sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Vale, Deni

Normalized to: Vale, D.

3 article(s) in total. 4 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1509.07342  [pdf] - 1357424
Hybrid method to resolve the neutrino mass hierarchy by supernova (anti)neutrino induced reactions
Comments: 22 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables
Submitted: 2015-09-24
We introduce a hybrid method to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy by simultaneous measurements of responses of at least two detectors to antineutrino and neutrino fluxes from accretion and cooling phases of core-collapse supernovae. The (anti)neutrino-nucleus cross sections for $^{56}$Fe and $^{208}$Pb are calculated in the framework of the relativistic nuclear energy density functional and weak interaction Hamiltonian, while the cross sections for inelastic scattering on free protons $\mathrm{p}(\bar{\nu}_\mathrm{e},\mathrm{e}^{+})\mathrm{n}$ are obtained using heavy-baryon chiral perturbation theory. The modelling of (anti)neutrino fluxes emitted from a protoneutron star in a core-collapse supernova include collective and Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein effects inside the exploding star. The particle emission rates from the elementary decay modes of the daughter nuclei are calculated for normal and inverted neutrino mass hierarchy. It is shown that simultaneous use of (anti)neutrino detectors with different target material allows to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy from the ratios of $\nu_\mathrm{e}$- and $\bar{\nu}_\mathrm{e}$-induced particle emissions. This hybrid method favors neutrinos from the supernova cooling phase and the implementation of detectors with heavier target nuclei ($^{208}$Pb) for the neutrino sector, while for antineutrinos the use of free protons in mineral oil or water is the appropriate choice.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1505.07486  [pdf] - 1300192
Modeling nuclear weak-interaction processes with relativistic energy density functionals
Comments: 22 pages, 12 figures, submitted for publication
Submitted: 2015-05-27
Relativistic energy density functionals have become a standard framework for nuclear structure studies of ground-state properties and collective excitations over the entire nuclide chart. We review recent developments in modeling nuclear weak-interaction processes: charge-exchange excitations and the role of isoscalar proton-neutron pairing, charged-current neutrino-nucleus reactions relevant for supernova evolution and neutrino detectors, and calculation of beta-decay rates for r-process nucleosynthesis.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1406.2584  [pdf] - 1300122
Resolving neutrino mass hierarchy from supernova (anti)neutrino-nucleus reactions
Comments: 4 pages, 2 figures, 1 table
Submitted: 2014-06-10
We introduce a hybrid method to determine neutrino mass hierarchy by simultaneous measurements of detector responses induced by antineutrino and neutrino fluxes from accretion and cooling phase of type II supernova. The (anti)neutrino-nucleus cross sections for $^{12}$C, $^{16}$O, $^{56}$Fe and $^{208}$Pb are calculated in the framework of relativistic nuclear energy density functional and weak Hamiltonian, while the cross sections for inelastic scattering on free protons, $p(\bar{\nu}_{e},e^{+})n$, are obtained using heavy-baryon chiral perturbation theory. The simulations of (anti)neutrino fluxes emitted from a protoneutron star in a core-collapse supernova include collective and Mickheev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein effects inside star. The emission rates of elementary decay modes of daughter nuclei are calculated for normal and inverted neutrino mass hierarchy. It is shown that simultaneous use of (anti)neutrino detectors with different target material and time dependence of the signal allow to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy from the ratios of $\nu_e / $ $\bar{\nu}_e$ induced particle emissions. The hybrid method favors detectors with heavier target nuclei ($^{208}$Pb) for the neutrino sector, while for antineutrinos the use of free protons and light nuclei ($\text{H}_2\text{O}$ or $\text{-CH}_2\text{-}$) represent appropriate choice.