Normalized to: Turcati, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0707.1297 [pdf] - 2930
Hubble Diagram of Gamma-Rays Bursts calibrated with Gurzadyan-Xue
Cosmology
Submitted: 2007-07-09, last modified: 2008-05-11
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) being the most luminous among known cosmic objects
carry an essential potential for cosmological studies if properly used as
standard candles. In this paper we test with GRBs the cosmological predictions
of the Gurzadyan-Xue (GX) model of dark energy, a novel theory that predicts,
without any free parameters, the current vacuum fluctuation energy density
close to the value inferred from the SNIa observations. We also compare the GX
results with those predicted by the concordance scenario $\Lambda$-CDM.
According to the statistical approach by Schaefer (2007), the use of several
empirical relations obtained from GRBs observables, after a consistent
calibration for a specific model, enables one to probe current cosmological
models. Based on this recently introduced method, we use the 69 GRBs sample
collected by Schaefer (2007); and the most recently released SWIFT satellite
data (Sakamoto et al. 2007) together with the 41 GRBs sample collected by
Rizzuto et al. (2007), which has the more firmly determined redshifts. Both
data samples span a distance scale up to redshift about 7. We show that the GX
models are compatible with the Hubble diagram of the Schaefer (2007) 69 GRBs
sample. Such adjustment is almost identical to the one for the concordance
$\Lambda$-CDM.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0610796 [pdf] - 86220
Hubble diagram of gamma-ray bursts: Robust evidence for a Chaplygin gas
expansion-driven universe with phase transition at $z \simeq 3$
Submitted: 2006-10-26
The Hubble diagram (HD) of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) having properly estimated
redshifts is compared with the predicted one for the Chaplygin gas (CG), a dark
energy candidate. The CG cosmology and that of Friedmann and $\Lambda$-CDM
models are studied and confronted to the GRBs observations. The model-to-sample
$\chi^2$ statistical analysis indicates the CG model as the best fit. The
present GRBs HD plot exhibits a marked trend: as one goes back in time, it gets
much closer to the predict HD for a Friedmann universe. This clear trend
conclusively demonstrates that a transition from decelerate to accelerate
expansion did take place. However, contrarily to claims based on supernovae
type Ia, the transition redshift lies somewhere between $\sim 2.5 < z \simeq
3.5$ rather than at $z \sim 0.5-1$. All of these striking features of the GRBs
HD constitute the most robust demonstration that the Chaplygin gas can in fact
be the universe's driving dark energy field.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609262 [pdf] - 84854
Hubble diagram of gamma-ray bursts and prevalence of energy conditions
in Friedmann-Lema\^itre-Robertson-Walker Cosmology
Submitted: 2006-09-09
In this {\sl Letter} we construct the Hubble diagram (HD) for the standard
Friedmann-Lema\^itre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) cosmological model after enforcing
it with the general relativistic energy conditions, heeding to investigate
whether it still stands on as the leading scenario for cosmology in face of the
distance modulus-redshift relation of a sample of GRBs that had their redshifts
properly estimated and corrected upon applying on the data analysis the {\sl
Ghirlanda relation} (Ghirlanda et al. 2004) and the recently discovered {\sl
Firmani et al. relation} (Firmani et al. 2006a). Our $\chi^2$ analysis support
the view that FLRW plus the strong energy condition (SEC) is what better fits
the GRB data. But this is not the whole story, since for a cosmological
constant $\Lambda \neq 0$ the FLRW+SEC analysis with undefined $p=p(\rho)$
suggests that $\Lambda$ is not constant anyhow, because it does not follows the
$p= \omega \rho$ HD, with $\omega=-1$. Thenceforth, one concludes that either
the cosmological constant does not exist at all, and consequently one is left
with the FLRW+SEC which fits properly the GRBs HD and there is no late-time
acceleration, or it does exist but should be time-varying. This all is contrary
to current views based on SNIa observations that advogate for an actual
constant $\Lambda$ and an accelerating universe. In connection to the results
above, this last argumentation would imply that either there is something wrong
with the SNIa interpretation regarding cosmic late-time acceleration
(Middleditch 2006) or we will have to move away from general relativity. We
would better to think that general relativity is still the most correct theory
of gravity.