sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Unruh, S. H.

Normalized to: Unruh, S.

5 article(s) in total. 13 co-authors, from 1 to 4 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2006.10778  [pdf] - 2118326
An adapted filter function for density split statistics in weak lensing
Comments:
Submitted: 2020-06-18
Context. The density split statistics in weak gravitational lensing analyses probes the correlation between regions of different (foreground) galaxy number densities and their weak lensing signal, measured by the shape distortion of background galaxies. Aims. In this paper, we reconsider density split statistics, by constructing a new angular filter function that is adapted to the expected relation between galaxy number density and shear pattern, in a way that the filter weighting the galaxy number density is matched to the filter that is used to quantify the shear signal. Methods. We use the results of numerical ray-tracing simulations, specifically through Millennium Simulation supplemented by a galaxy distribution based on a semi-analytic model, to construct a matched pair of adapted filter functions for the galaxy density and the tangential shear signal. We compare the performance of our new filter to the previously used top-hat filter, applying both to a different and independent set of numerical simulations (SLICS, cosmo-SLICS). Results. We show that the adapted filter yields a better correlation between the total matter and the galaxy distribution. Furthermore, the adapted filter provides a larger signal-to-noise ratio to constrain the bias between the total matter and the galaxy distribution, and we show that it is, in general, a more sensitive discriminator between different cosmologies, with the exception of cosmologies with very large $\sigma_8$ values. All analyses lead to the conclusion that our adapted filter should be favored in future density split statistic works.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.06400  [pdf] - 2124546
The importance of magnification effects in galaxy-galaxy lensing
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-10-14
Magnification changes the observed number counts of galaxies on the sky. This biases the observed tangential shear profiles around galaxies, the so-called galaxy-galaxy lensing (GGL) signal, and the related excess mass profile. Correspondingly, inference of physical quantities, such as the mean mass profile of halos around galaxies, are affected by magnification effects. We use simulated shear and galaxy data of the Millennium Simulation to quantify the effect on shear and mass estimates from magnified lens and source number counts. The former are due to the large-scale matter distribution in the foreground of the lenses, the latter are caused by magnification of the source population by the matter associated with the lenses. The GGL signal is calculated from the simulations by an efficient fast-Fourier transform that can also be applied to real data. The numerical treatment is complemented by a leading-order analytical description of the magnification effects, which is shown to fit the numerical shear data well. We find the magnification effect is strongest for steep galaxy luminosity functions and high redshifts. For a lens redshift of $z_\mathrm{d}=0.83$, a limiting magnitude of $22\,\mathrm{mag}$ in the $r$-band and a source redshift of $z_\mathrm{s}=0.99$, we find that a magnification correction changes the shear profile up to $45\%$ and the mass is biased by up to $55 \%$. For medium-redshift galaxies the relative change in shear and mass is typically a few percent. As expected, the sign of the bias depends on the local slope of the lens luminosity function $\alpha_\mathrm{d}$, where the mass is biased low for $\alpha_\mathrm{d}<1$ and biased high for $\alpha_\mathrm{d}>1$. Whereas the magnification effect of sources is rarely than more $1\%$, the statistical power of future weak lensing surveys warrants correction for this effect.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1808.09516  [pdf] - 1846797
Magnification bias in the shear-ratio test: a viable mitigation strategy
Comments: 9 pages, 7 figures
Submitted: 2018-08-28, last modified: 2019-01-18
Using the same lens galaxies, the ratios of tangential shears for different source galaxy redshifts is equal to the ratios of their corresponding angular-diameter distances. This is the so-called shear-ratio test (SRT) and it is valid when effects induced by the intervening large-scale structure (LSS) can be neglected. The dominant LSS effect is magnification bias which, on the one hand, induces an additional shear, and on the other hand, causes a magnification of the lens population. Our objective is to quantify the magnification bias for the SRT and show an easy-to-apply mitigation strategy that does not rely on additional observations. We use ray-tracing data through the Millennium simulation to measure the influence of magnification on the SRT and test our mitigation strategy. Using the SRT as a null-test we find deviations from zero up to $10 \%$ for a flux-limited sample of lens galaxies, which is a strong function of lens redshift and the lens-source line-of-sight separation. Using our mitigation strategy we can improve the null-test by a factor of $\sim \!100$.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1606.04321  [pdf] - 1574522
Ambiguities in gravitational lens models: the density field from the source position transformation
Comments: 13 pages, 16 figures, submitted to A&A
Submitted: 2016-06-14
Strong gravitational lensing is regarded as the most precise technique to measure the mass in the inner region of galaxies or galaxy clusters. In particular, the mass within one Einstein radius can be determined with an accuracy of order of a few percent or better, depending on the image configuration. For other radii, however, degeneracies exist between galaxy density profiles, precluding an accurate determination of the enclosed mass. The source position transformation (SPT), which includes the well-known mass-sheet transformation (MST) as a special case, describes this degeneracy of the lensing observables in a more general way. In this paper we explore properties of an SPT, removing the MST to leading order, i.e., we consider degeneracies which have not been described before. The deflection field $\boldsymbol{\hat{\alpha}}(\boldsymbol{\theta})$ resulting from an SPT is not curl-free in general, and thus not a deflection that can be obtained from a lensing mass distribution. Starting from a variational principle, we construct lensing potentials that give rise to a deflection field $\boldsymbol{\tilde{\alpha}}$, which differs from $\boldsymbol{\hat{\alpha}}$ by less than an observationally motivated upper limit. The corresponding mass distributions from these 'valid' SPTs are studied: their radial profiles are modified relative to the original mass distribution in a significant and non-trivial way, and originally axi-symmetric mass distributions can obtain a finite ellipticity. These results indicate a significant effect of the SPT on quantitative analyses of lens systems. We show that the mass inside the Einstein radius of the original mass distribution is conserved by the SPT; hence, as is the case for the MST, the SPT does not affect the mass determination at the Einstein radius. [...]
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9404039  [pdf] - 91395
Yet Another Model of Soft Gamma Repeaters
Comments: 16pp, Tex, WU-JIK-94-1
Submitted: 1994-04-19
We develop a model of SGR in which a supernova leaves planets orbiting a neutron star in intersecting eccentric orbits. These planets will collide in $\sim 10^4$ years if their orbits are coplanar. Some fragments of debris lose their angular momentum in the collision and fall onto the neutron star, producing a SGR. The initial accretion of matter left by the collision with essentially no angular momentum may produce a superburst like that of March 5, 1979, while debris fragments which later lose their angular momentum produce an irregular pattern of smaller bursts.