Normalized to: Valotti, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.05036 [pdf] - 1789513
The XXL Survey XXIV. The final detection pipeline
Faccioli, L.;
Pacaud, F.;
Sauvageot, J. -L.;
Pierre, M.;
Chiappetti, L.;
Clerc, N.;
Gastaud, R.;
Koulouridis, E.;
Brun, A. M. C. Le;
Valotti, A.
Submitted: 2018-09-12
A well characterised detection pipeline is an important ingredient for X-ray
cluster surveys. We present the final development of the XXL Survey pipeline.
The pipeline optimally uses X-ray information by combining many overlapping
observations of a source when possible, both for its detection and its
characterisation. It can robustly detect and characterise several types of
X-ray sources: AGNs (point-like), galaxy clusters (extended), galaxy clusters
contaminated by a central AGN, and pairs of AGNs close on the sky. We perform a
thorough suite of validation tests via realistic simulations of XMM-Newton
images and we introduce new selection criteria for various types of sources
that will be detected by the survey. We find that the use of overlapping
observations allows new clusters to be securely identified that would be missed
or less securely identified by using only one observation at the time. We also
find that with the new pipeline we can robustly identify clusters with a
central AGN that would otherwise have been missed, and we can flag pairs of
AGNs close on the sky that might have been mistaken for a cluster.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.01569 [pdf] - 1701513
The cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys: IV. Testing ASpiX
with template-based cosmological simulations
Submitted: 2017-10-04, last modified: 2018-02-05
Following extensive tests on analytical toy-catalogues (paper III), we
present the results of a more realistic study over a 711 deg2 template-based
cosmological simulation. Dark matter halos from the Aardvark simulation have
been ascribed luminosities, temperatures and core-radii, using local scaling
relations and assuming self-similar evolution. Predicted X-ray sky-maps are
converted into XMM event lists using an instrumental simulator. The XXL
pipeline run on the resulting sky images, produces an 'observed' cluster
catalogue over which the tests have been performed. This allowed us to
investigate the relative power of various combinations of count-rate,
hardness-ratio, apparent-size and redshift information. Two fitting methods
were used : a traditional MCMC approach and a simple minimisation procedure
(Amoeba) whose mean uncertainties are a posteriori evaluated by means of
synthetic catalogues. Results were analysed and compared to the predictions
from a Fisher analysis (FA). For this particular catalogue realisation,
assuming perfectly known scaling relations, the CR-HR combination gives
$\sigma_8$ and $\Omega_m$ at the 10% level, while CR-HR-r$_c$-z improves this
to $\leq$ 3%. Adding a second hardness ratio improves results from the
CR-HR1-r$_c$ combination, but to a lesser extent than adding redshift
information. When all coefficients of the M-T relation (including scatter) are
also fitted, cosmological parameters are constrained to within 5-10%, and
larger for the M-T coefficients (up to a factor of two for the scatter). Errors
returned by the MCMC, by Amoeba, and by FA predictions, are in most cases in
excellent agreement and always within a factor of two. We also study the impact
of the scatter of the M-Rc relation on the number of detected clusters: for the
cluster typical sizes usually assumed, the larger the scatter, the lower the
number of detected objects.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.07762 [pdf] - 1593478
The cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys; III. 4D X-ray
observable diagrams
Submitted: 2016-09-25, last modified: 2017-09-06
Despite compelling theoretical arguments, the use of clusters as cosmological
probes is, in practice, frequently questioned because of the many uncertainties
impinging on cluster mass estimates. Our aim is to develop a fully
self-consistent cosmological approach of X-ray cluster surveys, exclusively
based on observable quantities, rather than masses. This procedure is justified
given the possibility to directly derive the cluster properties via ab initio
modelling, either analytically or by using hydrodynamical simulations. In this
third paper, we evaluate the method on cluster toy-catalogues. We model the
population of detected clusters in the count-rate -- hardness-ratio -- angular
size -- redshift space and compare the corresponding 4-dimensional diagram with
theoretical predictions. The best cosmology+physics parameter configuration is
determined using a simple minimisation procedure; errors on the parameters are
derived by scanning the likelihood hyper-surfaces with a wide range of starting
values. The method allows a simultaneous fit of the cosmological parameters, of
the cluster evolutionary physics and of the selection effects. When using
information from the X-ray survey alone plus redshifts, this approach is shown
to be as accurate as the mass function for the cosmological parameters and to
perform better for the cluster physics, as modelled in the scaling relations.
It enables the identification of degenerate combinations of parameter values.
Given the considerably shorter computer times involved for running the
minimisation procedure in the observed parameter space, this method appears to
clearly outperform traditional mass-based approaches when X-ray survey data
alone are available.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.01781 [pdf] - 1580346
The XXL survey: first results and future
Pierre, M.;
Adami, C.;
Birkinshaw, M.;
Chiappetti, L.;
Ettori, S.;
Evrard, A.;
Faccioli, L.;
Gastaldello, F.;
Giles, P.;
Horellou, C.;
Iovino, A.;
Koulouridis, E.;
Lidman, C.;
Brun, A. Le;
Maughan, B.;
Maurogordato, S.;
McCarthy, I.;
Miyazaki, S.;
Pacaud, F.;
Paltani, S.;
Plionis, M.;
Reiprich, T.;
Sadibekova, T.;
Smolcic, V.;
Snowden, S.;
Surdej, J.;
Tsirou, M.;
Vignali, C.;
Willis, J.;
Alis, S.;
Altieri, B.;
Baran, N.;
Benoist, C.;
Bongiorno, A.;
Bremer, M.;
Butler, A.;
Cappi, A.;
Caretta, C.;
Ciliegi, P.;
Clerc, N.;
Corasaniti, P. S.;
Coupon, J.;
Delhaize, J.;
Delvecchio, I.;
Democles, J.;
Desai, Sh.;
Devriendt, J.;
Dubois, Y.;
Eckert, D.;
Elyiv, A.;
Farahi, A.;
Ferrari, C.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Forman, W.;
Georgantopoulos, I.;
Guglielmo, V.;
Huynh, M.;
Jerlin, N.;
Jones, Ch.;
Lavoie, S.;
Fevre, J. -P. Le;
Lieu, M.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Marulli, F.;
Mantz, A.;
McGee, S.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Melnyk, O.;
Moscardini, L.;
Novak, M.;
Piconcelli, E.;
Poggianti, B.;
Pomarede, D.;
Pompei, E.;
Ponman, T.;
Ceja, M. E. Ramos;
Ranalli, P.;
Rapetti, D.;
Raychaudhury, S.;
Ricci, M.;
Rottgering, H.;
Sahlén, M.;
Sauvageot, J. -L.;
Schimd, C.;
Sereno, M.;
Smith, G. P.;
Umetsu, K.;
Valageas, P.;
Valotti, A.;
Valtchanov, I.;
Veropalumbo, A.;
Ascaso, B.;
Barnes, D.;
De Petris, M.;
Durret, F.;
Donahue, M.;
Ithana, M.;
Jarvis, M.;
Johnston-Hollitt, M.;
Kalfountzou, E.;
Kay, S.;
La Franca, F.;
Okabe, N.;
Muzzin, A.;
Rettura, A.;
Ricci, F.;
Ridl, J.;
Risaliti, G.;
Takizawa, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Truong, N.
Submitted: 2016-10-06, last modified: 2017-07-11
The XXL survey currently covers two 25 sq. deg. patches with XMM observations
of ~10ks. We summarise the scientific results associated with the first release
of the XXL data set, that occurred mid 2016. We review several arguments for
increasing the survey depth to 40 ks during the next decade of XMM operations.
X-ray (z<2) cluster, (z<4) AGN and cosmic background survey science will then
benefit from an extraordinary data reservoir. This, combined with deep
multi-$\lambda$ observations, will lead to solid standalone cosmological
constraints and provide a wealth of information on the formation and evolution
of AGN, clusters and the X-ray background. In particular, it will offer a
unique opportunity to pinpoint the z>1 cluster density. It will eventually
constitute a reference study and an ideal calibration field for the upcoming
eROSITA and Euclid missions.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.04317 [pdf] - 1426198
The XXL Survey: I. Scientific motivations - XMM-Newton observing plan -
Follow-up observations and simulation programme
Pierre, M.;
Pacaud, F.;
Adami, C.;
Alis, S.;
Altieri, B.;
Baran, B.;
Benoist, C.;
Birkinshaw, M.;
Bongiorno, A.;
Bremer, M. N.;
Brusa, M.;
Butler, A.;
Ciliegi, P.;
Chiappetti, L.;
Clerc, N.;
Corasaniti, P. S.;
Coupon, J.;
De Breuck, C.;
Democles, J.;
Desai, S.;
Delhaize, J.;
Devriendt, J.;
Dubois, Y.;
Eckert, D.;
Elyiv, A.;
Ettori, S.;
Evrard, A.;
Faccioli, L.;
Farahi, A.;
Ferrari, C.;
Finet, F.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Gandhi, P.;
Gastaldello, F.;
Gastaud, R.;
Georgantopoulos, I.;
Giles, P.;
Guennou, L.;
Guglielmo, V.;
Horellou, C.;
Husband, K.;
Huynh, M;
Iovino, A.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Koulouridis, E.;
Lavoie, S.;
Brun, A. M. C. Le;
Fevre, J. P. Le;
Lidman, C.;
Lieu, M.;
Lin, C. A.;
Mantz, A.;
Maughan, B. J.;
Maurogordato, S.;
McCarthy, I. G.;
McGee, S.;
Melin, J. B.;
Melnyk, O.;
Menanteau, F.;
Novak, M.;
Paltani, S.;
Plionis, M.;
Poggianti, B. M.;
Pomarede, D.;
Pompei, E.;
Ponman, T. J.;
Ramos-Ceja, M. E.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rapetti, D.;
Raychaudury, S.;
Reiprich, T. H.;
Rottgering, H.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E.;
Sadibekova, T.;
Santos, J.;
Sauvageot, J. L.;
Schimd, C.;
Sereno, M.;
Smith, G. P.;
Smolčić, V.;
Snowden, S.;
Spergel, D.;
Stanford, S.;
Surdej, J.;
Valageas, P.;
Valotti, A.;
Valtchanov, I.;
Vignali, C.;
Willis, J.;
Ziparo, F.
Submitted: 2015-12-14
We present the XXL Survey, the largest XMM programme totaling some 6.9 Ms to
date and involving an international consortium of roughly 100 members. The XXL
Survey covers two extragalactic areas of 25 deg2 each at a point-source
sensitivity of ~ 5E-15 erg/sec/cm2 in the [0.5-2] keV band (completeness
limit). The survey's main goals are to provide constraints on the dark energy
equation of state from the space-time distribution of clusters of galaxies and
to serve as a pathfinder for future, wide-area X-ray missions. We review
science objectives, including cluster studies, AGN evolution, and large-scale
structure, that are being conducted with the support of approximately 30
follow-up programmes. We describe the 542 XMM observations along with the
associated multi-lambda and numerical simulation programmes. We give a detailed
account of the X-ray processing steps and describe innovative tools being
developed for the cosmological analysis. The paper provides a thorough
evaluation of the X-ray data, including quality controls, photon statistics,
exposure and background maps, and sky coverage. Source catalogue construction
and multi-lambda associations are briefly described. This material will be the
basis for the calculation of the cluster and AGN selection functions, critical
elements of the cosmological and science analyses. The XXL multi-lambda data
set will have a unique lasting legacy value for cosmological and extragalactic
studies and will serve as a calibration resource for future dark energy studies
with clusters and other X-ray selected sources. With the present article, we
release the XMM XXL photon and smoothed images along with the corresponding
exposure maps. The XMM XXL observation list (Table B.1) is available in
electronic form at the CDS. The present paper is the first in a series
reporting results of the XXL-XMM survey.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1103.5401 [pdf] - 336504
Precision cosmology and 7Li data
Submitted: 2011-03-28
At variance from 2H, 3He and 4He abundances, 7Li abundance data yield an
extra constraint to cosmological parameters, in top of those deriving from CMB,
BAO, SNIa or H0 data. This constraint, often disregarded, would favor smaller
$\Omega_b h^2$ values, also indicating a preference for Dark Energy state
equations well in the phantom regime, simultaneously softening the upper limit
on the sum of neutrino masses, up to ~1.6eV.