sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Toliou, Athanasia

Normalized to: Toliou, A.

3 article(s) in total. 6 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1912.09118  [pdf] - 2017805
Secular resonance sweeping and orbital excitation in decaying disks
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-12-19
We revisit the problem of secular resonance sweeping during the dissipation of a protoplanetary disk and its possible role in exciting the orbits of primordial asteroids, in the light of recent models of solar system evolution. We develop an integrator that incorporates the gravitational effect of a uniformly (or not) depleting, axisymmetric disk with arbitrary surface density profile; its performance is verified by analytical calculations. The secular response of fictitious asteroids, under perturbations from Jupiter, Saturn and a decaying disk, is thoroughly studied. Note that the existence of a symmetry plane induced by the disk, lifts the inherent degeneracy of the two-planet system, such that the '$s_5$' nodal frequency can also play a major role. We examine different resonant configurations for the planets (2:1, 3:2, 5:3), disk models and depletion scenarios. For every case we compute the corresponding time paths of secular resonances, which show when and where resonance crossing occurs. The excitation of asteroids, particularly in inclination, is studied in the various models and compared to analytical estimates. We find that inclination excitation in excess of $\sim 10^{\circ}$ is possible in the asteroid belt, but the nearly uniform spread of $\Delta i\sim 20^{\circ}$ observed calls for the combined action of secular resonance sweeping with other mechanisms (e.g. scattering by Mars-sized embryos) that would be operating during terrestrial planet formation. Our results are also applicable to extrasolar planetary systems.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1611.02604  [pdf] - 1532502
How primordial is the structure of comet 67P/C-G? Combined collisional and dynamical models suggest a late formation
Comments: Astronomy & Astrophysics, accepted pending minor revisions
Submitted: 2016-11-08
There is an active debate about whether the properties of comets as observed today are primordial or, alternatively, if they are a result of collisional evolution or other processes. We investigate the effects of collisions on a comet with a structure like 67P/C-G. We develop scaling laws for the critical specific impact energies required for a significant shape alteration. These are then used in simulations of the combined dynamical and collisional evolution of comets in order to study the survival probability of a primordially formed object with a shape like 67P/C-G. The effects of impacts on comet 67P/C-G are studied using a SPH shock physics code. The resulting critical specific impact energy defines a minimal projectile size which is used to compute the number of shape-changing collisions in a set of dynamical simulations. These simulations follow the dispersion of the trans-Neptunian disk during the giant planet instability, the formation of a scattered disk, and produce 87 objects that penetrate into the inner solar system with orbits consistent with the observed JFC population. The collisional evolution before the giant planet instability is not considered here. Hence, our study is conservative in its estimation of the number of collisions. We find that in any scenario considered here, comet 67P/C-G would have experienced a significant number of shape-changing collisions, if it formed primordially. This is also the case for generic bi-lobe shapes. Our study also shows that impact heating is very localized and that collisionally processed bodies can still have a high porosity. Our study indicates that the observed bi-lobe structure of comet 67P/C-G may not be primordial, but might have originated in a rather recent event, possibly within the last 1 Gy. This may be the case for any kilometer-sized two-component cometary nuclei.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1606.04330  [pdf] - 1447802
Magnitude and timing of the giant planet instability: A reassessment from the perspective of the asteroid belt
Comments:
Submitted: 2016-06-14
It is generally accepted today that our solar system has undergone a phase during which the orbits of the giant planets became very unstable. In recent years, many studies have identified traces of this event and have provided reasonable justification for this occurrence. The magnitude (in terms of orbital variation) and the timing of the instability though (early or late with respect to the dispersal of the gas disk) still remains an open debate. The terrestrial planets seem to set a strict constraint: either the giant planet instability happened early, while the terrestrial planets were still forming, or the orbits of Jupiter and Saturn had to separate from each other impulsively, with a large enough `jump' in semimajor axis (Brasser et al. 2009; Kaib and Chambers 2016) for the terrestrial planets to remain stable. Because a large orbital jump is a low probability event, the early instability hypothesis seems to be favored. However, the asteroid belt would also evolve in a different way, assuming different instability amplitudes. These two constraints need to match each other in order to favor one scenario over the other. Considering an initially dynamically cold disk of asteroids, Morbidelli et al. (2010) concluded that a comparably large jump is needed to reconstruct the current asteroid belt. Here we confirm the same conclusion, but considering an asteroid population already strongly excited in eccentricity, such as that produced in the Grand Tack scenario (Walsh et al. 2011). Because the asteroids existed since the time of removal of the gas disk, unlike the terrestrial planets, this constraint on the width of the giant planet jump is valid regardless of whether the instability happened early or late. Hence, at this stage, assuming an early instability does not appear to provide any advantage in terms of the probabilistic reconstruction of the solar system structure.