Normalized to: Torres-Orjuela, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.00721 [pdf] - 2084130
Phase shift of gravitational waves induced by aberration
Submitted: 2020-01-02, last modified: 2020-04-13
The velocity of a gravitational wave (GW) source provides crucial information
about its formation and evolution processes. Previous studies considered the
Doppler effect on the phase of GWs as a potential signature of a time-dependent
velocity of the source. However, the Doppler shift only accounts for the time
component of the wave vector, and in principle motion also affects the spatial
components. The latter effect, known as ``aberration'' for light, is analyzed
in this paper for GWs and applied to the waveform modeling of an accelerating
source. We show that the additional aberrational phase shift could be
detectable in two astrophysical scenarios, namely, a recoiling binary black
hole (BBH) due to GW radiation and a BBH in a triple system. Our results
suggest that adding the aberrational phase shift in the waveform templates
could significantly enhance the detectability of moving sources.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.09857 [pdf] - 2083979
Detecting the Beaming Effect of Gravitational Waves
Submitted: 2018-06-26, last modified: 2019-04-15
The models currently used in the detection of gravitational waves (GWs)
either do not consider a relative motion between the center-of-mass of the
source and the observer, or usually only consider its effect on the frequencies
of GWs. However, it is known for light waves that a relative motion not only
changes the frequencies but also the brightness of the source, the latter of
which is called the `beaming effect'. Here we investigate such an effect for
GWs and find that the observed amplitude of a GW signal, unlike the behavior of
light, is not a monotonic function of the relative velocity and responds
differently to the two GW polarizations. We attribute the difference to a
rotation of the wave-vector, as well as a reorientation of the GW
polarizations. We find that even for velocities as small as $0.25\%$ of the
speed of light, ignoring the aforementioned beaming effect could induce a
systematic error that is larger than the designated calibration accuracy of
LIGO. This error could lead to an incorrect estimation of the distance and
orbital inclination of a GW source, or result in a spurious signal that appears
to be incompatible with general relativity.