Normalized to: Urban, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.00813 [pdf] - 1779760
Speckle Interferometry at the U.S. Naval Observatory. XXIII
Submitted: 2018-11-02
The results of 3,989 intensified CCD observations of double stars, made with
the 26-inch refractor of the U.S. Naval Observatory, are presented. Each
observation of a system represents a combination of over two thousand
short-exposure images. These observations are averaged into 1,911 mean relative
positions and range in separation from 0.289 to 128.638, with a median
separation of 8.669. Four orbits are improved. This is the 23rd in this series
of papers and covers the period 4 January 2017 through 13 September 2017.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.09780 [pdf] - 1415310
W1J00 and W2J00: Results of the Observations made with the Six-inch
Transit Circle 1977-1982 AND Results of Pole-to-Pole Observations made with
the Six-inch and Seven-inch Transit Circles 1985-1996
Submitted: 2016-05-31
The astronomical results contained in this publication represent a
continuation of previous work of the United States Naval Observatory Six-inch
and Seven-inch transit circles. The results are also the last from United
States Naval Observatory transit circles, since those instruments are no longer
in service.
For the W1J00, we present the results of observations made with the Six-inch
Transit Circle in Washington, D.C., between September 1977 and July 1982. The
catalog, called W1J00, contains mean positions of 7267 stars, all but five are
north of -30 degrees declination, and 4383 observations of solar system
objects. Positions of stars are for mean epoch of observation, on equator and
equinox J2000.0. Positions of solar system objects are apparent places. Error
estimates are about 100 mas per coordinate for the majority of stars.
For the W2J00, we present the results of observations made with the Six-inch
Transit Circle in Washington, D.C. and the Seven-inch Transit Circle at the
Black Birch station near Blenheim, New Zealand between April 1985 and February
1996. The catalog, called W2J00, contains mean positions of 44,395 globally
distributed stars, 5048 observations of the planets, and 6518 observations of
the brighter minor planets. Positions of stars are for mean epoch of
observation, on equator and equinox J2000.0. Positions of solar system objects
are apparent places. Error estimates are about 75 mas per coordinate for the
majority of stars.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.01546 [pdf] - 1306246
Historical Reflections on the Work of IAU Commission 4 (Ephemerides)
Kaplan, George H.;
Bangert, John A.;
Fienga, Agnes;
Folkner, William;
Hohenkerk, Catherine;
Lukashova, Marina;
Pitjeva, Elena V.;
Seidelmann, P. Kenneth;
Sveshnikov, Michael;
Urban, Sean;
Vondrak, Jan;
Weratschnig, Julia;
Williams, James G.
Submitted: 2015-11-04
As part of a reorganization of the International Astronomical Union (IAU),
Commission 4 (Ephemerides) went out of existence after the IAU General Assembly
in August 2015. This paper presents brief discussions of some of the
developments in fundamental astronomy that have influenced and been influenced
by the work of Commission 4 over its 96-year history. The paper also presents
notes about some of the publications of the national institutions that have
played an essential role in the commission's mission. The contents of this
paper were submitted for Commission 4's final report, to appear in IAU
Transactions Vol. XXIX-A.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.04877 [pdf] - 1488850
An Overview of the 2014 ALMA Long Baseline Campaign
Partnership, ALMA;
Fomalont, E. B.;
Vlahakis, C.;
Corder, S.;
Remijan, A.;
Barkats, D.;
Lucas, R.;
Hunter, T. R.;
Brogan, C. L.;
Asaki, Y.;
Matsushita, S.;
Dent, W. R. F.;
Hills, R. E.;
Phillips, N.;
Richards, A. M. S.;
Cox, P.;
Amestica, R.;
Broguiere, D.;
Cotton, W.;
Hales, A. S.;
Hiriart, R.;
Hirota, A.;
Hodge, J. A.;
Impellizzeri, C. M. V.;
Kern, J.;
Kneissl, R.;
Liuzzo, E.;
Marcelino, N.;
Marson, R.;
Mignano, A.;
Nakanishi, K.;
Nikolic, B.;
Perez, J. E.;
Pérez, L. M.;
Toledo, I.;
Aladro, R.;
Butler, B.;
Cortes, J.;
Cortes, P.;
Dhawan, V.;
Di Francesco, J.;
Espada, D.;
Galarza, F.;
Garcia-Appadoo, D.;
Guzman-Ramirez, L.;
Humphreys, E. M.;
Jung, T.;
Kameno, S.;
Laing, R. A.;
Leon, S.;
Mangum, J.;
Marconi, G.;
Nagai, H.;
Nyman, L. -A.;
Radiszcz, M.;
Rodón, J. A.;
Sawada, T.;
Takahashi, S.;
Tilanus, R. P. J.;
van Kempen, T.;
Vilaro, B. Vila;
Watson, L. C.;
Wiklind, T.;
Gueth, F.;
Tatematsu, K.;
Wootten, A.;
Castro-Carrizo, A.;
Chapillon, E.;
Dumas, G.;
de Gregorio-Monsalvo, I.;
Francke, H.;
Gallardo, J.;
Garcia, J.;
Gonzalez, S.;
Hibbard, J. E.;
Hill, T.;
Kaminski, T.;
Karim, A.;
Krips, M.;
Kurono, Y.;
Lopez, C.;
Martin, S.;
Maud, L.;
Morales, F.;
Pietu, V.;
Plarre, K.;
Schieven, G.;
Testi, L.;
Videla, L.;
Villard, E.;
Whyborn, N.;
Zwaan, M. A.;
Alves, F.;
Andreani, P.;
Avison, A.;
Barta, M.;
Bedosti, F.;
Bendo, G. J.;
Bertoldi, F.;
Bethermin, M.;
Biggs, A.;
Boissier, J.;
Brand, J.;
Burkutean, S.;
Casasola, V.;
Conway, J.;
Cortese, L.;
Dabrowski, B.;
Davis, T. A.;
Trigo, M. Diaz;
Fontani, F.;
Franco-Hernandez, R.;
Fuller, G.;
Madrid, R. Galvan;
Giannetti, A.;
Ginsburg, A.;
Graves, S. F.;
Hatziminaoglou, E.;
Hogerheijde, M.;
Jachym, P.;
Serra, I. Jimenez;
Karlicky, M.;
Klaasen, P.;
Kraus, M.;
Kunneriath, D.;
Lagos, C.;
Longmore, S.;
Leurini, S.;
Maercker, M.;
Magnelli, B.;
Vidal, I. Marti;
Massardi, M.;
Maury, A.;
Muehle, S.;
Muller, S.;
Muxlow, T.;
O'Gorman, E.;
Paladino, R.;
Petry, D.;
Pineda, J.;
Randall, S.;
Richer, J. S.;
Rossetti, A.;
Rushton, A.;
Rygl, K.;
Monge, A. Sanchez;
Schaaf, R.;
Schilke, P.;
Stanke, T.;
Schmalzl, M.;
Stoehr, F.;
Urban, S.;
van Kampen, E.;
Vlemmings, W.;
Wang, K.;
Wild, W.;
Yang, Y.;
Iguchi, S.;
Hasegawa, T.;
Saito, M.;
Inatani, J.;
Mizuno, N.;
Asayama, S.;
Kosugi, G.;
Morita, K. -I.;
Chiba, K.;
Kawashima, S.;
Okumura, S. K.;
Ohashi, N.;
Ogasawara, R.;
Sakamoto, S.;
Noguchi, T.;
Huang, Y. -D.;
Liu, S. -Y.;
Kemper, F.;
Koch, P. M.;
Chen, M. -T.;
Chikada, Y.;
Hiramatsu, M.;
Iono, D.;
Shimojo, M.;
Komugi, S.;
Kim, J.;
Lyo, A. -R.;
Muller, E.;
Herrera, C.;
Miura, R. E.;
Ueda, J.;
Chibueze, J.;
Su, Y. -N.;
Trejo-Cruz, A.;
Wang, K. -S.;
Kiuchi, H.;
Ukita, N.;
Sugimoto, M.;
Kawabe, R.;
Hayashi, M.;
Miyama, S.;
Ho, P. T. P.;
Kaifu, N.;
Ishiguro, M.;
Beasley, A. J.;
Bhatnagar, S.;
Braatz, J. A.;
Brisbin, D. G.;
Brunetti, N.;
Carilli, C.;
Crossley, J. H.;
D'Addario, L.;
Meyer, J. L. Donovan;
Emerson, D. T.;
Evans, A. S.;
Fisher, P.;
Golap, K.;
Griffith, D. M.;
Hale, A. E.;
Halstead, D.;
Hardy, E. J.;
Hatz, M. C.;
Holdaway, M.;
Indebetouw, R.;
Jewell, P. R.;
Kepley, A. A.;
Kim, D. -C.;
Lacy, M. D.;
Leroy, A. K.;
Liszt, H. S.;
Lonsdale, C. J.;
Matthews, B.;
McKinnon, M.;
Mason, B. S.;
Moellenbrock, G.;
Moullet, A.;
Myers, S. T.;
Ott, J.;
Peck, A. B.;
Pisano, J.;
Radford, S. J. E.;
Randolph, W. T.;
Venkata, U. Rao;
Rawlings, M. G.;
Rosen, R.;
Schnee, S. L.;
Scott, K. S.;
Sharp, N. K.;
Sheth, K.;
Simon, R. S.;
Tsutsumi, T.;
Wood, S. J.
Submitted: 2015-04-19, last modified: 2015-04-24
A major goal of the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) is to
make accurate images with resolutions of tens of milliarcseconds, which at
submillimeter (submm) wavelengths requires baselines up to ~15 km. To develop
and test this capability, a Long Baseline Campaign (LBC) was carried out from
September to late November 2014, culminating in end-to-end observations,
calibrations, and imaging of selected Science Verification (SV) targets. This
paper presents an overview of the campaign and its main results, including an
investigation of the short-term coherence properties and systematic phase
errors over the long baselines at the ALMA site, a summary of the SV targets
and observations, and recommendations for science observing strategies at long
baselines. Deep ALMA images of the quasar 3C138 at 97 and 241 GHz are also
compared to VLA 43 GHz results, demonstrating an agreement at a level of a few
percent. As a result of the extensive program of LBC testing, the highly
successful SV imaging at long baselines achieved angular resolutions as fine as
19 mas at ~350 GHz. Observing with ALMA on baselines of up to 15 km is now
possible, and opens up new parameter space for submm astronomy.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1003.2136 [pdf] - 1025634
The Third US Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog (UCAC3)
Zacharias, N.;
Finch, C.;
Girard, T.;
Hambly, N.;
Wycoff, G.;
Zacharias, M.;
Castillo, D.;
Corbin, T.;
DiVittorio, M.;
Dutta, S.;
Gaume, R.;
Gauss, S.;
Germain, M.;
Hall, D.;
Hartkopf, W.;
Hsu, D.;
Holdenried, E.;
Makarov, V.;
Martines, M.;
Mason, B.;
Monet, D.;
Rafferty, T.;
Rhodes, A.;
Siemers, T.;
Smith, D.;
Tilleman, T.;
Urban, S.;
Wieder, G.;
Winter, L.;
Young, A.
Submitted: 2010-03-09
The third US Naval Observatory (USNO) CCD Astrograph Catalog, UCAC3 was
released at the IAU General Assembly on 2009 August 10. It is the first all-sky
release in this series and contains just over 100 million objects, about 95
million of them with proper motions, covering about R = 8 to 16 magnitudes.
Current epoch positions are obtained from the observations with the 20 cm
aperture USNO Astrograph's "red lens", equipped with a 4k by 4k CCD. Proper
motions are derived by combining these observations with over 140 ground- and
space-based catalogs, including Hipparcos/Tycho and the AC2000.2, as well as
unpublished measures of over 5000 plates from other astrographs. For most of
the faint stars in the Southern Hemisphere the Yale/San Juan first epoch plates
from the SPM program (YSJ1) form the basis for proper motions. These data are
supplemented by all-sky Schmidt plate survey astrometry and photometry obtained
from the SuperCOSMOS project, as well as 2MASS near-IR photometry. Major
differences of UCAC3 data as compared to UCAC2 include a completely new raw
data reduction with improved control over systematic errors in positions,
significantly improved photometry, slightly deeper limiting magnitude, coverage
of the north pole region, greater completeness by inclusion of double stars and
weak detections. This of course leads to a catalog which is not as "clean" as
UCAC2 and problem areas are outlined for the user in this paper. The positional
accuracy of stars in UCAC3 is about 15 to 100 mas per coordinate, depending on
magnitude, while the errors in proper motions range from 1 to 10 mas/yr
depending on magnitude and observing history, with a significant improvement
over UCAC2 achieved due to the re-reduced SPM data and inclusion of more
astrograph plate data unavailable at the time of UCAC2.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0403060 [pdf] - 63251
The second US Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog (UCAC2)
Submitted: 2004-03-02
The second USNO CCD Astrograph Catalog, UCAC2 was released in July 2003.
Positions and proper motions for 48,330,571 sources (mostly stars) are
available on 3 CDs, supplemented with 2MASS photometry for 99.5% of the
sources. The catalog covers the sky area from -90 to +40 degrees declination,
going up to +52 in some areas; this completely supersedes the UCAC1 released in
2001. Current epoch positions are obtained from observations with the USNO
8-inch Twin Astrograph equipped with a 4k CCD camera. The precision of the
positions are 15 to 70 mas, depending on magnitude, with estimated systematic
errors of 10 mas or below. Proper motions are derived by utilizing over 140
ground-and space-based catalogs, including Hipparcos/Tycho, the AC2000.2, as
well as yet unpublished re-measures of the AGK2 plates and scans from the NPM
and SPM plates. Proper motion errors are about 1 to 3 mas/yr for stars to 12th
magnitude, and about 4 to 7 mas/yr for fainter stars to 16th magnitude. The
observational data, astrometric reductions, results, and important information
for the users of this catalog are presented.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0004378 [pdf] - 35737
Comparing Tycho-2 Astrometry with UCAC1
Submitted: 2000-04-27
The Tycho-2 Catalogue, released in February 2000, is based on the ESA
Hipparcos space mission data and various ground-based catalogs for proper
motions. An external comparison of the Tycho-2 astrometry is presented here
using the first U.S. Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog (UCAC1). The
UCAC1 data were obtained from observations performed at CTIO between February
1998 and November 1999, using the 206 mm aperture 5-element lens astrograph and
a 4k x 4k CCD. Only small systematic differences in position between Tycho-2
and UCAC1 up to 15 milliarcseconds (mas) are found, mainly as a function of
magnitude. The standard deviations of the distributions of the position
differences are in the 35 to 140 mas range, depending on magnitude. The
observed scatter in the position differences is about 30% larger than expected
from the combined formal, internal errors, also depending on magnitude. The
Tycho-2 Catalogue has the more precise positions for bright stars (V <= 10 mag)
while the UCAC1 positions are significantly better at the faint end (11 mag <=
V <= 12.5 mag) of the magnitude range in common. UCAC1 goes much fainter (to
R=16) than Tycho-2; however complete sky coverage is not expected before mid
2003.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9907213 [pdf] - 107438
The Full-sky Astrometric Mapping Explorer -- Astrometry for the New
Millennium
Horner, Scott D.;
Germain, Marvin E.;
Greene, Thomas P.;
Harris, Fred H.;
Johnson, Mark S.;
Johnston, Kenneth J.;
Monet, David G.;
Murison, Marc A.;
Phillips, James D.;
Reasenberg, Robert D.;
Seidelmann, P. Kenneth;
Urban, Sean E.;
Vassar, Richard H.
Submitted: 1999-07-15
FAME is designed to perform an all-sky, astrometric survey with unprecedented
accuracy. It will create a rigid astrometric catalog of 4x10^7 stars with 5 <
m_V < 15. For bright stars, 5 < m_V < 9, FAME will determine positions and
parallaxes accurate to < 50 microarcseconds, with proper motion errors < 50
microarcseconds/year. For fainter stars, 9 < m_V < 15, FAME will determine
positions and parallaxes accurate to < 500 microarcseconds, with proper motion
errors < 500 microarcseconds/year. It will also collect photometric data on
these 4 x 10^7 stars in four Sloan DSS colors.