Torroni, V.
Normalized to: Torroni, V.
3 article(s) in total. 37 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 27,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9910235 [pdf] - 108789
BeppoSAX Observations of GRB980425: Detection of the Prompt Event and
Monitoring of the Error Box
Pian, E.;
Amati, L.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Butler, R. C.;
Costa, E.;
Cusumano, G.;
Danziger, J.;
Feroci, M.;
Fiore, F.;
Frontera, F.;
Giommi, P.;
Masetti, N.;
Muller, J. M.;
Nicastro, L.;
Oosterbroek, T.;
Orlandini, M.;
Owens, A.;
Palazzi, E.;
Parmar, A.;
Piro, L.;
Zand, J. J. M. in 't;
Castro-Tirado, A.;
Coletta, A.;
Fiume, D. Dal;
Del Sordo, S.;
Heise, J.;
Soffitta, P.;
Torroni, V.
Submitted: 1999-10-13
We present BeppoSAX follow-up observations of GRB980425 obtained with the
Narrow Field Instruments (NFI) in April, May, and November 1998. The first NFI
observation has detected within the 8' radius error box of the GRB an X-ray
source positionally consistent with the supernova 1998bw, which exploded within
a day of GRB980425, and a fainter X-ray source, not consistent with the
position of the supernova. The former source is detected in the following NFI
pointings and exhibits a decline of a factor of two in six months. If it is
associated with SN 1998bw, this is the first detection of X-ray emission from a
Type I supernova above 2 keV. The latter source exhibits only marginally
significant variability. The X-ray spectra and variability of the supernova are
compared with thermal and non-thermal models of supernova high energy emission.
Based on the BeppoSAX data, it is not possible to firmly establish which of the
two detected sources is the GRB X-ray counterpart, although probability
considerations favor the supernova.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9909204 [pdf] - 108240
The 0.1-100 keV spectral shape and variability of Mkn421 in high state
Malizia, A.;
Capalbi, M.;
Fiore, F.;
Giommi, P.;
Gandolfi, G.;
Tesseri, A.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Butler, R. C.;
Celidonio, G.;
Coletta, A.;
Di Ciolo, L.;
Muller, J. M.;
Piro, L.;
Rebecchi, S.;
Ricci, D.;
Ricci, R.;
Smith, M.;
Torroni, V.
Submitted: 1999-09-13
The results of a BeppoSAX TOO observation of the BL Lac object Mkn421 during
a high intensity state are reported and compared with monitoring X-ray data
collected with the BeppoSAX Wide Field Cameras (WFC) and the RXTE All Sky
Monitor(ASM). The 0.1-100 keV spectrum of Mkn421 shows continuous convex
curvature that can be interpreted as the high-energy end of the synchrotron
emission. The source shows significant short-term temporal and spectral
variability, which can be interpreted in terms of synchrotron cooling. The
comparison of our results with those of previous observations when the source
was a factor 3-5 fainter shows evidence for strong spectral variability, with
the maximum of the synchrotron power shifting to higher energy during high
states. This behaviour suggest an increase in the number of energetic electrons
during high states.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9903113 [pdf] - 105518
BeppoSAX Detection and Follow-up of GRB980425
Pian, E.;
Amati, L.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Butler, R. C.;
Costa, E.;
Cusumano, G.;
Danziger, J.;
Feroci, M.;
Fiore, F.;
Frontera, F.;
Giommi, P.;
Masetti, N.;
Muller, J. M.;
Oosterbroek, T.;
Owens, A.;
Palazzi, E.;
Piro, L.;
Castro-Tirado, A.;
Coletta, A.;
Fiume, D. Dal;
Del Sordo, S.;
Heise, J.;
Nicastro, L.;
Orlandini, M.;
Parmar, A.;
Soffitta, P.;
Torroni, V.;
Zand, J. J. M. in 't
Submitted: 1999-03-08, last modified: 1999-07-13
We present BeppoSAX GRBM and WFC light curves of GRB980425 and NFI follow-up
data taken in 1998 April, May, and November. The first NFI observation has
detected within the 8' radius error box of the GRB an X-ray source positionally
consistent with the supernova SN 1998bw, exploded within a day of GRB980425,
and a fainter X-ray source, not consistent with the position of the supernova.
The former source is detected in the following NFI pointings and exhibits a
decline of a factor of two in six months. If it is associated with SN 1998bw,
this is the first detection of hard X-ray emission from a Type I supernova. The
latter source exhibits only marginally significant variability. Based on these
data, it is not possible to select either source as a firm candidate for the
GRB counterpart.
