Normalized to: Tomin, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0811.3123 [pdf] - 18695
Mean-field dynamos in random Arnold-Beltrami-Childress and Roberts flows
Submitted: 2008-11-19, last modified: 2009-05-11
We study magnetic field evolution in flows with fluctuating in time governing
parameters in electrically conducting fluid. We use a standard mean-field
approach to derive equations for large-scale magnetic field for the fluctuating
ABC-flow as well as for the fluctuating Roberts flow. The derived mean-field
dynamo equations have growing solutions with growth rate of the large-scale
magnetic field which is not controlled by molecular magnetic diffusivity. Our
study confirms the Zeldovich idea that the nonstationarity of the fluid flow
may remove the obstacle in large-scale dynamo action of classic stationary
flows.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0802.3668 [pdf] - 10390
Current Helicity and Twist as Two Indicators of The Mirror Asymmetry of
solar Magnetic Fields
Submitted: 2008-02-25
A comparison between the two tracers of magnetic field mirror asymmetry in
solar active regions, twist and current helicity, is presented. It is shown
that for individual active regions these tracers do not possess visible
similarity while averaging by time over the solar cycle, or by latitude,
reveals similarities in their behaviour. The main property of the dataset is
anti-symmetry over the solar equator. Considering the evolution of helical
properties over the solar cycle we find signatures of a possible sign change at
the beginning of the cycle, though more systematic observational data are
required for a definite confirmation. We discuss the role of both tracers in
the context of the solar dynamo theory.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0603242 [pdf] - 80451
The distribution of current helicity at the solar surface at the
beginning of the solar cycle
Submitted: 2006-03-09
A fraction of solar active regions are observed to have current helicity of a
sign that contradicts the polarity law for magnetic helicity; this law
corresponds to the well-known Hale polarity law for sunspots. A significant
excess of active regions with the "wrong" sign of helicity is seen to occur
just at the beginning of the cycle. We compare these observations with
predictions from a dynamo model based on principles of helicity conservation,
discussed by Zhang et al. (2006). This model seems capable of explaining only a
fraction of the regions with the wrong sign of the helicity. We attribute the
remaining excess to additional current helicity production from the twisting of
rising magnetic flux tubes, as suggested by Choudhuri et al. (2004). We
estimate the relative contributions of this effect and that connected with the
model based on magnetic helicity conservation.