Normalized to: Troxel, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.14961 [pdf] - 2122762
A statistical standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant from the
LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave compact object merger GW190814 and Dark Energy
Survey galaxies
Palmese, A.;
deVicente, J.;
Pereira, M. E. S.;
Annis, J.;
Hartley, W.;
Herner, K.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Crocce, M.;
Huterer, D.;
Hernandez, I. Magana;
Davis, T. M.;
Garcia, A.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gschwend, J.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kessler, R.;
Lahav, O.;
Morgan, R.;
Nicolaou, C.;
Conselice, C.;
Foley, R. J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Everett, S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Paz-Chinchon, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, J. Allyn;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Wilkinson, R. D.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2020-06-25
We present a measurement of the Hubble constant $H_0$ using the gravitational
wave (GW) event GW190814, which resulted from the coalescence of a 23 $M_\odot$
black hole with a 2.6 $M_\odot$ compact object, as a standard siren. No
compelling electromagnetic counterpart with associated host galaxy has been
identified for this event, thus our analysis accounts for $\sim$ 2,700
potential host galaxies within a statistical framework. The redshift
information is obtained from the photometric redshift (photo-$z$) catalog from
the Dark Energy Survey. The luminosity distance is provided by the
gravitational wave sky map published by the LIGO/Virgo Collaboration. Since
this GW event has the second-smallest sky localization area after GW170817,
GW190814 is likely to provide the best constraint on cosmology from a single
standard siren without identifying an electromagnetic counterpart. Our analysis
uses photo-$z$ probability distribution functions and corrects for photo-$z$
biases. We also reanalyze the binary-black hole GW170814 within this updated
framework. We explore how our findings impact the $H_0$ constraints from
GW170817, the only GW merger associated with a unique host galaxy, and
therefore the most powerful standard siren to date. From a combination of
GW190814, GW170814 and GW170817, our analysis yields $H_0 = 69.0^{+ 14}_{- 7.5
}~{\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$ (68% Highest Density Interval, HDI) for a prior in
$H_0$ uniform between $[20,140]~{\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$. The addition of
GW190814 and GW170814 to GW170817 improves the 68% HDI from GW170817 alone by
$\sim 12\%$, showing how well-localized mergers without counterparts can
provide a marginal contribution to standard siren measurements, provided that a
complete galaxy catalog is available at the location of the event.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.05929 [pdf] - 2089021
Blinding multi-probe cosmological experiments
Muir, J.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Huterer, D.;
Elsner, F.;
Krause, E.;
Roodman, A.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Zuntz, J.;
Collaboration, the DES
Submitted: 2019-11-13, last modified: 2020-05-04
The goal of blinding is to hide an experiment's critical results -- here the
inferred cosmological parameters -- until all decisions affecting its analysis
have been finalised. This is especially important in the current era of
precision cosmology, when the results of any new experiment are closely
scrutinised for consistency or tension with previous results. In analyses that
combine multiple observational probes, like the combination of galaxy
clustering and weak lensing in the Dark Energy Survey (DES), it is challenging
to blind the results while retaining the ability to check for (in)consistency
between different parts of the data. We propose a simple new blinding
transformation that works by modifying the summary statistics that are input to
parameter estimation, such as two-point correlation functions. The
transformation shifts the measured statistics to new values that are consistent
with (blindly) shifted cosmological parameters, while preserving internal
(in)consistency. We apply the blinding transformation to simulated data for the
projected DES Year 3 galaxy clustering and weak lensing analysis, demonstrating
that practical blinding is achieved without significant perturbation of
internal-consistency checks, as measured here by degradation of the $\chi^2$
between data and best-fitting model. Our blinding method conserves $\chi^2$
more precisely as experiments evolve to higher precision.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.04702 [pdf] - 2077370
Cosmology with the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope -- Synergies
with the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time
Eifler, Tim;
Simet, Melanie;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Hirata, Christopher;
Huang, Hung-Jin;
Fang, Xiao;
Miranda, Vivian;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Doux, Cyrille;
Heinrich, Chen;
Huff, Eric;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Hemmati, Shoubaneh;
Xu, Jiachuan;
Rogozenski, Paul;
Capak, Peter;
Choi, Ami;
Dore, Olivier;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jarvis, Mike;
MacCrann, Niall;
Masters, Dan;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Spergel, David N.;
Troxel, Michael;
von der Linden, Anja;
Wang, Yun;
Weinberg, David H.;
Wenzl, Lukas;
Wu, Hao-Yi
Submitted: 2020-04-09, last modified: 2020-04-11
We explore synergies between the space-based Wide-Field Infrared Survey
Telescope (WFIRST) and the ground-based Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of
Space and Time (LSST). In particular, we consider a scenario where the
currently envisioned survey strategy for WFIRST's High Latitude Survey (HLS),
i.e., 2000 square degrees in four narrow photometric bands is altered in favor
of a strategy that combines rapid coverage of the LSST area (to full LSST
depth) in one band. We find that a 5-month WFIRST survey in the W-band can
cover the full LSST survey area providing high-resolution imaging for >95% of
the LSST Year 10 gold galaxy sample. We explore a second, more ambitious
scenario where WFIRST spends 1.5 years covering the LSST area. For this second
scenario we quantify the constraining power on dark energy equation of state
parameters from a joint weak lensing and galaxy clustering analysis, and
compare it to an LSST-only survey and to the Reference WFIRST HLS survey. Our
survey simulations are based on the WFIRST exposure time calculator and
redshift distributions from the CANDELS catalog. Our statistical uncertainties
account for higher-order correlations of the density field, and we include a
wide range of systematic effects, such as uncertainties in shape and redshift
measurements, and modeling uncertainties of astrophysical systematics, such as
galaxy bias, intrinsic galaxy alignment, and baryonic physics. Assuming the
5-month WFIRST wide scenario, we find a significant increase in constraining
power for the joint LSST+WFIRST wide survey compared to LSST Y10 (FoM(Wwide)=
2.4 FoM(LSST)) and compared to LSST+WFIRST HLS (FoM(Wwide)= 5.5 FoM(HLS)).
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.05271 [pdf] - 2077420
Cosmology with the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope -- Multi-Probe
Strategies
Eifler, Tim;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Heinrich, Chen;
Miranda, Vivian;
Hirata, Christopher;
Xu, Jiachuan;
Hemmati, Shoubaneh;
Simet, Melanie;
Capak, Peter;
Choi, Ami;
Dore, Olivier;
Doux, Cyrille;
Fang, Xiao;
Hounsell, Rebekah;
Huff, Eric;
Huang, Hung-Jin;
Jarvis, Mike;
Masters, Dan;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Scolnic, Dan;
Spergel, David N.;
Troxel, Michael;
von der Linden, Anja;
Wang, Yun;
Weinberg, David H.;
Wenzl, Lukas;
Wu, Hao-Yi
Submitted: 2020-04-10
We simulate the scientific performance of the Wide-Field Infrared Survey
Telescope (WFIRST) High Latitude Survey (HLS) on dark energy and modified
gravity. The 1.6 year HLS Reference survey is currently envisioned to image
2000 deg$^2$ in multiple bands to a depth of $\sim$26.5 in Y, J, H and to cover
the same area with slit-less spectroscopy beyond z=3. The combination of deep,
multi-band photometry and deep spectroscopy will allow scientists to measure
the growth and geometry of the Universe through a variety of cosmological
probes (e.g., weak lensing, galaxy clusters, galaxy clustering, BAO, Type Ia
supernova) and, equally, it will allow an exquisite control of observational
and astrophysical systematic effects. In this paper we explore multi-probe
strategies that can be implemented given WFIRST's instrument capabilities. We
model cosmological probes individually and jointly and account for correlated
systematics and statistical uncertainties due to the higher order moments of
the density field. We explore different levels of observational systematics for
the WFIRST survey (photo-z and shear calibration) and ultimately run a joint
likelihood analysis in N-dim parameter space. We find that the WFIRST reference
survey alone (no external data sets) can achieve a standard dark energy FoM of
>300 when including all probes. This assumes no information from external data
sets and realistic assumptions for systematics. Our study of the HLS reference
survey should be seen as part of a future community driven effort to simulate
and optimize the science return of WFIRST.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.10454 [pdf] - 2129267
The impact of spectroscopic incompleteness in direct calibration of
redshift distributions for weak lensing surveys
Hartley, W. G.;
Chang, C.;
Samani, S.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Davis, T. M.;
Hoyle, B.;
Gruen, D.;
Asorey, J.;
Gschwend, J.;
Lidman, C.;
Kuehn, K.;
King, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
DeRose, J.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Whiteway, L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Chinchon, F. Paz-;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Varga, T. N.;
Weller, J.;
Wilkinson, R. D.
Submitted: 2020-03-23
Obtaining accurate distributions of galaxy redshifts is a critical aspect of
weak lensing cosmology experiments. One of the methods used to estimate and
validate redshift distributions is apply weights to a spectroscopic sample so
that their weighted photometry distribution matches the target sample. In this
work we estimate the \textit{selection bias} in redshift that is introduced in
this procedure. We do so by simulating the process of assembling a
spectroscopic sample (including observer-assigned confidence flags) and
highlight the impacts of spectroscopic target selection and redshift failures.
We use the first year (Y1) weak lensing analysis in DES as an example data set
but the implications generalise to all similar weak lensing surveys. We find
that using colour cuts that are not available to the weak lensing galaxies can
introduce biases of $\Delta~z\sim0.015$ in the weighted mean redshift of
different redshift intervals. To assess the impact of incompleteness in
spectroscopic samples, we select only objects with high observer-defined
confidence flags and compare the weighted mean redshift with the true mean. We
find that the mean redshift of the DES Y1 weak lensing sample is typically
biased at the $\Delta~z=0.005-0.05$ level after the weighting is applied. The
bias we uncover can have either sign, depending on the samples and redshift
interval considered. For the highest redshift bin, the bias is larger than the
uncertainties in the other DES Y1 redshift calibration methods, justifying the
decision of not using this method for the redshift estimations. We discuss
several methods to mitigate this bias.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.11124 [pdf] - 2055421
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster
Abundances and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, Tim;
Aguena, Michel;
Alarcon, Alex;
Allam, Sahar;
Allen, Steve;
Annis, James;
Avila, Santiago;
Bacon, David;
Bermeo, Alberto;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bertin, Emmanuel;
Bhargava, Sunayana;
Bocquet, Sebastian;
Brooks, David;
Brout, Dillon;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Burke, David;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Carretero, Jorge;
Castander, Francisco Javier;
Cawthon, Ross;
Chang, Chihway;
Chen, Xinyi;
Choi, Ami;
Costanzi, Matteo;
Crocce, Martin;
da Costa, Luiz;
Davis, Tamara;
De Vicente, Juan;
DeRose, Joseph;
Desai, Shantanu;
Diehl, H. Thomas;
Dietrich, Jörg;
Dodelson, Scott;
Doel, Peter;
Drlica-Wagner, Alex;
Eckert, Kathleen;
Eifler, Tim;
Elvin-Poole, Jack;
Estrada, Juan;
Everett, Spencer;
Evrard, August;
Farahi, Arya;
Ferrero, Ismael;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frieman, Josh;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Gatti, Marco;
Gaztanaga, Enrique;
Gerdes, David;
Giannantonio, Tommaso;
Giles, Paul;
Grandis, Sebastian;
Gruen, Daniel;
Gruendl, Robert;
Gschwend, Julia;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Hartley, Will;
Hinton, Samuel;
Hollowood, Devon L.;
Honscheid, Klaus;
Hoyle, Ben;
Huterer, Dragan;
James, David;
Jarvis, Mike;
Jeltema, Tesla;
Johnson, Margaret;
Kent, Stephen;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Kron, Richard;
Kuehn, Kyler;
Kuropatkin, Nikolay;
Lahav, Ofer;
Li, Ting;
Lidman, Christopher;
Lima, Marcos;
Lin, Huan;
MacCrann, Niall;
Maia, Marcio;
Mantz, Adam;
Marshall, Jennifer;
Martini, Paul;
Mayers, Julian;
Melchior, Peter;
Mena, Juan;
Menanteau, Felipe;
Miquel, Ramon;
Mohr, Joe;
Nichol, Robert;
Nord, Brian;
Ogando, Ricardo;
Palmese, Antonella;
Paz-Chinchon, Francisco;
Malagón, Andrés Plazas;
Prat, Judit;
Rau, Markus Michael;
Romer, Kathy;
Roodman, Aaron;
Rooney, Philip;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Rykoff, Eli;
Sako, Masao;
Samuroff, Simon;
Sanchez, Carles;
Saro, Alexandro;
Scarpine, Vic;
Schubnell, Michael;
Scolnic, Daniel;
Serrano, Santiago;
Sevilla, Ignacio;
Sheldon, Erin;
Smith, J. Allyn;
Suchyta, Eric;
Swanson, Molly;
Tarle, Gregory;
Thomas, Daniel;
To, Chun-Hao;
Troxel, Michael A.;
Tucker, Douglas;
Varga, Tamas Norbert;
von der Linden, Anja;
Walker, Alistair;
Wechsler, Risa;
Weller, Jochen;
Wilkinson, Reese;
Wu, Hao-Yi;
Yanny, Brian;
Zhang, Zhuowen;
Zuntz, Joe
Submitted: 2020-02-25
We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of
redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset.
Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as
were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in
surprisingly low values for $S_8 =\sigma_8(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}= 0.65\pm
0.04$, driven by a low matter density parameter, $\Omega_{\rm
m}=0.179^{+0.031}_{-0.038}$, with $\sigma_8-\Omega_{\rm m}$ posteriors in
$2.4\sigma$ tension with the DES Y1 3x2pt results, and in $5.6\sigma$ with the
Planck CMB analysis. These results include the impact of post-unblinding
changes to the analysis, which did not improve the level of consistency with
other data sets compared to the results obtained at the unblinding. The fact
that multiple cosmological probes (supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations,
cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and CMB anisotropies), and other galaxy cluster
analyses all favor significantly higher matter densities suggests the presence
of systematic errors in the data or an incomplete modeling of the relevant
physics. Cross checks with X-ray and microwave data, as well as independent
constraints on the observable--mass relation from SZ selected clusters, suggest
that the discrepancy resides in our modeling of the weak lensing signal rather
than the cluster abundance. Repeating our analysis using a higher richness
threshold ($\lambda \ge 30$) significantly reduces the tension with other
probes, and points to one or more richness-dependent effects not captured by
our model.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.13484 [pdf] - 2065205
Detection of cross-correlation between gravitational lensing and gamma
rays
Ammazzalorso, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Regis, M.;
Camera, S.;
Ando, S.;
Fornengo, N.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Choi, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Gatti, M.;
MacCrann, N.;
Omori, Y.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2019-07-31, last modified: 2020-01-22
In recent years, many gamma-ray sources have been identified, yet the
unresolved component hosts valuable information on the faintest emission. In
order to extract it, a cross-correlation with gravitational tracers of matter
in the Universe has been shown to be a promising tool. We report here the first
identification of a cross-correlation signal between gamma rays and the
distribution of mass in the Universe probed by weak gravitational lensing. We
use the Dark Energy Survey Y1 weak lensing catalogue and the Fermi Large Area
Telescope 9-year gamma-ray data, obtaining a signal-to-noise ratio of 5.3. The
signal is mostly localised at small angular scales and high gamma-ray energies,
with a hint of correlation at extended separation. Blazar emission is likely
the origin of the small-scale effect. We investigate implications of the
large-scale component in terms of astrophysical sources and particle dark
matter emission.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.09481 [pdf] - 2018288
A Synthetic WFIRST High-Latitude Imaging Survey: Simulation Suite and
the Impact of Wavefront Errors on Weak Gravitational Lensing
Troxel, M. A.;
Long, H.;
Hirata, C. M.;
Choi, A.;
Jarvis, M.;
Mandelbaum, R.;
Wang, K.;
Yamamoto, M.;
Hemmati, S.;
Capak, P.
Submitted: 2019-12-19
The Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST) mission is expected to
launch in the mid-2020s. Its weak lensing program is designed to enable
unprecedented systematics control in photometric measurements, including shear
recovery, point-spread function (PSF) correction, and photometric calibration.
This will enable exquisite weak lensing science and allow us to adjust to and
reliably contribute to the cosmological landscape after the initial years of
observations from other concurrent Stage IV dark energy experiments. This
potential requires equally careful planning and requirements validation as the
mission prepares to enter its construction phase. We present a suite of image
simulations based on GalSim that are used to construct a complex, synthetic
WFIRST weak lensing survey that incorporates realistic input galaxies and
stars, relevant detector non-idealities, and the current reference five-year
WFIRST survey strategy. We present a first study to empirically validate the
existing WFIRST weak lensing requirements flowdown using a suite of 12 matched
image simulations, each representing a different perturbation to the wavefront
or image motion model. These are chosen to induce a range of potential static
and low- and high-frequency time-dependent PSF model errors. We analyze the
measured shapes of galaxies from each of these simulations and compare them to
a reference, fiducial simulation to infer the response of the shape measurement
to each of these modes in the wavefront model. We then compare this to existing
analytic flowdown requirements, and find general agreement between the
empirically derived response and that predicted by the analytic model.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.05568 [pdf] - 1998159
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology with moments of weak
lensing mass maps -- validation on simulations
Gatti, M.;
Chang, C.;
Friedrich, O.;
Jain, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Crocce, M.;
DeRose, J.;
Ferrero, I.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Harrison, I.;
Jeffrey, N.;
MacCrann, N.;
McClintock, T.;
Secco, L.;
Whiteway, L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Crocce, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Everett, S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchon, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
collaboration, the DES
Submitted: 2019-11-13
We present a simulated cosmology analysis using the second and third moments
of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps. The analysis is geared towards the
third year (Y3) data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), but the methodology can
be applied to other weak lensing data sets. The second moment, or variances, of
the convergence as a function of smoothing scale contains information similar
to standard shear 2-point statistics. The third moment, or the skewness,
contains additional non-Gaussian information. We present the formalism for
obtaining the convergence maps from the measured shear and for obtaining the
second and third moments of these maps given partial sky coverage. We estimate
the covariance matrix from a large suite of numerical simulations. We test our
pipeline through a simulated likelihood analyses varying 5 cosmological
parameters and 10 nuisance parameters. Our forecast shows that the combination
of second and third moments provides a 1.5 percent constraint on $S_8 \equiv
\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}$ for DES Y3 data. This is 20 percent better
than an analysis using a simulated DES Y3 shear 2-point statistics, owing to
the non-Gaussian information captured by the inclusion of higher-order
statistics. The methodology developed here can be applied to current and future
weak lensing datasets to make use of information from non-Gaussianity in the
cosmic density field and to improve constraints on cosmological parameters.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.01386 [pdf] - 1996113
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: The relationship between mass and
light around cosmic voids
Fang, Y.;
Hamaus, N.;
Jain, B.;
Pandey, S.;
Pollina, G.;
Sánchez, C.;
Kovács, A.;
Chang, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Choi, A.;
Crocce, M.;
DeRose, J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztañaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Cawthon, R.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Everett, S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2019-09-03, last modified: 2019-11-11
What are the mass and galaxy profiles of cosmic voids? In this paper we use
two methods to extract voids in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 redMaGiC
galaxy sample to address this question. We use either 2D slices in projection,
or the 3D distribution of galaxies based on photometric redshifts to identify
voids. For the mass profile, we measure the tangential shear profiles of
background galaxies to infer the excess surface mass density. The
signal-to-noise ratio for our lensing measurement ranges between 10.7 and 14.0
for the two void samples. We infer their 3D density profiles by fitting models
based on N-body simulations and find good agreement for void radii in the range
15-85 Mpc. Comparison with their galaxy profiles then allows us to test the
relation between mass and light at the 10%-level, the most stringent test to
date. We find very similar shapes for the two profiles, consistent with a
linear relationship between mass and light both within and outside the void
radius. We validate our analysis with the help of simulated mock catalogues and
estimate the impact of photometric redshift uncertainties on the measurement.
Our methodology can be used for cosmological applications, including tests of
gravity with voids. This is especially promising when the lensing profiles are
combined with spectroscopic measurements of void dynamics via redshift-space
distortions.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02499 [pdf] - 1995367
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological
Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kim, A. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, S.;
Lemos, P.;
Leonard, C. D.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Muir, J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Raveri, M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-10-04, last modified: 2019-11-08
We present constraints on extensions of the minimal cosmological models
dominated by dark matter and dark energy, $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM, by using a
combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing from the
first-year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1) in combination with external
data. We consider four extensions of the minimal dark energy-dominated
scenarios: 1) nonzero curvature $\Omega_k$, 2) number of relativistic species
$N_{\rm eff}$ different from the standard value of 3.046, 3) time-varying
equation-of-state of dark energy described by the parameters $w_0$ and $w_a$
(alternatively quoted by the values at the pivot redshift, $w_p$, and $w_a$),
and 4) modified gravity described by the parameters $\mu_0$ and $\Sigma_0$ that
modify the metric potentials. We also consider external information from Planck
CMB measurements; BAO measurements from SDSS, 6dF, and BOSS; RSD measurements
from BOSS; and SNIa information from the Pantheon compilation. Constraints on
curvature and the number of relativistic species are dominated by the external
data; when these are combined with DES Y1, we find
$\Omega_k=0.0020^{+0.0037}_{-0.0032}$ at the 68% confidence level, and $N_{\rm
eff}<3.28\, (3.55)$ at 68% (95%) confidence. For the time-varying
equation-of-state, we find the pivot value $(w_p, w_a)=(-0.91^{+0.19}_{-0.23},
-0.57^{+0.93}_{-1.11})$ at pivot redshift $z_p=0.27$ from DES alone, and $(w_p,
w_a)=(-1.01^{+0.04}_{-0.04}, -0.28^{+0.37}_{-0.48})$ at $z_p=0.20$ from DES Y1
combined with external data; in either case we find no evidence for the
temporal variation of the equation of state. For modified gravity, we find the
present-day value of the relevant parameters to be $\Sigma_0=
0.43^{+0.28}_{-0.29}$ from DES Y1 alone, and $(\Sigma_0,
\mu_0)=(0.06^{+0.08}_{-0.07}, -0.11^{+0.42}_{-0.46})$ from DES Y1 combined with
external data, consistent with predictions from GR.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.06989 [pdf] - 1953361
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Intrinsic Alignments
and their Colour Dependence from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
Samuroff, S.;
Blazek, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Krause, E.;
Leonard, C. D.;
Prat, J.;
Gruen, D.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Gatti, M.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Larsen, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.
Submitted: 2018-11-16, last modified: 2019-08-06
We perform a joint analysis of intrinsic alignments and cosmology using
tomographic weak lensing, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing
measurements from Year 1 (Y1) of the Dark Energy Survey. We define early- and
late-type subsamples, which are found to pass a series of systematics tests,
including for spurious photometric redshift error and point spread function
correlations. We analyse these split data alongside the fiducial mixed Y1
sample using a range of intrinsic alignment models. In a fiducial Nonlinear
Alignment Model (NLA) analysis, assuming a flat \lcdm~cosmology, we find a
significant difference in intrinsic alignment amplitude, with early-type
galaxies favouring $A_\mathrm{IA} = 2.38^{+0.32}_{-0.31}$ and late-type
galaxies consistent with no intrinsic alignments at $0.05^{+0.10}_{-0.09}$. We
find weak evidence of a diminishing alignment amplitude at higher redshifts in
the early-type sample. The analysis is repeated using a number of extended
model spaces, including a physically motivated model that includes both tidal
torquing and tidal alignment mechanisms. In multiprobe likelihood chains in
which cosmology, intrinsic alignments in both galaxy samples and all other
relevant systematics are varied simultaneously, we find the tidal alignment and
tidal torquing parts of the intrinsic alignment signal have amplitudes $A_1 =
2.66 ^{+0.67}_{-0.66}$, $A_2=-2.94^{+1.94}_{-1.83}$, respectively, for
early-type galaxies and $A_1 = 0.62 ^{+0.41}_{-0.41}$, $A_2 =
-2.26^{+1.30}_{-1.16}$ for late-type galaxies. In the full (mixed) Y1 sample
the best constraints are $A_1 = 0.70 ^{+0.41}_{-0.38}$, $A_2 = -1.36
^{+1.08}_{-1.41}$. For all galaxy splits and IA models considered, we report
cosmological parameter constraints that are consistent with the results of
Troxel et al. (2017) and Dark Energy Survey Collaboration (2017).
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.05005 [pdf] - 1938344
Phenotypic redshifts with self-organizing maps: A novel method to
characterize redshift distributions of source galaxies for weak lensing
Buchs, R.;
Davis, C.;
Gruen, D.;
DeRose, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Sánchez, C.;
Myles, J.;
Roodman, A.;
Allen, S.;
Amon, A.;
Choi, A.;
Masters, D. C.;
Miquel, R.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruend, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.
Submitted: 2019-01-15, last modified: 2019-08-05
Wide-field imaging surveys such as the Dark Energy Survey (DES) rely on
coarse measurements of spectral energy distributions in a few filters to
estimate the redshift distribution of source galaxies. In this regime, sample
variance, shot noise, and selection effects limit the attainable accuracy of
redshift calibration and thus of cosmological constraints. We present a new
method to combine wide-field, few-filter measurements with catalogs from deep
fields with additional filters and sufficiently low photometric noise to break
degeneracies in photometric redshifts. The multi-band deep field is used as an
intermediary between wide-field observations and accurate redshifts, greatly
reducing sample variance, shot noise, and selection effects. Our implementation
of the method uses self-organizing maps to group galaxies into phenotypes based
on their observed fluxes, and is tested using a mock DES catalog created from
N-body simulations. It yields a typical uncertainty on the mean redshift in
each of five tomographic bins for an idealized simulation of the DES Year 3
weak-lensing tomographic analysis of $\sigma_{\Delta z} = 0.007$, which is a
60% improvement compared to the Year 1 analysis. Although the implementation of
the method is tailored to DES, its formalism can be applied to other large
photometric surveys with a similar observing strategy.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02212 [pdf] - 1922933
Cosmological lensing ratios with DES Y1, SPT and Planck
Prat, J.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Shin, T.;
Sánchez, C.;
Chang, C.;
Jain, B.;
Miquel, R.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Cawthon, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gatti, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Mawdsley, B.;
Nicola, A.;
Omori, Y.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Chown, R.;
Crites, A. T.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Doel, P.;
Everett, W. B.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
George, E. M.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
de Haan, T.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Knox, L.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Lima, M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miller, C. J.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04, last modified: 2019-07-25
Correlations between tracers of the matter density field and gravitational
lensing are sensitive to the evolution of the matter power spectrum and the
expansion rate across cosmic time. Appropriately defined ratios of such
correlation functions, on the other hand, depend only on the angular diameter
distances to the tracer objects and to the gravitational lensing source planes.
Because of their simple cosmological dependence, such ratios can exploit
available signal-to-noise down to small angular scales, even where directly
modeling the correlation functions is difficult. We present a measurement of
lensing ratios using galaxy position and lensing data from the Dark Energy
Survey, and CMB lensing data from the South Pole Telescope and Planck,
obtaining the highest precision lensing ratio measurements to date. Relative to
the concordance $\Lambda$CDM model, we find a best fit lensing ratio amplitude
of $A = 1.1 \pm 0.1$. We use the ratio measurements to generate cosmological
constraints, focusing on the curvature parameter. We demonstrate that
photometrically selected galaxies can be used to measure lensing ratios, and
argue that future lensing ratio measurements with data from a combination of
LSST and Stage-4 CMB experiments can be used to place interesting cosmological
constraints, even after considering the systematic uncertainties associated
with photometric redshift and galaxy shear estimation.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.07184 [pdf] - 1985744
On the need for synthetic data and robust data simulators in the 2020s
Submitted: 2019-07-16
As observational datasets become larger and more complex, so too are the
questions being asked of these data. Data simulations, i.e., synthetic data
with properties (pixelization, noise, PSF, artifacts, etc.) akin to real data,
are therefore increasingly required for several purposes, including: (1)
testing complicated measurement methods, (2) comparing models and astrophysical
simulations to observations in a manner that requires as few assumptions about
the data as possible, (3) predicting observational results based on models and
astrophysical simulations for, e.g., proposal planning, and (4) mitigating risk
for future observatories and missions by effectively priming and testing
pipelines. We advocate for an increase in using synthetic data to plan for and
interpret real observations as a matter of routine. This will require funding
for (1) facilities to provide robust data simulators for their instruments,
telescopes, and surveys, and (2) making synthetic data publicly available in
archives (much like real data) so as to lower the barrier of entry to all.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.01136 [pdf] - 1966790
Producing a BOSS-CMASS sample with DES imaging
Lee, S.;
Huff, E. M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Choi, A.;
Hirata, C.;
Honscheid, K.;
MacCrann, N.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Davis, C.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Cawthon, R.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Weller, J.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2019-06-03
We present a sample of galaxies with the Dark Energy Survey (DES) photometry
that replicates the properties of the BOSS CMASS sample. The CMASS galaxy
sample has been well characterized by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)
collaboration and was used to obtain the most powerful redshift-space galaxy
clustering measurements to date. A joint analysis of redshift-space distortions
(such as those probed by CMASS from SDSS) and a galaxy-galaxy lensing
measurement for an equivalent sample from DES can provide powerful cosmological
constraints. Unfortunately, the DES and SDSS-BOSS footprints have only minimal
overlap, primarily on the celestial equator near the SDSS Stripe 82 region.
Using this overlap, we build a robust Bayesian model to select CMASS-like
galaxies in the remainder of the DES footprint. The newly defined DES-CMASS
(DMASS) sample consists of 117,293 effective galaxies covering $1,244 {\rm
deg}^2$. Through various validation tests, we show that the DMASS sample
selected by this model matches well with the BOSS CMASS sample, specifically in
the South Galactic cap (SGC) region that includes Stripe 82. Combining
measurements of the angular correlation function and the clustering-z
distribution of DMASS, we constrain the difference in mean galaxy bias and mean
redshift between the BOSS CMASS and DMASS samples to be $\Delta b =
0.010^{+0.045}_{-0.052}$ and $\Delta z = \left( 3.46^{+5.48}_{-5.55} \right)
\times 10^{-3}$ for the SGC portion of CMASS, and $\Delta b =
0.044^{+0.044}_{-0.043} $ and $\Delta z= ( 3.51^{+4.93}_{-5.91}) \times
10^{-3}$ for the full CMASS sample. These values indicate that the mean bias of
galaxies and mean redshift in the DMASS sample is consistent with both CMASS
samples within $1\sigma$.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02377 [pdf] - 1893288
First Cosmology Results Using Type Ia Supernovae From the Dark Energy
Survey: Analysis, Systematic Uncertainties, and Validation
Brout, D.;
Scolnic, D.;
Kessler, R.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Davis, T. M.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Lasker, J.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Sako, M.;
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Zhang, B.;
Andersen, P.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Brown, P.;
Calcino, J.;
Carollo, D.;
Challis, P.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Foley, R. J.;
Galbany, L.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kasai, E.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Miranda, V.;
Morganson, E.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Nugent, P.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Wester, W.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-06-01
We present the analysis underpinning the measurement of cosmological
parameters from 207 spectroscopically classified type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia)
from the first three years of the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program
(DES-SN), spanning a redshift range of 0.017<$z$<0.849. We combine the DES-SN
sample with an external sample of 122 low-redshift ($z$<0.1) SNe Ia, resulting
in a "DES-SN3YR" sample of 329 SNe Ia. Our cosmological analyses are blinded:
after combining our DES-SN3YR distances with constraints from the Cosmic
Microwave Background (CMB; Planck Collaboration 2016), our uncertainties in the
measurement of the dark energy equation-of-state parameter, $w$, are .042
(stat) and .059 (stat+syst) at 68% confidence. We provide a detailed systematic
uncertainty budget, which has nearly equal contributions from photometric
calibration, astrophysical bias corrections, and instrumental bias corrections.
We also include several new sources of systematic uncertainty. While our sample
is <1/3 the size of the Pantheon sample, our constraints on $w$ are only larger
by 1.4$\times$, showing the impact of the DES SN Ia light curve quality. We
find that the traditional stretch and color standardization parameters of the
DES SNe Ia are in agreement with earlier SN Ia samples such as Pan-STARRS1 and
the Supernova Legacy Survey. However, we find smaller intrinsic scatter about
the Hubble diagram (0.077 mag). Interestingly, we find no evidence for a Hubble
residual step ( 0.007 $\pm$ 0.018 mag) as a function of host galaxy mass for
the DES subset, in 2.4$\sigma$ tension with previous measurements. We also
present novel validation methods of our sample using simulated SNe Ia inserted
in DECam images and using large catalog-level simulations to test for biases in
our analysis pipelines.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.12682 [pdf] - 2065167
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Wide field mass maps via forward
fitting in harmonic space
Mawdsley, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Chang, C.;
Melchior, P.;
Rozo, E.;
Seitz, S.;
Jeffrey, N.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Car- rasco;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2019-05-29
We present new wide-field weak lensing mass maps for the Year 1 Dark Energy
Survey data, generated via a forward fitting approach. This method of producing
maps does not impose any prior constraints on the mass distribution to be
reconstructed. The technique is found to improve the map reconstruction on the
edges of the field compared to the conventional Kaiser-Squires method, which
applies a direct inversion on the data; our approach is in good agreement with
the previous direct approach in the central regions of the footprint. The
mapping technique is assessed and verified with tests on simulations; together
with the Kaiser-Squires method, the technique is then applied to data from the
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data and the differences between the two methods are
compared. We also produce the first DES measurements of the convergence
Minkowski functionals and compare them to those measured in simulations.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02374 [pdf] - 1880991
First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy
Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Angus, C.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, P.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Casas, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gonzalez-Gaitan, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kovacs, E.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pursiainen, M.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Spinka, H.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swann, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Wiseman, P.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-10
We present the first cosmological parameter constraints using measurements of
type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program
(DES-SN). The analysis uses a subsample of 207 spectroscopically confirmed SNe
Ia from the first three years of DES-SN, combined with a low-redshift sample of
122 SNe from the literature. Our "DES-SN3YR" result from these 329 SNe Ia is
based on a series of companion analyses and improvements covering SN Ia
discovery, spectroscopic selection, photometry, calibration, distance bias
corrections, and evaluation of systematic uncertainties. For a flat LCDM model
we find a matter density Omega_m = 0.331 +_ 0.038. For a flat wCDM model, and
combining our SN Ia constraints with those from the cosmic microwave background
(CMB), we find a dark energy equation of state w = -0.978 +_ 0.059, and Omega_m
= 0.321 +_ 0.018. For a flat w0waCDM model, and combining probes from SN Ia,
CMB and baryon acoustic oscillations, we find w0 = -0.885 +_ 0.114 and wa =
-0.387 +_ 0.430. These results are in agreement with a cosmological constant
and with previous constraints using SNe Ia (Pantheon, JLA).
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02375 [pdf] - 1877871
Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Banik, N.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Camacho, H.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Chan, K. C.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lemos, P.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-06
The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a
powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark
energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically--confirmed
Type Ia supernova lightcurves; the baryon acoustic oscillation feature; weak
gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results
from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, $w$, of dark
energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other
experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the
probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no dark
energy, finding $w=-0.80^{+0.09}_{-0.11}$. The geometry is shown to be
consistent with a spatially flat Universe, and we obtain a constraint on the
baryon density of $\Omega_b=0.069^{+0.009}_{-0.012}$ that is independent of
early Universe measurements. These results demonstrate the potential power of
large multi-probe photometric surveys and pave the way for order of magnitude
advances in our constraints on properties of dark energy and cosmology over the
next decade.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03181 [pdf] - 1871376
The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Ballester, O.;
Banerji, M.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baruah, L.;
Baumer, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M . R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bocquet, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busti, V.;
Campisano, R.;
Cardiel-Sas, L.;
Rosell, A. C arnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, X.;
Conselice, C.;
Costa, G.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Daues, G.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Farahi, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Fitzpatrick, M.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedel, D. N.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
tanaga, E. Gaz;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gower, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Juneau, S.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Khullar, G.;
Klein, M.;
Kovacs, A.;
Koziol, A. M. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kremin, A.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Li, T. S.;
Li, R. T.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
López-Reyes, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Maloney, J. D.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McClintock, T.;
McKay, T.;
McMahon, R . G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Mould, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nidever, D.;
Nikutta, R.;
Nogueira, F.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Nunes, L.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Old, L.;
Olsen, K.;
Pace, A. B.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Poh, J.;
Pond, C.;
redon, A. Por;
Pujol, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Reil, K.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sanchez, M. L.;
Santiago, B.;
Saro, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Scolnic, D.;
Scott, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shipp, N.;
Silveira, M. L.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, J. A.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
ira, F. Sobre;
Song, J.;
Stebbins, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
ker, A. R. Wal;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Wu, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-01-09, last modified: 2019-04-23
We describe the first public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR1,
consisting of reduced single epoch images, coadded images, coadded source
catalogs, and associated products and services assembled over the first three
years of DES science operations. DES DR1 is based on optical/near-infrared
imaging from 345 distinct nights (August 2013 to February 2016) by the Dark
Energy Camera mounted on the 4-m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo
Inter-American Observatory in Chile. We release data from the DES wide-area
survey covering ~5,000 sq. deg. of the southern Galactic cap in five broad
photometric bands, grizY. DES DR1 has a median delivered point-spread function
of g = 1.12, r = 0.96, i = 0.88, z = 0.84, and Y = 0.90 arcsec FWHM, a
photometric precision of < 1% in all bands, and an astrometric precision of 151
mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95" diameter aperture at S/N = 10
is g = 24.33, r = 24.08, i = 23.44, z = 22.69, and Y = 21.44 mag. DES DR1
includes nearly 400M distinct astronomical objects detected in ~10,000 coadd
tiles of size 0.534 sq. deg. produced from ~39,000 individual exposures.
Benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain ~310M and ~ 80M objects,
respectively, following a basic object quality selection. These data are
accessible through a range of interfaces, including query web clients, image
cutout servers, jupyter notebooks, and an interactive coadd image visualization
tool. DES DR1 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the
achieved depth and photometric precision.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.01174 [pdf] - 1860134
WFIRST: The Essential Cosmology Space Observatory for the Coming Decade
Doré, O.;
Hirata, C.;
Wang, Y.;
Weinberg, D.;
Eifler, T.;
Foley, R. J.;
Heinrich, C. He;
Krause, E.;
Perlmutter, S.;
Pisani, A.;
Scolnic, D.;
Spergel, D. N.;
Suntzeff, N.;
Aldering, G.;
Baltay, C.;
Capak, P.;
Choi, A.;
Deustua, S.;
Dvorkin, C.;
Fall, S. M.;
Fang, X.;
Fruchter, A.;
Galbany, L.;
Ho, S.;
Hounsell, R.;
Izard, A.;
Jain, B.;
Koekemoer, A. M.;
Kruk, J.;
Leauthaud, A.;
Malhotra, S.;
Mandelbaum, R.;
Massara, E.;
Masters, D.;
Miyatake, H.;
Plazas, A.;
Rhoads, J.;
Rhodes, J.;
Rose, B.;
Rubin, D.;
Sako, M.;
Samushia, L.;
Shirasaki, M.;
Simet, M.;
Takada, M.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wu, H.;
Yoshida, N.;
Zhai, Z.
Submitted: 2019-04-01
Two decades after its discovery, cosmic acceleration remains the most
profound mystery in cosmology and arguably in all of physics. Either the
Universe is dominated by a form of dark energy with exotic physical properties
not predicted by standard model physics, or General Relativity is not an
adequate description of gravity over cosmic distances. WFIRST emerged as a top
priority of Astro2010 in part because of its ability to address the mystery of
cosmic acceleration through both high precision measurements of the cosmic
expansion history and the growth of cosmic structures with multiple and
redundant probes. We illustrate in this white paper how mission design changes
since Astro2010 have made WFIRST an even more powerful dark energy facility and
have improved the ability of WFIRST to respond to changes in the experimental
landscape. WFIRST is the space-based probe of DE the community needs in the
mid-2020s.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.04425 [pdf] - 1846071
Dark Matter Science in the Era of LSST
Bechtol, Keith;
Drlica-Wagner, Alex;
Abazajian, Kevork N.;
Abidi, Muntazir;
Adhikari, Susmita;
Ali-Haïmoud, Yacine;
Annis, James;
Ansarinejad, Behzad;
Armstrong, Robert;
Asorey, Jacobo;
Baccigalupi, Carlo;
Banerjee, Arka;
Banik, Nilanjan;
Bennett, Charles;
Beutler, Florian;
Bird, Simeon;
Birrer, Simon;
Biswas, Rahul;
Biviano, Andrea;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Boddy, Kimberly K.;
Bonaca, Ana;
Borrill, Julian;
Bose, Sownak;
Bovy, Jo;
Frye, Brenda;
Brooks, Alyson M.;
Buckley, Matthew R.;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Bulbul, Esra;
Burchat, Patricia R.;
Burgess, Cliff;
Calore, Francesca;
Caputo, Regina;
Castorina, Emanuele;
Chang, Chihway;
Chapline, George;
Charles, Eric;
Chen, Xingang;
Clowe, Douglas;
Cohen-Tanugi, Johann;
Comparat, Johan;
Croft, Rupert A. C.;
Cuoco, Alessandro;
Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan;
D'Amico, Guido;
Davis, Tamara M;
Dawson, William A.;
de la Macorra, Axel;
Di Valentino, Eleonora;
Rivero, Ana Díaz;
Digel, Seth;
Dodelson, Scott;
Doré, Olivier;
Dvorkin, Cora;
Eckner, Christopher;
Ellison, John;
Erkal, Denis;
Farahi, Arya;
Fassnacht, Christopher D.;
Ferreira, Pedro G.;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Foreman, Simon;
Friedrich, Oliver;
Frieman, Joshua;
García-Bellido, Juan;
Gawiser, Eric;
Gerbino, Martina;
Giannotti, Maurizio;
Gill, Mandeep S. S.;
Gluscevic, Vera;
Golovich, Nathan;
Gontcho, Satya Gontcho A;
González-Morales, Alma X.;
Grin, Daniel;
Gruen, Daniel;
Hearin, Andrew P.;
Hendel, David;
Hezaveh, Yashar D.;
Hirata, Christopher M.;
Hložek, Renee;
Horiuchi, Shunsaku;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jee, M. James;
Jeltema, Tesla E.;
Kamionkowski, Marc;
Kaplinghat, Manoj;
Keeley, Ryan E.;
Keeton, Charles R.;
Khatri, Rishi;
Koposov, Sergey E.;
Koushiappas, Savvas M.;
Kovetz, Ely D.;
Lahav, Ofer;
Lam, Casey;
Lee, Chien-Hsiu;
Li, Ting S.;
Liguori, Michele;
Lin, Tongyan;
Lisanti, Mariangela;
LoVerde, Marilena;
Lu, Jessica R.;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Mao, Yao-Yuan;
McDermott, Samuel D.;
McNanna, Mitch;
Medford, Michael;
Meerburg, P. Daniel;
Meyer, Manuel;
Mirbabayi, Mehrdad;
Mishra-Sharma, Siddharth;
Marc, Moniez;
More, Surhud;
Moustakas, John;
Muñoz, Julian B.;
Murgia, Simona;
Myers, Adam D.;
Nadler, Ethan O.;
Necib, Lina;
Newburgh, Laura;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Nord, Brian;
Nourbakhsh, Erfan;
Nuss, Eric;
O'Connor, Paul;
Pace, Andrew B.;
Padmanabhan, Hamsa;
Palmese, Antonella;
Peiris, Hiranya V.;
Peter, Annika H. G.;
Piacentni, Francesco;
Piacentini, Francesco;
Plazas, Andrés;
Polin, Daniel A.;
Prakash, Abhishek;
Prescod-Weinstein, Chanda;
Read, Justin I.;
Ritz, Steven;
Robertson, Brant E.;
Rose, Benjamin;
Rosenfeld, Rogerio;
Rossi, Graziano;
Samushia, Lado;
Sánchez, Javier;
Sánchez-Conde, Miguel A.;
Schaan, Emmanuel;
Sehgal, Neelima;
Senatore, Leonardo;
Seo, Hee-Jong;
Shafieloo, Arman;
Shan, Huanyuan;
Shipp, Nora;
Simon, Joshua D.;
Simon, Sara;
Slatyer, Tracy R.;
Slosar, Anže;
Sridhar, Srivatsan;
Stebbins, Albert;
Straniero, Oscar;
Strigari, Louis E.;
Tait, Tim M. P.;
Tollerud, Erik;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tyson, J. Anthony;
Uhlemann, Cora;
Urenña-López, L. Arturo;
Verma, Aprajita;
Vilalta, Ricardo;
Walter, Christopher W.;
Wang, Mei-Yu;
Watson, Scott;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Wittman, David;
Xu, Weishuang;
Yanny, Brian;
Young, Sam;
Yu, Hai-Bo;
Zaharijas, Gabrijela;
Zentner, Andrew R.;
Zuntz, Joe
Submitted: 2019-03-11
Astrophysical observations currently provide the only robust, empirical
measurements of dark matter. In the coming decade, astrophysical observations
will guide other experimental efforts, while simultaneously probing unique
regions of dark matter parameter space. This white paper summarizes
astrophysical observations that can constrain the fundamental physics of dark
matter in the era of LSST. We describe how astrophysical observations will
inform our understanding of the fundamental properties of dark matter, such as
particle mass, self-interaction strength, non-gravitational interactions with
the Standard Model, and compact object abundances. Additionally, we highlight
theoretical work and experimental/observational facilities that will complement
LSST to strengthen our understanding of the fundamental characteristics of dark
matter.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01530 [pdf] - 1840662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy
Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Aleksić, J.;
Allam, S.;
Allen, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baumer, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Childress, M.;
Choi, A.;
Conselice, C.;
Crittenden, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Elsner, F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fang, Y.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Kovacs, A.;
Krause, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mudd, D.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Peacock, J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Roe, N.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Yuan, F.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2019-03-01
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and
$w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.05569 [pdf] - 1832668
The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s
Akeson, Rachel;
Armus, Lee;
Bachelet, Etienne;
Bailey, Vanessa;
Bartusek, Lisa;
Bellini, Andrea;
Benford, Dominic;
Bennett, David;
Bhattacharya, Aparna;
Bohlin, Ralph;
Boyer, Martha;
Bozza, Valerio;
Bryden, Geoffrey;
Novati, Sebastiano Calchi;
Carpenter, Kenneth;
Casertano, Stefano;
Choi, Ami;
Content, David;
Dayal, Pratika;
Dressler, Alan;
Doré, Olivier;
Fall, S. Michael;
Fan, Xiaohui;
Fang, Xiao;
Filippenko, Alexei;
Finkelstein, Steven;
Foley, Ryan;
Furlanetto, Steven;
Kalirai, Jason;
Gaudi, B. Scott;
Gilbert, Karoline;
Girard, Julien;
Grady, Kevin;
Greene, Jenny;
Guhathakurta, Puragra;
Heinrich, Chen;
Hemmati, Shoubaneh;
Hendel, David;
Henderson, Calen;
Henning, Thomas;
Hirata, Christopher;
Ho, Shirley;
Huff, Eric;
Hutter, Anne;
Jansen, Rolf;
Jha, Saurabh;
Johnson, Samson;
Jones, David;
Kasdin, Jeremy;
Kelly, Patrick;
Kirshner, Robert;
Koekemoer, Anton;
Kruk, Jeffrey;
Lewis, Nikole;
Macintosh, Bruce;
Madau, Piero;
Malhotra, Sangeeta;
Mandel, Kaisey;
Massara, Elena;
Masters, Daniel;
McEnery, Julie;
McQuinn, Kristen;
Melchior, Peter;
Melton, Mark;
Mennesson, Bertrand;
Peeples, Molly;
Penny, Matthew;
Perlmutter, Saul;
Pisani, Alice;
Plazas, Andrés;
Poleski, Radek;
Postman, Marc;
Ranc, Clément;
Rauscher, Bernard;
Rest, Armin;
Roberge, Aki;
Robertson, Brant;
Rodney, Steven;
Rhoads, James;
Rhodes, Jason;
Ryan, Russell;
Sahu, Kailash;
Sand, David;
Scolnic, Dan;
Seth, Anil;
Shvartzvald, Yossi;
Siellez, Karelle;
Smith, Arfon;
Spergel, David;
Stassun, Keivan;
Street, Rachel;
Strolger, Louis-Gregory;
Szalay, Alexander;
Trauger, John;
Troxel, M. A.;
Turnbull, Margaret;
van der Marel, Roeland;
von der Linden, Anja;
Wang, Yun;
Weinberg, David;
Williams, Benjamin;
Windhorst, Rogier;
Wollack, Edward;
Wu, Hao-Yi;
Yee, Jennifer;
Zimmerman, Neil
Submitted: 2019-02-14
The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) is a 2.4m space telescope
with a 0.281 deg^2 field of view for near-IR imaging and slitless spectroscopy
and a coronagraph designed for > 10^8 starlight suppresion. As background
information for Astro2020 white papers, this article summarizes the current
design and anticipated performance of WFIRST. While WFIRST does not have the UV
imaging/spectroscopic capabilities of the Hubble Space Telescope, for wide
field near-IR surveys WFIRST is hundreds of times more efficient. Some of the
most ambitious multi-cycle HST Treasury programs could be executed as routine
General Observer (GO) programs on WFIRST. The large area and time-domain
surveys planned for the cosmology and exoplanet microlensing programs will
produce extraordinarily rich data sets that enable an enormous range of
Archival Research (AR) investigations. Requirements for the coronagraph are
defined based on its status as a technology demonstration, but its expected
performance will enable unprecedented observations of nearby giant exoplanets
and circumstellar disks. WFIRST is currently in the Preliminary Design and
Technology Completion phase (Phase B), on schedule for launch in 2025, with
several of its critical components already in production.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.08061 [pdf] - 1828815
Effects of NII and H$\alpha$ Line Blending on the WFIRST Galaxy Redshift
Survey
Submitted: 2018-04-21, last modified: 2019-02-07
The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) will conduct a galaxy
redshift survey using the H$\alpha$ emission line primarily for spectroscopic
redshift determination. Due to the modest spectroscopic resolution of the
grism, the H$\alpha$ and the neighboring [NII] lines are blended, leading to a
redshift bias that depends on the [NII]/H$\alpha$ ratio, which is correlated
with a galaxy's metallicity, hence mass and ultimately environment. We
investigate how this bias propagates into the galaxy clustering and
cosmological parameters obtained from the WFIRST. Using simulation, we explore
the effect of line blending on redshift-space distortion and baryon acoustic
oscillation (BAO) measurements. We measure the BAO parameters
$\alpha_{\parallel}$, $\alpha_{\perp}$, the logarithmic growth factor $f_{v}$,
and calculate their errors based on the correlations between the line ratio and
large-scale structure. We find $\Delta\alpha_{\parallel} = 0.31 \pm 0.23 \%$
($0.26\pm0.17\%$), $\Delta\alpha_{\perp} = -0.10\pm0.10\%$ ($-0.12 \pm 0.11
\%$), and $\Delta f_{v} = 0.17\pm0.33\%$ ($-0.20 \pm 0.30\%$) for redshift
1.355--1.994 (0.700--1.345), which use approximately 18$\%$, 9$\%$, and 7$\%$
of the systematic error budget in a root-sum-square sense. These errors may
already be tolerable but further mitigations are discussed. Biases due to the
environment-independent redshift error can be mitigated by measuring the
redshift error probability distribution function. High-spectral-resolution
re-observation of a few thousand galaxies would be required (if by direct
approach) to reduce them to below 25$\%$ of the error budget. Finally, we
outline the next steps to improve the modeling of [NII]-induced blending biases
and their interaction with other redshift error sources.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.04533 [pdf] - 1822746
Weak Lensing Analysis of SPT selected Galaxy Clusters using Dark Energy
Survey Science Verification Data
Stern, C.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Bocquet, S.;
Applegate, D.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Gruen, D.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Saro, A.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Benson, B. A.;
Capasso, R.;
Chiu, I.;
Desai, S.;
Rapetti, D.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Saliwanchik, B.;
Schrabback, T.;
Gupta, N.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2018-02-13, last modified: 2018-12-12
We present weak lensing (WL) mass constraints for a sample of massive galaxy
clusters detected by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) via the Sunyaev-Zeldovich
effect (SZE). We use $griz$ imaging data obtained from the Science Verification
(SV) phase of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) to fit the WL shear signal of 33
clusters in the redshift range $0.25 \le z \le 0.8$ with NFW profiles and to
constrain a four-parameter SPT mass-observable relation. To account for biases
in WL masses, we introduce a WL mass to true mass scaling relation described by
a mean bias and an intrinsic, log-normal scatter. We allow for correlated
scatter within the WL and SZE mass-observable relations and use simulations to
constrain priors on nuisance parameters related to bias and scatter from WL. We
constrain the normalization of the $\zeta-M_{500}$ relation,
$A_\mathrm{SZ}=12.0_{-6.7}^{+2.6}$ when using a prior on the mass slope
$B_\mathrm{SZ}$ from the latest SPT cluster cosmology analysis. Without this
prior, we recover $A_\mathrm{SZ}=10.8_{-5.2}^{+2.3}$ and
$B_\mathrm{SZ}=1.30_{-0.44}^{+0.22}$. Results in both cases imply lower cluster
masses than measured in previous work with and without WL, although the
uncertainties are large. The WL derived value of $B_\mathrm{SZ}$ is $\approx
20\%$ lower than the value preferred by the most recent SPT cluster cosmology
analysis. The method demonstrated in this work is designed to constrain cluster
masses and cosmological parameters simultaneously and will form the basis for
subsequent studies that employ the full SPT cluster sample together with the
DES data.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.06209 [pdf] - 1794662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Measurement of the Baryon Acoustic
Oscillation scale in the distribution of galaxies to redshift 1
The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Camacho, H.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chan, K. C.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manera, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-12-17, last modified: 2018-12-09
We present angular diameter distance measurements obtained by locating the
BAO scale in the distribution of galaxies selected from the first year of Dark
Energy Survey data. We consider a sample of over 1.3 million galaxies
distributed over a footprint of 1318 deg$^2$ with $0.6 < z_{\rm photo} < 1$ and
a typical redshift uncertainty of $0.03(1+z)$. This sample was selected, as
fully described in a companion paper, using a color/magnitude selection that
optimizes trade-offs between number density and redshift uncertainty. We
investigate the BAO signal in the projected clustering using three conventions,
the angular separation, the co-moving transverse separation, and spherical
harmonics. Further, we compare results obtained from template based and machine
learning photometric redshift determinations. We use 1800 simulations that
approximate our sample in order to produce covariance matrices and allow us to
validate our distance scale measurement methodology. We measure the angular
diameter distance, $D_A$, at the effective redshift of our sample divided by
the true physical scale of the BAO feature, $r_{\rm d}$. We obtain close to a 4
per cent distance measurement of $D_A(z_{\rm eff}=0.81)/r_{\rm d} = 10.75\pm
0.43 $. These results are consistent with the flat $\Lambda$CDM concordance
cosmological model supported by numerous other recent experimental results. All
data products are publicly available here:
https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/y1a1/bao
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.09795 [pdf] - 1785791
DES Y1 Results: Validating cosmological parameter estimation using
simulated Dark Energy Surveys
MacCrann, N.;
DeRose, J.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Blazek, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Crocce, M.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Becker, M. R.;
Jain, B.;
Krause, E.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Gruen, D.;
Zuntz, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Prat, J.;
Wang, M.;
Dodelson, S.;
Kravtsov, A.;
Fosalba, P.;
Busha, M. T.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Huterer, D.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-03-26, last modified: 2018-11-14
We use mock galaxy survey simulations designed to resemble the Dark Energy
Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) data to validate and inform cosmological parameter
estimation. When similar analysis tools are applied to both simulations and
real survey data, they provide powerful validation tests of the DES Y1
cosmological analyses presented in companion papers. We use two suites of
galaxy simulations produced using different methods, which therefore provide
independent tests of our cosmological parameter inference. The cosmological
analysis we aim to validate is presented in DES Collaboration et al. (2017) and
uses angular two-point correlation functions of galaxy number counts and weak
lensing shear, as well as their cross-correlation, in multiple redshift bins.
While our constraints depend on the specific set of simulated realisations
available, for both suites of simulations we find that the input cosmology is
consistent with the combined constraints from multiple simulated DES Y1
realizations in the $\Omega_m-\sigma_8$ plane. For one of the suites, we are
able to show with high confidence that any biases in the inferred
$S_8=\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}$ and $\Omega_m$ are smaller than the DES Y1
$1-\sigma$ uncertainties. For the other suite, for which we have fewer
realizations, we are unable to be this conclusive; we infer a roughly 70%
probability that systematic biases in the recovered $\Omega_m$ and $S_8$ are
sub-dominant to the DES Y1 uncertainty. As cosmological analyses of this kind
become increasingly more precise, validation of parameter inference using
survey simulations will be essential to demonstrate robustness.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02322 [pdf] - 1924924
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering,
Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bianchini, F.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
de Haan, T.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Everett, W. B.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
George, E. M.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hoyle, B.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Knox, L.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Luong-Van, D.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miquel, R.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Muir, J.;
Natoli, T.;
Nicola, A.;
Nord, B.;
Omori, Y.;
Padin, S.;
Pandey, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pryke, C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Yanny, B.;
Zahn, O.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three
cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field,
and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These
three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping optical
imaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and
millimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole Telescope
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints from
the joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxy
density and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency between
these measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological
models. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlation
functions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum)
yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} =
0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We test
for consistency between these five correlation function measurements and the
Planck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models.
Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields
$S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$.
These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from the
first year DES joint-probes analysis.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02441 [pdf] - 1945701
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-correlation between DES Y1
galaxy weak lensing and SPT+Planck CMB weak lensing
Omori, Y.;
Baxter, E.;
Chang, C.;
Kirk, D.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Cawthon, R.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Miquel, R.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rozo, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sheldon, E.;
Simard, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
de Haan, T.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Everett, W. B.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
George, E. M.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Hou, Z.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We cross-correlate galaxy weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) year-one (Y1) data with a cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak
lensing map derived from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck data, with an
effective overlapping area of 1289 deg$^{2}$. With the combined measurements
from four source galaxy redshift bins, we reject the hypothesis of no lensing
with a significance of $10.8\sigma$. When employing angular scale cuts, this
significance is reduced to $6.8\sigma$, which remains the highest
signal-to-noise measurement of its kind to date. We fit the amplitude of the
correlation functions while fixing the cosmological parameters to a fiducial
$\Lambda$CDM model, finding $A = 0.99 \pm 0.17$. We additionally use the
correlation function measurements to constrain shear calibration bias,
obtaining constraints that are consistent with previous DES analyses. Finally,
when performing a cosmological analysis under the $\Lambda$CDM model, we obtain
the marginalized constraints of $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.261^{+0.070}_{-0.051}$ and
$S_{8}\equiv \sigma_{8}\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.660^{+0.085}_{-0.100}$.
These measurements are used in a companion work that presents cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of two-point functions among galaxies,
galaxy shears, and CMB lensing using DES, SPT and Planck data.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.05257 [pdf] - 1811023
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Methodology and Projections for Joint
Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point
Functions
Baxter, E. J.;
Omori, Y.;
Chang, C.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L.;
Choi, A.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gruen, D.;
Holder, G. P.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
MacCrann, N.;
Nicola, A.;
Pandey, S.;
Prat, J.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-02-14, last modified: 2018-10-04
Optical imaging surveys measure both the galaxy density and the gravitational
lensing-induced shear fields across the sky. Recently, the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) collaboration used a joint fit to two-point correlations between these
observables to place tight constraints on cosmology (DES Collaboration et al.
2017). In this work, we develop the methodology to extend the DES year one
joint probes analysis to include cross-correlations of the optical survey
observables with gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
as measured by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. Using simulated
analyses, we show how the resulting set of five two-point functions increases
the robustness of the cosmological constraints to systematic errors in galaxy
lensing shear calibration. Additionally, we show that contamination of the
SPT+Planck CMB lensing map by the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect is a
potentially large source of systematic error for two-point function analyses,
but show that it can be reduced to acceptable levels in our analysis by masking
clusters of galaxies and imposing angular scale cuts on the two-point
functions. The methodology developed here will be applied to the analysis of
data from the DES, the SPT, and Planck in a companion work.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02342 [pdf] - 1929685
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: tomographic cross-correlations
between DES galaxies and CMB lensing from SPT+Planck
Omori, Y.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Porredon, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Chang, C.;
Crocce, M.;
Fosalba, P.;
Alarcon, A.;
Banik, N.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T.;
Dodelson, S.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gruen, D.;
Holder, G. P.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Muir, J.;
Prat, J.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Simard, G.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bianchini, F.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
de Haan, T.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Everett, W. B.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
George, E. M.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hoyle, B.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Lima, M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We measure the cross-correlation between redMaGiC galaxies selected from the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-1 data and gravitational lensing of the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) reconstructed from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and
Planck data over 1289 sq. deg. When combining measurements across multiple
galaxy redshift bins spanning the redshift range of $0.15<z<0.90$, we reject
the hypothesis of no correlation at 19.9$\sigma$ significance. When removing
small-scale data points where thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich signal and nonlinear
galaxy bias could potentially bias our results, the detection significance is
reduced to 9.9$\sigma$. We perform a joint analysis of galaxy-CMB lensing
cross-correlations and galaxy clustering to constrain cosmology, finding
$\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.276^{+0.029}_{-0.030}$ and
$S_{8}=\sigma_{8}\sqrt{\mathstrut \Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} =
0.800^{+0.090}_{-0.094}$. We also perform two alternate analyses aimed at
constraining only the growth rate of cosmic structure as a function of
redshift, finding consistency with predictions from the concordance
$\Lambda$CDM model. The measurements presented here are part of a joint
cosmological analysis that combines galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing and CMB
lensing using data from DES, SPT and Planck.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.07298 [pdf] - 1760974
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of redMaGiC Redshift
Distributions in DES and SDSS from Cross-Correlations
Cawthon, R.;
Davis, C.;
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Rozo, E.;
Frieman, J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2017-12-19, last modified: 2018-10-03
We present calibrations of the redshift distributions of redMaGiC galaxies in
the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR8
data. These results determine the priors of the redshift distribution of
redMaGiC galaxies, which were used for galaxy clustering measurements and as
lenses for galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements in DES Y1 cosmological analyses.
We empirically determine the bias in redMaGiC photometric redshift estimates
using angular cross-correlations with Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey
(BOSS) galaxies. For DES, we calibrate a single parameter redshift bias in
three photometric redshift bins: $z \in[0.15,0.3]$, [0.3,0.45], and [0.45,0.6].
Our best fit results in each bin give photometric redshift biases of $|\Delta
z|<0.01$. To further test the redMaGiC algorithm, we apply our calibration
procedure to SDSS redMaGiC galaxies, where the statistical precision of the
cross-correlation measurement is much higher due to a greater overlap with BOSS
galaxies. For SDSS, we also find best fit results of $|\Delta z|<0.01$. We
compare our results to other analyses of redMaGiC photometric redshifts.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.07273 [pdf] - 1791036
Self-calibration method for II and GI types of intrinsic alignments of
galaxies
Submitted: 2018-09-19
We introduce a self-calibration method that can be applied to the intrinsic
ellipticity--intrinsic ellipticity (II) and gravitational shear -- intrinsic
ellipticity (GI) types of intrinsic alignment of galaxies. The method combines
previous self-calibration techniques with modifications to one of them in order
to use auto-spectra in addition to cross-spectra between redshift bins. This
allows one to use the self-calibration while preserving all the constraining
power of cosmic shear from surveys. We show that the new method provides more
flexibility in using various redshift bin widths. We perform cosmological
parameter constraint forecast when this method is applied to the Large Synoptic
Survey Telescope (LSST). Compared to the original self-calibration, we find
that the new method provides further significant reduction in any residual
shift in the cosmological parameters (e.g. factors of $2-4$ for the dark energy
equation of state) which is promising for accurate cosmology.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.00039 [pdf] - 1767415
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of
redMaPPer Galaxy Clusters
McClintock, T.;
Varga, T. N.;
Gruen, D.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Shin, T.;
Melchior, P.;
DeRose, J.;
Seitz, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Sheldon, E.;
Zhang, Y.;
von der Linden, A.;
Jeltema, T.;
Mantz, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Allen, S.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bermeo, A.;
Bhargava, S.;
Costanzi, M.;
Everett, S.;
Farahi, A.;
Hamaus, N.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Hoyle, B.;
Israel, H.;
Li, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Morris, G.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pollina, G.;
Rau, M. M.;
Simet, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-04-30, last modified: 2018-09-12
We constrain the mass--richness scaling relation of redMaPPer galaxy clusters
identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data using weak gravitational
lensing. We split clusters into $4\times3$ bins of richness $\lambda$ and
redshift $z$ for $\lambda\geq20$ and $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.65$ and measure the
mean masses of these bins using their stacked weak lensing signal. By modeling
the scaling relation as $\langle M_{\rm 200m}|\lambda,z\rangle = M_0
(\lambda/40)^F ((1+z)/1.35)^G$, we constrain the normalization of the scaling
relation at the 5.0 per cent level as $M_0 = [3.081 \pm 0.075 ({\rm stat}) \pm
0.133 ({\rm sys})] \cdot 10^{14}\ {\rm M}_\odot$ at $\lambda=40$ and $z=0.35$.
The richness scaling index is constrained to be $F=1.356 \pm 0.051\ ({\rm
stat})\pm 0.008\ ({\rm sys})$ and the redshift scaling index $G=-0.30\pm 0.30\
({\rm stat})\pm 0.06\ ({\rm sys})$. These are the tightest measurements of the
normalization and richness scaling index made to date. We use a semi-analytic
covariance matrix to characterize the statistical errors in the recovered weak
lensing profiles. Our analysis accounts for the following sources of systematic
error: shear and photometric redshift errors, cluster miscentering, cluster
member dilution of the source sample, systematic uncertainties in the modeling
of the halo--mass correlation function, halo triaxiality, and projection
effects. We discuss prospects for reducing this systematic error budget, which
dominates the uncertainty on $M_0$. Our result is in excellent agreement with,
but has significantly smaller uncertainties than, previous measurements in the
literature, and augurs well for the power of the DES cluster survey as a tool
for precision cosmology and upcoming galaxy surveys such as LSST, Euclid and
WFIRST.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01533 [pdf] - 1746405
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Shape Catalogues
Zuntz, J.;
Sheldon, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Jarvis, M.;
MacCrann, N.;
Gruen, D.;
Prat, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Choi, A.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Dodelson, S.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Fang, Y.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jain, B.;
Kirk, D.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Krawiec, C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Soergel, B.;
Varga, T. N.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roe, N.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-09-07
We present two galaxy shape catalogues from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1
data set, covering 1500 square degrees with a median redshift of $0.59$. The
catalogues cover two main fields: Stripe 82, and an area overlapping the South
Pole Telescope survey region. We describe our data analysis process and in
particular our shape measurement using two independent shear measurement
pipelines, METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE. The METACALIBRATION catalogue uses a
Gaussian model with an innovative internal calibration scheme, and was applied
to $riz$-bands, yielding 34.8M objects. The IM3SHAPE catalogue uses a
maximum-likelihood bulge/disc model calibrated using simulations, and was
applied to $r$-band data, yielding 21.9M objects. Both catalogues pass a suite
of null tests that demonstrate their fitness for use in weak lensing science.
We estimate the 1$\sigma$ uncertainties in multiplicative shear calibration to
be $0.013$ and $0.025$ for the METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE catalogues,
respectively.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.01669 [pdf] - 1746010
The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC) Science Requirements
Document
The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Eifler, Tim;
Hložek, Renée;
Collett, Thomas;
Gawiser, Eric;
Scolnic, Daniel;
Alonso, David;
Awan, Humna;
Biswas, Rahul;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Burchat, Patricia;
Chisari, Nora Elisa;
Dell'Antonio, Ian;
Digel, Seth;
Frieman, Josh;
Goldstein, Daniel A.;
Hook, Isobel;
Ivezić, Željko;
Kahn, Steven M.;
Kamath, Sowmya;
Kirkby, David;
Kitching, Thomas;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Leget, Pierre-François;
Marshall, Philip J.;
Meyers, Joshua;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Nichol, Robert;
Rykoff, Eli;
Sanchez, F. Javier;
Slosar, Anže;
Sullivan, Mark;
Troxel, M. A.
Submitted: 2018-09-05
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) Dark Energy Science Collaboration
(DESC) will use five cosmological probes: galaxy clusters, large scale
structure, supernovae, strong lensing, and weak lensing. This Science
Requirements Document (SRD) quantifies the expected dark energy constraining
power of these probes individually and together, with conservative assumptions
about analysis methodology and follow-up observational resources based on our
current understanding and the expected evolution within the field in the coming
years. We then define requirements on analysis pipelines that will enable us to
achieve our goal of carrying out a dark energy analysis consistent with the
Dark Energy Task Force definition of a Stage IV dark energy experiment. This is
achieved through a forecasting process that incorporates the flowdown to
detailed requirements on multiple sources of systematic uncertainty. Future
versions of this document will include evolution in our software capabilities
and analysis plans along with updates to the LSST survey strategy.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01537 [pdf] - 1743609
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing
Prat, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Fang, Y.;
Gruen, D.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Kokron, N.;
Secco, L. F.;
Jain, B.;
Miquel, R.;
MacCrann, N.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Blazek, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Crocce, M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gatti, M.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jarvis, M.;
Rau, M. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-09-04
We present galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements from 1321 sq. deg. of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 (Y1) data. The lens sample consists of a selection
of 660,000 red galaxies with high-precision photometric redshifts, known as
redMaGiC, split into five tomographic bins in the redshift range $0.15 < z <
0.9$. We use two different source samples, obtained from the Metacalibration
(26 million galaxies) and Im3shape (18 million galaxies) shear estimation
codes, which are split into four photometric redshift bins in the range $0.2 <
z < 1.3$. We perform extensive testing of potential systematic effects that can
bias the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal, including those from shear estimation,
photometric redshifts, and observational properties. Covariances are obtained
from jackknife subsamples of the data and validated with a suite of log-normal
simulations. We use the shear-ratio geometric test to obtain independent
constraints on the mean of the source redshift distributions, providing
validation of those obtained from other photo-$z$ studies with the same data.
We find consistency between the galaxy bias estimates obtained from our
galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements and from galaxy clustering, therefore
showing the galaxy-matter cross-correlation coefficient $r$ to be consistent
with one, measured over the scales used for the cosmological analysis. The
results in this work present one of the three two-point correlation functions,
along with galaxy clustering and cosmic shear, used in the DES cosmological
analysis of Y1 data, and hence the methodology and the systematics tests
presented here provide a critical input for that study as well as for future
cosmological analyses in DES and other photometric galaxy surveys.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.07335 [pdf] - 1779615
A Unified Analysis of Four Cosmic Shear Surveys
Chang, Chihway;
Wang, Michael;
Dodelson, Scott;
Eifler, Tim;
Heymans, Catherine;
Jarvis, Michael;
Jee, M. James;
Joudaki, Shahab;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Malz, Alex;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Mohammed, Irshad;
Schneider, Michael;
Simet, Melanie;
Troxel, Michael;
Zuntz, Joe
Submitted: 2018-08-22, last modified: 2018-08-28
In the past few years, several independent collaborations have presented
cosmological constraints from tomographic cosmic shear analyses. These analyses
differ in many aspects: the datasets, the shear and photometric redshift
estimation algorithms, the theory model assumptions, and the inference
pipelines. To assess the robustness of the existing cosmic shear results, we
present in this paper a unified analysis of four of the recent cosmic shear
surveys: the Deep Lens Survey (DLS), the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing
Survey (CFHTLenS), the Science Verification data from the Dark Energy Survey
(DES-SV), and the 450 deg$^{2}$ release of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-450).
By using a unified pipeline, we show how the cosmological constraints are
sensitive to the various details of the pipeline. We identify several analysis
choices that can shift the cosmological constraints by a significant fraction
of the uncertainties. For our fiducial analysis choice, considering a Gaussian
covariance, conservative scale cuts, assuming no baryonic feedback
contamination, identical cosmological parameter priors and intrinsic alignment
treatments, we find the constraints (mean, 16% and 84% confidence intervals) on
the parameter $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_{8}(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}$ to be
$S_{8}=0.94_{-0.045}^{+0.046}$ (DLS), $0.66_{-0.071}^{+0.070}$ (CFHTLenS),
$0.84_{-0.061}^{+0.062}$ (DES-SV) and $0.76_{-0.049}^{+0.048}$ (KiDS-450). From
the goodness-of-fit and the Bayesian evidence ratio, we determine that amongst
the four surveys, the two more recent surveys, DES-SV and KiDS-450, have
acceptable goodness-of-fit and are consistent with each other. The combined
constraints are $S_{8}=0.79^{+0.042}_{-0.041}$, which is in good agreement with
the first year of DES cosmic shear results and recent CMB constraints from the
Planck satellite.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01536 [pdf] - 1747811
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Avila, S.;
Banik, N.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Friedrich, O.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sanchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
DAndrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lewis, G.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Moller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
ONeill, C. R.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-08-28
We measure the clustering of DES Year 1 galaxies that are intended to be
combined with weak lensing samples in order to produce precise cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of large-scale structure and lensing
correlations. Two-point correlation functions are measured for a sample of $6.6
\times 10^{5}$ luminous red galaxies selected using the \textsc{redMaGiC}
algorithm over an area of $1321$ square degrees, in the redshift range $0.15 <
z < 0.9$, split into five tomographic redshift bins. The sample has a mean
redshift uncertainty of $\sigma_{z}/(1+z) = 0.017$. We quantify and correct
spurious correlations induced by spatially variable survey properties, testing
their impact on the clustering measurements and covariance. We demonstrate the
sample's robustness by testing for stellar contamination, for potential biases
that could arise from the systematic correction, and for the consistency
between the two-point auto- and cross-correlation functions. We show that the
corrections we apply have a significant impact on the resultant measurement of
cosmological parameters, but that the results are robust against arbitrary
choices in the correction method. We find the linear galaxy bias in each
redshift bin in a fiducial cosmology to be $b(z$=$0.24)=1.40 \pm 0.08$,
$b(z$=$0.38)=1.61 \pm 0.05$, $b(z$=$0.53)=1.60 \pm 0.04$ for galaxies with
luminosities $L/L_*>$$0.5$, $b(z$=$0.68)=1.93 \pm 0.05$ for $L/L_*>$$1$ and
$b(z$=$0.83)=1.99 \pm 0.07$ for $L/L_*$$>1.5$, broadly consistent with
expectations for the redshift and luminosity dependence of the bias of red
galaxies. We show these measurements to be consistent with the linear bias
obtained from tangential shear measurements.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.10663 [pdf] - 1728965
Survey geometry and the internal consistency of recent cosmic shear
measurements
Troxel, M. A.;
Krause, E.;
Chang, C.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gruen, D.;
MacCrann, N.;
Chen, A.;
Davis, C.;
DeRose, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Gatti, M.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Prat, J.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wang, M.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2018-04-27, last modified: 2018-07-31
We explore the impact of an update to the typical approximation for the shape
noise term in the analytic covariance matrix for cosmic shear experiments that
assumes the absence of survey boundary and mask effects. We present an exact
expression for the number of galaxy pairs in this term based on the the survey
mask, which leads to more than a factor of three increase in the shape noise on
the largest measured scales for the Kilo-Degree Survey (KIDS-450) real-space
cosmic shear data. We compare the result of this analytic expression to several
alternative methods for measuring the shape noise from the data and find
excellent agreement. This update to the covariance resolves any internal model
tension evidenced by the previously large cosmological best-fit $\chi^2$ for
the KiDS-450 cosmic shear data. The best-fit $\chi^2$ is reduced from 161 to
121 for 118 degrees of freedom. We also apply a correction to how the
multiplicative shear calibration uncertainty is included in the covariance.
This change, along with a previously known update to the reported effective
angular values of the data vector, jointly shift the inferred amplitude of the
correlation function to higher values. We find that this improves agreement of
the KiDS-450 cosmic shear results with Dark Energy Survey Year 1 and Planck
results.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.06808 [pdf] - 1751714
The Splashback Feature around DES Galaxy Clusters: Galaxy Density and
Weak Lensing Profiles
Chang, C.;
Baxter, E.;
Jain, B.;
Sánchez, C.;
Adhikari, S.;
Varga, T. N.;
Fang, Y.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Kravtsov, A.;
Gruen, D.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kim, A. G.;
Prat, J.;
MacCrann, N.;
McClintock, T.;
Palmese, A.;
Rapetti, D.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-18, last modified: 2018-07-31
Splashback refers to the process of matter that is accreting onto a dark
matter halo reaching its first orbital apocenter and turning around in its
orbit. The cluster-centric radius at which this process occurs, r_sp, defines a
halo boundary that is connected to the dynamics of the cluster. A rapid decline
in the halo profile is expected near r_sp. We measure the galaxy number density
and weak lensing mass profiles around redMaPPer galaxy clusters in the first
year Dark Energy Survey (DES) data. For a cluster sample with mean M_200m mass
~2.5 x 10^14 M_sun, we find strong evidence of a splashback-like steepening of
the galaxy density profile and measure r_sp=1.13 +/- 0.07 Mpc/h, consistent
with earlier SDSS measurements of More et al. (2016) and Baxter et al. (2017).
Moreover, our weak lensing measurement demonstrates for the first time the
existence of a splashback-like steepening of the matter profile of galaxy
clusters. We measure r_sp=1.34 +/- 0.21 Mpc/h from the weak lensing data, in
good agreement with our galaxy density measurements. For different cluster and
galaxy samples, we find that consistent with LCDM simulations, r_sp scales with
R_200m and does not evolve with redshift over the redshift range of 0.3--0.6.
We also find that potential systematic effects associated with the redMaPPer
algorithm may impact the location of r_sp. We discuss progress needed to
understand the systematic uncertainties and fully exploit forthcoming data from
DES and future surveys, emphasizing the importance of more realistic mock
catalogs and independent cluster samples.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05045 [pdf] - 1722433
Density split statistics: Cosmological constraints from counts and
lensing in cells in DES Y1 and SDSS data
Gruen, D.;
Friedrich, O.;
Krause, E.;
DeRose, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Davis, C.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Blazek, J.;
Chang, C.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hilbert, S.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lahav, O.;
MacCrann, N.;
McClintock, T.;
Prat, J.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-10-13, last modified: 2018-07-24
We derive cosmological constraints from the probability distribution function
(PDF) of evolved large-scale matter density fluctuations. We do this by
splitting lines of sight by density based on their count of tracer galaxies,
and by measuring both gravitational shear around and counts-in-cells in
overdense and underdense lines of sight, in Dark Energy Survey (DES) First Year
and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data. Our analysis uses a perturbation
theory model (see companion paper Friedrich at al.) and is validated using
N-body simulation realizations and log-normal mocks. It allows us to constrain
cosmology, bias and stochasticity of galaxies w.r.t. matter density and, in
addition, the skewness of the matter density field.
From a Bayesian model comparison, we find that the data weakly prefer a
connection of galaxies and matter that is stochastic beyond Poisson
fluctuations on <=20 arcmin angular smoothing scale. The two stochasticity
models we fit yield DES constraints on the matter density
$\Omega_m=0.26^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ and $\Omega_m=0.28^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ that are
consistent with each other. These values also agree with the DES analysis of
galaxy and shear two-point functions (3x2pt) that only uses second moments of
the PDF. Constraints on $\sigma_8$ are model dependent
($\sigma_8=0.97^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$ and $0.80^{+0.06}_{-0.07}$ for the two
stochasticity models), but consistent with each other and with the 3x2pt
results if stochasticity is at the low end of the posterior range.
As an additional test of gravity, counts and lensing in cells allow to
compare the skewness $S_3$ of the matter density PDF to its LCDM prediction. We
find no evidence of excess skewness in any model or data set, with better than
25 per cent relative precision in the skewness estimate from DES alone.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01532 [pdf] - 1681410
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Redshift distributions of the weak
lensing source galaxies
Hoyle, B.;
Gruen, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Rau, M. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
DeRose, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Davis, C.;
Alarcon, A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Davis, T. M.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Gatti, M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Martini, P.;
Mudd, D.;
Möller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-05-11
We describe the derivation and validation of redshift distribution estimates
and their uncertainties for the galaxies used as weak lensing sources in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 cosmological analyses. The Bayesian Photometric
Redshift (BPZ) code is used to assign galaxies to four redshift bins between
z=0.2 and 1.3, and to produce initial estimates of the lensing-weighted
redshift distributions $n^i_{PZ}(z)$ for bin i. Accurate determination of
cosmological parameters depends critically on knowledge of $n^i$ but is
insensitive to bin assignments or redshift errors for individual galaxies. The
cosmological analyses allow for shifts $n^i(z)=n^i_{PZ}(z-\Delta z^i)$ to
correct the mean redshift of $n^i(z)$ for biases in $n^i_{\rm PZ}$. The $\Delta
z^i$ are constrained by comparison of independently estimated 30-band
photometric redshifts of galaxies in the COSMOS field to BPZ estimates made
from the DES griz fluxes, for a sample matched in fluxes, pre-seeing size, and
lensing weight to the DES weak-lensing sources. In companion papers, the
$\Delta z^i$ are further constrained by the angular clustering of the source
galaxies around red galaxies with secure photometric redshifts at 0.15<z<0.9.
This paper details the BPZ and COSMOS procedures, and demonstrates that the
cosmological inference is insensitive to details of the $n^i(z)$ beyond the
choice of $\Delta z^i$. The clustering and COSMOS validation methods produce
consistent estimates of $\Delta z^i$, with combined uncertainties of
$\sigma_{\Delta z^i}=$0.015, 0.013, 0.011, and 0.022 in the four bins. We
marginalize over these in all analyses to follow, which does not diminish the
constraining power significantly. Repeating the photo-z procedure using the
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF) algorithm instead of BPZ, or using the
$n^i(z)$ directly estimated from COSMOS, yields no discernible difference in
cosmological inferences.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01531 [pdf] - 1676737
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Yanny, B.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Hoyle, B.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Davis, C.;
de Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Leistedt, B.;
Li, T. S.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Neilsen, E.;
Rau, M. M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wyatt, S.;
Zhang, Y.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-05-03
We describe the creation, content, and validation of the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) internal year-one cosmology data set, Y1A1 GOLD, in support of upcoming
cosmological analyses. The Y1A1 GOLD data set is assembled from multiple epochs
of DES imaging and consists of calibrated photometric zeropoints, object
catalogs, and ancillary data products - e.g., maps of survey depth and
observing conditions, star-galaxy classification, and photometric redshift
estimates - that are necessary for accurate cosmological analyses. The Y1A1
GOLD wide-area object catalog consists of ~137 million objects detected in
coadded images covering ~1800 deg$^2$ in the DES grizY filters. The 10{\sigma}
limiting magnitude for galaxies is g = 23.4, r = 23.2, i = 22.5, z = 21.8, and
Y = 20.1. Photometric calibration of Y1A1 GOLD was performed by combining
nightly zeropoint solutions with stellar-locus regression, and the absolute
calibration accuracy is better than 2% over the survey area. DES Y1A1 GOLD is
the largest photometric data set at the achieved depth to date, enabling
precise measurements of cosmic acceleration at z $\lesssim$ 1.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01538 [pdf] - 1747812
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic
Shear
Troxel, M. A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Zuntz, J.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Krause, E.;
Dodelson, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Blazek, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Samuroff, S.;
Prat, J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Davis, C.;
Ferté, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Amara, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Choi, A.;
De Vicente, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Frieman, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Krawiec, C.;
Lahav, O.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Peacock, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Stebbins, A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-04-30
We use 26 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape
catalogs over 1321 deg$^2$ of the sky to produce the most significant
measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain
cosmological parameters in both the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM models, while
also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust
using two independent shape catalogs, two independent \photoz\ calibration
methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a
3.5\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} =
0.782^{+0.027}_{-0.027}$ at 68\% CL, which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over
the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In
$w$CDM, we find a 4.8\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}
= 0.777^{+0.036}_{-0.038}$ and a dark energy equation-of-state
$w=-0.95^{+0.33}_{-0.39}$. We find results that are consistent with previous
cosmic shear constraints in $\sigma_8$ -- $\Omega_m$, and see no evidence for
disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the CMB. Finally, we find
no evidence preferring a $w$CDM model allowing $w\ne -1$. We expect further
significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more
than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective
integrated exposure time per galaxy.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05162 [pdf] - 1716953
Density split statistics: joint model of counts and lensing in cells
Friedrich, O.;
Gruen, D.;
DeRose, J.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
McClintock, T.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Seitz, S.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Blazek, J.;
Chang, C.;
Hilbert, S.;
Jain, B.;
Kovacs, A.;
Lahav, O.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-14, last modified: 2018-04-24
We present density split statistics, a framework that studies lensing and
counts-in-cells as a function of foreground galaxy density, thereby providing a
large-scale measurement of both 2-point and 3-point statistics. Our method
extends our earlier work on trough lensing and is summarized as follows: given
a foreground (low redshift) population of galaxies, we divide the sky into
subareas of equal size but distinct galaxy density. We then measure lensing
around uniformly spaced points separately in each of these subareas, as well as
counts-in-cells statistics (CiC). The lensing signals trace the matter density
contrast around regions of fixed galaxy density. Through the CiC measurements
this can be related to the density profile around regions of fixed matter
density. Together, these measurements constitute a powerful probe of cosmology,
the skewness of the density field and the connection of galaxies and matter.
In this paper we show how to model both the density split lensing signal and
CiC from basic ingredients: a non-linear power spectrum, clustering hierarchy
coefficients from perturbation theory and a parametric model for galaxy bias
and shot-noise. Using N-body simulations, we demonstrate that this model is
sufficiently accurate for a cosmological analysis on year 1 data from the Dark
Energy Survey.
[49]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.03628 [pdf] - 1663504
WFIRST Science Investigation Team "Cosmology with the High Latitude
Survey" Annual Report 2017
Doré, Olivier;
Hirata, Christopher;
Wang, Yun;
Weinberg, David;
Baronchelli, Ivano;
Benson, Andrew;
Capak, Peter;
Choi, Ami;
Eifler, Tim;
Hemmati, Shoubaneh;
Ho, Shirley;
Izard, Albert;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jarvis, Mike;
Kiessling, Alina;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Massara, Elena;
Masters, Dan;
Merson, Alex;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Malagon, Andres Plazas;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Samushia, Lado;
Shapiro, Chaz;
Simet, Melanie;
Spergel, David;
Teplitz, Harry;
Troxel, Michael;
Bean, Rachel;
Colbert, James;
Heinrich, Chen He;
Heitmann, Katrin;
Helou, George;
Hudson, Michael;
Huff, Eric;
Leauthaud, Alexie;
MacCrann, Niall;
Padmanabhan, Nikhil;
Pisani, Alice;
Rhodes, Jason;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Seiffert, Mike;
Smith, Kendrick;
Takada, Masahiro;
von der Linden, Anja;
Lupton, Robert;
Yoshida, Naoki;
Wu, Hao-Yi;
Zu, Ying
Submitted: 2018-04-10
Cosmic acceleration is the most surprising cosmological discovery in many
decades. Testing and distinguishing among possible explanations requires
cosmological measurements of extremely high precision probing the full history
of cosmic expansion and structure growth and, ideally, compare and contrast
matter and relativistic tracers of the gravity potential. This program is one
of the defining objectives of the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope
(WFIRST), as set forth in the New Worlds, New Horizons report (NWNH) in 2010.
The WFIRST mission has the ability to improve these measurements by 1-2 orders
of magnitude compared to the current state of the art, while simultaneously
extending their redshift grasp, greatly improving control of systematic
effects, and taking a unified approach to multiple probes that provide
complementary physical information and cross-checks of cosmological results. We
describe in this annual report the activities of the Science Investigation Team
(SIT) "Cosmology with the High Latitude Survey (HLS)" during the year 2017.
This team was selected by NASA in December 2015 in order to address the
stringent challenges of the WFIRST dark energy (DE) program through the
Project's formulation phase. This SIT has elected to jointly address Galaxy
Redshift Survey, Weak Lensing and Cluster Growth and thus fully embrace the
fact that the imaging and spectroscopic elements of the HLS will be realized as
an integrated observing program, and they jointly impose requirements on
performance and operations. WFIRST is designed to be able to deliver a
definitive result on the origin of cosmic acceleration. It is not optimized for
Figure of Merit sensitivity but for control of systematic uncertainties and for
having multiple techniques each with multiple cross-checks. Our SIT work
focuses on understanding the potential systematics in the WFIRST DE
measurements.
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01360 [pdf] - 1641262
A Measurement of CMB Cluster Lensing with SPT and DES Year 1 Data
Baxter, E. J.;
Raghunathan, S.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Fosalba, P.;
Hou, Z.;
Holder, G. P.;
Omori, Y.;
Patil, S.;
Rozo, E.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Aylor, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bleem, L.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Davis, C.;
de Haan, T.;
Desai, S.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dodelson, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Estrada, J.;
Everett, W. B.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
George, E. M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Knox, L.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Manzotti, A.;
March, M.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Rapetti, D.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Staniszewski, F. Z.;
Stark, A.;
Story, K.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Williamson, R.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-03, last modified: 2018-02-16
Clusters of galaxies gravitationally lens the cosmic microwave background
(CMB) radiation, resulting in a distinct imprint in the CMB on arcminute
scales. Measurement of this effect offers a promising way to constrain the
masses of galaxy clusters, particularly those at high redshift. We use CMB maps
from the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) survey to measure the CMB
lensing signal around galaxy clusters identified in optical imaging from first
year observations of the Dark Energy Survey. The cluster catalog used in this
analysis contains 3697 members with mean redshift of $\bar{z} = 0.45$. We
detect lensing of the CMB by the galaxy clusters at $8.1\sigma$ significance.
Using the measured lensing signal, we constrain the amplitude of the relation
between cluster mass and optical richness to roughly $17\%$ precision, finding
good agreement with recent constraints obtained with galaxy lensing. The error
budget is dominated by statistical noise but includes significant contributions
from systematic biases due to the thermal SZ effect and cluster miscentering.
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01535 [pdf] - 1637501
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Curved-Sky Weak Lensing Mass Map
Chang, C.;
Pujol, A.;
Mawdsley, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Melchior, P.;
Kovács, A.;
Jain, B.;
Leistedt, B.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Alarcon, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Busha, M. T.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeffrey, N.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2017-12-19
We construct the largest curved-sky galaxy weak lensing mass map to date from
the DES first-year (DES Y1) data. The map, about 10 times larger than previous
work, is constructed over a contiguous $\approx1,500 $deg$^2$, covering a
comoving volume of $\approx10 $Gpc$^3$. The effects of masking, sampling, and
noise are tested using simulations. We generate weak lensing maps from two DES
Y1 shear catalogs, Metacalibration and Im3shape, with sources at redshift
$0.2<z<1.3,$ and in each of four bins in this range. In the highest
signal-to-noise map, the ratio between the mean signal-to-noise in the E-mode
and the B-mode map is $\sim$1.5 ($\sim$2) when smoothed with a Gaussian filter
of $\sigma_{G}=30$ (80) arcminutes. The second and third moments of the
convergence $\kappa$ in the maps are in agreement with simulations. We also
find no significant correlation of $\kappa$ with maps of potential systematic
contaminants. Finally, we demonstrate two applications of the mass maps: (1)
cross-correlation with different foreground tracers of mass and (2) exploration
of the largest peaks and voids in the maps.
[52]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.01072 [pdf] - 1585501
Effects of Self-Calibration of Intrinsic Alignment on Cosmological
Parameter Constraints from Future Cosmic Shear Surveys
Submitted: 2017-07-04, last modified: 2017-11-02
Intrinsic alignments (IA) of galaxies have been recognized as one of the most
serious contaminants to weak lensing. These systematics need to be isolated and
mitigated in order for ongoing and future lensing surveys to reach their full
potential. The IA self-calibration (SC) method was shown in previous studies to
be able to reduce the GI contamination by up to a factor of 10 for the 2-point
and 3-point correlations. The SC method does not require to assume an IA model
in its working and can extract the GI signal from the same photo-z survey
offering the possibility to test and understand structure formation scenarios
and their relationship to IA models. In this paper, we study the effects of the
IA SC mitigation method on the precision and accuracy of cosmological parameter
constraints from future cosmic shear surveys LSST, WFIRST and Euclid. We
perform analytical and numerical calculations to estimate the loss of precision
and the residual bias in the best fit cosmological parameters after the
self-calibration is performed. We take into account uncertainties from
photometric redshifts and the galaxy bias. We find that the confidence contours
are slightly inflated from applying the SC method itself while a significant
increase is due to the inclusion of the photo-z uncertainties. The bias of
cosmological parameters is reduced from several-$\sigma$, when IA is not
corrected for, to below 1-$\sigma$ after SC is applied. These numbers are
comparable to those resulting from applying the method of marginalizing over IA
model parameters despite the fact that the two methods operate very
differently. We conclude that implementing the SC for these future cosmic-shear
surveys will not only allow one to efficiently mitigate the GI contaminant but
also help to understand their modeling and link to structure formation.
[53]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.00403 [pdf] - 1739830
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: A Precise H0 Measurement from DES Y1,
BAO, and D/H Data
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Henning, J. W.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Park, Y.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Reil, K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-11-01
We combine Dark Energy Survey Year 1 clustering and weak lensing data with
Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN)
experiments to constrain the Hubble constant. Assuming a flat $\Lambda$CDM
model with minimal neutrino mass ($\sum m_\nu = 0.06$ eV) we find
$H_0=67.2^{+1.2}_{-1.0}$ km/s/Mpc (68% CL). This result is completely
independent of Hubble constant measurements based on the distance ladder,
Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropies (both temperature and
polarization), and strong lensing constraints. There are now five data sets
that: a) have no shared observational systematics; and b) each constrain the
Hubble constant with a few percent level precision. We compare these five
independent measurements, and find that, as a set, the differences between them
are significant at the $2.1\sigma$ level ($\chi^2/dof=20.1/11$, probability to
exceed=4%). This difference is low enough that we consider the data sets
statistically consistent with each other. The best fit Hubble constant obtained
by combining all five data sets is $H_0 = 69.1^{+0.4}_{-0.6}$ km/s/Mpc.
[55]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05459 [pdf] - 1589775
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/Virgo GW170817. I. Dark Energy Camera Discovery of the Optical
Counterpart
Soares-Santos, M.;
Holz, D. E.;
Annis, J.;
Chornock, R.;
Herner, K.;
Berger, E.;
Brout, D.;
Chen, H.;
Kessler, R.;
Sako, M.;
Allam, S.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Butler, R. E.;
Palmese, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Frieman, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Lin, H.;
Scolnic, D.;
Cowperthwaite, P.;
Neilsen, E.;
Marriner, J.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Blanchard, P.;
Brown, D. A.;
Carlin, J. L.;
Conselice, C.;
Cook, E. R.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Drout, M. R.;
Durret, F.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fong, W.;
Fryer, C. L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S . S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Hanna, C.;
Kasen, D.;
Li, T. S.;
Lopes, P. A. A.;
Lourenço, A. C. C.;
Margutti, R.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Matheson, T.;
Medina, G. E.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Muñoz, R. R.;
Muir, J.;
Nicholl, M.;
Quataert, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sauseda, M.;
Schlegel, D. J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sobreira, F.;
Stebbins, A.;
Villar, V. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) discovery of the optical
counterpart of the first binary neutron star merger detected through
gravitational wave emission, GW170817. Our observations commenced 10.5 hours
post-merger, as soon as the localization region became accessible from Chile.
We imaged 70 deg$^2$ in the $i$ and $z$ bands, covering 93\% of the initial
integrated localization probability, to a depth necessary to identify likely
optical counterparts (e.g., a kilonova). At 11.4 hours post-merger we detected
a bright optical transient located $10.6''$ from the nucleus of NGC\,4993 at
redshift $z=0.0098$, consistent (for $H_0 = 70$\, km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$) with
the distance of $40 \pm 8$\, Mpc reported by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
and the Virgo Collaboration (LVC). At detection the transient had magnitudes
$i\approx 17.30$ and $z\approx 17.45$, and thus an absolute magnitude of $M_i =
-15.7$, in the luminosity range expected for a kilonova. We identified 1,500
potential transient candidates. Applying simple selection criteria aimed at
rejecting background events such as supernovae, we find the transient
associated with NGC\,4993 as the only remaining plausible counterpart, and
reject chance coincidence at the 99.5\% confidence level. We therefore conclude
that the optical counterpart we have identified near NGC\,4993 is associated
with GW170817. This discovery ushers in the era of multi-messenger astronomy
with gravitational waves, and demonstrates the power of DECam to identify the
optical counterparts of gravitational-wave sources.
[56]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05840 [pdf] - 1589828
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. II. UV, Optical, and Near-IR Light Curves and Comparison
to Kilonova Models
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Berger, E.;
Villar, V. A.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Nicholl, M.;
Chornock, R.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Fong, W.;
Margutti, R.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, D. A.;
Butler, R. E.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doctor, Z.;
Drout, M. R.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Frieman, J. A.;
Fryer, C. L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Guillochon, J.;
Herner, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kasen, D.;
Kessler, R.;
Marriner, J.;
Matheson, T.;
Neilsen,, E. H.;
Quataert, E.;
Palmese, A.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D. M.;
Smith, N.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Balbinot, E.;
Carlin, J. L.;
Cook, E. R.;
Durret, F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lopes, P. A. A.;
Lourenço, A. C. C.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Medina, G. E.;
Muir, J.;
Muñoz, R. R.;
Sauseda, M.;
Schlegel, D. J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Wester, W.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roe, N.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present UV, optical, and NIR photometry of the first electromagnetic
counterpart to a gravitational wave source from Advanced LIGO/Virgo, the binary
neutron star merger GW170817. Our data set extends from the discovery of the
optical counterpart at $0.47$ days to $18.5$ days post-merger, and includes
observations with the Dark Energy Camera (DECam), Gemini-South/FLAMINGOS-2
(GS/F2), and the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} ({\it HST}). The spectral energy
distribution (SED) inferred from this photometry at $0.6$ days is well
described by a blackbody model with $T\approx 8300$ K, a radius of $R\approx
4.5\times 10^{14}$ cm (corresponding to an expansion velocity of $v\approx
0.3c$), and a bolometric luminosity of $L_{\rm bol}\approx 5\times10^{41}$ erg
s$^{-1}$. At $1.5$ days we find a multi-component SED across the optical and
NIR, and subsequently we observe rapid fading in the UV and blue optical bands
and significant reddening of the optical/NIR colors. Modeling the entire data
set we find that models with heating from radioactive decay of $^{56}$Ni, or
those with only a single component of opacity from $r$-process elements, fail
to capture the rapid optical decline and red optical/NIR colors. Instead,
models with two components consistent with lanthanide-poor and lanthanide-rich
ejecta provide a good fit to the data, the resulting "blue" component has
$M_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{blue}\approx 0.01$ M$_\odot$ and
$v_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{blue}\approx 0.3$c, and the "red" component has
$M_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{red}\approx 0.04$ M$_\odot$ and
$v_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{red}\approx 0.1$c. These ejecta masses are broadly
consistent with the estimated $r$-process production rate required to explain
the Milky Way $r$-process abundances, providing the first evidence that BNS
mergers can be a dominant site of $r$-process enrichment.
[57]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.02517 [pdf] - 1589408
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts in the
DES -- Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Redshift Distributions
Davis, C.;
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Cawthon, R.;
Rozo, E.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-06
We present the calibration of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) weak
lensing source galaxy redshift distributions from clustering measurements. By
cross-correlating the positions of source galaxies with luminous red galaxies
selected by the redMaGiC algorithm we measure the redshift distributions of the
source galaxies as placed into different tomographic bins. These measurements
constrain any such shifts to an accuracy of $\sim0.02$ and can be computed even
when the clustering measurements do not span the full redshift range. The
highest-redshift source bin is not constrained by the clustering measurements
because of the minimal redshift overlap with the redMaGiC galaxies. We compare
our constraints with those obtained from $\texttt{COSMOS}$ 30-band photometry
and find that our two very different methods produce consistent constraints.
[58]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.00992 [pdf] - 1648618
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts - Methods
and Systematics Characterization
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Davis, C.;
Cawthon, R.;
Rau, M. M.;
DeRose, J.;
De Vicente, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Hoyle, B.;
Miquel, R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roodman, A.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Davis, T. M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.
Submitted: 2017-09-04
We use numerical simulations to characterize the performance of a
clustering-based method to calibrate photometric redshift biases. In
particular, we cross-correlate the weak lensing (WL) source galaxies from the
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) sample with redMaGiC galaxies (luminous red
galaxies with secure photometric redshifts) to estimate the redshift
distribution of the former sample. The recovered redshift distributions are
used to calibrate the photometric redshift bias of standard photo-$z$ methods
applied to the same source galaxy sample. We apply the method to three
photo-$z$ codes run in our simulated data: Bayesian Photometric Redshift (BPZ),
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF), and Random Forest-based photo-$z$ (RF).
We characterize the systematic uncertainties of our calibration procedure, and
find that these systematic uncertainties dominate our error budget. The
dominant systematics are due to our assumption of unevolving bias and
clustering across each redshift bin, and to differences between the shapes of
the redshift distributions derived by clustering vs photo-$z$'s. The systematic
uncertainty in the mean redshift bias of the source galaxy sample is $\Delta z
\lesssim 0.02$, though the precise value depends on the redshift bin under
consideration. We discuss possible ways to mitigate the impact of our dominant
systematics in future analyses.
[59]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.09247 [pdf] - 1996655
Beyond linear galaxy alignments
Submitted: 2017-08-30
Galaxy intrinsic alignments (IA) are a critical uncertainty for current and
future weak lensing measurements. We describe a perturbative expansion of IA,
analogous to the treatment of galaxy biasing. From an astrophysical
perspective, this model includes the expected large-scale alignment mechanisms
for galaxies that are pressure-supported (tidal alignment) and
rotation-supported (tidal torquing) as well as the cross-correlation between
the two. Alternatively, this expansion can be viewed as an effective model
capturing all relevant effects up to the given order. We include terms up to
second order in the density and tidal fields and calculate the resulting IA
contributions to two-point statistics at one-loop order. For fiducial
amplitudes of the IA parameters, we find the quadratic alignment and
linear-quadratic cross terms can contribute order-unity corrections to the
total intrinsic alignment signal at $k\sim0.1\,h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$, depending on
the source redshift distribution. These contributions can lead to significant
biases on inferred cosmological parameters in Stage IV photometric weak lensing
surveys. We perform forecasts for an LSST-like survey, finding that use of the
standard "NLA" model for intrinsic alignments cannot remove these large
parameter biases, even when allowing for a more general redshift dependence.
The model presented here will allow for more accurate and flexible IA treatment
in weak lensing and combined probes analyses, and an implementation is made
available as part of the public FAST-PT code. The model also provides a more
advanced framework for understanding the underlying IA processes and their
relationship to fundamental physics.
[60]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01534 [pdf] - 1648606
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Impact of Galaxy Neighbours on
Weak Lensing Cosmology with im3shape
Samuroff, S.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Zuntz, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Huff, E. M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Doel, P.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.
Submitted: 2017-08-04
We use a suite of simulated images based on Year 1 of the Dark Energy Survey
to explore the impact of galaxy neighbours on shape measurement and shear
cosmology. The hoopoe image simulations include realistic blending, galaxy
positions, and spatial variations in depth and PSF properties. Using the
im3shape maximum-likelihood shape measurement code, we identify four mechanisms
by which neighbours can have a non-negligible influence on shear estimation.
These effects, if ignored, would contribute a net multiplicative bias of $m
\sim 0.03 - 0.09$ in the DES Y1 im3shape catalogue, though the precise impact
will be dependent on both the measurement code and the selection cuts applied.
This can be reduced to percentage level or less by removing objects with close
neighbours, at a cost to the effective number density of galaxies
$n_\mathrm{eff}$ of 30%. We use the cosmological inference pipeline of DES Y1
to explore the cosmological implications of neighbour bias and show that
omitting blending from the calibration simulation for DES Y1 would bias the
inferred clustering amplitude $S_8\equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega _\mathrm{m}
/0.3)^{0.5}$ by $2 \sigma$ towards low values. Finally, we use the hoopoe
simulations to test the effect of neighbour-induced spatial correlations in the
multiplicative bias. We find the impact on the recovered $S_8$ of ignoring such
correlations to be subdominant to statistical error at the current level of
precision.
[61]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.08256 [pdf] - 1663185
Cross-Correlation Redshift Calibration Without Spectroscopic Calibration
Samples in DES Science Verification Data
Davis, C.;
Rozo, E.;
Roodman, A.;
Alarcon, A.;
Cawthon, R.;
Gatti, M.;
Lin, H.;
Miquel, R.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2017-07-25
Galaxy cross-correlations with high-fidelity redshift samples hold the
potential to precisely calibrate systematic photometric redshift uncertainties
arising from the unavailability of complete and representative training and
validation samples of galaxies. However, application of this technique in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) is hampered by the relatively low number density,
small area, and modest redshift overlap between photometric and spectroscopic
samples. We propose instead using photometric catalogs with reliable
photometric redshifts for photo-z calibration via cross-correlations. We verify
the viability of our proposal using redMaPPer clusters from the Sloan Digital
Sky Survey (SDSS) to successfully recover the redshift distribution of SDSS
spectroscopic galaxies. We demonstrate how to combine photo-z with
cross-correlation data to calibrate photometric redshift biases while
marginalizing over possible clustering bias evolution in either the calibration
or unknown photometric samples. We apply our method to DES Science Verification
(DES SV) data in order to constrain the photometric redshift distribution of a
galaxy sample selected for weak lensing studies, constraining the mean of the
tomographic redshift distributions to a statistical uncertainty of $\Delta z
\sim \pm 0.01$. We forecast that our proposal can in principle control
photometric redshift uncertainties in DES weak lensing experiments at a level
near the intrinsic statistical noise of the experiment over the range of
redshifts where redMaPPer clusters are available. Our results provide strong
motivation to launch a program to fully characterize the systematic errors from
bias evolution and photo-z shapes in our calibration procedure.
[62]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.09359 [pdf] - 1585253
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Multi-Probe Methodology and Simulated
Likelihood Analyses
Krause, E.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Zuntz, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Dodelson, S.;
Blazek, J.;
Secco, L. F.;
MacCrann, N.;
Baxter, E.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Crocce, M.;
DeRose, J.;
Ferte, A.;
Kokron, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Miranda, V.;
Omori, Y.;
Porredon, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Samuroff, S.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-06-28
We present the methodology for and detail the implementation of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) 3x2pt DES Year 1 (Y1) analysis, which combines
configuration-space two-point statistics from three different cosmological
probes: cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing, and galaxy clustering, using data
from the first year of DES observations. We have developed two independent
modeling pipelines and describe the code validation process. We derive
expressions for analytical real-space multi-probe covariances, and describe
their validation with numerical simulations. We stress-test the inference
pipelines in simulated likelihood analyses that vary 6-7 cosmology parameters
plus 20 nuisance parameters and precisely resemble the analysis to be presented
in the DES 3x2pt analysis paper, using a variety of simulated input data
vectors with varying assumptions.
We find that any disagreement between pipelines leads to changes in assigned
likelihood $\Delta \chi^2 \le 0.045$ with respect to the statistical error of
the DES Y1 data vector. We also find that angular binning and survey mask do
not impact our analytic covariance at a significant level. We determine lower
bounds on scales used for analysis of galaxy clustering (8 Mpc$~h^{-1}$) and
galaxy-galaxy lensing (12 Mpc$~h^{-1}$) such that the impact of modeling
uncertainties in the non-linear regime is well below statistical errors, and
show that our analysis choices are robust against a variety of systematics.
These tests demonstrate that we have a robust analysis pipeline that yields
unbiased cosmological parameter inferences for the flagship 3x2pt DES Y1
analysis. We emphasize that the level of independent code development and
subsequent code comparison as demonstrated in this paper is necessary to
produce credible constraints from increasingly complex multi-probe analyses of
current data.
[63]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05552 [pdf] - 1572642
Cosmology from Cosmic Shear with DES Science Verification Data
The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Armstrong, R.;
Bacon, D.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Baxter, E.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Bruderer, C.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Erickson, B.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
Gangkofner, C.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W.;
Hirsch, M.;
Honscheid, K.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kravtsov, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Kwan, J.;
Lahav, O.;
Leistedt, B.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nicola, A.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Palmese, A.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Refregier, A.;
Roe, N.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rowe, B.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sabiu, C.;
Sadeh, I.;
Sako, M.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Seo, H.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-07-20, last modified: 2017-05-03
We present the first constraints on cosmology from the Dark Energy Survey
(DES), using weak lensing measurements from the preliminary Science
Verification (SV) data. We use 139 square degrees of SV data, which is less
than 3\% of the full DES survey area. Using cosmic shear 2-point measurements
over three redshift bins we find $\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.81
\pm 0.06$ (68\% confidence), after marginalising over 7 systematics parameters
and 3 other cosmological parameters. We examine the robustness of our results
to the choice of data vector and systematics assumed, and find them to be
stable. About $20$\% of our error bar comes from marginalising over shear and
photometric redshift calibration uncertainties. The current state-of-the-art
cosmic shear measurements from CFHTLenS are mildly discrepant with the
cosmological constraints from Planck CMB data; our results are consistent with
both datasets. Our uncertainties are $\sim$30\% larger than those from CFHTLenS
when we carry out a comparable analysis of the two datasets, which we attribute
largely to the lower number density of our shear catalogue. We investigate
constraints on dark energy and find that, with this small fraction of the full
survey, the DES SV constraints make negligible impact on the Planck
constraints. The moderate disagreement between the CFHTLenS and Planck values
of $\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}$ is present regardless of the value of
$w$.
[64]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.06890 [pdf] - 1580445
Weak-lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters in Dark
Energy Survey Science Verification data
Melchior, P.;
Gruen, D.;
McClintock, T.;
Varga, T. N.;
Sheldon, E.;
Rozo, E.;
Amara, A.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bermeo, A.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Clampitt, J.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kacprzak, T.;
MacCrann, N.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Saro, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Bonnett, C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2016-10-21, last modified: 2017-04-28
We use weak-lensing shear measurements to determine the mean mass of
optically selected galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification
data. In a blinded analysis, we split the sample of more than 8,000 redMaPPer
clusters into 15 subsets, spanning ranges in the richness parameter $5 \leq
\lambda \leq 180$ and redshift $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.8$, and fit the averaged mass
density contrast profiles with a model that accounts for seven distinct sources
of systematic uncertainty: shear measurement and photometric redshift errors;
cluster-member contamination; miscentering; deviations from the NFW halo
profile; halo triaxiality; and line-of-sight projections. We combine the
inferred cluster masses to estimate the joint scaling relation between mass,
richness and redshift, $\mathcal{M}(\lambda,z) \varpropto M_0 \lambda^{F}
(1+z)^{G}$. We find $M_0 \equiv \langle
M_{200\mathrm{m}}\,|\,\lambda=30,z=0.5\rangle=\left[ 2.35 \pm 0.22\ \rm{(stat)}
\pm 0.12\ \rm{(sys)} \right] \cdot 10^{14}\ M_\odot$, with $F =
1.12\,\pm\,0.20\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.06\ \rm{(sys)}$ and $G = 0.18\,\pm\,
0.75\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.24\ \rm{(sys)}$. The amplitude of the mass-richness
relation is in excellent agreement with the weak-lensing calibration of
redMaPPer clusters in SDSS by Simet et al. (2016) and with the Saro et al.
(2015) calibration based on abundance matching of SPT-detected clusters. Our
results extend the redshift range over which the mass-richness relation of
redMaPPer clusters has been calibrated with weak lensing from $z\leq 0.3$ to
$z\leq0.8$. Calibration uncertainties of shear measurements and photometric
redshift estimates dominate our systematic error budget and require substantial
improvements for forthcoming studies.
[65]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.05790 [pdf] - 1530541
Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing in the DES Science Verification Data
Clampitt, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Kwan, J.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Park, Y.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Jain, B.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Blazek, J.;
Bonnett, C.;
Crocce, M.;
Fang, Y.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Jarvis, M.;
Miquel, R.;
Prat, J.;
Ross, A. J.;
Sheldon, E.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Armstrong, R.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2016-03-18, last modified: 2016-12-09
We present galaxy-galaxy lensing results from 139 square degrees of Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) data. Our lens sample consists of
red galaxies, known as redMaGiC, which are specifically selected to have a low
photometric redshift error and outlier rate. The lensing measurement has a
total signal-to-noise of 29 over scales $0.09 < R < 15$ Mpc/$h$, including all
lenses over a wide redshift range $0.2 < z < 0.8$. Dividing the lenses into
three redshift bins for this constant moving number density sample, we find no
evidence for evolution in the halo mass with redshift. We obtain consistent
results for the lensing measurement with two independent shear pipelines, ngmix
and im3shape. We perform a number of null tests on the shear and photometric
redshift catalogs and quantify resulting systematic uncertainties. Covariances
from jackknife subsamples of the data are validated with a suite of 50 mock
surveys. The results and systematics checks in this work provide a critical
input for future cosmological and galaxy evolution studies with the DES data
and redMaGiC galaxy samples. We fit a Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) model,
and demonstrate that our data constrains the mean halo mass of the lens
galaxies, despite strong degeneracies between individual HOD parameters.
[66]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05598 [pdf] - 1445264
Cosmic Shear Measurements with DES Science Verification Data
Becker, M. R.;
Troxel, M. A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Krause, E.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Friedrich, O.;
Nicola, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Amara, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Chang, C.;
Dodelson, S.;
Erickson, B.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kravtsov, A.;
Leistedt, B.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sabiu, C.;
Sanchez, C.;
Seo, H.;
Sheldon, E.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Collaboration, The DES
Submitted: 2015-07-20, last modified: 2016-07-27
We present measurements of weak gravitational lensing cosmic shear two-point
statistics using Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data. We demonstrate
that our results are robust to the choice of shear measurement pipeline, either
ngmix or im3shape, and robust to the choice of two-point statistic, including
both real and Fourier-space statistics. Our results pass a suite of null tests
including tests for B-mode contamination and direct tests for any dependence of
the two-point functions on a set of 16 observing conditions and galaxy
properties, such as seeing, airmass, galaxy color, galaxy magnitude, etc. We
furthermore use a large suite of simulations to compute the covariance matrix
of the cosmic shear measurements and assign statistical significance to our
null tests. We find that our covariance matrix is consistent with the halo
model prediction, indicating that it has the appropriate level of halo sample
variance. We compare the same jackknife procedure applied to the data and the
simulations in order to search for additional sources of noise not captured by
the simulations. We find no statistically significant extra sources of noise in
the data. The overall detection significance with tomography for our highest
source density catalog is 9.7sigma. Cosmological constraints from the
measurements in this work are presented in a companion paper (DES et al. 2015).
[67]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.07910 [pdf] - 1513600
Simultaneous Constraints on Cosmology and Photometric Redshift Bias from
Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering
Submitted: 2016-07-26
We investigate the expected cosmological constraints from a combination of
weak lensing and large-scale galaxy clustering using realistic redshift
distributions. Introducing a systematic bias in the weak lensing redshift
distributions (of 0.05 in redshift) produces a $>2\sigma$ bias in the recovered
matter power spectrum amplitude and dark energy equation of state, for
preliminary Stage III surveys. We demonstrate that these cosmological errors
can be largely removed by marginalising over unknown biases in the assumed weak
lensing redshift distributions, if we assume high quality redshift information
for the galaxy clustering sample. Furthermore the cosmological constraining
power is mostly retained despite removing much of the information on the weak
lensing redshift distribution biases. We show that this comes from
complementary degeneracy directions between cosmic shear and the combination of
galaxy clustering with cross-correlation between shear and galaxy number
density. Finally we examine how the self-calibration performs when the assumed
distributions differ from the true distributions by more than a simple uniform
bias. We find that the effectiveness of this self-calibration method will
depend on the details of a given experiment and the nature of the uncertainties
on the estimated redshift distributions.
[68]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.07384 [pdf] - 1459368
Joint Measurement of Lensing-Galaxy Correlations Using SPT and DES SV
Data
Baxter, E. J.;
Clampitt, J.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Dodelson, S.;
Jain, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Fosalba, P.;
Kirk, D.;
Kwan, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Story, K. T.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Armstrong, R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Chown, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
de Haan, T.;
Holder, G. P.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Omori, Y.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Romer, A. K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Stark, A. A.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2016-02-23, last modified: 2016-06-30
We measure the correlation of galaxy lensing and cosmic microwave background
lensing with a set of galaxies expected to trace the matter density field. The
measurements are performed using pre-survey Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science
Verification optical imaging data and millimeter-wave data from the 2500 square
degree South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SPT-SZ) survey. The two
lensing-galaxy correlations are jointly fit to extract constraints on
cosmological parameters, constraints on the redshift distribution of the lens
galaxies, and constraints on the absolute shear calibration of DES galaxy
lensing measurements. We show that an attractive feature of these fits is that
they are fairly insensitive to the clustering bias of the galaxies used as
matter tracers. The measurement presented in this work confirms that DES and
SPT data are consistent with each other and with the currently favored
$\Lambda$CDM cosmological model. It also demonstrates that joint lensing-galaxy
correlation measurement considered here contains a wealth of information that
can be extracted using current and future surveys.
[69]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.00405 [pdf] - 1415044
Galaxy bias from the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data:
combining galaxy density maps and weak lensing maps
Chang, C.;
Pujol, A.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Amara, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bonnett, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Fosalba, P.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Hartley, W.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Ross, A. J.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2016-01-04, last modified: 2016-04-27
We measure the redshift evolution of galaxy bias for a magnitude-limited
galaxy sample by combining the galaxy density maps and weak lensing shear maps
for a $\sim$116 deg$^{2}$ area of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science
Verification data. This method was first developed in Amara et al. (2012) and
later re-examined in a companion paper (Pujol et al. 2016) with rigorous
simulation tests and analytical treatment of tomographic measurements. In this
work we apply this method to the DES SV data and measure the galaxy bias for a
i$<$22.5 galaxy sample. We find the galaxy bias and 1$\sigma$ error bars in 4
photometric redshift bins to be 1.12$\pm$0.19 (z=0.2-0.4), 0.97$\pm$0.15
(z=0.4-0.6), 1.38$\pm$0.39 (z=0.6-0.8)), and 1.45$\pm$0.56 (z=0.8-1.0). These
measurements are consistent at the 2$\sigma$ level with measurements on the
same dataset using galaxy clustering and cross-correlation of galaxies with CMB
lensing, with most of the redshift bins consistent within the 1{\sigma} error
bars. In addition, our method provides the only $\sigma_8$-independent
constraint among the three. We forward-model the main observational effects
using mock galaxy catalogs by including shape noise, photo-z errors and masking
effects. We show that our bias measurement from the data is consistent with
that expected from simulations. With the forthcoming full DES data set, we
expect this method to provide additional constraints on the galaxy bias
measurement from more traditional methods. Furthermore, in the process of our
measurement, we build up a 3D mass map that allows further exploration of the
dark matter distribution and its relation to galaxy evolution.
[70]
oai:arXiv.org:1604.07871 [pdf] - 1494677
Cosmology from large scale galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing
with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
Kwan, Juliana;
Sanchez, Carles;
Clampitt, Joseph;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Crocce, Martin;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Zuntz, Joe;
Amara, Adam;
Becker, Matthew;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bonnett, Christopher;
DeRose, Joseph;
Dodelson, Scott;
Eifler, Tim;
Gaztanaga, Enrique;
Giannantonio, Tommaso;
Gruen, Daniel;
Hartley, Will;
Kacprzak, Tomasz;
Kirk, Donnacha;
Krause, Elisabeth;
MacCrann, Niall;
Miquel, Ramon;
Park, Youngsoo;
Ross, Ashley;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Rykoff, Eli;
Sheldon, Erin;
Troxel, Michael A.;
Wechsler, Risa;
Abbott, Tim;
Abdalla, Filipe;
Allam, Sahar;
Benoit-Lévy, Aurélien;
Brooks, David;
Burke, David;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Cunha, Carlos;
D'Andrea, Chris;
da Costa, Luiz;
Desai, Shantanu;
Diehl, H. Thomas;
Dietrich, Jörg;
Doel, Peter;
Evrard, August;
Fernandez, Enrique;
Finley, David;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frieman, Josh;
Gerdes, David;
Gruendl, Robert;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Honscheid, Klaus;
James, David;
Jarvis, Mike;
Kuehn, Kyler;
Lahav, Ofer;
Lima, Marcos;
Maia, Marcio;
Marshall, Jennifer;
Martini, Paul;
Melchior, Peter;
Mohr, Joe;
Nichol, Robert;
Nord, Brian;
Plazas, Andres;
Reil, Kevin;
Romer, Kathy;
Roodman, Aaron;
Sanchez, Eusebio;
Scarpine, Vic;
Sevilla, Ignacio;
Smith, R. Chris;
Soares-Santos, Marcelle;
Sobreira, Flavia;
Suchyta, Eric;
Swanson, Molly;
Tarle, Gregory;
Thomas, Daniel;
Vikram, Vinu;
Walker, Alistair
Submitted: 2016-04-26
We present cosmological constraints from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) using a
combined analysis of angular clustering of red galaxies and their
cross-correlation with weak gravitational lensing of background galaxies. We
use a 139 square degree contiguous patch of DES data from the Science
Verification (SV) period of observations. Using large scale measurements, we
constrain the matter density of the Universe as Omega_m = 0.31 +/- 0.09 and the
clustering amplitude of the matter power spectrum as sigma_8 = 0.74 +/- 0.13
after marginalizing over seven nuisance parameters and three additional
cosmological parameters. This translates into S_8 = sigma_8(Omega_m/0.3)^{0.16}
= 0.74 +/- 0.12 for our fiducial lens redshift bin at 0.35 <z< 0.5, while S_8 =
0.78 +/- 0.09 using two bins over the range 0.2 <z< 0.5. We study the
robustness of the results under changes in the data vectors, modelling and
systematics treatment, including photometric redshift and shear calibration
uncertainties, and find consistency in the derived cosmological parameters. We
show that our results are consistent with previous cosmological analyses from
DES and other data sets and conclude with a joint analysis of DES angular
clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing with Planck CMB data, Baryon Accoustic
Oscillations and Supernova type Ia measurements.
[71]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05603 [pdf] - 1411151
The DES Science Verification Weak Lensing Shear Catalogues
Jarvis, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Zuntz, J.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Amara, A.;
Armstrong, R.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Chang, C.;
Das, R.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Gangkofner, C.;
Gruen, D.;
Hirsch, M.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jain, B.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
MacCrann, N.;
Melchior, P.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Refregier, A.;
Rowe, B.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Suchyta, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2015-07-20, last modified: 2016-04-25
We present weak lensing shear catalogues for 139 square degrees of data taken
during the Science Verification (SV) time for the new Dark Energy Camera
(DECam) being used for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We describe our object
selection, point spread function estimation and shear measurement procedures
using two independent shear pipelines, IM3SHAPE and NGMIX, which produce
catalogues of 2.12 million and 3.44 million galaxies respectively. We detail a
set of null tests for the shear measurements and find that they pass the
requirements for systematic errors at the level necessary for weak lensing
science applications using the SV data. We also discuss some of the planned
algorithmic improvements that will be necessary to produce sufficiently
accurate shear catalogues for the full 5-year DES, which is expected to cover
5000 square degrees.
[72]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.05040 [pdf] - 1470597
Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey
Science Verification data
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Friedrich, O.;
Amara, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Marian, L.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Suchyta, E.;
Aleksić, J.;
Bacon, D.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Chang, C.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Hartley, W.;
Huff, E. M.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Melchior, P.;
Nicola, A.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Weller, J.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Armstrong, R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2016-03-16
Shear peak statistics has gained a lot of attention recently as a practical
alternative to the two point statistics for constraining cosmological
parameters. We perform a shear peak statistics analysis of the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) data, using weak gravitational lensing
measurements from a 139 deg$^2$ field. We measure the abundance of peaks
identified in aperture mass maps, as a function of their signal-to-noise ratio,
in the signal-to-noise range $0<\mathcal S / \mathcal N<4$. To predict the peak
counts as a function of cosmological parameters we use a suite of $N$-body
simulations spanning 158 models with varying $\Omega_{\rm m}$ and $\sigma_8$,
fixing $w = -1$, $\Omega_{\rm b} = 0.04$, $h = 0.7$ and $n_s=1$, to which we
have applied the DES SV mask and redshift distribution. In our fiducial
analysis we measure $\sigma_{8}(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.6}=0.77 \pm 0.07$, after
marginalising over the shear multiplicative bias and the error on the mean
redshift of the galaxy sample. We introduce models of intrinsic alignments,
blending, and source contamination by cluster members. These models indicate
that peaks with $\mathcal S / \mathcal N>4$ would require significant
corrections, which is why we do not include them in our analysis. We compare
our results to the cosmological constraints from the two point analysis on the
SV field and find them to be in good agreement in both the central value and
its uncertainty. We discuss prospects for future peak statistics analysis with
upcoming DES data.
[73]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.04535 [pdf] - 1378743
Cross-correlation of gravitational lensing from DES Science Verification
data with SPT and Planck lensing
Kirk, D.;
Omori, Y.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Larsen, P.;
Amara, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Dodelson, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Holder, G.;
Jain, B.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Lahav, O.;
MacCrann, N.;
Nicola, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Sheldon, E.;
Story, K. T.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2015-12-14
We measure the cross-correlation between weak lensing of galaxy images and of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The effects of gravitational lensing on
different sources will be correlated if the lensing is caused by the same mass
fluctuations. We use galaxy shape measurements from 139 deg$^{2}$ of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification data and overlapping CMB lensing from
the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. The DES source galaxies have a
median redshift of $z_{\rm med} {\sim} 0.7$, while the CMB lensing kernel is
broad and peaks at $z{\sim}2$. The resulting cross-correlation is maximally
sensitive to mass fluctuations at $z{\sim}0.44$. Assuming the Planck 2015
best-fit cosmology, the amplitude of the DES$\times$SPT cross-power is found to
be $A = 0.88 \pm 0.30$ and that from DES$\times$Planck to be $A = 0.86 \pm
0.39$, where $A=1$ corresponds to the theoretical prediction. These are
consistent with the expected signal and correspond to significances of $2.9
\sigma$ and $2.2 \sigma$ respectively. We demonstrate that our results are
robust to a number of important systematic effects including the shear
measurement method, estimator choice, photometric redshift uncertainty and CMB
lensing systematics. Significant intrinsic alignment of galaxy shapes would
increase the cross-correlation signal inferred from the data; we calculate a
value of $A = 1.08 \pm 0.36$ for DES$\times$SPT when we correct the
observations with a simple IA model. With three measurements of this
cross-correlation now existing in the literature, there is not yet reliable
evidence for any deviation from the expected LCDM level of cross-correlation,
given the size of the statistical uncertainties and the significant impact of
systematic errors, particularly IAs. We provide forecasts for the expected
signal-to-noise of the combination of the five-year DES survey and SPT-3G.
[74]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05090 [pdf] - 1324854
Weak lensing by galaxy troughs in DES Science Verification data
Gruen, D.;
Friedrich, O.;
Amara, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Bonnett, C.;
Hartley, W.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Krause, E.;
Mana, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Seitz, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-07-17, last modified: 2015-12-08
We measure the weak lensing shear around galaxy troughs, i.e. the radial
alignment of background galaxies relative to underdensities in projections of
the foreground galaxy field over a wide range of redshift in Science
Verification data from the Dark Energy Survey. Our detection of the shear
signal is highly significant (10 to 15$\sigma$ for the smallest angular scales)
for troughs with the redshift range z in [0.2,0.5] of the projected galaxy
field and angular diameters of 10 arcmin...1{\deg}. These measurements probe
the connection between the galaxy, matter density, and convergence fields. By
assuming galaxies are biased tracers of the matter density with Poissonian
noise, we find agreement of our measurements with predictions in a fiducial
Lambda cold dark matter model. The prediction for the lensing signal on large
trough scales is virtually independent of the details of the underlying model
for the connection of galaxies and matter. Our comparison of the shear around
troughs with that around cylinders with large galaxy counts is consistent with
a symmetry between galaxy and matter over- and underdensities. In addition, we
measure the two-point angular correlation of troughs with galaxies which, in
contrast to the lensing signal, is sensitive to galaxy bias on all scales. The
lensing signal of troughs and their clustering with galaxies is therefore a
promising probe of the statistical properties of matter underdensities and
their connection to the galaxy field.
[75]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05909 [pdf] - 1475231
Redshift distributions of galaxies in the DES Science Verification shear
catalogue and implications for weak lensing
Bonnett, C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Hartley, W.;
Amara, A.;
Leistedt, B.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bridle, S.;
Bruderer, C.;
Busha, M. T.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Childress, M. J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
Crocce, M.;
Davis, T. M.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Frieman, J.;
Gangkofner, C.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gruen, D.;
Kacprzak, T.;
King, A.;
Kwan, J.;
Lahav, O.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Miquel, R.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Palmese, A.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Refregier, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sadeh, I.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Uddin, S.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2015-07-21, last modified: 2015-07-23
We present photometric redshift estimates for galaxies used in the weak
lensing analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification (DES SV) data.
Four model- or machine learning-based photometric redshift methods -- ANNZ2,
BPZ calibrated against BCC-Ufig simulations, SkyNet, and TPZ -- are analysed.
For training, calibration, and testing of these methods, we construct a
catalogue of spectroscopically confirmed galaxies matched against DES SV data.
The performance of the methods is evaluated against the matched spectroscopic
catalogue, focusing on metrics relevant for weak lensing analyses, with
additional validation against COSMOS photo-zs. From the galaxies in the DES SV
shear catalogue, which have mean redshift $0.72\pm0.01$ over the range
$0.3<z<1.3$, we construct three tomographic bins with means of $z=\{0.45, 0.67,
1.00\}$. These bins each have systematic uncertainties $\delta z \lesssim 0.05$
in the mean of the fiducial SkyNet photo-z $n(z)$. We propagate the errors in
the redshift distributions through to their impact on cosmological parameters
estimated with cosmic shear, and find that they cause shifts in the value of
$\sigma_8$ of approx. 3%. This shift is within the one sigma statistical errors
on $\sigma_8$ for the DES SV shear catalog. We further study the potential
impact of systematic differences on the critical surface density,
$\Sigma_{\mathrm{crit}}$, finding levels of bias safely less than the
statistical power of DES SV data. We recommend a final Gaussian prior for the
photo-z bias in the mean of $n(z)$ of width $0.05$ for each of the three
tomographic bins, and show that this is a sufficient bias model for the
corresponding cosmology analysis.
[76]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.03002 [pdf] - 1248536
Wide-Field Lensing Mass Maps from DES Science Verification Data:
Methodology and Detailed Analysis
Vikram, V.;
Chang, C.;
Jain, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Amara, A.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S.;
Brout, D.;
Busha, M.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Hartley, W.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kovacs, A.;
Lahav, O.;
Leistedt, B.;
Lin, H.;
Melchior, P.;
Peiris, H.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E.;
Sanchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J.;
Martini, P.;
Merritt, K. W.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Sevilla, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2015-04-12, last modified: 2015-07-20
Weak gravitational lensing allows one to reconstruct the spatial distribution
of the projected mass density across the sky. These "mass maps" provide a
powerful tool for studying cosmology as they probe both luminous and dark
matter. In this paper, we present a weak lensing mass map reconstructed from
shear measurements in a 139 sq. deg area from the Dark Energy Survey (DES)
Science Verification (SV) data. We compare the distribution of mass with that
of the foreground distribution of galaxies and clusters. The overdensities in
the reconstructed map correlate well with the distribution of optically
detected clusters. We demonstrate that candidate superclusters and voids along
the line of sight can be identified, exploiting the tight scatter of the
cluster photometric redshifts. We cross-correlate the mass map with a
foreground magnitude-limited galaxy sample from the same data. Our measurement
gives results consistent with mock catalogs from N-body simulations that
include the primary sources of statistical uncertainties in the galaxy,
lensing, and photo-z catalogs. The statistical significance of the
cross-correlation is at the 6.8-sigma level with 20 arcminute smoothing. A
major goal of this study is to investigate systematic effects arising from a
variety of sources, including PSF and photo-z uncertainties. We make maps
derived from twenty variables that may characterize systematics and find the
principal components. We find that the contribution of systematics to the
lensing mass maps is generally within measurement uncertainties. In this work,
we analyze less than 3% of the final area that will be mapped by the DES; the
tools and analysis techniques developed in this paper can be applied to
forthcoming larger datasets from the survey.
[77]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.01871 [pdf] - 1255013
Wide-Field Lensing Mass Maps from DES Science Verification Data
Chang, C.;
Vikram, V.;
Jain, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Amara, A.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S.;
Brout, D.;
Busha, M.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Hartley, W.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kovacs, A.;
Lahav, O.;
Lin, H.;
Melchior, P.;
Peiris, H.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E.;
Sanchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Merritt, K. W.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sevilla, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2015-05-07, last modified: 2015-07-20
We present a mass map reconstructed from weak gravitational lensing shear
measurements over 139 sq. deg from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science
Verification data. The mass map probes both luminous and dark matter, thus
providing a tool for studying cosmology. We find good agreement between the
mass map and the distribution of massive galaxy clusters identified using a
red-sequence cluster finder. Potential candidates for super-clusters and voids
are identified using these maps. We measure the cross-correlation between the
mass map and a magnitude-limited foreground galaxy sample and find a detection
at the 5-7 sigma level on a large range of scales. These measurements are
consistent with simulated galaxy catalogs based on LCDM N-body simulations,
suggesting low systematics uncertainties in the map. We summarize our key
findings in this letter; the detailed methodology and tests for systematics are
presented in a companion paper.
[78]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.4390 [pdf] - 917212
Effect of inhomogeneities on high precision measurements of cosmological
distances
Submitted: 2014-08-19, last modified: 2015-01-05
We study effects of inhomogeneities on distance measures in an exact
relativistic Swiss-cheese model of the universe, focusing on the distance
modulus. The model has LCDM background dynamics, and the `holes' are
non-symmetric structures described by the Szekeres metric. The Szekeres exact
solution of Einstein's equations, which is inhomogeneous and anisotropic,
allows us to capture potentially relevant effects on light propagation due to
nontrivial evolution of structures in an exact framework. Light beams
traversing a single Szekeres structure in different ways can experience either
magnification or demagnification, depending on the particular path, and we
explore a small additional effect due time evolution of the structures. We
study the probability distributions of $\Delta\mu=\mu_{LCDM}-\mu_{SC}$ for
sources at different redshifts in various Swiss-cheese constructions, where the
light beams travel through a large number of randomly oriented holes with
random impact parameters. We find for $\Delta\mu$ the dispersions $0.004\le
\sigma_{\Delta\mu} \le 0.008$ mag for sources with redshifts $1.0\le z \le
1.5$, which are smaller than the intrinsic dispersion of, for example,
magnitudes of type Ia supernovae. The shapes of the distributions we obtain for
our Swiss-cheese constructions are peculiar in the sense that they are not
consistently skewed toward the demagnification side, as they are in analyses of
lensing in cosmological simulations, reflecting a limitation of these
constructions. This could be the result of requiring the continuity of
Einstein's equations throughout the overall spacetime patchwork, which imposes
the condition that compensating overdense shells must accompany the underdense
void regions in the holes. The possibility to explore other uses of these
constructions that could circumvent this limitation and lead to different
statistics remains open. (Abridged)
[79]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.6990 [pdf] - 1154778
The Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and its Impact on Weak Gravitational
Lensing in an Era of Precision Cosmology
Submitted: 2014-07-25, last modified: 2014-12-07
The wealth of incoming and future cosmological observations will allow us to
map out the structure and evolution of the observable universe to an
unprecedented level of precision. Among these observations is the weak
gravitational lensing of galaxies, e.g., cosmic shear that measures the minute
distortions of background galaxy images by intervening cosmic structure. Weak
lensing and cosmic shear promise to be a powerful probe of astrophysics and
cosmology, constraining models of dark energy, measuring the evolution of
structure in the universe, and testing theories of gravity on cosmic scales.
However, the intrinsic alignment of galaxies -- their shape and orientation
before being lensed -- may pose a great challenge to the use of weak
gravitational lensing as an accurate cosmological probe, and has been
identified as one of the primary physical systematic biases in cosmic shear
studies. Correlations between this intrinsic alignment and the lensing signal
can persist even for large physical separations, and isolating the effect of
intrinsic alignment from weak lensing is not trivial. A great deal of work in
the last two decades has been devoted to understanding and characterizing this
intrinsic alignment, which is also a direct and complementary probe of
structure formation and evolution in its own right. In this review, we report
in a systematic way the state of our understanding of the intrinsic alignment
of galaxies, with a particular emphasis on its large-scale impact on weak
lensing measurements and methods for its isolation or mitigation. (Abridged)
[80]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.5936 [pdf] - 1201832
The effects of structure anisotropy on lensing observables in an exact
general relativistic setting for precision cosmology
Submitted: 2013-11-22, last modified: 2014-04-09
The study of relativistic, higher order and nonlinear effects has become
necessary in recent years in the pursuit of precision cosmology. We develop and
apply here a framework to study gravitational lensing in exact models in
general relativity that are not restricted to homogeneity and isotropy, and
where full nonlinearity and relativistic effects are included. We apply the
framework to a specific, anisotropic galaxy cluster model which is based on a
modified NFW halo density profile and described by the Szekeres metric. We
examine the effects of increasing levels of anisotropy in the galaxy cluster on
lensing observables like the convergence and shear for various lensing
geometries, finding a strong nonlinear response in both the convergence and
shear for rays passing through anisotropic regions of the cluster. Deviation
from the expected values in a spherically symmetric structure are asymmetric
with respect to path direction and thus will persist as a statistical effect
when averaged over some ensemble of such clusters. The resulting relative
difference in various geometries can be as large as approximately 2%, 8%, and
24% in the measure of convergence for levels of anisotropy of 5%, 10%, and 15%,
respectively, as a fraction of total cluster mass. For the total magnitude of
shear, the relative difference can grow near the center of the structure to be
as large as 15%, 32%, and 44% for the same levels of anisotropy, averaged over
the two extreme geometries. The convergence is impacted most strongly for rays
which pass in directions along the axis of maximum dipole anisotropy in the
structure, while the shear is most strongly impacted for rays which pass in
directions orthogonal to this axis, as expected. These effects due to
anisotropic structures will affect lensing measurements and must be fully
examined in an era of precision cosmology.
[81]
oai:arXiv.org:1401.7051 [pdf] - 1203018
Cross-correlation between cosmic microwave background lensing and galaxy
intrinsic alignment as a contaminant to gravitational lensing
cross-correlated probes of the universe
Submitted: 2014-01-27, last modified: 2014-04-09
We introduce here a cross-correlation term between CMB lensing and galaxy
intrinsic alignment, noted hereby as $\phi I$. This effect acts as a
contaminant to the cross-correlation between CMB lensing and galaxy lensing.
The latter cross-correlation has recently been detected for the first time, and
measurements will greatly improve as the area of overlap between galaxy and CMB
surveys increases and measurements of the CMB polarization become more
significant. This will constitute a powerful probe for studying the structure
and evolution of the universe. The magnitude of the $\phi I$ term is found to
be about 15% of the pure CMB lensing-galaxy lensing component and acts to
reduce the magnitude of its measured spectrum. This offset in the spectrum will
strongly impact its use for precision cosmological study if left unmitigated.
We also propose here a method to calibrate this $\phi I$ contamination through
use of a scaling relation that allows one to reduce the impact of $\phi I$ by a
factor of 20 or more in all redshift bins, which would reduce its magnitude
down to detection limits in almost all cases. This will allow the full use of
this probe for precision cosmology.
[82]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.5651 [pdf] - 1201812
Effects of anisotropy on gravitational infall in galaxy clusters using
an exact general relativistic model
Submitted: 2013-11-21, last modified: 2014-01-27
We study the effects and implications of anisotropies at the scale of galaxy
clusters by building an exact general relativistic model of a cluster using the
inhomogeneous and anisotropic Szekeres metric. The model is built from a
modified Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) density profile. We compare this to a
corresponding spherically symmetric structure in the Lemaitre-Tolman (LT) model
and quantify the impact of introducing varying levels of anisotropy. We examine
two physical measures of gravitational infall -- the growth rate of density and
the velocity of the source dust in the model. We introduce a generalization of
the LT dust velocity profile for the Szekeres metric and demonstrate its
consistency with the growth rate of density. We find that the growth rate of
density in one substructure increases by 0.5%, 1.5%, and 3.75% for 5%, 10%, and
15% levels of introduced anisotropy, which is measured as the fractional
displaced mass relative to the spherically symmetric case. The infall velocity
of the dust is found to increase by 2.5, 10, and 20 km/s (0.5%, 2%, and 4.5%),
respectively, for the same three levels of anisotropy. This response to the
anisotropy in a structure is found to be strongly nonlinear with respect to the
strength of anisotropy. These relative velocities correspond to an equivalent
increase in the total mass of the spherically symmetric structure of 1%, 3.8%,
and 8.4%, indicating that not accounting for the presence of anisotropic mass
distributions in cluster models can strongly bias the determination of physical
properties like the total mass.
[83]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.0723 [pdf] - 1172437
Stringent Restriction from the Growth of Large-Scale Structure on
Apparent Acceleration in Inhomogeneous Cosmological Models
Submitted: 2013-07-02, last modified: 2014-01-27
Probes of cosmic expansion constitute the main basis for arguments to support
or refute a possible apparent acceleration due to different expansion rates in
the universe as described by inhomogeneous cosmological models. We present in
this Letter a separate argument based on results from an analysis of the growth
rate of large-scale structure in the universe as modeled by the inhomogeneous
cosmological models of Szekeres. We use the models with no assumptions of
spherical or axial symmetries. We find that while the Szekeres models can fit
very well the observed expansion history without a $\Lambda$, they fail to
produce the observed late-time suppression in the growth unless $\Lambda$ is
added to the dynamics. A simultaneous fit to the supernova and growth factor
data shows that the cold dark matter model with a cosmological constant
($\Lambda$CDM) provides consistency with the data at a confidence level of
99.65% while the Szekeres model without $\Lambda$ achieves only a 60.46% level.
When the data sets are considered separately, the Szekeres with no $\Lambda$
fits the supernova data as well as the $\Lambda$CDM does, but provides a very
poor fit to the growth data with only 31.31% consistency level compared to
99.99% for the $\Lambda$CDM. This absence of late-time growth suppression in
inhomogeneous models without a $\Lambda$ is consolidated by a physical
explanation.
[84]
oai:arXiv.org:1212.2298 [pdf] - 1158414
Large-scale growth evolution in the Szekeres inhomogeneous cosmological
models with comparison to growth data
Submitted: 2012-12-10
We use the Szekeres inhomogeneous cosmological models to study the growth of
large-scale structure in the universe including nonzero spatial curvature and a
cosmological constant. In particular, we use the Goode and Wainwright
formulation, as in this form the models can be considered to represent exact
nonlinear perturbations of an averaged background. We identify a density
contrast in both classes I and II of the models, for which we derive growth
evolution equations. By including Lambda, the time evolution of the density
contrast as well as kinematic quantities can be tracked through the matter- and
Lambda-dominated cosmic eras up to the present and into the future. In various
models of class I and class II, the growth rate is found to be stronger than
that of the LCDM cosmology, and it is suppressed at later times due to the
presence of Lambda. We find that there are Szekeres models able to provide a
growth history similar to that of LCDM while requiring less matter content and
nonzero curvature, which speaks to the importance of including the effects of
large-scale inhomogeneities in analyzing the growth of large-scale structure.
Using data for the growth factor f from redshift space distortions and the
Lyman-alpha forest, we obtain best fit parameters for class II models and
compare their ability to match observations with LCDM. We find that there is
negligible difference between best fit Szekeres models with no priors and those
for LCDM, both including and excluding Lyman-alpha data. We also find that the
growth index gamma parametrization cannot be applied in a simple way to the
growth in Szekeres models, so a direct comparison of the function f to the data
is performed. We conclude that the Szekeres models can provide an exact
framework for the analysis of large-scale growth data that includes
inhomogeneities and allows for different interpretations of observations.
(abridged)
[85]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.1547 [pdf] - 1123218
Self-calibrating the gravitational shear-intrinsic ellipticity-intrinsic
ellipticity (GII) cross-correlation
Submitted: 2012-05-07, last modified: 2012-06-05
We extend the 3-point intrinsic alignment self-calibration technique to the
gravitational shear-intrinsic ellipticity-intrinsic ellipticity (GII)
bispectrum. The proposed technique will allow the measurement and removal of
the GII intrinsic alignment contamination from the cross-correlation weak
lensing signal. While significantly decreased from using cross-correlations
instead of auto-correlation in a single photo-z bin, the GII contamination
persists in adjacent photo-z bins and must be accounted for and removed from
the lensing signal. We relate the GII and galaxy density-intrinsic
ellipticity-intrinsic ellipticity (gII) bispectra through use of the galaxy
bias, and develop the estimator necessary to isolate the gII bispectrum from
observations. We find that the GII self-calibration technique performs at a
level comparable to that of the gravitational shear-gravitational
shear-intrinsic ellipticity correlation (GGI) self-calibration technique, with
measurement error introduced through the gII estimator generally negligible
when compared to minimum survey error. The accuracy of the relationship between
the GII and gII bispectra typically allows the GII self-calibration to reduce
the GII contamination by a factor of 10 or more for all adjacent photo-z bin
combinations at $\ell>300$. For larger scales, we find that the GII
contamination can be reduced by a factor of 3-5 or more. The GII
self-calibration technique is complementary to the existing GGI
self-calibration technique, which together will allow the total intrinsic
alignment cross-correlation signal in 3-point weak lensing to be measured and
removed.
[86]
oai:arXiv.org:1203.2138 [pdf] - 1117195
Self-Calibration for 3-point Intrinsic Alignment Auto-Correlations in
Weak Lensing Surveys
Submitted: 2012-03-09
The weak lensing signal (cosmic shear) has been shown to be strongly
contaminated by the various types of galaxy intrinsic alignment (IA)
correlations, which poses a barrier to precision weak lensing measurements. The
redshift dependence of the IA signal has been used at the 2-point level to
reduce this contamination by only measuring cross-correlations between large
redshift bins, which significantly reduces the galaxy intrinsic ellipticity -
intrinsic ellipticity (II) correlation. A self-calibration technique based on
the redshift dependences of the IA correlations has also been proposed as a
means to remove the 2-point IA contamination from the lensing signal. We
explore here the redshift dependences of the IA and lensing bispectra in order
to propose a self-calibration of the IA auto-correlations at the 3-point level
(i.e. GGI, GII, and III), which can be well understood without the assumption
of any particular IA model. We find that future weak lensing surveys will be
able to measure the distinctive IA redshift dependence over ranges of $|\Delta
z^P|\le 0.2$. Using conservative estimates of photo-z accuracy, we describe the
3-point self-calibration technique for the total IA signal, which can be
accomplished through lensing tomography of photo-z bin size $\sim 0.01$. We
find that the 3-point self-calibration can function at the accuracy of the
2-point technique with modest constraints in redshift separation. This allows
the 3-point IA auto-correlation self-calibration technique proposed here to
significantly reduce the contamination of the IA contamination to the weak
lensing bispectrum.
[87]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.4896 [pdf] - 1084321
Self-Calibration Technique for 3-point Intrinsic Alignment Correlations
in Weak Lensing Surveys
Submitted: 2011-09-22, last modified: 2011-12-23
The intrinsic alignment (IA) of galaxies has been shown to be a significant
barrier to precision cosmic shear measurements. (Zhang, 2010, ApJ, 720, 1090)
proposed a self-calibration technique for the power spectrum to calculate the
induced gravitational shear-galaxy intrinsic ellipticity correlation (GI) in
weak lensing surveys with photo-z measurements which is expected to reduce the
IA contamination by at least a factor of 10 for currently proposed surveys. We
confirm this using an independent analysis and propose an expansion to the
self-calibration technique for the bispectrum in order to calculate the
dominant IA gravitational shear-gravitational shear-intrinsic ellipticity
correlation (GGI) contamination. We first establish an estimator to extract the
galaxy density-density-intrinsic ellipticity (ggI) correlation from the galaxy
ellipticity-density-density measurement for a photo-z galaxy sample. We then
develop a relation between the GGI and ggI bispectra, which allows for the
estimation and removal of the GGI correlation from the cosmic shear signal. We
explore the performance of these two methods, compare to other possible sources
of error, and show that the GGI self-calibration technique can potentially
reduce the IA contamination by up to a factor of 5-10 for all but a few bin
choices, thus reducing the contamination to the percent level. The
self-calibration is less accurate for adjacent bins, but still allows for a
factor of three reduction in the IA contamination. The self-calibration thus
promises to be an efficient technique to isolate both the 2-point and 3-point
intrinsic alignment signals from weak lensing measurements.
[88]
oai:arXiv.org:0712.2436 [pdf] - 8148
Comparative Direct Analysis of Type Ia Supernova Spectra. IV.
Postmaximum
Submitted: 2007-12-14
A comparative study of optical spectra of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia)
obtained near 1 week, 3 weeks, and 3 months after maximum light is presented.
Most members of the four groups that were defined on the basis of maximum light
spectra in Paper II (core normal, broad line, cool, and shallow silicon)
develop highly homogeneous postmaximum spectra, although there are interesting
exceptions. Comparisons with SYNOW synthetic spectra show that most of the
spectral features can be accounted for in a plausible way. The fits show that 3
months after maximum light, when SN Ia spectra are often said to be in the
nebular phase and to consist of forbidden emission lines, the spectra actually
remain dominated by resonance scattering features of permitted lines, primarily
those of Fe II. Even in SN 1991bg, which is said to have made a very early
transition to the nebular phase, there is no need to appeal to forbidden lines
at 3 weeks postmaximum, and at 3 months postmaximum the only clear
identification of a forbidden line is [Ca II] 7291, 7324. Recent studies of SN
Ia rates indicate that most of the SNe Ia that have ever occurred have been
"prompt" SNe Ia, produced by young (100,000,000 yr) stellar populations, while
most of the SNe Ia that occur at low redshift today are "tardy", produced by an
older (several Gyrs) population. We suggest that the shallow silicon SNe Ia
tend to be the prompt ones.
[89]
oai:arXiv.org:0706.0081 [pdf] - 1806
Comparative Direct Analysis of Type Ia Supernova Spectra. III.
Premaximum
Branch, David;
Troxel, M. A.;
Jeffery, David J.;
Hatano, Kazuhito;
Musco, Miriam;
Parrent, Jerod;
Baron, E.;
Dang, Leann Chau;
Casebeer, D.;
Hall, Nicholas;
Ketchum, Wesley
Submitted: 2007-06-01
A comparative study of spectra of 21 Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) obtained
about one week before maximum light, and 8 spectra obtained 11 or more days
before maximum, is presented. To a large extent the premaximum spectra exhibit
the defining characteristics of the four groups defined in Paper II
(core-normal, broad-line, cool, and shallow-silicon). Comparisons with SYNOW
synthetic spectra show that all strong features and most weak ones can be
accounted for in a plausible way. The issues of detached high-velocity
features, the possible ubiquity of carbon clumps, the maximum detectable ejecta
velocities, and the possibility of blueshifted emission-line peaks are
discussed.
[90]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0701198 [pdf] - 88327
Direct Analysis of Spectra of the Unusual Type Ib Supernova 2005bf
Submitted: 2007-01-08
Synthetic spectra generated with the parameterized supernova
synthetic-spectrum code SYNOW are compared to spectra of the unusual Type Ib
supernova 2005bf. We confirm the discovery by Folatelli et al. (2006) that very
early spectra (about 30 days before maximum light) contain both
photospheric-velocity (8000 km/s) features of He I, Ca II, and Fe II, and
detached high-velocity (14,000 km/s) features of H-alpha, Ca II, and Fe II. An
early spectrum of SN 2005bf is an almost perfect match to a near-maximum-light
spectrum of the Type Ib SN 1999ex. Although these two spectra were at very
different times with respect to maximum light (20 days before maximum for SN
2005bf and five days after for SN 1999ex), they were for similar times after
explosion - about 20 days for SN 2005bf and 24 days for SN 1999ex. The almost
perfect match clinches the previously suggested identification of H-alpha in SN
1999ex and supports the proposition that many if not all Type Ib supernovae
eject a small amount of hydrogen. The earliest available spectrum of SN 2005bf
resembles a near-maximum-light spectrum of the Type Ic SN 1994I. These two
spectra also were at different times with respect to maximum light (32 days
before maximum for SN 2005bf and four days before for SN 1994I) but at similar
times after explosion - about eight days for SN 2005bf and 10 days for SN
1994I. The resemblance motivates us to consider a reinterpretation of the
spectra of Type Ic supernovae, involving coexisting photospheric-velocity and
high-velocity features. The implications of our results for the geometry of the
SN 2005bf ejecta, which has been suggested to be grossly asymmetric, are
briefly discussed.
[91]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0601048 [pdf] - 78906
Comparative Direct Analysis of Type Ia Supernova Spectra. II. Maximum
Light
Branch, David;
Dang, Leeann Chau;
Hall, Nicholas;
Ketchum, Wesley;
Melakayil, Mercy;
Parrent, Jerod;
Troxel, M. A.;
Casebeer, D.;
Jeffery, David J.;
Baron, E.
Submitted: 2006-01-03
A comparative study of near-maximum-light optical spectra of 24 Type Ia
supernovae (SNe Ia) is presented. The spectra are quantified in two ways, and
assigned to four groups. Seven "core-normal" SNe Ia have very similar spectra,
except for strong high-velocity CaII absorption in SN 2001el. Seven SNe Ia are
assigned to a "broad-line" group, the most extreme of which is SN 1984A. Five
SNe Ia, including SN 1991bg, are assigned to a "cool" group. Five SNe Ia,
including SN 1991T, are assigned to a "shallow-silicon" group. Comparisons with
SYNOW synthetic spectra provide a basis for discussion of line identifications,
and an internally consistent quantification of the maximum-light spectroscopic
diversity among SNe Ia. The extent to which SN Ia maximum-light spectra appear
to have a continuous distribution of properties, rather than consisting of
discrete subtypes, is discussed.
