and commissioning of LOFAR is well underway, with
over 27 of the Dutch stations and five International stations routinely
performing both single-station and interferometric observations over the
frequency range that LOFAR is anticipated to operate at. Here, we summarize the
capabilities of LOFAR and report on some of the early commissioning imaging of
Cygnus A.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1008.4693 [pdf] - 1941778
Progress with the LOFAR Imaging Pipeline
Heald, George;
McKean, John;
Pizzo, Roberto;
van Diepen, Ger;
van Zwieten, Joris E.;
van Weeren, Reinout J.;
Rafferty, David;
van der Tol, Sebastiaan;
Birzan, Laura;
Shulevski, Aleksandar;
Swinbank, John;
Orru, Emanuela;
De Gasperin, Francesco;
Ker, Louise;
Bonafede, Annalisa;
Macario, Giulia;
Ferrari, Chiara
Submitted: 2010-08-27
One of the science drivers of the new Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) is
large-area surveys of the low-frequency radio sky. Realizing this goal requires
automated processing of the interferometric data, such that fully calibrated
images are produced by the system during survey operations. The LOFAR Imaging
Pipeline is the tool intended for this purpose, and is now undergoing
significant commissioning work. The pipeline is now functional as an automated
processing chain. Here we present several recent LOFAR images that have been
produced during the still ongoing commissioning period. These early LOFAR
images are representative of some of the science goals of the commissioning
team members.