Normalized to: Tregon, B.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.3647 [pdf] - 1166676
Instrumental Methods for Professional and Amateur Collaborations in
Planetary Astronomy
Mousis, O.;
Hueso, R.;
Beaulieu, J. -P.;
Bouley, S.;
Carry, B.;
Colas, F.;
Klotz, A.;
Pellier, C.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Rousselot, P.;
Dib, M. Ali;
Beisker, W.;
Birlan, M.;
Buil, C.;
Delsanti, A.;
Frappa, E.;
Hammel, H. B.;
Levasseur-Regourd, A. -C.;
Orton, G. S.;
Sanchez-Lavega, A.;
Santerne, A.;
Tanga, P.;
Vaubaillon, J.;
Zanda, B.;
Baratoux, D.;
Boehm, T.;
Boudon, V.;
Bouquet, A.;
Buzzi, L.;
Dauvergne, J. -L.;
Decock, A.;
Delcroix, M.;
Drossart, P.;
Esseiva, N.;
Fischer, G.;
Fletcher, L. N.;
Foglia, S.;
Gomez-Forrellad, J. M.;
Guarro-Flo, J.;
Herald, D.;
Jehin, E.;
Kugel, F.;
Lebreton, J. -P.;
Lecacheux, J.;
Leroy, A.;
Maquet, L.;
Masi, G.;
Maury, A.;
Meyer, F.;
Pérez-Hoyos, S.;
Rajpurohit, A. S.;
Rinner, C.;
Rogers, J. H.;
Roques, F.;
Schmude,, R. W.;
Sicardy, B.;
Tregon, B.;
Vanhuysse, M.;
Wesley, A.;
Widemann, T.
Submitted: 2013-05-15, last modified: 2014-03-04
Amateur contributions to professional publications have increased
exponentially over the last decades in the field of Planetary Astronomy. Here
we review the different domains of the field in which collaborations between
professional and amateur astronomers are effective and regularly lead to
scientific publications. We discuss the instruments, detectors, softwares and
methodologies typically used by amateur astronomers to collect the scientific
data in the different domains of interest. Amateur contributions to the
monitoring of planets and interplanetary matter, characterization of asteroids
and comets, as well as the determination of the physical properties of Kuiper
Belt Objects and exoplanets are discussed.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.6943 [pdf] - 620042
Asteroids' physical models from combined dense and sparse photometry and
scaling of the YORP effect by the observed obliquity distribution
Hanuš, J.;
Ďurech, J.;
Brož, M.;
Marciniak, A.;
Warner, B. D.;
Pilcher, F.;
Stephens, R.;
Behrend, R.;
Carry, B.;
Čapek, D.;
Antonini, P.;
Audejean, M.;
Augustesen, K.;
Barbotin, E.;
Baudouin, P.;
Bayol, A.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Borczyk, W.;
Bosch, J. -G.;
Brochard, E.;
Brunetto, L.;
Casulli, S.;
Cazenave, A.;
Charbonnel, S.;
Christophe, B.;
Colas, F.;
Coloma, J.;
Conjat, M.;
Cooney, W.;
Correira, H.;
Cotrez, V.;
Coupier, A.;
Crippa, R.;
Cristofanelli, M.;
Dalmas, Ch.;
Danavaro, C.;
Demeautis, C.;
Droege, T.;
Durkee, R.;
Esseiva, N.;
Esteban, M.;
Fagas, M.;
Farroni, G.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Del Freo, F.;
Garcia, L.;
Geier, S.;
Godon, C.;
Grangeon, K.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Heck, N.;
Hellmich, S.;
Higgins, D.;
Hirsch, R.;
Husarik, M.;
Itkonen, T.;
Jade, O.;
Kamiński, K.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Klotz, A.;
Koff, R. A.;
Kryszczyńska, A.;
Kwiatkowski, T.;
Laffont, A.;
Leroy, A.;
Lecacheux, J.;
Leonie, Y.;
Leyrat, C.;
Manzini, F.;
Martin, A.;
Masi, G.;
Matter, D.;
Michałowski, J.;
Michałowski, M. J.;
Michałowski, T.;
Michelet, J.;
Michelsen, R.;
Morelle, E.;
Mottola, S.;
Naves, R.;
Nomen, J.;
Oey, J.;
Ogloza, W.;
Oksanen, A.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Pääkkönen, P.;
Paiella, M.;
Pallares, H.;
Paulo, J.;
Pavic, M.;
Payet, B.;
Polińska, M.;
Polishook, D.;
Poncy, R.;
Revaz, Y.;
Rinner, C.;
Rocca, M.;
Roche, A.;
Romeuf, D.;
Roy, R.;
Saguin, H.;
Salom, P. A.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santacana, G.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sareyan, J. -P.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Sposetti, S.;
Starkey, D.;
Stoss, R.;
Strajnic, J.;
Teng, J. -P.;
Tregon, B.;
Vagnozzi, A.;
Velichko, F. P.;
Waelchli, N.;
Wagrez, K.;
Wücher, H.
Submitted: 2013-01-29
The larger number of models of asteroid shapes and their rotational states
derived by the lightcurve inversion give us better insight into both the nature
of individual objects and the whole asteroid population. With a larger
statistical sample we can study the physical properties of asteroid
populations, such as main-belt asteroids or individual asteroid families, in
more detail. Shape models can also be used in combination with other types of
observational data (IR, adaptive optics images, stellar occultations), e.g., to
determine sizes and thermal properties. We use all available photometric data
of asteroids to derive their physical models by the lightcurve inversion method
and compare the observed pole latitude distributions of all asteroids with
known convex shape models with the simulated pole latitude distributions. We
used classical dense photometric lightcurves from several sources and
sparse-in-time photometry from the U.S. Naval Observatory in Flagstaff,
Catalina Sky Survey, and La Palma surveys (IAU codes 689, 703, 950) in the
lightcurve inversion method to determine asteroid convex models and their
rotational states. We also extended a simple dynamical model for the spin
evolution of asteroids used in our previous paper. We present 119 new asteroid
models derived from combined dense and sparse-in-time photometry. We discuss
the reliability of asteroid shape models derived only from Catalina Sky Survey
data (IAU code 703) and present 20 such models. By using different values for a
scaling parameter cYORP (corresponds to the magnitude of the YORP momentum) in
the dynamical model for the spin evolution and by comparing synthetics and
observed pole-latitude distributions, we were able to constrain the typical
values of the cYORP parameter as between 0.05 and 0.6.