Normalized to: Trigo, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.03017 [pdf] - 1725052
A Curious History of Sunspot Penumbrae: An Update
Submitted: 2018-07-09
The ratio of penumbral to umbral area of sunspots is an important topic for
solar and geophysical studies. Hathaway (Solar Physics, 286, 347, 2013) found a
curious behaviour in this parameter for small sunspot groups (areas smaller
than 100 millionths of solar hemisphere, msh) using records from Royal
Greenwich Observatory (RGO). Hathaway showed that penumbra-umbra ratio
decreased smoothly from more than 7 in 1905 to lower than 3 by 1930 and then
increased to almost 8 in 1961. Thus, Hathaway proposed the existence of a
secular variation in the penumbra-umbra area ratio. In order to confirm that
secular variation, we employ data of the sunspot catalogue published by the
Coimbra Astronomical Observatory (COI) for the period 1929-1941. Our results
disagree with the penumbra-umbra ratio found by Hathaway for that period.
However, the behaviour of this ratio for large (areas greater or equal than 100
msh) and small groups registered in COI during 1929-1941 is similar to data
available from RGO for the periods 1874-1914 and 1950-1976. Nevertheless, while
the average values and time evolution of the ratio in large groups is similar
to the ratio for small groups according to Coimbra data (1929-1941) it is not
analogous for RGO data for the same period. We also found that the behaviour of
the penumbra-umbra area ratio for smaller groups in both observatories is
significantly different. The main difference between the area measurements made
in Coimbra and RGO is associated with the umbra measurements. We would like to
stress that the two observatories used different methods of observation and
while in COI both methodology and instruments did not change during the study
period, some changes were carried out in RGO that could have affected
measurements of umbra and penumbra. These facts illustrate the importance of
the careful recovery of past solar data.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.06773 [pdf] - 1583619
Unusual rainbows as auroral candidates: another point of view
Submitted: 2017-05-18
Several auroral events that occurred in the past have not been catalogued as
such due to fact that they were described in the historical sources with
different terminology. Hayakawa et al. (2016) have reviewed historical oriental
chronicles and have proposed the terms "unusual rainbow" and "white rainbow" as
candidates to auroras. In this work, we present three events that took place in
the 18th century in two different settings (the Iberian Peninsula and Brazil)
that were originally described with similar definition/wording used by the
oriental chronicles, despite the inherent differences in terms associated to
oriental and Latin languages. We show that these terms are indeed applicable to
the three case studies from Europe and South America. Thus, the auroral
catalogues available can be extended for occidental sources with this new
terminology.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.1630 [pdf] - 1209989
Redefining the limit dates for the Maunder Minimum
Submitted: 2014-06-06
The Maunder Minimum corresponds to a prolonged minimum of solar activity a
phenomenon that is of particular interest to many branches of natural and
social sciences commonly considered to extend from 1645 until 1715. However,
our knowledge of past solar activity has improved significantly in recent years
and, thus, more precise dates for the onset and termination of this
particularly episode of our Sun can be established. Based on the simultaneous
analysis of distinct proxies we propose a redefinition of the Maunder Minimum
period with the core "Deep Maunder Minimum" spanning from 1645 to 1700 (that
corresponds to the Grand Minimum state) and a wider "Extended Maunder Minimum"
for the longer period 1618-1723 that includes the transition periods.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.2725 [pdf] - 1172621
Revised Group Sunspot Number for 1640, 1652, and 1741
Submitted: 2013-07-10
Some studies have shown that our knowledge on solar activity in the years
1640, 1652, and 1741 can be improved. In this contribution, we revise the
annual group sunspot numbers for these years from original observations. For
the years 1640, 1652 and 1741, we have obtained the corrected values 15.2, 1.8,
and 27.3, respectively (instead of the original values 15.0, 4.0, and 57.7).
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.6661 [pdf] - 1171645
Forty two years counting spots: solar observations by D. E. Hadden
during 1890-1931 revisited
Submitted: 2013-05-28
We have recovered the sunspot observations made by David E. Hadden during
1890-1931 from Alta, Iowa. We have digitized the available data published by
Hadden in different astronomical journals. This data series have been analyzed
and compared with the standard sunspot number series. Moreover, we provide
additional information on two great sunspot groups, previously not described,
that originated two important extreme episodes of space weather on February
1892 and September 1898.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1203.1073 [pdf] - 1117085
A Note on Solar Cycle Length during the Medieval Climate Anomaly
Submitted: 2012-03-05
The growing interest in the "Medieval Climate Anomaly" (MCA) and its possible
link to anomalous solar activity has prompted new reconstructions of solar
activity based on cosmogenic radionuclides. These proxies however do not
sufficiently constrain the Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) range, and are often
defined at low temporal resolution, inadequate to infer the solar cycle length
(SCL). We have reconstructed the SCL (average duration of 10.72 \pm 0.20 years)
during the MCA using observations of naked-eye sunspot and aurora sightings.
Thus, solar activity was most probably not exceptionally intense, supporting
the view that internal variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system was
the main driver of MCA.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1111.2633 [pdf] - 1091577
A Simple Method to Check the Reliability of Annual Sunspot Number in the
Historical Period 1610-1847
Submitted: 2011-11-10
A simple method to detect inconsistencies in low annual sunspot numbers based
on the relationship between these values and the annual number of active days
is described. The analysis allowed for the detection of problems in the annual
sunspot number series clustered in a few specific periods and unambiguous,
namely: i) before Maunder minimum, ii) the year 1652 during the Maunder
minimum, iii) the year 1741 in Solar Cycle -1, and iv) the so-called "lost"
solar cycle in 1790s and subsequent onset of the Dalton Minimum.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.2578 [pdf] - 902409
155-day Periodicity in Solar Cycles 3 and 4
Submitted: 2009-11-13
The near 155 days solar periodicity, so called Rieger periodicity, was first
detected in solar flares data and later confirmed with other important solar
indices. Unfortunately, a comprehensive analysis on the occurrence of this
periodicity during previous centuries can be further complicated due to the
poor quality of the sunspot number time-series. We try to detect the Rieger
periodicity during the solar cycles 3 and 4 using information on aurorae
observed at mid and low latitudes. We use two recently discovered aurora
datasets, observed in the last quarter of the 18th century from UK and Spain.
Besides simple histograms of time between consecutive events we analyse monthly
series of number of aurorae observed using different spectral analysis (MTM and
Wavelets). The histograms show the probable presence of Rieger periodicity
during cycles 3 and 4. However different spectral analysis applied has only
confirmed undoubtedly this hypothesis for solar cycle 3.