We introduce the DNNLikelihood, a novel framework to easily encode, through Deep Neural Networks (DNN), the full experimental information contained in complicated likelihood functions (LFs). We show how to efficiently parametrise the LF, treated as a multivariate function of parameters and nuisance parameters with high dimensionality, as an interpolating function in the form of a DNN predictor. We do not use any Gaussian approximation or dimensionality reduction, such as marginalisation or profiling over nuisance parameters, so that the full experimental information is retained. The procedure applies to both binned and unbinned LFs, and allows for an efficient distribution to multiple software platforms, e.g. through the framework-independent ONNX model format. The distributed DNNLikelihood can be used for different use cases, such as re-sampling through Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques, possibly with custom priors, combination with other LFs, when the correlations among parameters are known, and re-interpretation within different statistical approaches, i.e. Bayesian vs frequentist. We discuss the accuracy of our proposal and its relations with other approximation techniques and likelihood distribution frameworks. As an example, we apply our procedure to a pseudo-experiment corresponding to a realistic LHC search for new physics already considered in the literature.

We propose measures of the impact of research that improve on existing ones such as counting of number of papers, citations and $h$-index. Since different papers and different fields have largely different average number of co-authors and of references we replace citations with individual citations, shared among co-authors. Next, we improve on citation counting applying the PageRank algorithm to citations among papers. Being time-ordered, this reduces to a weighted counting of citation descendants that we call PaperRank. Similarly, we compute an AuthorRank applying the PageRank algorithm to citations among authors. These metrics quantify the impact of an author or paper taking into account the impact of those authors that cite it. Finally, we show how self- and circular- citations can be eliminated by defining a closed market of citation-coins. We apply these metrics to the InSpire database that covers fundamental physics, ranking papers, authors, journals, institutes, towns, countries, continents, genders, for all-time and in recent time periods.