Normalized to: Tinto, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.12739 [pdf] - 2056402
The Case for Probe-class NASA Astrophysics Missions
Elvis, Martin;
Arenberg, Jon;
Ballantyne, David;
Bautz, Mark;
Beichman, Charles;
Booth, Jeffrey;
Buckley, James;
Burns, Jack O.;
Camp, Jordan;
Conti, Alberto;
Cooray, Asantha;
Danchi, William;
Delabrouille, Jacques;
De Zotti, Gianfranco;
Flauger, Raphael;
Glenn, Jason;
Grindlay, Jonathan;
Hanany, Shaul;
Hartmann, Dieter;
Helou, George;
Herranz, Diego;
Hubmayr, Johannes;
Johnson, Bradley R.;
Jones, William;
Kasdin, N. Jeremy;
Kouvoliotou, Chryssa;
Kunze, Kerstin E.;
Lawrence, Charles;
Lazio, Joseph;
Lipscy, Sarah;
Lillie, Charles F.;
Maccarone, Tom;
Madsen, Kristin C.;
Mushotzky, Richard;
Olinto, Angela;
Plavchan, Peter;
Pogosian, Levon;
Ptak, Andrew;
Ray, Paul;
Rocha, Graca M.;
Scowen, Paul;
Seager, Sara;
Tinto, Massimo;
Tomsick, John;
Tucker, Gregory.;
Ulmer, Mel;
Wang, Yun;
Wollack, Edward J.
Submitted: 2020-02-12
Astrophysics spans an enormous range of questions on scales from individual
planets to the entire cosmos. To address the richness of 21st century
astrophysics requires a corresponding richness of telescopes spanning all bands
and all messengers. Much scientific benefit comes from having the
multi-wavelength capability available at the same time. Most of these bands,or
measurement sensitivities, require space-based missions. Historically, NASA has
addressed this need for breadth with a small number of flagship-class missions
and a larger number of Explorer missions. While the Explorer program continues
to flourish, there is a large gap between Explorers and strategic missions. A
fortunate combination of new astrophysics technologies with new, high capacity,
low dollar-per-kg to orbit launchers, and new satellite buses allow for cheaper
missions with capabilities approaching strategic mission levels. NASA has
recognized these developments by calling for Probe-class mission ideas for
mission studies, spanning most of the electromagnetic spectrum from GeV
gamma-rays to the far infrared, and the new messengers of neutrinos and
ultra-high energy cosmic rays. The key insight from the Probes exercise is that
order-of-magnitude advances in science performance metrics are possible across
the board for initial total cost estimates in the range 500M-1B dollars.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.04790 [pdf] - 1521300
Coherent observations of gravitational radiation with LISA and gLISA
Submitted: 2016-08-16
The geosynchronous Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (gLISA) is a
space-based gravitational wave (GW) mission that, for the past five years, has
been under joint study at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Stanford University,
the National Institute for Space Research (I.N.P.E., Brazil), and Space Systems
Loral. If flown at the same time as the LISA mission, the two arrays will
deliver a joint sensitivity that accounts for the best performance of both
missions in their respective parts of the mHz band. This simultaneous operation
will result in an optimally combined sensitivity curve that is "white" from a
few mHz to 1 Hz, making the two antennas capable of detecting, with high
signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), coalescing black-hole binaries (BHBs) with
masses in the range (10 - 100 million) solar masses. Their ability of jointly
tracking, with enhanced SNR, signals similar to that observed by the Advanced
Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (aLIGO) on September 14,
2015 (the GW150914 event) will result in a larger number of observable
small-mass binary black-holes and an improved precision of the parameters
characterizing these sources. Together, LISA, gLISA and aLIGO will cover, with
good sensitivity, a frequency band from a tenth of a mHz to a kHz frequency
band.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.3023 [pdf] - 1280753
Orbit analysis of a geostationary gravitational wave interferometer
detector array
Submitted: 2014-10-11
We analyze the trajectories of three geostationary satellites forming the
GEOstationary GRAvitational Wave Interferometer (GEOGRAWI)~\cite{tinto}, a
space-based laser interferometer mission aiming to detect and study
gravitational radiation in the ($10^{-4} - 10$) Hz band.
The combined effects of the gravity fields of the Earth, the Sun and the Moon
make the three satellites deviate from their nominally stationary, equatorial
and equilateral configuration. Since changes in the satellites relative
distances and orientations could negatively affect the precision of the laser
heterodyne measurements, we have derived the time-dependence of the
inter-satellite distances and velocities, the variations of the polar angles
made by the constellation's three arms with respect to a chosen reference
frame, and the time changes of the triangle's enclosed angles. We find that,
during the time between two consecutive station-keeping maneuvers (about two
weeks), the relative variations of the inter-satellite distances do not exceed
a value of $0.05$ percent, while the relative velocities between pairs of
satellites remain smaller than about $0.7 \ {\rm m/s}$. In addition, we find
the angles made by the arms of the triangle with the equatorial plane to be
periodic functions of time whose amplitudes grow linearly with time; the
maximum variations experienced by these angles as well as by those within the
triangle remain smaller than $3$ arc-minutes, while the East-West angular
variations of the three arms remain smaller than about $15$ arc-minutes during
the two-weeks period. The relatively small variations of these orbit parameters
result into a set of system functional and performance requirements that are
less stringent than those characterizing an interplanetary mission.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.1813 [pdf] - 1222445
gLISA: geosynchronous Laser Interferometer Space Antenna concepts with
off-the-shelf satellites
Submitted: 2014-10-07
We discuss two geosynchronous gravitational wave mission concepts, which we
generically name gLISA. One relies on the science instrument hosting program
onboard geostationary commercial satellites, while the other takes advantage of
recent developments in the aerospace industry that result in dramatic satellite
and launching vehicle cost reductions for a dedicated geosynchronous mission.
To achieve the required level of disturbance free-fall onboard these large and
heavy platforms we propose a "two-stage" drag-free system, which incorporates
the Modular Gravitational Reference Sensor (MGRS) (developed at Stanford
University) and does not rely on the use of micro-Newton thrusters. Although
both mission concepts are characterized by different technical and programmatic
challenges, individually they could be flown and operated at a cost
significantly lower than those of previously envisioned gravitational wave
missions. We estimate both mission concepts to cost less than 500M US$ each,
and in the year 2015 we will perform at JPL a detailed selecting mission cost
analysis.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1112.1565 [pdf] - 967230
Searching for Gravitational Waves with a Geostationary Interferometer
Submitted: 2011-12-07, last modified: 2013-08-16
We analyze the sensitivities of a geostationary gravitational wave
interferometer mission operating in the sub-Hertz band. Because of its smaller
armlength, in the lower part of its accessible frequency band ($10^{-4} - 2
\times 10^{-2}$ Hz) our proposed Earth-orbiting detector will be less
sensitive, by a factor of about seventy, than the Laser Interferometer Space
Antenna (LISA) mission. In the higher part of its band instead ($2 \times
10^{-2} - 10$ Hz), our proposed interferometer will have the capability of
observing super-massive black holes (SMBHs) with masses smaller than $\sim
10^{6}$ M$_{\odot}$. With good event rates for these systems, a geostationary
interferometer will be able to accurately probe the astrophysical scenarios
that account for their formation.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.5720 [pdf] - 667680
The Gravitational Universe
Consortium, The eLISA;
:;
Seoane, P. Amaro;
Aoudia, S.;
Audley, H.;
Auger, G.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, J.;
Barausse, E.;
Barke, S.;
Bassan, M.;
Beckmann, V.;
Benacquista, M.;
Bender, P. L.;
Berti, E.;
Binétruy, P.;
Bogenstahl, J.;
Bonvin, C.;
Bortoluzzi, D.;
Brause, N. C.;
Brossard, J.;
Buchman, S.;
Bykov, I.;
Camp, J.;
Caprini, C.;
Cavalleri, A.;
Cerdonio, M.;
Ciani, G.;
Colpi, M.;
Congedo, G.;
Conklin, J.;
Cornish, N.;
Danzmann, K.;
de Vine, G.;
DeBra, D.;
Freitag, M. Dewi;
Di Fiore, L.;
Aguilo, M. Diaz;
Diepholz, I.;
Dolesi, R.;
Dotti, M.;
Barranco, G. Fernández;
Ferraioli, L.;
Ferroni, V.;
Finetti, N.;
Fitzsimons, E.;
Gair, J.;
Galeazzi, F.;
Garcia, A.;
Gerberding, O.;
Gesa, L.;
Giardini, D.;
Gibert, F.;
Grimani, C.;
Groot, P.;
Cervantes, F. Guzman;
Haiman, Z.;
Halloin, H.;
Heinzel, G.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hogan, C.;
Holz, D.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hoyland, D.;
Hoyle, C. D.;
Hueller, M.;
Hughes, S.;
Jetzer, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Karnesis, N.;
Kilic, M.;
Killow, C.;
Klipstein, W.;
Kochkina, E.;
Korsakova, N.;
Krolak, A.;
Larson, S.;
Lieser, M.;
Littenberg, T.;
Livas, J.;
Lloro, I.;
Mance, D.;
Madau, P.;
Maghami, P.;
Mahrdt, C.;
Marsh, T.;
Mateos, I.;
Mayer, L.;
McClelland, D.;
McKenzie, K.;
McWilliams, S.;
Merkowitz, S.;
Miller, C.;
Mitryk, S.;
Moerschell, J.;
Mohanty, S.;
Monsky, A.;
Mueller, G.;
Müller, V.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicolodi, D.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nofrarias, M.;
Numata, K.;
Ohme, F.;
Otto, M.;
Perreur-Lloyd, M.;
Petiteau, A.;
Phinney, E. S.;
Plagnol, E.;
Pollack, S.;
Porter, E.;
Prat, P.;
Preston, A.;
Prince, T.;
Reiche, J.;
Richstone, D.;
Robertson, D.;
Rossi, E. M.;
Rosswog, S.;
Rubbo, L.;
Ruiter, A.;
Sanjuan, J.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Schlamminger, S.;
Schutz, B.;
Schütze, D.;
Sesana, A.;
Shaddock, D.;
Shah, S.;
Sheard, B.;
Sopuerta, C. F.;
Spector, A.;
Spero, R.;
Stanga, R.;
Stebbins, R.;
Stede, G.;
Steier, F.;
Sumner, T.;
Sun, K. -X.;
Sutton, A.;
Tanaka, T.;
Tanner, D.;
Thorpe, I.;
Tröbs, M.;
Tinto, M.;
Tu, H. -B.;
Vallisneri, M.;
Vetrugno, D.;
Vitale, S.;
Volonteri, M.;
Wand, V.;
Wang, Y.;
Wanner, G.;
Ward, H.;
Ware, B.;
Wass, P.;
Weber, W. J.;
Yu, Y.;
Yunes, N.;
Zweifel, P.
Submitted: 2013-05-24
The last century has seen enormous progress in our understanding of the
Universe. We know the life cycles of stars, the structure of galaxies, the
remnants of the big bang, and have a general understanding of how the Universe
evolved. We have come remarkably far using electromagnetic radiation as our
tool for observing the Universe. However, gravity is the engine behind many of
the processes in the Universe, and much of its action is dark. Opening a
gravitational window on the Universe will let us go further than any
alternative. Gravity has its own messenger: Gravitational waves, ripples in the
fabric of spacetime. They travel essentially undisturbed and let us peer deep
into the formation of the first seed black holes, exploring redshifts as large
as z ~ 20, prior to the epoch of cosmic re-ionisation. Exquisite and
unprecedented measurements of black hole masses and spins will make it possible
to trace the history of black holes across all stages of galaxy evolution, and
at the same time constrain any deviation from the Kerr metric of General
Relativity. eLISA will be the first ever mission to study the entire Universe
with gravitational waves. eLISA is an all-sky monitor and will offer a wide
view of a dynamic cosmos using gravitational waves as new and unique messengers
to unveil The Gravitational Universe. It provides the closest ever view of the
early processes at TeV energies, has guaranteed sources in the form of
verification binaries in the Milky Way, and can probe the entire Universe, from
its smallest scales around singularities and black holes, all the way to
cosmological dimensions.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1111.2576 [pdf] - 436813
A Geostationary Gravitational Wave Interferometer (GEOGRAWI)
Submitted: 2011-11-10
We propose a Geostationary Gravitational Wave Interferometer (GEOGRAWI)
mission concept for making observations in the sub-Hertz band. GEOGRAWI is
expected to meet some of LISA's science goals in the lower part of its
accessible frequency band ($10^{-4} - 2 \times 10^{-2}$ Hz), and to outperform
them by a large margin in the higher-part of it ($2 \times 10^{-2} - 10$ Hz).
As a consequence of its Earth-bound orbit, GEOGRAWI is significantly less
expensive than the interplanetary LISA mission and could be either an entirely
US mission or managed and operated by NASA in partnership with the Brazilian
Space Agency.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.3990 [pdf] - 362652
Nano-Hertz Gravitational Waves Searches with Interferometric Pulsar
Timing Experiments
Submitted: 2011-01-20
We estimate the sensitivity to nano-Hertz gravitational waves of pulsar
timing experiments in which two highly-stable millisecond pulsars are tracked
simultaneously with two neighboring radio telescopes that are referenced to the
same time-keeping subsystem (i.e. "the clock"). By taking the difference of the
two time-of-arrival residual data streams we can exactly cancel the clock noise
in the combined data set, thereby enhancing the sensitivity to gravitational
waves. We estimate that, in the band ($10^{-9} - 10^{-8}$) Hz, this
"interferometric" pulsar timing technique can potentially improve the
sensitivity to gravitational radiation by almost two orders of magnitude over
that of single-telescopes. Interferometric pulsar timing experiments could be
performed with neighboring pairs of antennas of the forthcoming large arraying
projects.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.3759 [pdf] - 956159
Pulsar Timing Sensitivity to Very-Low-Frequency Gravitational Waves
Submitted: 2011-01-19
At nanohertz frequencies gravitational waves (GWs) cause variations in
time-of-arrival of pulsar signals potentially measurable via precision timing
observations. Here we compute very-low-frequency GW sensitivity constrained by
instrumental, propagation, and other noises fundamentally limiting pulsar
timing observations. Reaching expected GW signal strengths will require
estimation and removal of $\simeq$99% of time-of-arrival fluctuations caused by
typical interstellar plasma turbulence and a reduction of white rms timing
noise to $\sim$100 nsec or less. If these were achieved, single-pulsar
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) = 1 sensitivity is then limited by the best current
terrestrial time standards at $h_{rms} \sim$2 $\times 10^{-16}$ [f/(1
cycle/year)]$^{-1/2}$ for $f < 3 \times 10^{-8}$ Hz, where f is Fourier
frequency and a bandwidth of 1 cycle/(10 years) is assumed. This sensitivity
envelope may be optimistic in that it assumes negligible intrinsic pulsar
rotational noise, perfect time transfer from time standard to observatory, and
stable pulse profiles. Nonetheless it can be compared to predicted signal
levels for a broadband astrophysical GW background from supermassive black hole
binaries. Such a background is comparable to timekeeping-noise only for
frequencies lower than about 1 cycle/(10 years), indicating that reliable
detections will require substantial improvements in signal-to-noise ratio
through pulsar array signal processing.