Turkington, M.
Normalized to: Turkington, M.
1 article(s) in total. 9 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 9,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.03365 [pdf] - 1663482
A Quantitative Comparison of Opacities Calculated Using the Distorted-
Wave and $\boldsymbol{R}$-Matrix Methods
Delahaye, F.;
Badnell, N. R.;
Ballance, C. P.;
Palmeri, P.;
Preval, S.;
Quinet, P.;
Ramsbottom, C.;
Smyth, R. T.;
Turkington, M.;
Zeippen, C. J.
Submitted: 2018-04-10
The present debate on the reliability of astrophysical opacities has reached
a new climax with the recent measurements of Fe opacities on the Z-machine at
the Sandia National Laboratory \citep{Bailey2015}. To understand the
differences between theoretical results, on the one hand, and experiments on
the other, as well as the differences among the various theoretical results,
detailed comparisons are needed. Many ingredients are involved in the
calculation of opacities; deconstructing the whole process and comparing the
differences at each step are necessary to quantify their importance and impact
on the final results. We present here such a comparison using the two main
approaches to calculate the required atomic data, the $R$-Matrix and
distorted-wave methods, as well as sets of configurations and coupling schemes
to quantify the effects on the opacities for the $Fe\ XVII$ and $Ni\ XIV$ ions.