Trentini, S.
Normalized to: Trentini, S.
2 article(s) in total. 6 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9610108 [pdf] - 95632
The optical variability of QSOs. II. The wavelength dependence
Submitted: 1996-10-15
The long-term variability of a sample of 149 optically selected QSOs in the
field of the Selected Area 94 has been studied in the R-band. The relations
between variability and luminosity and between variability and redshift have
been investigated by means of ``robust'' statistical estimators, allowing to
disentangle the effects of the measurement errors. The results are compared
with the corresponding properties of the variability in the B-band for the same
sample. An anti-correlation between the R-band variability and the intrinsic
luminosity is found, analogously to what is observed in the B-band. The
amplitude of the R-band variability turns out to be smaller (of a factor $1.13
\pm 0.05$) than the B-band variability. The implications in terms of the
black-hole, starburst and microlensing models are discussed.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9506140 [pdf] - 92930
The Optical Variability of QSO's
Submitted: 1995-06-30
The long-term variability of a sample of 486 optically selected QSOs in the
fields of the SA94, SA57 and SGP has been studied. The relations of variability
with luminosity and redshift have been investigated by means of statistical
estimators that are ``robust'' and allow at the same time to eliminate the
influence of the measurement errors. The analysis in the QSOs rest frame of
both the ensemble structure function ($SF$) and individual variability indices
show: 1) a negative correlation between variability and luminosity; 2) a
significant positive correlation between variability and $z$; 3) such
correlations may be equally well parameterized either with a model in which the
timescale of the variability is fixed for all the QSOs ($\tau \sim 2.4$ yr),
while the amplitude linearly increases with the absolute magnitude and $z$, or
with a model in which the timescale of the variability linearly depends on the
absolute magnitude and the amplitude is only a function of $z$. The same
analysis carried out in the observer's frame shows: 1) a negative correlation
between variability and luminosity; 2) the timescale of variability does not
depend significantly either on the absolute magnitude or on $z$; 3) the
ensemble structure function is well represented by a parameterization in which,
with a fixed timescale of about 5.5 yr, the amplitude linearly increases with
the absolute magnitude; 4) although the general behaviour of the $SF$ does not
show a systematic variation of the timescale and/or amplitude with $z$, if we
examine the average variability index for objects with $-25>M_B>-27$, we find
that below $z=1$ QSOs are significantly less variable than at higher redshift.
Implications in terms of the black-hole, starburst and microlensing models are
briefly discussed.