sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Thoudam, Satyendra

Normalized to: Thoudam, S.

71 article(s) in total. 1960 co-authors, from 1 to 49 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 15,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2007.03934  [pdf] - 2131060
The initial stage of cloud lightning imaged in high-resolution
Comments: Submitted to Journal of geophysics research: Atmospheres
Submitted: 2020-07-08
With LOFAR we have been able to image the development of lightning flashes with meter-scale accuracy and unprecedented detail. We discuss the primary steps behind our most recent lightning mapping method. To demonstrate the capabilities of our technique we show and interpret images of the first few milliseconds of two intra-cloud flashes. In all our flashes the negative leaders propagate in the charge layer below the main negative charge. Among several interesting features we show that in about 2~ms after initiation the Primary Initial Leader triggers the formation of a multitude (more than ten) negative leaders in a rather confined area of the atmosphere. From these only one or two continue to propagate after about 30~ms to extend over kilometers horizontally while another may propagate back to the initiation point. We also show that normal negative leaders can transition into an initial-leader like state, potentially in the presence of strong electric fields. In addition, we show some initial breakdown pulses that occurred during the primary initial leader, and even during two "secondary" initial leaders that developed out of stepped leaders.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:2005.13441  [pdf] - 2103019
On the cosmic-ray energy scale of the LOFAR radio telescope
Comments:
Submitted: 2020-05-27
Cosmic rays are routinely measured at LOFAR, both with a dense array of antennas and an array of plastic scintillators. We compare the reconstruction of cosmic-ray energy using radio and particle techniques and show that they are in good agreement. We also present the radiation energy of air showers measured at LOFAR. This value scales quadratically with the electromagnetic energy in an air shower, which can in turn be related to the energy of the primary particle. Once the local magnetic field is accounted for, the radiation energy allows for a direct comparison between the LOFAR energy scale and that of the Pierre Auger Observatory, which are shown to be in agreement. This technique demonstrates the potential to cross-calibrate the energy scales of different experiments using radiation energy.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:2003.04013  [pdf] - 2060965
A LOFAR Observation of Ionospheric Scintillation from Two Simultaneous Travelling Ionospheric Disturbances
Comments: 24 pages, 16 figures. Accepted for open-access publication in the Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate. For associated movie file, see https://www.swsc-journal.org/10.1051/swsc/2020010/olm
Submitted: 2020-03-09
This paper presents the results from one of the first observations of ionospheric scintillation taken using the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR). The observation was of the strong natural radio source Cas A, taken overnight on 18-19 August 2013, and exhibited moderately strong scattering effects in dynamic spectra of intensity received across an observing bandwidth of 10-80MHz. Delay-Doppler spectra (the 2-D FFT of the dynamic spectrum) from the first hour of observation showed two discrete parabolic arcs, one with a steep curvature and the other shallow, which can be used to provide estimates of the distance to, and velocity of, the scattering plasma. A cross-correlation analysis of data received by the dense array of stations in the LOFAR "core" reveals two different velocities in the scintillation pattern: a primary velocity of ~30m/s with a north-west to south-east direction, associated with the steep parabolic arc and a scattering altitude in the F-region or higher, and a secondary velocity of ~110m/s with a north-east to south-west direction, associated with the shallow arc and a scattering altitude in the D-region. Geomagnetic activity was low in the mid-latitudes at the time, but a weak sub-storm at high latitudes reached its peak at the start of the observation. An analysis of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) and ionosonde data from the time reveals a larger-scale travelling ionospheric disturbance (TID), possibly the result of the high-latitude activity, travelling in the north-west to south-east direction, and, simultaneously, a smaller--scale TID travelling in a north-east to south-west direction, which could be associated with atmospheric gravity wave activity. The LOFAR observation shows scattering from both TIDs, at different altitudes and propagating in different directions. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time that such a phenomenon has been reported.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.08472  [pdf] - 1886554
Status of the Lunar Detection Mode for Cosmic Particles of LOFAR
Comments: Proceedings of the 26th Extended European Cosmic Ray Symposium (ECRS), Barnaul/Belokurikha, 2018
Submitted: 2019-03-20
Cosmic particles hitting Earth's moon produce radio emission via the Askaryan effect. If the resulting radio ns-pulse can be detected by radio telescopes, this technique potentially increases the available collective area for ZeV scale particles by several orders of magnitude compared to current experiments. The LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR) is the largest radio telescope operating in the optimum frequency regime for this technique. In this contribution, we report on the status of the implementation of the lunar detection mode at LOFAR.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.08474  [pdf] - 1886556
Cosmic Ray Physics with the LOFAR Radio Telescope
Comments: Proceedings of the 26th Extended European Cosmic Ray Symposium (ECRS), Barnaul/Belokurikha, 2018
Submitted: 2019-03-20
The LOFAR radio telescope is able to measure the radio emission from cosmic ray induced air showers with hundreds of individual antennas. This allows for precision testing of the emission mechanisms for the radio signal as well as determination of the depth of shower maximum $X_{\max}$, the shower observable most sensitive to the mass of the primary cosmic ray, to better than 20 g/cm$^2$. With a densely instrumented circular area of roughly 320 m$^2$, LOFAR is targeting for cosmic ray astrophysics in the energy range $10^{16}$ - $10^{18}$ eV. In this contribution we give an overview of the status, recent results, and future plans of cosmic ray detection with the LOFAR radio telescope.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.05988  [pdf] - 1860079
Calibration of the LOFAR low-band antennas using the Galaxy and a model of the signal chain
Comments: 23 pages, 10 figures
Submitted: 2019-03-14
The LOw-Frequency ARray (LOFAR) is used to make precise measurements of radio emission from extensive air showers, yielding information about the primary cosmic ray. Interpreting the measured data requires an absolute and frequency-dependent calibration of the LOFAR system response. This is particularly important for spectral analyses, because the shape of the detected signal holds information about the shower development. We revisit the calibration of the LOFAR antennas in the range of 30 - 80 MHz. Using the Galactic emission and a detailed model of the LOFAR signal chain, we find an improved calibration that provides an absolute energy scale and allows for the study of frequency-dependent features in measured signals. With the new calibration, systematic uncertainties of 13% are reached, and comparisons of the spectral shape of calibrated data with simulations show promising agreement.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1804.01025  [pdf] - 1721063
Shock location and CME 3D reconstruction of a solar type II radio burst with LOFAR
Comments: 7 Figures, 9 Pages
Submitted: 2018-04-03
Type II radio bursts are evidence of shocks in the solar atmosphere and inner heliosphere that emit radio waves ranging from sub-meter to kilometer lengths. These shocks may be associated with CMEs and reach speeds higher than the local magnetosonic speed. Radio imaging of decameter wavelengths (20-90 MHz) is now possible with LOFAR, opening a new radio window in which to study coronal shocks that leave the inner solar corona and enter the interplanetary medium and to understand their association with CMEs. To this end, we study a coronal shock associated with a CME and type II radio burst to determine the locations at which the radio emission is generated, and we investigate the origin of the band-splitting phenomenon.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.07997  [pdf] - 1838112
Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array
Consortium, The Cherenkov Telescope Array; :; Acharya, B. S.; Agudo, I.; Samarai, I. Al; Alfaro, R.; Alfaro, J.; Alispach, C.; Batista, R. Alves; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrosi, G.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Aramo, C.; Araya, M.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Asano, K.; Ashley, M.; Backes, M.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Bamba, A.; Barkov, M.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Bastieri, D.; Becherini, Y.; Belfiore, A.; Benbow, W.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bernardos, M.; Bernlöhr, K.; Bertucci, B.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Blanch, O.; Blazek, J.; Boisson, C.; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonnoli, G.; Bosnjak, Z.; Böttcher, M.; Braiding, C.; Bregeon, J.; Brill, A.; Brown, A. M.; Brun, P.; Brunetti, G.; Buanes, T.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Capitanio, F.; Caproni, A.; Caraveo, P.; Cárdenas, V.; Carlile, C.; Carosi, R.; Carquín, E.; Carr, J.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Cauz, D.; Cerruti, M.; Chadwick, P.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R. C. G.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chernyakova, M.; Chikawa, M.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Coco, V.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Cortina, J.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Covino, S.; Crocker, R.; Cuadra, J.; Cuevas, O.; Cumani, P.; D'Aì, A.; D'Ammando, F.; D'Avanzo, P.; D'Urso, D.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; De Lucia, M.; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; De Persio, F.; de Souza, V.; Deil, C.; Del Santo, M.; Delgado, C.; della Volpe, D.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Venere, L.; Díaz, C.; Dib, C.; Diebold, S.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Domínguez, A.; Prester, D. Dominis; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Drass, H.; Dravins, D.; Dubus, G.; Dwarkadas, V. V.; Ebr, J.; Eckner, C.; Egberts, K.; Einecke, S.; Ekoume, T. R. N.; Elsässer, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Espinoza, C.; Evoli, C.; Fairbairn, M.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Falcone, A.; Farnier, C.; Fasola, G.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Fesquet, M.; Filipovic, M.; Fioretti, V.; Fontaine, G.; Fornasa, M.; Fortson, L.; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fruck, C.; Fujita, Y.; Fukazawa, Y.; Funk, S.; Füßling, M.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Gallant, Y.; Garcia, B.; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gaskins, J.; Gasparetto, T.; Gaug, M.; Gerard, L.; Giavitto, G.; Giglietto, N.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Gómez-Vargas, G.; González, M. M.; González, J. M.; Götz, D.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Green, A. J.; Greenshaw, T.; Griffiths, S.; Gunji, S.; Hadasch, D.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Hassan, T.; Hayashi, K.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Helo, J. C.; Hermann, G.; Hinton, J.; Hnatyk, B.; Hofmann, W.; Holder, J.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J.; Horns, D.; Horvath, P.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Humensky, T. B.; Hütten, M.; Iarlori, M.; Inada, T.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Ishio, K.; Iwamura, Y.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Jankowsky, D.; Jean, P.; Jung-Richardt, I.; Jurysek, J.; Kaaret, P.; Karkar, S.; Katagiri, H.; Katz, U.; Kawanaka, N.; Kazanas, D.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kimura, S.; Kisaka, S.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Kohri, K.; Komin, N.; Kosack, K.; Kraus, M.; Krause, M.; Krauß, F.; Kubo, H.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kuroda, H.; Kushida, J.; La Palombara, N.; Lamanna, G.; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Blanc, O. Le; Leach, S.; Lees, J. -P.; Lefaucheur, J.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lenain, J. -P.; Lico, R.; Limon, M.; Lindfors, E.; Lohse, T.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; López, M.; López-Coto, R.; Lu, C. -C.; Lucarelli, F.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maier, G.; Majumdar, P.; Malaguti, G.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Marcowith, A.; Marín, J.; Markoff, S.; Martí, J.; Martin, P.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, G.; Masetti, N.; Masuda, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Mazin, D.; Medina, C.; Melandri, A.; Mereghetti, S.; Meyer, M.; Minaya, I. A.; Mirabal, N.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mohammed, M.; Mohrmann, L.; Montaruli, T.; Moralejo, A.; Morcuende-Parrilla, D.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morris, P.; Morselli, A.; Moulin, E.; Mukherjee, R.; Mundell, C.; Murach, T.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Nagai, A.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Naito, T.; Nakamori, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Noda, K.; Nosek, D.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozaki, S.; O'Brien, P.; Oakes, L.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Okazaki, N.; Okumura, A.; Ong, R. A.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Osborne, J. P.; Ostrowski, M.; Otte, N.; Oya, I.; Padovani, M.; Paizis, A.; Palatiello, M.; Palatka, M.; Paoletti, R.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Parsons, R. D.; Pe'er, A.; Pech, M.; Pedaletti, G.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrucci, P.; Petruk, O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Piano, G.; Pisarski, A.; Pita, S.; Pohl, M.; Polo, M.; Pozo, D.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Principe, G.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Pühlhofer, G.; Punch, M.; Pürckhauer, S.; Queiroz, F.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rainò, S.; Razzaque, S.; Reimer, O.; Reimer, A.; Reisenegger, A.; Renaud, M.; Rezaeian, A. H.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Ribó, M.; Richtler, T.; Rico, J.; Rieger, F.; Riquelme, M.; Rivoire, S.; Rizi, V.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Rosado, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; Rulten, C.; Sadeh, I.; Safi-Harb, S.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sakurai, S.; Salina, G.; Sánchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Saturni, F. G.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schneider, M.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schulz, A.; Schussler, F.; Schwanke, U.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Seitenzahl, I.; Semikoz, D.; Sergijenko, O.; Servillat, M.; Shalchi, A.; Shellard, R. C.; Sidoli, L.; Siejkowski, H.; Sillanpää, A.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sliusar, V.; Slowikowska, A.; Sol, H.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Stawarz, Ł.; Stefanik, S.; Stephan, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Stratta, G.; Straumann, U.; Suomijarvi, T.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Tejedor, L. A.; Temnikov, P.; Terada, Y.; Terrier, R.; Terzic, T.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Thoudam, S.; Tian, W.; Tibaldo, L.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tomastik, J.; Tonev, D.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torresi, E.; Tosti, G.; Tothill, N.; Tovmassian, G.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Tsujimoto, S.; Umana, G.; Vagelli, V.; Vagnetti, F.; Valentino, M.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; van Eldik, C.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Varner, G. S.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Acosta, M. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vega, A.; Vercellone, S.; Veres, P.; Vergani, S.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Viana, A.; Vigorito, C.; Villanueva, J.; Voelk, H.; Vollhardt, A.; Vorobiov, S.; Vrastil, M.; Vuillaume, T.; Wagner, S. J.; Wagner, R.; Walter, R.; Ward, J. E.; Warren, D.; Watson, J. J.; Werner, F.; White, M.; White, R.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wilcox, P.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Wischnewski, R.; Wood, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Zanin, R.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zdziarski, A. A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhdanov, V. I.; Ziegler, A.; Zorn, J.
Comments: 213 pages, including references and glossary. Version 2: credits and references updated, some figures updated, and author list updated
Submitted: 2017-09-22, last modified: 2018-01-21
The Cherenkov Telescope Array, CTA, will be the major global observatory for very high energy gamma-ray astronomy over the next decade and beyond. The scientific potential of CTA is extremely broad: from understanding the role of relativistic cosmic particles to the search for dark matter. CTA is an explorer of the extreme universe, probing environments from the immediate neighbourhood of black holes to cosmic voids on the largest scales. Covering a huge range in photon energy from 20 GeV to 300 TeV, CTA will improve on all aspects of performance with respect to current instruments. The observatory will operate arrays on sites in both hemispheres to provide full sky coverage and will hence maximize the potential for the rarest phenomena such as very nearby supernovae, gamma-ray bursts or gravitational wave transients. With 99 telescopes on the southern site and 19 telescopes on the northern site, flexible operation will be possible, with sub-arrays available for specific tasks. CTA will have important synergies with many of the new generation of major astronomical and astroparticle observatories. Multi-wavelength and multi-messenger approaches combining CTA data with those from other instruments will lead to a deeper understanding of the broad-band non-thermal properties of target sources. The CTA Observatory will be operated as an open, proposal-driven observatory, with all data available on a public archive after a pre-defined proprietary period. Scientists from institutions worldwide have combined together to form the CTA Consortium. This Consortium has prepared a proposal for a Core Programme of highly motivated observations. The programme, encompassing approximately 40% of the available observing time over the first ten years of CTA operation, is made up of individual Key Science Projects (KSPs), which are presented in this document.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1711.07749  [pdf] - 1591531
Contributions of the LOFAR Cosmic Ray Key Science Project to the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2017)
Comments: compendium of 8 proceedings for the ICRC 2017
Submitted: 2017-11-21
Contributions of the LOFAR Cosmic Ray Key Science Project to the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2017)
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.03483  [pdf] - 1588207
Cherenkov Telescope Array Contributions to the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017)
Acero, F.; Acharya, B. S.; Portella, V. Acín; Adams, C.; Agudo, I.; Aharonian, F.; Samarai, I. Al; Alberdi, A.; Alcubierre, M.; Alfaro, R.; Alfaro, J.; Alispach, C.; Aloisio, R.; Batista, R. Alves; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrogi, L.; Ambrosi, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Anderson, J.; Anduze, M.; Angüner, E. O.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Antonuccio, V.; Antoranz, P.; Aramo, C.; Araya, M.; Arcaro, C.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Arrieta, M.; Asano, K.; Asano, A.; Ashley, M.; Aubert, P.; Singh, C. B.; Babic, A.; Backes, M.; Bajtlik, S.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Ballo, L.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Bandiera, R.; Barai, P.; Barbier, C.; Barcelo, M.; Barkov, M.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Bastieri, D.; Bauer, C.; Becciani, U.; Becherini, Y.; Tjus, J. Becker; Bednarek, W.; Belfiore, A.; Benbow, W.; Benito, M.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bernardos, M.; Bernhard, S.; Bernlöhr, K.; Salucci, C. Bertinelli; Bertucci, B.; Besel, M. -A.; Beshley, V.; Bettane, J.; Bhatt, N.; Bhattacharyya, W.; Bhattachryya, S.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bicknell, G.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bilinsky, A.; Bird, R.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Bitossi, M.; Blanch, O.; Blasi, P.; Blazek, J.; Boccato, C.; Bockermann, C.; Boehm, C.; Bohacova, M.; Boisson, C.; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonnoli, G.; Borkowski, J.; Bose, R.; Bosnjak, Z.; Böttcher, M.; Boutonnet, C.; Bouyjou, F.; Bowman, L.; Bozhilov, V.; Braiding, C.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Briggs, M.; Brill, A.; Brisken, W.; Bristow, D.; Britto, R.; Brocato, E.; Brown, A. M.; Brown, S.; Brügge, K.; Brun, P.; Brun, P.; Brun, F.; Brunetti, L.; Brunetti, G.; Bruno, P.; Bryan, M.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Buson, S.; Buss, J.; Byrum, K.; Caccianiga, A.; Cameron, R.; Canelli, F.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Capasso, M.; Capitanio, F.; Caproni, A.; Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R.; Caraveo, P.; Cárdenas, V.; Cardenzana, J.; Cardillo, M.; Carlile, C.; Caroff, S.; Carosi, R.; Carosi, A.; Carquín, E.; Carr, J.; Casandjian, J. -M.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Castro-Tirado, A. J.; Mora, J. Castroviejo; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Cauz, D.; Silva, C. Celestino; Celli, S.; Cerruti, M.; Chabanne, E.; Chadwick, P.; Chakraborty, N.; Champion, C.; Chatterjee, A.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Cheng, K.; Chernyakova, M.; Chikawa, M.; Chitnis, V. R.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Clark, P.; Coco, V.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Colombo, E.; Colome, J.; Colonges, S.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Cornat, R.; Cortina, J.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Courty, B.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Cristofari, P.; Criswell, S. J.; Crocker, R.; Croston, J.; Crovari, C.; Cuadra, J.; Cuevas, O.; Cui, X.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; D'Aì, A.; D'Ammando, F.; D'Avanzo, P.; D'Urso, D.; Da Vela, P.; Dale, Ø.; Dang, V. T.; Dangeon, L.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; De Caprio, V.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; De Lisio, C.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; De Lucia, M.; Neto, J. R. T. de Mello; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; De Persio, F.; de Souza, V.; Decock, J.; Deil, C.; Deiml, P.; Del Santo, M.; Delagnes, E.; Deleglise, G.; Reznicek, M. Delfino; Delgado, C.; Mengual, J. Delgado; Della Ceca, R.; della Volpe, D.; Detournay, M.; Devin, J.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Venere, L.; Diaz, L.; Díaz, C.; Dib, C.; Dickinson, H.; Diebold, S.; Digel, S.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Doert, M.; Domínguez, A.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donnarumma, I.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Downes, T.; Drake, G.; Drappeau, S.; Drass, H.; Dravins, D.; Drury, L.; Dubus, G.; Morå, K. Dundas; Durkalec, A.; Dwarkadas, V.; Ebr, J.; Eckner, C.; Edy, E.; Egberts, K.; Einecke, S.; Eisch, J.; Eisenkolb, F.; Ekoume, T. R. N.; Eleftheriadis, C.; Elsässer, D.; Emmanoulopoulos, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Escarate, P.; Eschbach, S.; Espinoza, C.; Evans, P.; Evoli, C.; Fairbairn, M.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Falcone, A.; Ramazani, V. Fallah; Farakos, K.; Farrell, E.; Fasola, G.; Favre, Y.; Fede, E.; Fedora, R.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Ferreira, O.; Fesquet, M.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fink, D.; Finley, J. P.; Finley, C.; Finoguenov, A.; Fioretti, V.; Fiorini, M.; Flores, H.; Foffano, L.; Föhr, C.; Fonseca, M. V.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Fornasa, M.; Fortin, P.; Fortson, L.; Fouque, N.; Fraga, B.; Franco, F. J.; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fruck, C.; Fugazza, D.; Fujita, Y.; Fukami, S.; Fukazawa, Y.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Furniss, A.; Füßling, M.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Gallant, Y.; Galloway, D.; Gallozzi, S.; Garcia, B.; Garcia, A.; Gil, R. García; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gardiol, D.; Gargano, F.; Gargano, C.; Garozzo, S.; Garrido-Ruiz, M.; Gascon, D.; Gasparetto, T.; Gaté, F.; Gaug, M.; Gebhardt, B.; Gebyehu, M.; Geffroy, N.; Genolini, B.; Ghalumyan, A.; Ghedina, A.; Ghirlanda, G.; Giammaria, P.; Gianotti, F.; Giebels, B.; Giglietto, N.; Gika, V.; Gimenes, R.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giovannini, G.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Gironnet, J.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Gómez, J. L.; Gómez-Vargas, G.; González, M. M.; González, J. M.; Gothe, K. S.; Gotz, D.; Goullon, J.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Grasseau, G.; Gredig, R.; Green, A. J.; Greenshaw, T.; Grenier, I.; Griffiths, S.; Grillo, A.; Grondin, M. -H.; Grube, J.; Guarino, V.; Guest, B.; Gueta, O.; Gunji, S.; Gyuk, G.; Hadasch, D.; Hagge, L.; Hahn, J.; Hahn, A.; Hakobyan, H.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Hassan, T.; Haubold, T.; Haupt, A.; Hayashi, K.; Hayashida, M.; He, H.; Heller, M.; Helo, J. C.; Henault, F.; Henri, G.; Hermann, G.; Hermel, R.; Llorente, J. Herrera; Herrero, A.; Hervet, O.; Hidaka, N.; Hinton, J.; Hiroshima, N.; Hirotani, K.; Hnatyk, B.; Hoang, J. K.; Hoffmann, D.; Hofmann, W.; Holder, J.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J.; Hörbe, M.; Horns, D.; Horvath, P.; Houles, J.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Huet, J. -M.; Hughes, G.; Hui, D.; Hull, G.; Humensky, T. B.; Hussein, M.; Hütten, M.; Iarlori, M.; Ikeno, Y.; Illa, J. M.; Impiombato, D.; Inada, T.; Ingallinera, A.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Ionica, M.; Iori, M.; Iriarte, A.; Ishio, K.; Israel, G. L.; Iwamura, Y.; Jablonski, C.; Jacholkowska, A.; Jacquemier, J.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Jankowsky, F.; Jankowsky, D.; Jansweijer, P.; Jarnot, C.; Jean, P.; Johnson, C. A.; Josselin, M.; Jung-Richardt, I.; Jurysek, J.; Kaaret, P.; Kachru, P.; Kagaya, M.; Kakuwa, J.; Kalekin, O.; Kankanyan, R.; Karastergiou, A.; Karczewski, M.; Karkar, S.; Katagiri, H.; Kataoka, J.; Katarzyński, K.; Katz, U.; Kawanaka, N.; Kaye, L.; Kazanas, D.; Kelley-Hoskins, N.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kihm, T.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kimura, S.; Kisaka, S.; Kishida, S.; Kissmann, R.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapen, J.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Kocot, J.; Kohri, K.; Komin, N.; Kong, A.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Kowal, G.; Koyama, S.; Kraus, M.; Krause, M.; Krauß, F.; Krennrich, F.; Kruger, P.; Kubo, H.; Kudryavtsev, V.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kumar, S.; Kuroda, H.; Kushida, J.; Kushwaha, P.; La Palombara, N.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Lahmann, R.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landoni, M.; Landriu, D.; Landt, H.; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Blanc, O. Le; Flour, T. Le; Sidaner, P. Le; Leach, S.; Leckngam, A.; Lee, S. -H.; Lee, W. H.; Lees, J. -P.; Lefaucheur, J.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leto, G.; Lico, R.; Limon, M.; Lindemann, R.; Lindfors, E.; Linhoff, L.; Lipniacka, A.; Lloyd, S.; Lohse, T.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopez, M.; Lopez-Coto, R.; Louge, T.; Louis, F.; Louys, M.; Lucarelli, F.; Lucchesi, D.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccarone, T.; Mach, E.; Madejski, G. M.; Maier, G.; Majczyna, A.; Majumdar, P.; Makariev, M.; Malaguti, G.; Malouf, A.; Maltezos, S.; Malyshev, D.; Malyshev, D.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Manigot, P.; Mannheim, K.; Maragos, N.; Marano, D.; Marcowith, A.; Marín, J.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Markoff, S.; Martí, J.; Martin, J. -M.; Martin, P.; Martin, L.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, G.; Martínez, O.; Marx, R.; Masetti, N.; Massimino, P.; Mastichiadis, A.; Mastropietro, M.; Masuda, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Matthews, N.; Mattiazzo, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Mayer, M.; Mazin, D.; Mazziotta, M. N.; Comb, L. Mc; McHardy, I.; Medina, C.; Melandri, A.; Melioli, C.; Melkumyan, D.; Mereghetti, S.; Meunier, J. -L.; Meures, T.; Meyer, M.; Micanovic, S.; Michael, T.; Michałowski, J.; Mievre, I.; Miller, J.; Minaya, I. A.; Mineo, T.; Mirabel, F.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mohammed, M.; Mohrmann, L.; Molijn, C.; Molinari, E.; Moncada, R.; Montaruli, T.; Monteiro, I.; Mooney, D.; Moore, P.; Moralejo, A.; Morcuende-Parrilla, D.; Moretti, E.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morris, P.; Morselli, A.; Moscato, F.; Motohashi, D.; Moulin, E.; Mueller, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar, P.; Mundell, C.; Mundet, J.; Murach, T.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Murphy, A.; Nagai, A.; Nagar, N.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Nagesh, B. K.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Nakayama, K.; Naumann, D.; Nayman, P.; Neise, D.; Nellen, L.; Nemmen, R.; Neronov, A.; Neyroud, N.; Nguyen, T.; Nguyen, T. T.; Trung, T. Nguyen; Nicastro, L.; Nicolau-Kukliński, J.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas-Rosillo, M.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Nishikawa, K. -I.; Nishiyama, G.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nolan, S.; Nosek, D.; Nöthe, M.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozaki, S.; Nunio, F.; O'Brien, P.; Oakes, L.; Ocampo, C.; Ochoa, J. P.; Oger, R.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Okazaki, N.; Okumura, A.; Olive, J. -F.; Ong, R. A.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Osborne, J. P.; Ostrowski, M.; Otte, N.; Ou, Z.; Ovcharov, E.; Oya, I.; Ozieblo, A.; Padovani, M.; Paiano, S.; Paizis, A.; Palacio, J.; Palatiello, M.; Palatka, M.; Pallotta, J.; Panazol, J. -L.; Paneque, D.; Panter, M.; Paoletti, R.; Paolillo, M.; Papitto, A.; Paravac, A.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Parsons, R. D.; Paśko, P.; Pavy, S.; Pe'er, A.; Pech, M.; Pedaletti, G.; Del Campo, P. Peñil; Perez, A.; Pérez-Torres, M. A.; Perri, L.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrera, S.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Petruk, O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Piano, G.; Piel, Q.; Pieloth, D.; Pintore, F.; García, C. Pio; Pisarski, A.; Pita, S.; Pizarro, L.; Platos, Ł.; Pohl, M.; Poireau, V.; Pollo, A.; Porthault, J.; Poutanen, J.; Pozo, D.; Prandini, E.; Prasit, P.; Prast, J.; Pressard, K.; Principe, G.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Pruteanu, G.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Puljak, I.; Punch, M.; Pürckhauer, S.; Queiroz, F.; Quinn, J.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rafighi, I.; Rainò, S.; Rajda, P. J.; Rando, R.; Rannot, R. C.; Razzaque, S.; Reichardt, I.; Reimer, O.; Reimer, A.; Reisenegger, A.; Renaud, M.; Reposeur, T.; Reville, B.; Rezaeian, A. H.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Ribó, M.; Richer, M. G.; Richtler, T.; Rico, J.; Rieger, F.; Riquelme, M.; Ristori, P. R.; Rivoire, S.; Rizi, V.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Roncadelli, M.; Rosado, J.; Rosen, S.; Lees, S. Rosier; Rousselle, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; del Mazo, J. E. Ruíz; Rujopakarn, W.; Rulten, C.; Russo, F.; Saavedra, O.; Sabatini, S.; Sacco, B.; Sadeh, I.; Hatlen, E. Sæther; Safi-Harb, S.; Sahakian, V.; Sailer, S.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sakurai, S.; Salek, D.; Greus, F. Salesa; Salina, G.; Sanchez, D.; Sánchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos, E. M.; Sanuy, A.; Sapozhnikov, L.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Sato, Y.; Saturni, F. G.; Savalle, R.; Sawada, M.; Schanne, S.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schmidt, T.; Schmoll, J.; Schneider, M.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schulz, A.; Schussler, F.; Schwanke, U.; Schwarz, J.; Schweizer, T.; Schwemmer, S.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Seglar-Arroyo, M.; Segreto, A.; Seitenzahl, I.; Semikoz, D.; Sergijenko, O.; Serre, N.; Servillat, M.; Seweryn, K.; Shah, K.; Shalchi, A.; Sharma, M.; Shellard, R. C.; Shilon, I.; Sidoli, L.; Sidz, M.; Siejkowski, H.; Silk, J.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Singh, B. B.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sizun, P.; Sliusar, V.; Slowikowska, A.; Smith, A.; Sobczyńska, D.; Sokolenko, A.; Sol, H.; Sottile, G.; Springer, W.; Stahl, O.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Staszak, D.; Stawarz, Ł.; Steenkamp, R.; Stefanik, S.; Stegmann, C.; Steiner, S.; Stella, C.; Stephan, M.; Sternberger, R.; Sterzel, M.; Stevenson, B.; Stodulska, M.; Stodulski, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Stratta, G.; Straumann, U.; Stuik, R.; Suchenek, M.; Suomijarvi, T.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Suric, T.; Sushch, I.; Sutcliffe, P.; Sykes, J.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, M.; Takalo, L.; Takami, S.; Takata, J.; Takeda, J.; Tam, T.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Tanci, C.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Tejedor, L. A.; Temme, F.; Temnikov, P.; Terada, Y.; Terrazas, J. C.; Terrier, R.; Terront, D.; Terzic, T.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Thoudam, S.; Tian, W.; Tibaldo, L.; Tiengo, A.; Tiziani, D.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tokarz, M.; Toma, K.; Tomastik, J.; Tonachini, A.; Tonev, D.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torresi, E.; Tosti, G.; Totani, T.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Trakarnsirinont, N.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Tsirou, M.; Tsujimoto, S.; Tsuru, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Umana, G.; Uslenghi, M.; Vagelli, V.; Vagnetti, F.; Valentino, M.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; Berg, A. M. Van den; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; van Soelen, B.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vanderwalt, J.; Varner, G. S.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Vázquez, J. R.; Acosta, M. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vega, A.; Veitch, P.; Venault, P.; Venter, C.; Vercellone, S.; Veres, P.; Vergani, S.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Veyssiere, C.; Viana, A.; Vicha, J.; Vigorito, C.; Villanueva, J.; Vincent, P.; Vink, J.; Visconti, F.; Vittorini, V.; Voelk, H.; Voisin, V.; Vollhardt, A.; Vorobiov, S.; Vovk, I.; Vrastil, M.; Vuillaume, T.; Wagner, S. J.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, P.; Wakely, S. P.; Walstra, T.; Walter, R.; Ward, M.; Ward, J. E.; Warren, D.; Watson, J. J.; Webb, N.; Wegner, P.; Weiner, O.; Weinstein, A.; Weniger, C.; Werner, F.; Wetteskind, H.; White, M.; White, R.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wiesand, S.; Wijers, R.; Wilcox, P.; Wilhelm, A.; Wilkinson, M.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Winter, M.; Wojcik, P.; Wolf, D.; Wood, M.; Wörnlein, A.; Wu, T.; Yadav, K. K.; Yaguna, C.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamane, N.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yelos, D.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Yu, P.; Zaborov, D.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zajczyk, A.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Zanin, R.; Sanchez, R. Zanmar; Zaric, D.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zdziarski, A. A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhdanov, V. I.; Ziegler, A.; Ziemann, J.; Ziętara, K.; Zink, A.; Ziółkowski, J.; Zitelli, V.; Zoli, A.; Zorn, J.
Comments: Index of Cherenkov Telescope Array conference proceedings at the ICRC2017, Busan, Korea
Submitted: 2017-09-11, last modified: 2017-10-24
List of contributions from the Cherenkov Telescope Array Consortium presented at the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference, July 12-20 2017, Busan, Korea.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1707.03428  [pdf] - 1585811
The Association of a J-burst with a Solar Jet
Comments: 11 pages, 8 figures
Submitted: 2017-07-11, last modified: 2017-08-14
Context. The Sun is an active star that produces large-scale energetic events such as solar flares and coronal mass ejections and numerous smaller-scale events such as solar jets. These events are often associated with accelerated particles that can cause emission at radio wavelengths. The reconfiguration of the solar magnetic field in the corona is believed to be the cause of the majority of solar energetic events and accelerated particles. Aims. Here, we investigate a bright J-burst that was associated with a solar jet and the possible emission mechanism causing these two phenomena. Methods. We used data from the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) to observe a solar jet, and radio data from the Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) and the Nan\c{c}ay Radioheliograph (NRH) to observe a J-burst over a broad frequency range (33-173 MHz) on 9 July 2013 at ~11:06 UT. Results. The J-burst showed fundamental and harmonic components and it was associated with a solar jet observed at extreme ultraviolet wavelengths with SDO. The solar jet occurred at a time and location coincident with the radio burst, in the northern hemisphere, and not inside a group of complex active regions in the southern hemisphere. The jet occurred in the negative polarity region of an area of bipolar plage. Newly emerged positive flux in this region appeared to be the trigger of the jet. Conclusions. Magnetic reconnection between the overlying coronal field lines and the newly emerged positive field lines is most likely the cause of the solar jet. Radio imaging provides a clear association between the jet and the J-burst which shows the path of the accelerated electrons.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:1708.01053  [pdf] - 1586713
Very-High-Energy gamma-ray astronomy with the ALTO observatory
Comments: 7 pages, 2 figures, Proceedings of the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017), Busan (South Korea)
Submitted: 2017-08-03
ALTO is a concept/project in the exploratory phase since 2013 aiming to build a wide-field VHE gamma-ray observatory at very high altitude in the Southern hemisphere. The operation of such an observatory will complement the Northern hemisphere observations performed by HAWC and will make possible the exploration of the central region of our Galaxy and the hunt for PeVatrons, and to search for extended Galactic objects such as the Vela Supernova Remnant and the Fermi bubbles. The ALTO project is aiming for a substantial improvement of the Water Cherenkov Detection Technique by increasing the altitude of the observatory in order to lower the energy threshold, by using a layer of scintillator below the water tank to optimize the S/B discrimination, by minimizing the size of the tanks and having a more compact array to sample the air-shower footprints with better precision, and by using precise electronics which will provide time-stamped waveforms to improve the angular and energy resolution. ALTO is designed to have as low an energy threshold as possible so as to act as a fast trigger alert to other observatories, primarily to the Southern part of CTA, for transient Galactic and extra-galactic phenomena. The wide FoV resulting from the detection technique allows the survey of a large portion of the sky continuously, thus giving the possibility to access emission from Gamma-Ray Bursts, Active Galactic Nuclei and X-ray binary flares, and extended emissions of both Galactic (Vela SNR, Fermi bubbles) and extra-galactic (AGN radio lobes) origin. The ALTO observatory will be composed of about a thousand detection units, each of which consists of a Water Cherenkov Detector positioned above a liquid Scintillation Detector, distributed within an area of about 200 m in diameter. The project is in the design study phase which is soon to be followed by a prototyping phase.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:1708.01059  [pdf] - 1586715
Simulation study for the proposed wide field-of-view gamma-ray detector array ALTO
Comments: 8 pages, 5 figures, Proceedings of the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017), Busan (South Korea)
Submitted: 2017-08-03
ALTO is a wide field-of-view air shower detector array for very-high-energy (VHE) gamma-ray astronomy, proposed to be installed in the Southern Hemisphere at an altitude of about 5.1 km above sea level. The array will use water Cherenkov detectors, as in the HAWC observatory, but combined with scintillator detectors, to detect air showers induced by VHE gamma rays in the atmosphere. It is being designed to attain a lower energy threshold, better energy and angular resolution, and improved sensitivity. The array will consist of about 1250 small-sized (3.6 m diameter) detector units distributed over a circular area of about 160 m in diameter. Each detector unit will consist of a water Cherenkov detector and a liquid scintillation detector underneath which will preferentially identify muons, facilitating the background (cosmic ray) rejection, thereby improving the sensitivity. The background rejection will be further enhanced by the close-packed arrangement and the small size of the detectors which will allow a fine sampling of air-shower footprints at the ground. In this contribution, we present the Monte-Carlo simulation of the experiment performed using CORSIKA and GEANT4 simulation packages. The expected performance of the array in terms of reconstruction accuracies of the shower core and arrival direction, as well as preliminary estimate of the trigger energy threshold after preliminary selection cuts for a point-like gamma-ray source are presented.
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:1704.04136  [pdf] - 2039686
Prospects for CTA observations of the young SNR RX J1713.7-3946
Consortium, The CTA; :; Acero, F.; Aloisio, R.; Amans, J.; Amato, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Aramo, C.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Asano, K.; Ashley, M.; Backes, M.; Balazs, C.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Barkov, M.; Barrio, J. A.; Benbow, W.; Bernlöhr, K.; Beshley, V.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bilinsky, A.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Blanch, O.; Blasi, P.; Blazek, J.; Boisson, C.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonnoli, G.; Braiding, C.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Brown, A. M.; Bugaev, V.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Böttcher, M.; Cameron, R.; Capalbi, M.; Caproni, A.; Caraveo, P.; Carosi, R.; Cascone, E.; Cerruti, M.; Chaty, S.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chernyakova, M.; Chikawa, M.; Chudoba, J.; Cohen-Tanugi, J.; Colafrancesco, S.; Conforti, V.; Contreras, J. L.; Costa, A.; Cotter, G.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; D'Ammando, F.; D'Urso, D.; Daniel, M.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; De Lisio, C.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; de Naurois, M.; De Palma, F.; Del Santo, M.; Delgado, C.; della Volpe, D.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Venere, L.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J.; Dumas, D.; Dwarkadas, V.; Díaz, C.; Ebr, J.; Egberts, K.; Einecke, S.; Elsässer, D.; Eschbach, S.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Fasola, G.; Fedorova, E.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Fesquet, M.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipovíc, M. D.; Fioretti, V.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Franco, F. J.; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fujita, Y.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Förster, A.; Gadola, A.; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Giglietto, N.; Giordano, F.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J.; Gnatyk, R.; Goldoni, P.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Green, A. J.; Griffiths, S.; Gunji, S.; Hakobyan, H.; Hara, S.; Hassan, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Helo, J. C.; Hinton, J.; Hnatyk, B.; Huet, J.; Huetten, M.; Humensky, T. B.; Hussein, M.; Hörandel, J.; Ikeno, Y.; Inada, T.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Jacquemier, J.; Janecek, P.; Jankowsky, D.; Jung, I.; Kaaret, P.; Katagiri, H.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kimura, S.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Kocot, J.; Kohri, K.; Komin, N.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Koyama, S.; Kraus, M.; Kubo, H.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kushida, J.; La Palombara, N.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landt, H.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Lee, S.; Lees, J.; Lefaucheur, J.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leto, G.; Lindfors, E.; Lohse, T.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopez, M.; Lucarelli, F.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; López-Coto, R.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maier, G.; Malaguti, G.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Mangano, S.; Marcowith, A.; Martí, J.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, G.; Masuda, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Melioli, C.; Mineo, T.; Mirabal, N.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mohammed, M.; Montaruli, T.; Moralejo, A.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morselli, A.; Moulin, E.; Mukherjee, R.; Mundell, C.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nemmen, R.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas-Rosillo, M.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nosek, D.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozaki, S.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Okumura, A.; Ong, R. A.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Ostrowski, M.; Oya, I.; Padovani, M.; Palacio, J.; Palatka, M.; Paredes, J. M.; Pavy, S.; Pe'er, A.; Persic, M.; Petrucci, P.; Petruk, O.; Pisarski, A.; Pohl, M.; Porcelli, A.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Principe, G.; Prouza, M.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rameez, M.; Reimer, O.; Renaud, M.; Ribó, M.; Rico, J.; Rizi, V.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Rosado, J.; Rousselle, J.; Rowell, G.; Rudak, B.; Sadeh, I.; Safi-Harb, S.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sanchez, D.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Sarkar, S.; Sawada, M.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schussler, F.; Sergijenko, O.; Servillat, M.; Shalchi, A.; Shellard, R. C.; Siejkowski, H.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Sliusar, V.; Sol, H.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Stawarz, Ł.; Stefanik, S.; Stephan, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, M.; Takeda, J.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, S.; Tejedor, L. A.; Telezhinsky, I.; Temnikov, P.; Terada, Y.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Thoudam, S.; Tokanai, F.; Torres, D. F.; Torresi, E.; Tosti, G.; Townsley, C.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Tsujimoto, S.; Vagelli, V.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vassiliev, V.; Vecchi, M.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Vigorito, C.; Vorobiov, S.; Vrastil, M.; Acosta, M. L. Vázquez; Wagner, S. J.; Wagner, R.; Wakely, S. P.; Walter, R.; Ward, J. E.; Watson, J. J.; Weinstein, A.; White, M.; White, R.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wilcox, P.; Williams, D. A.; Wischnewski, R.; Wojcik, P.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Zacharias, M.; Zampieri, L.; Zanin, R.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zdziarski, A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhdanov, V.; Ziegler, A.; Zorn, J.
Comments: 19 pages, 5 figures. Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2017-04-13
We perform simulations for future Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) observations of RX~J1713.7$-$3946, a young supernova remnant (SNR) and one of the brightest sources ever discovered in very-high-energy (VHE) gamma rays. Special attention is paid to explore possible spatial (anti-)correlations of gamma rays with emission at other wavelengths, in particular X-rays and CO/H{\sc i} emission. We present a series of simulated images of RX J1713.7$-$3946 for CTA based on a set of observationally motivated models for the gamma-ray emission. In these models, VHE gamma rays produced by high-energy electrons are assumed to trace the non-thermal X-ray emission observed by {\it XMM-Newton}, whereas those originating from relativistic protons delineate the local gas distributions. The local atomic and molecular gas distributions are deduced by the NANTEN team from CO and H{\sc i} observations. Our primary goal is to show how one can distinguish the emission mechanism(s) of the gamma rays (i.e., hadronic vs leptonic, or a mixture of the two) through information provided by their spatial distribution, spectra, and time variation. This work is the first attempt to quantitatively evaluate the capabilities of CTA to achieve various proposed scientific goals by observing this important cosmic particle accelerator.
[15]  oai:arXiv.org:1703.06008  [pdf] - 1567716
Thunderstorm electric fields probed by extensive air showers through their polarized radio emission
Comments:
Submitted: 2017-03-14, last modified: 2017-03-20
We observe a large fraction of circular polarization in radio emission from extensive air showers recorded during thunderstorms, much higher than in the emission from air showers measured during fair-weather circumstances. We show that the circular polarization of the air showers measured during thunderstorms can be explained by the change in the direction of the transverse current as a function of altitude induced by atmospheric electric fields. Thus by using the full set of Stokes parameters for these events, we obtain a good characterization of the electric fields in thunderclouds. We also measure a large horizontal component of the electric fields in the two events that we have analysed.
[16]  oai:arXiv.org:1701.07338  [pdf] - 1535018
The effect of the atmospheric refractive index on the radio signal of extensive air showers
Comments: 13 pages, 5 figures. Accepted for publication in Astroparticle Physics
Submitted: 2017-01-25
For the interpretation of measurements of radio emission from extensive air showers, an important systematic uncertainty arises from natural variations of the atmospheric refractive index $n$. At a given altitude, the refractivity $N=10^6\, (n-1)$ can have relative variations on the order of $10 \%$ depending on temperature, humidity, and air pressure. Typical corrections to be applied to $N$ are about $4\%$. Using CoREAS simulations of radio emission from air showers, we have evaluated the effect of varying $N$ on measurements of the depth of shower maximum $X_{\rm max}$. For an observation band of 30 to 80 MHz, a difference of $4 \%$ in refractivity gives rise to a systematic error in the inferred $X_{\rm max}$ between 3.5 and 11 $\mathrm{g/cm^2}$, for proton showers with zenith angles ranging from 15 to 50 degrees. At higher frequencies, from 120 to 250 MHz, the offset ranges from 10 to 22 $\mathrm{g/cm^2}$. These offsets were found to be proportional to the geometric distance to $X_{\rm max}$. We have compared the results to a simple model based on the Cherenkov angle. For the 120 to 250 MHz band, the model is in qualitative agreement with the simulations. In typical circumstances, we find a slight decrease in $X_{\rm max}$ compared to the default refractivity treatment in CoREAS. While this is within commonly treated systematic uncertainties, accounting for it explicitly improves the accuracy of $X_{\rm max}$ measurements.
[17]  oai:arXiv.org:1612.06592  [pdf] - 1597996
Realtime processing of LOFAR data for the detection of nano-second pulses from the Moon
Comments: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP2016), USA
Submitted: 2016-12-20
The low flux of the ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECR) at the highest energies provides a challenge to answer the long standing question about their origin and nature. Even lower fluxes of neutrinos with energies above $10^{22}$ eV are predicted in certain Grand-Unifying-Theories (GUTs) and e.g.\ models for super-heavy dark matter (SHDM). The significant increase in detector volume required to detect these particles can be achieved by searching for the nano-second radio pulses that are emitted when a particle interacts in Earth's moon with current and future radio telescopes. In this contribution we present the design of an online analysis and trigger pipeline for the detection of nano-second pulses with the LOFAR radio telescope. The most important steps of the processing pipeline are digital focusing of the antennas towards the Moon, correction of the signal for ionospheric dispersion, and synthesis of the time-domain signal from the polyphased-filtered signal in frequency domain. The implementation of the pipeline on a GPU/CPU cluster will be discussed together with the computing performance of the prototype.
[18]  oai:arXiv.org:1611.00758  [pdf] - 1532400
Measurement of the circular polarization in radio emission from extensive air showers confirms emission mechanisms
Comments: Accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. D
Submitted: 2016-11-02, last modified: 2016-11-19
We report here on a novel analysis of the complete set of four Stokes parameters that uniquely determine the linear and/or circular polarization of the radio signal for an extensive air shower. The observed dependency of the circular polarization on azimuth angle and distance to the shower axis is a clear signature of the interfering contributions from two different radiation mechanisms, a main contribution due to a geomagnetically-induced transverse current and a secondary component due to the build-up of excess charge at the shower front. The data, as measured at LOFAR, agree very well with a calculation from first principles. This opens the possibility to use circular polarization as an investigative tool in the analysis of air shower structure, such as for the determination of atmospheric electric fields.
[19]  oai:arXiv.org:1605.03111  [pdf] - 1513530
Cosmic-ray energy spectrum and composition up to the ankle - the case for a second Galactic component
Comments: Added Table 4; Published in A&A, 595 (2016) A33 (Highlight paper)
Submitted: 2016-05-10, last modified: 2016-11-11
We have carried out a detailed study to understand the observed energy spectrum and composition of cosmic rays with energies up to ~10^18 eV. Our study shows that a single Galactic component with subsequent energy cut-offs in the individual spectra of different elements, optimised to explain the observed spectra below ~10^14 eV and the knee in the all-particle spectrum, cannot explain the observed all-particle spectrum above ~2x10^16 eV. We discuss two approaches for a second component of Galactic cosmic rays -- re-acceleration at a Galactic wind termination shock, and supernova explosions of Wolf-Rayet stars, and show that the latter scenario can explain almost all observed features in the all-particle spectrum and the composition up to ~10^18 eV, when combined with a canonical extra-galactic spectrum expected from strong radio galaxies or a source population with similar cosmological evolution. In this two-component Galactic model, the knee at ~ 3x10^15 eV and the second knee at ~10^17 eV in the all-particle spectrum are due to the cut-offs in the first and second components, respectively. We also discuss several variations of the extra-galactic component, from a minimal contribution to scenarios with a significant component below the ankle (at ~4x10^18 eV), and find that extra-galactic contributions in excess of regular source evolution are neither indicated nor in conflict with the existing data. Our main result is that the second Galactic component predicts a composition of Galactic cosmic rays at and above the second knee that largely consists of helium or a mixture of helium and CNO nuclei, with a weak or essentially vanishing iron fraction, in contrast to most common assumptions. This prediction is in agreement with new measurements from LOFAR and the Pierre Auger Observatory which indicate a strong light component and a rather low iron fraction between ~10^17 and 10^18 eV.
[20]  oai:arXiv.org:1610.05151  [pdf] - 1497663
Contributions of the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) to the 6th International Symposium on High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy (Gamma 2016)
Consortium, The CTA; :; Abchiche, A.; Abeysekara, U.; Abril, Ó.; Acero, F.; Acharya, B. S.; Adams, C.; Agnetta, G.; Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.; Albert, A.; Alcubierre, M.; Alfaro, J.; Alfaro, R.; Allafort, A. J.; Aloisio, R.; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrogi, L.; Ambrosi, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Anderson, J.; Anduze, M.; Angüner, E. O.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Antonucci, M.; Antonuccio, V.; Antoranz, P.; Aramo, C.; Aravantinos, A.; Araya, M.; Arcaro, C.; Arezki, B.; Argan, A.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Arrieta, M.; Asano, K.; Ashley, M.; Aubert, P.; Singh, C. B.; Babic, A.; Backes, M.; Bais, A.; Bajtlik, S.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Balis, D.; Balkowski, C.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Bandiera, R.; Barber, A.; Barbier, C.; Barcelo, M.; Barkov, M.; Barnacka, A.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Basso, S.; Bastieri, D.; Bauer, C.; Becciani, U.; Becherini, Y.; Tjus, J. Becker; Beckmann, V.; Bednarek, W.; Benbow, W.; Ventura, D. Benedico; Berdugo, J.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bernhard, S.; Bernlöhr, K.; Bertucci, B.; Besel, M. -A.; Beshley, V.; Bhatt, N.; Bhattacharjee, P.; Bhattacharyya, W.; Bhattachryya, S.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bicknell, G.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bilinsky, A.; Bilnik, W.; Biondo, B.; Bird, R.; Bird, T.; Bissaldi, E.; Bitossi, M.; Blanch, O.; Blasi, P.; Blazek, J.; Bockermann, C.; Boehm, C.; Bogacz, L.; Bogdan, M.; Bohacova, M.; Boisson, C.; Boix, J.; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonifacio, P.; Bonnarel, F.; Bonnoli, G.; Borkowski, J.; Bose, R.; Bosnjak, Z.; Böttcher, M.; Bousquet, J. -J.; Boutonnet, C.; Bouyjou, F.; Bowman, L.; Braiding, C.; Brantseg, T.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Briggs, M.; Brigida, M.; Bringmann, T.; Brisken, W.; Bristow, D.; Britto, R.; Brocato, E.; Bron, S.; Brook, P.; Brooks, W.; Brown, A. M.; Brügge, K.; Brun, F.; Brun, P.; Brun, P.; Brunetti, G.; Brunetti, L.; Bruno, P.; Buanes, T.; Bucciantini, N.; Buchholtz, G.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Buson, S.; Buss, J.; Byrum, K.; Cadoux, F.; Tovar, J. Calvo; Cameron, R.; Canelli, F.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Capasso, M.; Capobianco, G.; Caproni, A.; Caraveo, P.; Cardenzana, J.; Cardillo, M.; Carius, S.; Carlile, C.; Carosi, A.; Carosi, R.; Carquín, E.; Carr, J.; Carroll, M.; Carter, J.; Carton, P. -H.; Casandjian, J. -M.; Casanova, S.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Casiraghi, M.; Castellina, A.; Mora, J. Castroviejo; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Catalanotti, S.; Cauz, D.; Cavazzani, S.; Cerchiara, P.; Chabanne, E.; Chadwick, P.; Chaleil, T.; Champion, C.; Chatterjee, A.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chen, X.; Cheng, K.; Chernyakova, M.; Chiappetti, L.; Chikawa, M.; Chinn, D.; Chitnis, V. R.; Cho, N.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Ciocci, M. A.; Clay, R.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Colley, J. -M.; Colombo, E.; Colome, J.; Colonges, S.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Connell, S.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Coppi, P.; Corbel, S.; Coridian, J.; Cornat, R.; Corona, P.; Corti, D.; Cortina, J.; Cossio, L.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Courty, B.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Crimi, G.; Criswell, S. J.; Crocker, R.; Croston, J.; Cuadra, J.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; Da Vela, P.; Dale, Ø.; D'Ammando, F.; Dang, D.; Dang, V. T.; Dangeon, L.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; Costa, B. de Aguiar; De Angelis, A.; Cardoso, R. F. de Araujo; De Caprio, V.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; De Lisio, C.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; Neto, J. R. T. de Mello; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; De Persio, F.; de Souza, V.; Decock, G.; Decock, J.; Deil, C.; Del Santo, M.; Delagnes, E.; Deleglise, G.; Delgado, C.; Delgado, J.; della Volpe, D.; Deloye, P.; Detournay, M.; Dettlaff, A.; Devin, J.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Paola, A.; Di Pierro, F.; Diaz, M. A.; Díaz, C.; Dib, C.; Dick, J.; Dickinson, H.; Diebold, S.; Digel, S.; Dipold, J.; Disset, G.; Distefano, A.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Doert, M.; Dohmke, M.; Domínguez, A.; Dominik, N.; Dominique, J. -L.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donat, A.; Donnarumma, I.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Downes, T.; Doyle, K.; Drake, G.; Drappeau, S.; Drass, H.; Dravins, D.; Drury, L.; Dubus, G.; Ducci, L.; Dumas, D.; Morå, K. Dundas; Durand, D.; D'Urso, D.; Dwarkadas, V.; Dyks, J.; Dyrda, M.; Ebr, J.; Edy, E.; Egberts, K.; Eger, P.; Egorov, A.; Einecke, S.; Eisch, J.; Eisenkolb, F.; Eleftheriadis, C.; Elsaesser, D.; Elsässer, D.; Emmanoulopoulos, D.; Engelbrecht, C.; Engelhaupt, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Escarate, P.; Eschbach, S.; Espinoza, C.; Evans, P.; Fairbairn, M.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Falcone, A.; Ramazani, V. Fallah; Fantinel, D.; Farakos, K.; Farnier, C.; Farrell, E.; Fasola, G.; Favre, Y.; Fede, E.; Fedora, R.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Ferenc, D.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Ferreira, O.; Fesquet, M.; Fetfatzis, P.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipčič, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fink, D.; Finley, C.; Finley, J. P.; Finoguenov, A.; Fioretti, V.; Fiorini, M.; Fleischhack, H.; Flores, H.; Florin, D.; Föhr, C.; Fokitis, E.; Fonseca, M. V.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Fontes, B.; Fornasa, M.; Fornasa, M.; Förster, A.; Fortin, P.; Fortson, L.; Fouque, N.; Franckowiak, A.; Franckowiak, A.; Franco, F. J.; Albuquerque, I. Freire Mota; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fresnillo, L.; Fruck, C.; Fuessling, M.; Fugazza, D.; Fujita, Y.; Fukami, S.; Fukazawa, Y.; Fukuda, T.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Furniss, A.; Gäbele, W.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Galindo, D.; Gall, D. D.; Gallant, Y.; Galloway, D.; Gallozzi, S.; Galvez, J. A.; Gao, S.; Garcia, A.; Garcia, B.; Gil, R. García; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gardiol, D.; Gargano, C.; Gargano, F.; Garozzo, S.; Garrecht, F.; Garrido, L.; Garrido-Ruiz, M.; Gascon, D.; Gaskins, J.; Gaudemard, J.; Gaug, M.; Gaweda, J.; Gebhardt, B.; Gebyehu, M.; Geffroy, N.; Genolini, B.; Gerard, L.; Ghalumyan, A.; Ghedina, A.; Ghislain, P.; Giammaria, P.; Giannakaki, E.; Gianotti, F.; Giarrusso, S.; Giavitto, G.; Giebels, B.; Gieras, T.; Giglietto, N.; Gika, V.; Gimenes, R.; Giomi, M.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giovannini, G.; Girardot, P.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Gironnet, J.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Gomez, G.; Gonzalez, M. M.; González, A.; Gora, D.; Gothe, K. S.; Gotz, D.; Goullon, J.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Grasseau, G.; Gredig, R.; Green, A. J.; Green, A. M.; Greenshaw, T.; Grenier, I.; Griffiths, S.; Grillo, A.; Grondin, M. -H.; Grube, J.; Grudzinska, M.; Grygorczuk, J.; Guarino, V.; Guberman, D.; Gunji, S.; Gyuk, G.; Hadasch, D.; Hagedorn, A.; Hagge, L.; Hahn, J.; Hakobyan, H.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Hassan, T.; Hatanaka, K.; Haubold, T.; Haupt, A.; Hayakawa, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Heller, R.; Helo, J. C.; Henault, F.; Henri, G.; Hermann, G.; Hermel, R.; Llorente, J. Herrera; Llorente, J. Herrera; Herrero, A.; Hervet, O.; Hidaka, N.; Hinton, J.; Hirai, W.; Hirotani, K.; Hnatyk, B.; Hoang, J.; Hoffmann, D.; Hofmann, W.; Holch, T.; Holder, J.; Hooper, S.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J.; Hörbe, M.; Horns, D.; Horvath, P.; Hose, J.; Houles, J.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Huet, J. -M.; Huetten, M.; Hughes, G.; Hui, D.; Humensky, T. B.; Hussein, M.; Iacovacci, M.; Ibarra, A.; Ikeno, Y.; Illa, J. M.; Impiombato, D.; Inada, T.; Incorvaia, S.; Infante, L.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Ishio, K.; Ishio, K.; Israel, G. L.; Iwamura, Y.; Jablonski, C.; Jacholkowska, A.; Jacquemier, J.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Janiak, M.; Jankowsky, D.; Jankowsky, F.; Jean, P.; Jegouzo, I.; Jenke, P.; Jimenez, J. J.; Jingo, M.; Jingo, M.; Jocou, L.; Jogler, T.; Johnson, C. A.; Jones, M.; Josselin, M.; Journet, L.; Jung, I.; Kaaret, P.; Kagaya, M.; Kakuwa, J.; Kalekin, O.; Kalkuhl, C.; Kamon, H.; Kankanyan, R.; Karastergiou, A.; Kärcher, K.; Karczewski, M.; Karkar, S.; Karn, P.; Kasperek, J.; Katagiri, H.; Kataoka, J.; Katarzyński, K.; Kato, S.; Katz, U.; Kawanaka, N.; Kaye, L.; Kazanas, D.; Kelley-Hoskins, N.; Kersten, J.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kihm, T.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kisaka, S.; Kishida, S.; Kissmann, R.; Klepser, S.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapen, J.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Köck, F.; Kocot, J.; Kohri, K.; Kokkotas, K.; Kokkotas, K.; Kolitzus, D.; Komin, N.; Kominis, I.; Kong, A.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Koss, G.; Kossatz, M.; Kowal, G.; Koyama, S.; Kozioł, J.; Kraus, M.; Krause, J.; Krause, M.; Krawzcynski, H.; Krennrich, F.; Kretzschmann, A.; Kruger, P.; Kubo, H.; Kudryavtsev, V.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kuklis, M.; Kuroda, H.; Kushida, J.; La Barbera, A.; La Palombara, N.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Laffon, H.; Lahmann, R.; Lakicevic, M.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landriu, D.; Landt, H.; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Fèvre, J. -P. Le; Flour, T. Le; Sidaner, P. Le; Lee, S. -H.; Lee, W. H.; Lees, J. -P.; Lefaucheur, J.; Leffhalm, K.; Leich, H.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lelas, D.; Lemière, A.; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leonard, R.; Leoni, R.; Lessio, L.; Leto, G.; Leveque, A.; Lieunard, B.; Limon, M.; Lindemann, R.; Lindfors, E.; Linhoff, L.; Liolios, A.; Lipniacka, A.; Lockart, H.; Lohse, T.; Łokas, E.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopatin, A.; Lopez, M.; Loreggia, D.; Louge, T.; Louis, F.; Louys, M.; Lucarelli, F.; Lucchesi, D.; Lüdecke, H.; Luigi, T.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccarone, T.; Maccarone, T. J.; Mach, E.; Madejski, G. M.; Madonna, A.; Magniette, F.; Magniez, A.; Mahabir, M.; Maier, G.; Majumdar, P.; Majumdar, P.; Makariev, M.; Malaguti, G.; Malaspina, G.; Mallot, A. K.; Malouf, A.; Maltezos, S.; Malyshev, D.; Mancilla, A.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Manigot, P.; Mankushiyil, N.; Mannheim, K.; Maragos, N.; Marano, D.; Marchegiani, P.; Marcomini, J. A.; Marcowith, A.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Markoff, S.; Martens, C.; Martí, J.; Martin, J. -M.; Martin, L.; Martin, P.; Martínez, G.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, O.; Martynyuk-Lototskyy, K.; Marx, R.; Masetti, N.; Massimino, P.; Mastichiadis, A.; Mastroianni, S.; Mastropietro, M.; Masuda, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Matsuoka, S.; Matthews, N.; Mattiazzo, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Maxted, N.; Maya, J.; Mayer, M.; Mazin, D.; Mazziotta, M. N.; Comb, L. Mc; McCubbin, N.; McHardy, I.; Medina, C.; Mehrez, F.; Melioli, C.; Melkumyan, D.; Melse, T.; Mereghetti, S.; Merk, M.; Mertsch, P.; Meunier, J. -L.; Meures, T.; Meyer, M.; Meyrelles, J. L.; Miccichè, A.; Michael, T.; Michałowski, J.; Mientjes, P.; Mievre, I.; Mihailidis, A.; Miller, J.; Mineo, T.; Minuti, M.; Mirabal, N.; Mirabel, F.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mognet, I.; Mohammed, M.; Moharana, R.; Mohrmann, L.; Molinari, E.; Molyneux, P.; Monmarthe, E.; Monnier, G.; Montaruli, T.; Monte, C.; Monteiro, I.; Mooney, D.; Moore, P.; Moralejo, A.; Morello, C.; Moretti, E.; Mori, K.; Morris, P.; Morselli, A.; Moscato, F.; Motohashi, D.; Mottez, F.; Moudden, Y.; Moulin, E.; Mueller, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar, P.; Munari, M.; Mundell, C.; Mundet, J.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Muronga, A.; Murphy, A.; Nagar, N.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Nagesh, B. K.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nakayama, K.; Nanni, J.; Naumann, D.; Nayman, P.; Nellen, L.; Nemmen, R.; Neronov, A.; Neyroud, N.; Nguyen, T.; Nguyen, T. T.; Trung, T. Nguyen; Nicastro, L.; Nicolau-Kukliński, J.; Niederwanger, F.; Niedźwiecki, A.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas-Rosillo, M.; Nikolaidis, A.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Nishikawa, K. -I.; Nishiyama, G.; Noda, K.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nolan, S.; Northrop, R.; Nosek, D.; Nöthe, M.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozka, L.; Nunio, F.; Oakes, L.; O'Brien, P.; Ocampo, C.; Occhipinti, G.; Ochoa, J. P.; de Bhroithe, A. OFaolain; Oger, R.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Ohoka, H.; Okazaki, N.; Okumura, A.; Olive, J. -F.; Olszowski, D.; Ong, R. A.; Ono, S.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Osborne, J.; Ostrowski, M.; Ottaway, D.; Otte, N.; Öttl, S.; Ovcharov, E.; Oya, I.; Ozieblo, A.; Padovani, M.; Pagano, I.; Paiano, S.; Paizis, A.; Palacio, J.; Palatka, M.; Pallotta, J.; Panagiotidis, K.; Panazol, J. -L.; Paneque, D.; Panter, M.; Panzera, M. R.; Paoletti, R.; Paolillo, M.; Papayannis, A.; Papyan, G.; Paravac, A.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Park, N.; Parsons, D.; Paśko, P.; Pavy, S.; Pech, M.; Peck, A.; Pedaletti, G.; Pe'er, A.; Peet, S.; Pelat, D.; Pepato, A.; Perez, M. d. C.; Perri, L.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Petruk, O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Pfeiffer, G.; Piano, G.; Pieloth, D.; Pierre, E.; de Pinho, F. Pinto; García, C. Pio; Piret, Y.; Pisarski, A.; Pita, S.; Platos, Ł.; Platzer, R.; Podkladkin, S.; Pogosyan, L.; Pohl, M.; Poinsignon, P.; Pollo, A.; Porcelli, A.; Porthault, J.; Potter, W.; Poulios, S.; Poutanen, J.; Prandini, E.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Pressard, K.; Principe, G.; Profeti, F.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Pruchniewicz, R.; Pruteanu, G.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Puljak, I.; Punch, M.; Pürckhauer, S.; Pyzioł, R.; Queiroz, F.; Quel, E. J.; Quinn, J.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rafighi, I.; Rainò, S.; Rajda, P. J.; Rameez, M.; Rando, R.; Rannot, R. C.; Rataj, M.; Ravel, T.; Razzaque, S.; Reardon, P.; Reichardt, I.; Reimann, O.; Reimer, A.; Reimer, O.; Reisenegger, A.; Renaud, M.; Renner, S.; Reposeur, T.; Reville, B.; Rezaeian, A.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Prado, R. Ribeiro; Ribó, M.; Richards, G.; Richer, M. G.; Richtler, T.; Rico, J.; Ridky, J.; Rieger, F.; Riquelme, M.; Ristori, P. R.; Rivoire, S.; Rizi, V.; Roache, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Roncadelli, M.; Rosado, J.; Rose, J.; Rosen, S.; Lees, S. Rosier; Ross, D.; Rouaix, G.; Rousselle, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Roy, F.; Royer, S.; Rubini, A.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; Rujopakarn, W.; Rulten, C.; Rupiński, M.; Russo, F.; Russo, F.; Rutkowski, K.; Saavedra, O.; Sabatini, S.; Sacco, B.; Sadeh, I.; Saemann, E. O.; Safi-Harb, S.; Saggion, A.; Sahakian, V.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sakurai, S.; Salamon, A.; Salega, M.; Salek, D.; Greus, F. Salesa; Salgado, J.; Salina, G.; Salinas, L.; Salini, A.; Sanchez, D.; Sanchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos, E. M.; Santos-Lima, R.; Sanuy, A.; Sapozhnikov, L.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Satalecka, K.; Sato, Y.; Savalle, R.; Sawada, M.; Sayède, F.; Schanne, S.; Schanz, T.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schmid, J.; Schmidt, T.; Schmoll, J.; Schneider, M.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schubert, A.; Schullian, E. -M.; Schultze, J.; Schulz, A.; Schulz, S.; Schure, K.; Schussler, F.; Schwab, T.; Schwanke, U.; Schwarz, J.; Schweizer, T.; Schwemmer, S.; Schwendicke, U.; Schwerdt, C.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Segreto, A.; Seiradakis, J. -H.; Sembroski, G. H.; Semikoz, D.; Sergijenko, O.; Serre, N.; Servillat, M.; Seweryn, K.; Shafi, N.; Shalchi, A.; Sharma, M.; Shayduk, M.; Shellard, R. C.; Shibata, T.; Shigenaka, A.; Shilon, I.; Shum, E.; Sidoli, L.; Sidz, M.; Sieiro, J.; Siejkowski, H.; Silk, J.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Simpson, H.; Singh, B. B.; Sinha, A.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sizun, P.; Sliusar, V.; Sliusar, V.; Smith, A.; Sobczyńska, D.; Sol, H.; Sottile, G.; Sowiński, M.; Spanier, F.; Spengler, G.; Spiga, R.; Stadler, R.; Stahl, O.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Staszak, D.; Stawarz, Ł.; Steenkamp, R.; Stefanik, S.; Stegmann, C.; Steiner, S.; Stella, C.; Stephan, M.; Stergioulas, N.; Sternberger, R.; Sterzel, M.; Stevenson, B.; Stinzing, F.; Stodulska, M.; Stodulski, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Stratta, G.; Straumann, U.; Stringhetti, L.; Strzys, M.; Stuik, R.; Sulanke, K. -H.; Suomijärvi, T.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Suric, T.; Sushch, I.; Sutcliffe, P.; Sykes, J.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Szwarnog, P.; Tacchini, A.; Tachihara, K.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, M.; Takalo, L.; Takami, S.; Takata, J.; Takeda, J.; Talbot, G.; Tam, T.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, S.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tanci, C.; Tanigawa, S.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Taylor, A.; Tejedor, L. A.; Telezhinsky, I.; Temme, F.; Temnikov, P.; Tenzer, C.; Terada, Y.; Terrazas, J. C.; Terrier, R.; Terront, D.; Terzic, T.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Tezier, D.; Thayer, J.; Thornhill, J.; Thoudam, S.; Thuermann, D.; Tibaldo, L.; Tiengo, A.; Timpanaro, M. C.; Tiziani, D.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tokarz, M.; Toma, K.; Tomastik, J.; Tomono, Y.; Tonachini, A.; Tonev, D.; Torii, K.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torres, M.; Torresi, E.; Toso, G.; Tosti, G.; Totani, T.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Toyama, T.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Trzeciak, M.; Tsinganos, K.; Tsujimoto, S.; Tsuru, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Umana, G.; Umetsu, Y.; Upadhya, S. S.; Uslenghi, M.; Vagelli, V.; Vagnetti, F.; Valdes-Galicia, J.; Valentino, M.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; van Soelen, B.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vanderwalt, J.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Vázquez, J. R.; Acosta, M. L. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vega, A.; Vegas, I.; Veitch, P.; Venault, P.; Venema, L.; Venter, C.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Verma, K.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Veyssiere, C.; Viana, A.; Viaux, N.; Vicha, J.; Vigorito, C.; Vincent, P.; Vincent, S.; Vink, J.; Vittorini, V.; Vlahakis, N.; Vlahos, L.; Voelk, H.; Voisin, V.; Vollhardt, A.; Volpicelli, A.; von Brand, H.; Vorobiov, S.; Vovk, I.; Vrastil, M.; Vu, L. V.; Vuillaume, T.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, S. J.; Wakely, S. P.; Walstra, T.; Walter, R.; Walther, T.; Ward, J. E.; Ward, M.; Warda, K.; Warren, D.; Wassberg, S.; Watson, J. J.; Wawer, P.; Wawrzaszek, R.; Webb, N.; Wegner, P.; Weiner, O.; Weinstein, A.; Wells, R.; Werner, F.; Wetteskind, H.; White, M.; White, R.; Więcek, M.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wiesand, S.; Wijers, R.; Wilcox, P.; Wild, N.; Wilhelm, A.; Wilkinson, M.; Will, M.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Williams, J. T.; Willingale, R.; Wilson, N.; Winde, M.; Winiarski, K.; Winkler, H.; Winter, M.; Wischnewski, R.; Witt, E.; Wojcik, P.; Wolf, D.; Wood, M.; Wörnlein, A.; Wu, E.; Wu, T.; Yadav, K. K.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamane, N.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yelos, D.; Yoshida, A.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Yu, P.; Zabalza, V.; Zaborov, D.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zajczyk, A.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Sanchez, R. Zanmar; Zaric, D.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zdziarski, A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhao, A.; Zhdanov, V.; Ziegler, A.; Ziemann, J.; Ziętara, K.; Zink, A.; Ziółkowski, J.; Zitelli, V.; Zoli, A.; Zorn, J.; Żychowski, P.
Comments: Index of CTA conference proceedings for the Gamma 2016, Heidelberg, Germany
Submitted: 2016-10-17
List of contributions from the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) Consortium presented at the 6th International Symposium on High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy (Gamma 2016), July 11-15, 2016, in Heidelberg, Germany.
[21]  oai:arXiv.org:1609.06590  [pdf] - 1557715
Search for Cosmic Particles with the Moon and LOFAR
Comments: To be published in the Proceedings of the ARENA2016 conference, Groningen, The Netherlands
Submitted: 2016-09-21
The low flux of the ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECR) at the highest energies provides a challenge to answer the long standing question about their origin and nature. A significant increase in the number of detected UHECR is expected to be achieved by employing Earth's moon as detector, and search for short radio pulses that are emitted when a particle interacts in the lunar rock. Observation of these short pulses with current and future radio telescopes also allows to search for the even lower fluxes of neutrinos with energies above $10^{22}$ eV, that are predicted in certain Grand-Unifying-Theories (GUTs), and e.g. models for super-heavy dark matter (SHDM). In this contribution we present the initial design for such a search with the LOFAR radio telescope.
[22]  oai:arXiv.org:1608.02133  [pdf] - 1507610
LBCS: the LOFAR Long-Baseline Calibrator Survey
Comments: Accepted by Astronomy & Astrophysics. Error in figure 6 corrected
Submitted: 2016-08-06, last modified: 2016-09-09
(abridged). We outline LBCS (the LOFAR Long-Baseline Calibrator Survey), whose aim is to identify sources suitable for calibrating the highest-resolution observations made with the International LOFAR Telescope, which include baselines >1000 km. Suitable sources must contain significant correlated flux density (50-100mJy) at frequencies around 110--190~MHz on scales of a few hundred mas. At least for the 200--300-km international baselines, we find around 1 suitable calibrator source per square degree over a large part of the northern sky, in agreement with previous work. This should allow a randomly selected target to be successfully phase calibrated on the international baselines in over 50% of cases. Products of the survey include calibrator source lists and fringe-rate and delay maps of wide areas -- typically a few degrees -- around each source. The density of sources with significant correlated flux declines noticeably with baseline length over the range 200--600~km, with good calibrators on the longest baselines appearing only at the rate of 0.5 per square degree. Coherence times decrease from 1--3 minutes on 200-km baselines to about 1 minute on 600-km baselines, suggesting that ionospheric phase variations contain components with scales of a few hundred kilometres. The longest median coherence time, at just over 3 minutes, is seen on the DE609 baseline, which at 227km is close to being the shortest. We see median coherence times of between 80 and 110 seconds on the four longest baselines (580--600~km), and about 2 minutes for the other baselines. The success of phase transfer from calibrator to target is shown to be influenced by distance, in a manner that suggests a coherence patch at 150-MHz of the order of 1 degree.
[23]  oai:arXiv.org:1603.01594  [pdf] - 1399729
A large light-mass component of cosmic rays at 10^{17} - 10^{17.5} eV from radio observations
Comments: 35 pages, 11 figures, updated version: Pierre Auger Observatory data ICRC 2015 added to Fig 2
Submitted: 2016-03-04, last modified: 2016-05-01
Cosmic rays are the highest energy particles found in nature. Measurements of the mass composition of cosmic rays between 10^{17} eV and 10^{18} eV are essential to understand whether this energy range is dominated by Galactic or extragalactic sources. It has also been proposed that the astrophysical neutrino signal comes from accelerators capable of producing cosmic rays of these energies. Cosmic rays initiate cascades of secondary particles (air showers) in the atmosphere and their masses are inferred from measurements of the atmospheric depth of the shower maximum, Xmax, or the composition of shower particles reaching the ground. Current measurements suffer from either low precision, or a low duty cycle and a high energy threshold. Radio detection of cosmic rays is a rapidly developing technique, suitable for determination of Xmax with a duty cycle of in principle nearly 100%. The radiation is generated by the separation of relativistic charged particles in the geomagnetic field and a negative charge excess in the shower front. Here we report radio measurements of Xmax with a mean precision of 16 g/cm^2 between 10^{17}-10^{17.5} eV. Because of the high resolution in $Xmax we can determine the mass spectrum and find a mixed composition, containing a light mass fraction of ~80%. Unless the extragalactic component becomes significant already below 10^{17.5} eV, our measurements indicate an additional Galactic component dominating at this energy range.
[24]  oai:arXiv.org:1603.08354  [pdf] - 1400534
Timing calibration and spectral cleaning of LOFAR time series data
Comments: Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics; 10 pages, 7 figures
Submitted: 2016-03-28
We describe a method for spectral cleaning and timing calibration of short voltage time series data from individual radio interferometer receivers. It makes use of the phase differences in Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) spectra across antenna pairs. For strong, localized terrestrial sources these are stable over time, while being approximately uniform-random for a sum over many sources or for noise. Using only milliseconds-long datasets, the method finds the strongest interfering transmitters, a first-order solution for relative timing calibrations, and faulty data channels. No knowledge of gain response or quiescent noise levels of the receivers is required. With relatively small data volumes, this approach is suitable for use in an online system monitoring setup for interferometric arrays. We have applied the method to our cosmic-ray data collection, a collection of measurements of short pulses from extensive air showers, recorded by the LOFAR radio telescope. Per air shower, we have collected 2 ms of raw time series data for each receiver. The spectral cleaning has a calculated optimal sensitivity corresponding to a power signal-to-noise ratio of 0.08 (or -11 dB) in a spectral window of 25 kHz, for 2 ms of data in 48 antennas. This is well sufficient for our application. Timing calibration across individual antenna pairs has been performed at 0.4 ns precision; for calibration of signal clocks across stations of 48 antennas the precision is 0.1 ns. Monitoring differences in timing calibration per antenna pair over the course of the period 2011 to 2015 shows a precision of 0.08 ns, which is useful for monitoring and correcting drifts in signal path synchronizations. A cross-check method for timing calibration is presented, using a pulse transmitter carried by a drone flying over the array. Timing precision is similar, 0.3 ns.
[25]  oai:arXiv.org:1507.08932  [pdf] - 1332578
Calibrating the absolute amplitude scale for air showers measured at LOFAR
Comments: 34 pages, 10 figures
Submitted: 2015-07-31, last modified: 2015-12-28
Air showers induced by cosmic rays create nanosecond pulses detectable at radio frequencies. These pulses have been measured successfully in the past few years at the LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR) and are used to study the properties of cosmic rays. For a complete understanding of this phenomenon and the underlying physical processes, an absolute calibration of the detecting antenna system is needed. We present three approaches that were used to check and improve the antenna model of LOFAR and to provide an absolute calibration of the whole system for air shower measurements. Two methods are based on calibrated reference sources and one on a calibration approach using the diffuse radio emission of the Galaxy, optimized for short data-sets. An accuracy of 19% in amplitude is reached. The absolute calibration is also compared to predictions from air shower simulations. These results are used to set an absolute energy scale for air shower measurements and can be used as a basis for an absolute scale for the measurement of astronomical transients with LOFAR.
[26]  oai:arXiv.org:1512.00014  [pdf] - 1425267
LOFAR MSSS: Detection of a low-frequency radio transient in 400 hrs of monitoring of the North Celestial Pole
Comments: 23 pages, 16 figures, 5 tables, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2015-11-30
We present the results of a four-month campaign searching for low-frequency radio transients near the North Celestial Pole with the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR), as part of the Multifrequency Snapshot Sky Survey (MSSS). The data were recorded between 2011 December and 2012 April and comprised 2149 11-minute snapshots, each covering 175 deg^2. We have found one convincing candidate astrophysical transient, with a duration of a few minutes and a flux density at 60 MHz of 15-25 Jy. The transient does not repeat and has no obvious optical or high-energy counterpart, as a result of which its nature is unclear. The detection of this event implies a transient rate at 60 MHz of 3.9 (+14.7, -3.7) x 10^-4 day^-1 deg^-2, and a transient surface density of 1.5 x 10^-5 deg^-2, at a 7.9-Jy limiting flux density and ~10-minute time-scale. The campaign data were also searched for transients at a range of other time-scales, from 0.5 to 297 min, which allowed us to place a range of limits on transient rates at 60 MHz as a function of observation duration.
[27]  oai:arXiv.org:1511.09118  [pdf] - 1359004
Imaging Jupiter's radiation belts down to 127 MHz with LOFAR
Comments: 10 pages, 12 figures, accepted for publication in A&A (27/11/2015) - abstract edited because of limited characters
Submitted: 2015-11-29
Context. Observing Jupiter's synchrotron emission from the Earth remains today the sole method to scrutinize the distribution and dynamical behavior of the ultra energetic electrons magnetically trapped around the planet (because in-situ particle data are limited in the inner magnetosphere). Aims. We perform the first resolved and low-frequency imaging of the synchrotron emission with LOFAR at 127 MHz. The radiation comes from low energy electrons (~1-30 MeV) which map a broad region of Jupiter's inner magnetosphere. Methods (see article for complete abstract) Results. The first resolved images of Jupiter's radiation belts at 127-172 MHz are obtained along with total integrated flux densities. They are compared with previous observations at higher frequencies and show a larger extent of the synchrotron emission source (>=4 $R_J$). The asymmetry and the dynamic of east-west emission peaks are measured and the presence of a hot spot at lambda_III=230 {\deg} $\pm$ 25 {\deg}. Spectral flux density measurements are on the low side of previous (unresolved) ones, suggesting a low-frequency turnover and/or time variations of the emission spectrum. Conclusions. LOFAR is a powerful and flexible planetary imager. The observations at 127 MHz depict an extended emission up to ~4-5 planetary radii. The similarities with high frequency results reinforce the conclusion that: i) the magnetic field morphology primarily shapes the brightness distribution of the emission and ii) the radiating electrons are likely radially and latitudinally distributed inside about 2 $R_J$. Nonetheless, the larger extent of the brightness combined with the overall lower flux density, yields new information on Jupiter's electron distribution, that may shed light on the origin and mode of transport of these particles.
[28]  oai:arXiv.org:1511.03045  [pdf] - 1347607
Influence of Atmospheric Electric Fields on the Radio Emission from Extensive Air Showers
Comments:
Submitted: 2015-11-10
The atmospheric electric fields in thunderclouds have been shown to significantly modify the intensity and polarization patterns of the radio footprint of cosmic-ray-induced extensive air showers. Simulations indicated a very non-linear dependence of the signal strength in the frequency window of 30-80 MHz on the magnitude of the atmospheric electric field. In this work we present an explanation of this dependence based on Monte-Carlo simulations, supported by arguments based on electron dynamics in air showers and expressed in terms of a simplified model. We show that by extending the frequency window to lower frequencies additional sensitivity to the atmospheric electric field is obtained.
[29]  oai:arXiv.org:1509.06396  [pdf] - 1351498
Wide-Band, Low-Frequency Pulse Profiles of 100 Radio Pulsars with LOFAR
Comments: 38 pages, 11 figures, 5 tables, A&A in press, updated with editorial corrections
Submitted: 2015-09-21, last modified: 2015-10-30
LOFAR offers the unique capability of observing pulsars across the 10-240 MHz frequency range with a fractional bandwidth of roughly 50%. This spectral range is well-suited for studying the frequency evolution of pulse profile morphology caused by both intrinsic and extrinsic effects: such as changing emission altitude in the pulsar magnetosphere or scatter broadening by the interstellar medium, respectively. The magnitude of most of these effects increases rapidly towards low frequencies. LOFAR can thus address a number of open questions about the nature of radio pulsar emission and its propagation through the interstellar medium. We present the average pulse profiles of 100 pulsars observed in the two LOFAR frequency bands: High Band (120-167 MHz, 100 profiles) and Low Band (15-62 MHz, 26 profiles). We compare them with Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT) and Lovell Telescope observations at higher frequencies (350 and1400 MHz) in order to study the profile evolution. The profiles are aligned in absolute phase by folding with a new set of timing solutions from the Lovell Telescope, which we present along with precise dispersion measures obtained with LOFAR. We find that the profile evolution with decreasing radio frequency does not follow a specific trend but, depending on the geometry of the pulsar, new components can enter into, or be hidden from, view. Nonetheless, in general our observations confirm the widening of pulsar profiles at low frequencies, as expected from radius-to-frequency mapping or birefringence theories. We offer this catalog of low-frequency pulsar profiles in a user friendly way via the EPN Database of Pulsar Profiles (http://www.epta.eu.org/epndb/).
[30]  oai:arXiv.org:1509.01257  [pdf] - 1304096
The LOFAR Multifrequency Snapshot Sky Survey (MSSS) I. Survey description and first results
Heald, G. H.; Pizzo, R. F.; Orrú, E.; Breton, R. P.; Carbone, D.; Ferrari, C.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Jurusik, W.; Macario, G.; Mulcahy, D.; Rafferty, D.; Asgekar, A.; Brentjens, M.; Fallows, R. A.; Frieswijk, W.; Toribio, M. C.; Adebahr, B.; Arts, M.; Bell, M. R.; Bonafede, A.; Bray, J.; Broderick, J.; Cantwell, T.; Carroll, P.; Cendes, Y.; Clarke, A. O.; Croston, J.; Daiboo, S.; de Gasperin, F.; Gregson, J.; Harwood, J.; Hassall, T.; Heesen, V.; Horneffer, A.; van der Horst, A. J.; Iacobelli, M.; Jelić, V.; Jones, D.; Kant, D.; Kokotanekov, G.; Martin, P.; McKean, J. P.; Morabito, L. K.; Nikiel-Wroczyński, B.; Offringa, A.; Pandey, V. N.; Pandey-Pommier, M.; Pietka, M.; Pratley, L.; Riseley, C.; Rowlinson, A.; Sabater, J.; Scaife, A. M. M.; Scheers, L. H. A.; Sendlinger, K.; Shulevski, A.; Sipior, M.; Sobey, C.; Stewart, A. J.; Stroe, A.; Swinbank, J.; Tasse, C.; Trüstedt, J.; Varenius, E.; van Velzen, S.; Vilchez, N.; van Weeren, R. J.; Wijnholds, S.; Williams, W. L.; de Bruyn, A. G.; Nijboer, R.; Wise, M.; Alexov, A.; Anderson, J.; Avruch, I. M.; Beck, R.; Bell, M. E.; van Bemmel, I.; Bentum, M. J.; Bernardi, G.; Best, P.; Breitling, F.; Brouw, W. N.; Brüggen, M.; Butcher, H. R.; Ciardi, B.; Conway, J. E.; de Geus, E.; de Jong, A.; de Vos, M.; Deller, A.; Dettmar, R. J.; Duscha, S.; Eislöffel, J.; Engels, D.; Falcke, H.; Fender, R.; Garrett, M. A.; Grießmeier, J.; Gunst, A. W.; Hamaker, J. P.; Hessels, J. W. T.; Hoeft, M.; Hörandel, J.; Holties, H. A.; Intema, H.; Jackson, N. J.; Jütte, E.; Karastergiou, A.; Klijn, W. F. A.; Kondratiev, V. I.; Koopmans, L. V. E.; Kuniyoshi, M.; Kuper, G.; Law, C.; van Leeuwen, J.; Loose, M.; Maat, P.; Markoff, S.; McFadden, R.; McKay-Bukowski, D.; Mevius, M.; Miller-Jones, J. C. A.; Morganti, R.; Munk, H.; Nelles, A.; Noordam, J. E.; Norden, M. J.; Paas, H.; Polatidis, A. G.; Reich, W.; Renting, A.; Röttgering, H.; Schoenmakers, A.; Schwarz, D.; Sluman, J.; Smirnov, O.; Stappers, B. W.; Steinmetz, M.; Tagger, M.; Tang, Y.; ter Veen, S.; Thoudam, S.; Vermeulen, R.; Vocks, C.; Vogt, C.; Wijers, R. A. M. J.; Wucknitz, O.; Yatawatta, S.; Zarka, P.
Comments: 23 pages, 19 figures. Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics. MSSS Verification Field images and catalog data may be downloaded from http://vo.astron.nl
Submitted: 2015-09-03
We present the Multifrequency Snapshot Sky Survey (MSSS), the first northern-sky LOFAR imaging survey. In this introductory paper, we first describe in detail the motivation and design of the survey. Compared to previous radio surveys, MSSS is exceptional due to its intrinsic multifrequency nature providing information about the spectral properties of the detected sources over more than two octaves (from 30 to 160 MHz). The broadband frequency coverage, together with the fast survey speed generated by LOFAR's multibeaming capabilities, make MSSS the first survey of the sort anticipated to be carried out with the forthcoming Square Kilometre Array (SKA). Two of the sixteen frequency bands included in the survey were chosen to exactly overlap the frequency coverage of large-area Very Large Array (VLA) and Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) surveys at 74 MHz and 151 MHz respectively. The survey performance is illustrated within the "MSSS Verification Field" (MVF), a region of 100 square degrees centered at J2000 (RA,Dec)=(15h,69deg). The MSSS results from the MVF are compared with previous radio survey catalogs. We assess the flux and astrometric uncertainties in the catalog, as well as the completeness and reliability considering our source finding strategy. We determine the 90% completeness levels within the MVF to be 100 mJy at 135 MHz with 108" resolution, and 550 mJy at 50 MHz with 166" resolution. Images and catalogs for the full survey, expected to contain 150,000-200,000 sources, will be released to a public web server. We outline the plans for the ongoing production of the final survey products, and the ultimate public release of images and source catalogs.
[31]  oai:arXiv.org:1506.09134  [pdf] - 1273184
Measurement of the cosmic-ray energy spectrum above $10^{16}$ eV with the LOFAR Radboud Air Shower Array
Comments: 12 pages, Accepted by Astroparticle Physics, updated authors list
Submitted: 2015-06-30, last modified: 2015-07-01
The energy reconstruction of extensive air showers measured with the LOFAR Radboud Air Shower Array (LORA) is presented in detail. LORA is a particle detector array located in the center of the LOFAR radio telescope in the Netherlands. The aim of this work is to provide an accurate and independent energy measurement for the air showers measured through their radio signal with the LOFAR antennas. The energy reconstruction is performed using a parameterized relation between the measured shower size and the cosmic-ray energy obtained from air shower simulations. In order to illustrate the capabilities of LORA, the all-particle cosmic-ray energy spectrum has been reconstructed, assuming that cosmic rays are composed only of protons or iron nuclei in the energy range between $\sim2\times10^{16}$ and $2\times10^{18}$ eV. The results are compatible with literature values and a changing mass composition in the transition region from a galactic to an extragalactic origin of cosmic rays.
[32]  oai:arXiv.org:1505.03064  [pdf] - 1005774
LOFAR discovery of a quiet emission mode in PSR B0823+26
Comments: 15 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2015-05-12
PSR B0823+26, a 0.53-s radio pulsar, displays a host of emission phenomena over timescales of seconds to (at least) hours, including nulling, subpulse drifting, and mode-changing. Studying pulsars like PSR B0823+26 provides further insight into the relationship between these various emission phenomena and what they might teach us about pulsar magnetospheres. Here we report on the LOFAR discovery that PSR B0823+26 has a weak and sporadically emitting 'quiet' (Q) emission mode that is over 100 times weaker (on average) and has a nulling fraction forty-times greater than that of the more regularly-emitting 'bright' (B) mode. Previously, the pulsar has been undetected in the Q-mode, and was assumed to be nulling continuously. PSR B0823+26 shows a further decrease in average flux just before the transition into the B-mode, and perhaps truly turns off completely at these times. Furthermore, simultaneous observations taken with the LOFAR, Westerbork, Lovell, and Effelsberg telescopes between 110 MHz and 2.7 GHz demonstrate that the transition between the Q-mode and B-mode occurs within one single rotation of the neutron star, and that it is concurrent across the range of frequencies observed.
[33]  oai:arXiv.org:1505.00624  [pdf] - 1269314
Anomaly in the cosmic-ray energy spectrum at GeV-TeV energies
Comments: 6 pages, To appear in the proceedings of the 24th European Cosmic Ray Symposium, 2014, Kiel
Submitted: 2015-05-04
Recent measurements of cosmic rays by various experiments have found that the energy spectrum of cosmic rays is harder in the TeV region than at GeV energies. The origin of the spectral hardening is not clearly understood. In this paper, we discuss the possibility that the spectral hardening might be due to the effect of re-acceleration of cosmic rays by weak shocks associated with old supernova remnants in the Galaxy.
[34]  oai:arXiv.org:1504.06642  [pdf] - 1232206
The peculiar radio galaxy 4C 35.06: a case for recurrent AGN activity?
Comments: 10 pages, 6 figures. Accepted to A&A
Submitted: 2015-04-24
Using observations obtained with the LOw Fequency ARray (LOFAR), the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT) and archival Very Large Array (VLA) data, we have traced the radio emission to large scales in the complex source 4C 35.06 located in the core of the galaxy cluster Abell 407. At higher spatial resolution (~4"), the source was known to have two inner radio lobes spanning 31 kpc and a diffuse, low-brightness extension running parallel to them, offset by about 11 kpc (in projection). At 62 MHz, we detect the radio emission of this structure extending out to 210 kpc. At 1.4 GHz and intermediate spatial resolution (~30"), the structure appears to have a helical morphology. We have derived the characteristics of the radio spectral index across the source. We show that the source morphology is most likely the result of at least two episodes of AGN activity separated by a dormant period of around 35 Myr. The AGN is hosted by one of the galaxies located in the cluster core of Abell 407. We propose that it is intermittently active as it moves in the dense environment in the cluster core. Using LOFAR, we can trace the relic plasma from that episode of activity out to greater distances from the core than ever before. Using the the WSRT, we detect HI in absorption against the center of the radio source. The absorption profile is relatively broad (FWHM of 288 km/s), similar to what is found in other clusters. Understanding the duty cycle of the radio emission as well as the triggering mechanism for starting (or restarting) the radio-loud activity can provide important constraints to quantify the impact of AGN feedback on galaxy evolution. The study of these mechanisms at low frequencies using morphological and spectral information promises to bring new important insights in this field.
[35]  oai:arXiv.org:1504.05742  [pdf] - 984470
Probing Atmospheric Electric Fields in Thunderstorms through Radio Emission from Cosmic-Ray-Induced Air Showers
Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures, accepted for publication in Physical Review Letters
Submitted: 2015-04-22
We present measurements of radio emission from cosmic ray air showers that took place during thunderstorms. The intensity and polarization patterns of these air showers are radically different from those measured during fair-weather conditions. With the use of a simple two-layer model for the atmospheric electric field, these patterns can be well reproduced by state-of-the-art simulation codes. This in turn provides a novel way to study atmospheric electric fields.
[36]  oai:arXiv.org:1411.7868  [pdf] - 1055726
The radio emission pattern of air showers as measured with LOFAR - a tool for the reconstruction of the energy and the shower maximum
Comments: 15 pages, 10 figures, accepted for publication in JCAP
Submitted: 2014-11-28, last modified: 2015-04-13
The pattern of the radio emission of air showers is finely sampled with the Low-Frequency ARray (LOFAR). A set of 382 measured air showers is used to test a fast, analytic parameterization of the distribution of pulse powers. Using this parameterization we are able to reconstruct the shower axis and give estimators for the energy of the air shower as well as the distance to the shower maximum.
[37]  oai:arXiv.org:1406.7242  [pdf] - 944764
LOFAR Sparse Image Reconstruction
Comments: Published in A&A, 19 pages, 9 figures
Submitted: 2014-06-27, last modified: 2015-03-06
Context. The LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR) radio telescope is a giant digital phased array interferometer with multiple antennas distributed in Europe. It provides discrete sets of Fourier components of the sky brightness. Recovering the original brightness distribution with aperture synthesis forms an inverse problem that can be solved by various deconvolution and minimization methods Aims. Recent papers have established a clear link between the discrete nature of radio interferometry measurement and the "compressed sensing" (CS) theory, which supports sparse reconstruction methods to form an image from the measured visibilities. Empowered by proximal theory, CS offers a sound framework for efficient global minimization and sparse data representation using fast algorithms. Combined with instrumental direction-dependent effects (DDE) in the scope of a real instrument, we developed and validated a new method based on this framework Methods. We implemented a sparse reconstruction method in the standard LOFAR imaging tool and compared the photometric and resolution performance of this new imager with that of CLEAN-based methods (CLEAN and MS-CLEAN) with simulated and real LOFAR data Results. We show that i) sparse reconstruction performs as well as CLEAN in recovering the flux of point sources; ii) performs much better on extended objects (the root mean square error is reduced by a factor of up to 10); and iii) provides a solution with an effective angular resolution 2-3 times better than the CLEAN images. Conclusions. Sparse recovery gives a correct photometry on high dynamic and wide-field images and improved realistic structures of extended sources (of simulated and real LOFAR datasets). This sparse reconstruction method is compatible with modern interferometric imagers that handle DDE corrections (A- and W-projections) required for current and future instruments such as LOFAR and SKA
[38]  oai:arXiv.org:1412.6947  [pdf] - 1223762
A possible origin of gamma rays from the Fermi Bubbles
Comments: 6 pages, Talk presented at Cosmic Ray Origin- beyond the standard models, March 2014, Dolomites, Italy; published in Nuclear Physics B Proceedings
Submitted: 2014-12-22
One of the most exciting discoveries of recent years is a pair of gigantic gamma-ray emission regions, the so-called Fermi bubbles, above and below the Galactic center. The bubbles, discovered by the Fermi space telescope, extend up to $\sim 50^\circ$ in Galactic latitude and are $\sim 40^\circ$ wide in Galactic longitude. The gamma-ray emission is also found to correlate with radio, microwave and X-rays emission. The origin of the bubbles and the associated non-thermal emissions are still not clearly understood. Possible explanations for the non-thermal emission include cosmic-ray injection from the Galactic center by high speed Galactic winds/jets, acceleration by multiple shocks or plasma turbulence present inside the bubbles, and acceleration by strong shock waves associated with the expansion of the bubbles. In this paper, I will discuss the possibility that the gamma-ray emission is produced by the injection of Galactic cosmic-rays mainly protons during their diffusive propagation through the Galaxy. The protons interact with the bubble plasma producing $\pi^\circ$-decay gamma rays, while at the same time, radio and microwave synchrotron emissions are produced by the secondary electrons/positrons resulting from the $\pi^{\pm}$ decays.
[39]  oai:arXiv.org:1411.6865  [pdf] - 904300
Measuring a Cherenkov ring in the radio emission from air showers at 110-190 MHz with LOFAR
Comments: 20 pages, 10 figures, accpeted for publication in Astroparticle Physics
Submitted: 2014-11-25
Measuring radio emission from air showers offers a novel way to determine properties of the primary cosmic rays such as their mass and energy. Theory predicts that relativistic time compression effects lead to a ring of amplified emission which starts to dominate the emission pattern for frequencies above ~100 MHz. In this article we present the first detailed measurements of this structure. Ring structures in the radio emission of air showers are measured with the LOFAR radio telescope in the frequency range of 110 - 190 MHz. These data are well described by CoREAS simulations. They clearly confirm the importance of including the index of refraction of air as a function of height. Furthermore, the presence of the Cherenkov ring offers the possibility for a geometrical measurement of the depth of shower maximum, which in turn depends on the mass of the primary particle.
[40]  oai:arXiv.org:1411.2743  [pdf] - 926654
The LOFAR long baseline snapshot calibrator survey
Comments: 13 pages, 9 figures. Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics
Submitted: 2014-11-11
Aims. An efficient means of locating calibrator sources for International LOFAR is developed and used to determine the average density of usable calibrator sources on the sky for subarcsecond observations at 140 MHz. Methods. We used the multi-beaming capability of LOFAR to conduct a fast and computationally inexpensive survey with the full International LOFAR array. Sources were pre-selected on the basis of 325 MHz arcminute-scale flux density using existing catalogues. By observing 30 different sources in each of the 12 sets of pointings per hour, we were able to inspect 630 sources in two hours to determine if they possess a sufficiently bright compact component to be usable as LOFAR delay calibrators. Results. Over 40% of the observed sources are detected on multiple baselines between international stations and 86 are classified as satisfactory calibrators. We show that a flat low-frequency spectrum (from 74 to 325 MHz) is the best predictor of compactness at 140 MHz. We extrapolate from our sample to show that the density of calibrators on the sky that are sufficiently bright to calibrate dispersive and non-dispersive delays for the International LOFAR using existing methods is 1.0 per square degree. Conclusions. The observed density of satisfactory delay calibrator sources means that observations with International LOFAR should be possible at virtually any point in the sky, provided that a fast and efficient search using the methodology described here is conducted prior to the observation to identify the best calibrator.
[41]  oai:arXiv.org:1409.5437  [pdf] - 869661
LOFAR low-band antenna observations of the 3C295 and Bootes fields: source counts and ultra-steep spectrum sources
Comments: 26 pages, 20 figures, ApJ in press
Submitted: 2014-09-18
We present LOFAR Low Band observations of the Bootes and 3C295 fields. Our images made at 34, 46, and 62 MHz reach noise levels of 12, 8, and 5 mJy beam$^{-1}$, making them the deepest images ever obtained in this frequency range. In total, we detect between 300 and 400 sources in each of these images, covering an area of 17 to 52 deg$^{2}$. From the observations we derive Euclidean-normalized differential source counts. The 62 MHz source counts agree with previous GMRT 153 MHz and VLA 74 MHz differential source counts, scaling with a spectral index of $-0.7$. We find that a spectral index scaling of $-0.5$ is required to match up the LOFAR 34 MHz source counts. This result is also in agreement with source counts from the 38 MHz 8C survey, indicating that the average spectral index of radio sources flattens towards lower frequencies. We also find evidence for spectral flattening using the individual flux measurements of sources between 34 and 1400 MHz and by calculating the spectral index averaged over the source population. To select ultra-steep spectrum ($\alpha < -1.1$) radio sources, that could be associated with massive high redshift radio galaxies, we compute spectral indices between 62 MHz, 153 MHz and 1.4 GHz for sources in the Bo\"otes field. We cross-correlate these radio sources with optical and infrared catalogues and fit the spectral energy distribution to obtain photometric redshifts. We find that most of these ultra-steep spectrum sources are located in the $ 0.7 \lesssim z \lesssim 2.5$ range.
[42]  oai:arXiv.org:1406.1355  [pdf] - 1209969
Polarized radio emission from extensive air showers measured with LOFAR
Comments: 22 pages, 14 figures, accepted for publication in JCAP
Submitted: 2014-06-05, last modified: 2014-09-09
We present LOFAR measurements of radio emission from extensive air showers. We find that this emission is strongly polarized, with a median degree of polarization of nearly $99\%$, and that the angle between the polarization direction of the electric field and the Lorentz force acting on the particles, depends on the observer location in the shower plane. This can be understood as a superposition of the radially polarized charge-excess emission mechanism, first proposed by Askaryan and the geomagnetic emission mechanism proposed by Kahn and Lerche. We calculate the relative strengths of both contributions, as quantified by the charge-excess fraction, for $163$ individual air showers. We find that the measured charge-excess fraction is higher for air showers arriving from closer to the zenith. Furthermore, the measured charge-excess fraction also increases with increasing observer distance from the air shower symmetry axis. The measured values range from $(3.3\pm 1.0)\%$ for very inclined air showers at $25\, \mathrm{m}$ to $(20.3\pm 1.3)\%$ for almost vertical showers at $225\, \mathrm{m}$. Both dependencies are in qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions.
[43]  oai:arXiv.org:1408.7001  [pdf] - 1216575
A method for high precision reconstruction of air shower Xmax using two-dimensional radio intensity profiles
Comments: 12 pages, 10 figures, submitted to Phys. Rev. D
Submitted: 2014-08-29, last modified: 2014-09-01
The mass composition of cosmic rays contains important clues about their origin. Accurate measurements are needed to resolve long-standing issues such as the transition from Galactic to extragalactic origin, and the nature of the cutoff observed at the highest energies. Composition can be studied by measuring the atmospheric depth of the shower maximum Xmax of air showers generated by high-energy cosmic rays hitting the Earth's atmosphere. We present a new method to reconstruct Xmax based on radio measurements. The radio emission mechanism of air showers is a complex process that creates an asymmetric intensity pattern on the ground. The shape of this pattern strongly depends on the longitudinal development of the shower. We reconstruct Xmax by fitting two-dimensional intensity profiles, simulated with CoREAS, to data from the LOFAR radio telescope. In the dense LOFAR core, air showers are detected by hundreds of antennas simultaneously. The simulations fit the data very well, indicating that the radiation mechanism is now well-understood. The typical uncertainty on the reconstruction of Xmax for LOFAR showers is 17 g/cm^2.
[44]  oai:arXiv.org:1408.4469  [pdf] - 1216403
LORA: A scintillator array for LOFAR to measure extensive air showers
Comments: 10 pages, Accepted for publication in Nuclear Instruments and Methods A
Submitted: 2014-08-19
The measurement of the radio emission from extensive air showers, induced by high-energy cosmic rays is one of the key science projects of the LOFAR radio telescope. The LOfar Radboud air shower Array (LORA) has been installed in the core of LOFAR in the Netherlands. The main purpose of LORA is to measure the properties of air showers and to trigger the read-out of the LOFAR radio antennas to register extensive air showers. The experimental set-up of the array of scintillation detectors and its performance are described.
[45]  oai:arXiv.org:1408.0411  [pdf] - 885132
The LOFAR Pilot Surveys for Pulsars and Fast Radio Transients
Comments: 18 pages, 10 figures, accepted for A&A
Submitted: 2014-08-02
We have conducted two pilot surveys for radio pulsars and fast transients with the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR) around 140 MHz and here report on the first low-frequency fast-radio burst limit and the discovery of two new pulsars. The first survey, the LOFAR Pilot Pulsar Survey (LPPS), observed a large fraction of the northern sky, ~1.4 x 10^4 sq. deg, with 1-hr dwell times. Each observation covered ~75 sq. deg using 7 independent fields formed by incoherently summing the high-band antenna fields. The second pilot survey, the LOFAR Tied-Array Survey (LOTAS), spanned ~600 sq. deg, with roughly a 5-fold increase in sensitivity compared with LPPS. Using a coherent sum of the 6 LOFAR "Superterp" stations, we formed 19 tied-array beams, together covering 4 sq. deg per pointing. From LPPS we derive a limit on the occurrence, at 142 MHz, of dispersed radio bursts of < 150 /day/sky, for bursts brighter than S > 107 Jy for the narrowest searched burst duration of 0.66 ms. In LPPS, we re-detected 65 previously known pulsars. LOTAS discovered two pulsars, the first with LOFAR or any digital aperture array. LOTAS also re-detected 27 previously known pulsars. These pilot studies show that LOFAR can efficiently carry out all-sky surveys for pulsars and fast transients, and they set the stage for further surveying efforts using LOFAR and the planned low-frequency component of the Square Kilometer Array.
[46]  oai:arXiv.org:1407.4244  [pdf] - 1042991
Lunar occultation of the diffuse radio sky: LOFAR measurements between 35 and 80 MHz
Comments: 15 pages, 11 figures, 1 table
Submitted: 2014-07-16
We present radio observations of the Moon between $35$ and $80$ MHz to demonstrate a novel technique of interferometrically measuring large-scale diffuse emission extending far beyond the primary beam (global signal) for the first time. In particular, we show that (i) the Moon appears as a negative-flux source at frequencies $35<\nu<80$ MHz since it is `colder' than the diffuse Galactic background it occults, (ii) using the (negative) flux of the lunar disc, we can reconstruct the spectrum of the diffuse Galactic emission with the lunar thermal emission as a reference, and (iii) that reflected RFI (radio-frequency interference) is concentrated at the center of the lunar disc due to specular nature of reflection, and can be independently measured. Our RFI measurements show that (i) Moon-based Cosmic Dawn experiments must design for an Earth-isolation of better than $80$ dB to achieve an RFI temperature $<1$ mK, (ii) Moon-reflected RFI contributes to a dipole temperature less than $20$ mK for Earth-based Cosmic Dawn experiments, (iii) man-made satellite-reflected RFI temperature exceeds $20$ mK if the aggregate cross section of visible satellites exceeds $80$ m$^2$ at $800$ km height, or $5$ m$^2$ at $400$ km height. Currently, our diffuse background spectrum is limited by sidelobe confusion on short baselines (10-15% level). Further refinement of our technique may yield constraints on the redshifted global $21$-cm signal from Cosmic Dawn ($40>z>12$) and the Epoch of Reionization ($12>z>5$).
[47]  oai:arXiv.org:1407.4385  [pdf] - 863117
LOFAR tied-array imaging of Type III solar radio bursts
Comments: 9 pages, 6 figures
Submitted: 2014-07-16
The Sun is an active source of radio emission which is often associated with energetic phenomena such as solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). At low radio frequencies (<100 MHz), the Sun has not been imaged extensively because of the instrumental limitations of previous radio telescopes. Here, the combined high spatial, spectral and temporal resolution of the Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) was used to study solar Type III radio bursts at 30-90 MHz and their association with CMEs. The Sun was imaged with 126 simultaneous tied-array beams within 5 solar radii of the solar centre. This method offers benefits over standard interferometric imaging since each beam produces high temporal (83 ms) and spectral resolution (12.5 kHz) dynamic spectra at an array of spatial locations centred on the Sun. LOFAR's standard interferometric output is currently limited to one image per second. Over a period of 30 minutes, multiple Type III radio bursts were observed, a number of which were found to be located at high altitudes (4 solar radii from the solar center at 30 MHz) and to have non-radial trajectories. These bursts occurred at altitudes in excess of values predicted by 1D radial electron density models. The non-radial high altitude Type III bursts were found to be associated with the expanding flank of a CME. The CME may have compressed neighbouring streamer plasma producing larger electron densities at high altitudes, while the non-radial burst trajectories can be explained by the deflection of radial magnetic fields as the CME expanded in the low corona.
[48]  oai:arXiv.org:1407.2093  [pdf] - 863074
Initial LOFAR observations of Epoch of Reionization windows: II. Diffuse polarized emission in the ELAIS-N1 field
Jelic, V.; de Bruyn, A. G.; Mevius, M.; Abdalla, F. B.; Asad, K. M. B.; Bernardi, G.; Brentjens, M. A.; Bus, S.; Chapman, E.; Ciardi, B.; Daiboo, S.; Fernandez, E. R.; Ghosh, A.; Harker, G.; Jensen, H.; Kazemi, S.; Koopmans, L. V. E.; Labropoulos, P.; Martinez-Rubi, O.; Mellema, G.; Offringa, A. R.; Pandey, V. N.; Patil, A. H.; Thomas, R. M.; Vedantham, H. K.; Veligatla, V.; Yatawatta, S.; Zaroubi, S.; Alexov, A.; Anderson, J.; Avruch, I. M.; Beck, R.; Bell, M. E.; Bentum, M. J.; Best, P.; Bonafede, A.; Bregman, J.; Breitling, F.; Broderick, J.; Brouw, W. N.; Bruggen, M.; Butcher, H. R.; Conway, J. E.; de Gasperin, F.; de Geus, E.; Deller, A.; Dettmar, R. -J.; Duscha, S.; Eisloffel, J.; Engels, D.; Falcke, H.; Fallows, R. A.; Fender, R.; Ferrari, C.; Frieswijk, W.; Garrett, M. A.; Griessmeier, J.; Gunst, A. W.; Hamaker, J. P.; Hassall, T. E.; Haverkorn, M.; Heald, G.; Hessels, J. W. T.; Hoeft, M.; Horandel, J.; Horneffer, A.; van der Horst, A.; Iacobelli, M.; Juette, E.; Karastergiou, A.; Kondratiev, V. I.; Kramer, M.; Kuniyoshi, M.; Kuper, G.; van Leeuwen, J.; Maat, P.; Mann, G.; McKay-Bukowski, D.; McKean, J. P.; Munk, H.; Nelles, A.; Norden, M. J.; Paas, H.; Pandey-Pommier, M.; Pietka, G.; Pizzo, R.; Polatidis, A. G.; Reich, W.; Rottgering, H.; Rowlinson, A.; Scaife, A. M. M.; Schwarz, D.; Serylak, M.; Smirnov, O.; Steinmetz, M.; Stewart, A.; Tagger, M.; Tang, Y.; Tasse, C.; ter Veen, S.; Thoudam, S.; Toribio, C.; Vermeulen, R.; Vocks, C.; van Weeren, R. J.; Wijers, R. A. M. J.; Wijnholds, S. J.; Wucknitz, O.; Zarka, P.
Comments: 12 pages, 9 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2014-07-08
This study aims to characterise the polarized foreground emission in the ELAIS-N1 field and to address its possible implications for the extraction of the cosmological 21-cm signal from the Low-Frequency Array - Epoch of Reionization (LOFAR-EoR) data. We use the high band antennas of LOFAR to image this region and RM-synthesis to unravel structures of polarized emission at high Galactic latitudes. The brightness temperature of the detected Galactic emission is on average 4 K in polarized intensity and covers the range from -10 to +13rad m^-2 in Faraday depth. The total polarized intensity and polarization angle show a wide range of morphological features. We have also used the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT) at 350 MHz to image the same region. The LOFAR and WSRT images show a similar complex morphology, at comparable brightness levels, but their spatial correlation is very low. The fractional polarization at 150 MHz, expressed as a percentage of the total intensity, amounts to 1.5%. There is no indication of diffuse emission in total intensity in the interferometric data, in line with results at higher frequencies. The wide frequency range, good angular resolution and good sensitivity make LOFAR an exquisite instrument for studying Galactic polarized emission at a resolution of 1-2 rad m^-2 in Faraday depth. The different polarised patterns observed at 150 MHz and 350 MHz are consistent with different source distributions along the line of sight wring in a variety of Faraday thin regions of emission. The presence of polarised foregrounds is a serious complication for Epoch of Reionization experiments. To avoid the leakage of polarized emission into total intensity, which can depend on frequency, we need to calibrate the instrumental polarization across the field of view to a small fraction of 1%.
[49]  oai:arXiv.org:1404.3907  [pdf] - 1208991
The shape of the radio wavefront of extensive air showers as measured with LOFAR
Comments: Accepted for publication in Astroparticle Physics
Submitted: 2014-04-15, last modified: 2014-06-08
Extensive air showers, induced by high energy cosmic rays impinging on the Earth's atmosphere, produce radio emission that is measured with the LOFAR radio telescope. As the emission comes from a finite distance of a few kilometers, the incident wavefront is non-planar. A spherical, conical or hyperbolic shape of the wavefront has been proposed, but measurements of individual air showers have been inconclusive so far. For a selected high-quality sample of 161 measured extensive air showers, we have reconstructed the wavefront by measuring pulse arrival times to sub-nanosecond precision in 200 to 350 individual antennas. For each measured air shower, we have fitted a conical, spherical, and hyperboloid shape to the arrival times. The fit quality and a likelihood analysis show that a hyperboloid is the best parametrization. Using a non-planar wavefront shape gives an improved angular resolution, when reconstructing the shower arrival direction. Furthermore, a dependence of the wavefront shape on the shower geometry can be seen. This suggests that it will be possible to use a wavefront shape analysis to get an additional handle on the atmospheric depth of the shower maximum, which is sensitive to the mass of the primary particle.
[50]  oai:arXiv.org:1404.3630  [pdf] - 1208969
GeV-TeV cosmic-ray spectral anomaly as due to re-acceleration by weak shocks in the Galaxy
Comments: 12 pages, A&A accepted
Submitted: 2014-04-14
Recent cosmic-ray measurements have found an anomaly in the cosmic-ray energy spectrum at GeV-TeV energies. Although the origin of the anomaly is not clearly understood, suggested explanations include effect of cosmic-ray source spectrum, propagation effects, and the effect of nearby sources. In this paper, we propose that the spectral anomaly might be an effect of re-acceleration of cosmic rays by weak shocks in the Galaxy. After acceleration by strong supernova remnant shock waves, cosmic rays undergo diffusive propagation through the Galaxy. During the propagation, cosmic rays may again encounter expanding supernova remnant shock waves, and get re-accelerated. As the probability of encountering old supernova remnants is expected to be larger than the younger ones due to their bigger sizes, re-acceleration is expected to be mainly due to weaker shocks. Since weaker shocks generate a softer particle spectrum, the resulting re-accelerated component will have a spectrum steeper than the initial cosmic-ray source spectrum produced by strong shocks. For a reasonable set of model parameters, it is shown that such re-accelerated component can dominate the GeV energy region while the non-reaccelerated component dominates at higher energies, explaining the observed GeV-TeV spectral anomaly.
[51]  oai:arXiv.org:1401.2876  [pdf] - 1202705
Discovery of Carbon Radio Recombination Lines in absorption towards Cygnus~A
Comments: In press
Submitted: 2014-01-13
We present the first detection of carbon radio recombination line absorption along the line of sight to Cygnus A. The observations were carried out with the LOw Frequency ARray in the 33 to 57 MHz range. These low frequency radio observations provide us with a new line of sight to study the diffuse, neutral gas in our Galaxy. To our knowledge this is the first time that foreground Milky Way recombination line absorption has been observed against a bright extragalactic background source. By stacking 48 carbon $\alpha$ lines in the observed frequency range we detect carbon absorption with a signal-to-noise ratio of about 5. The average carbon absorption has a peak optical depth of 2$\times$10$^{-4}$, a line width of 10 km s$^{-1}$ and a velocity of +4 km s$^{-1}$ with respect to the local standard of rest. The associated gas is found to have an electron temperature $T_{e}\sim$ 110 K and density $n_{e}\sim$ 0.06 cm$^{-3}$. These properties imply that the observed carbon $\alpha$ absorption likely arises in the cold neutral medium of the Orion arm of the Milky Way. Hydrogen and helium lines were not detected to a 3$\sigma$ peak optical depth limit of 1.5$\times$10$^{-4}$ for a 4 km s$^{-1}$ channel width. Radio recombination lines associated with Cygnus A itself were also searched for, but are not detected. We set a 3$\sigma$ upper limit of 1.5$\times$10$^{-4}$ for the peak optical depth of these lines for a 4 km s$^{-1}$ channel width.
[52]  oai:arXiv.org:1311.1399  [pdf] - 843057
Detecting cosmic rays with the LOFAR radio telescope
Comments:
Submitted: 2013-11-06
The low frequency array (LOFAR), is the first radio telescope designed with the capability to measure radio emission from cosmic-ray induced air showers in parallel with interferometric observations. In the first $\sim 2\,\mathrm{years}$ of observing, 405 cosmic-ray events in the energy range of $10^{16} - 10^{18}\,\mathrm{eV}$ have been detected in the band from $30 - 80\,\mathrm{MHz}$. Each of these air showers is registered with up to $\sim1000$ independent antennas resulting in measurements of the radio emission with unprecedented detail. This article describes the dataset, as well as the analysis pipeline, and serves as a reference for future papers based on these data. All steps necessary to achieve a full reconstruction of the electric field at every antenna position are explained, including removal of radio frequency interference, correcting for the antenna response and identification of the pulsed signal.
[53]  oai:arXiv.org:1304.6972  [pdf] - 1166226
Fermi bubble $\gamma$-rays as a result of diffusive injection of Galactic cosmic rays
Comments: ApJ Letters accepted, major revision after referee's comments
Submitted: 2013-04-25, last modified: 2013-10-02
Recently, the {\it{Fermi}} space telescope has discovered two large $\gamma$-ray emission regions, the so-called "Fermi bubbles", that extend up to $\sim 50^\circ$ above and below the Galactic center. The $\gamma$-ray emission from the bubbles are found to follow a hard spectrum with no significant spatial variation in intensity and spectral shape. The origin of the emission is still not clearly understood. Suggested explanations include injection of cosmic-ray nuclei from the Galactic center by high-speed Galactic winds, electron acceleration by multiple shocks and stochastic electron acceleration inside the bubbles. In this letter, it is proposed that the $\gamma$-rays can be the result of diffusive injection of Galactic cosmic-ray protons during their propagation through the Galaxy. Considering that the bubbles are slowly expanding, and cosmic rays undergo much slower diffusion inside the bubbles than in the averaged Galaxy and at the same time suffer losses due to adiabatic expansion and inelastic collisions with the bubble plasma, this model can explain the observed intensity profile, the emission spectrum and the measured luminosity without invoking any additional particle production processes unlike other existing models.
[54]  oai:arXiv.org:1308.1357  [pdf] - 702808
Cosmic-ray spectral anomaly at GeV-TeV energies as due to re-acceleration by weak shocks in the Galaxy
Comments: 4 pages, Talk presented at the International Cosmic Ray Conference, Rio De Janeiro, 2013
Submitted: 2013-08-06
Recent cosmic-ray measurements by the ATIC, CREAM and PAMELA experiments have found an apparent hardening of the energy spectrum at TeV energies. Although the origin of the hardening is not clearly understood, possible explanations include hardening in the cosmic-ray source spectrum, changes in the cosmic-ray propagation properties in the Galaxy and the effect of nearby sources. In this contribution, we propose that the spectral anomaly might be an effect of re-acceleration of cosmic rays by weak shocks in the Galaxy. After acceleration by strong supernova remnant shock waves, cosmic rays undergo diffusive propagation through the Galaxy. During the propagation, cosmic rays may again encounter expanding supernova remnant shock waves, and get re-accelerated. As the probability of encountering old supernova remnants is expected to be larger than the young ones due to their bigger size, re-acceleration is expected to be produced mainly by weaker shocks. Since weaker shocks generate a softer particle spectrum, the resulting re-accelerated component will have a spectrum steeper than the initial cosmic-ray source spectrum produced by strong shocks. For a reasonable set of model parameters, it is shown that such re-accelerated component can dominate the GeV energy region while the non-reaccelerated component dominates at higher energies, explaining the observed GeV-TeV spectral anomaly.
[55]  oai:arXiv.org:1304.1400  [pdf] - 1165742
Revisiting the hardening of the cosmic-ray energy spectrum at TeV energies
Comments: MNRAS accepted
Submitted: 2013-04-04, last modified: 2013-08-05
Measurements of cosmic rays by experiments such as ATIC, CREAM, and PAMELA indicate a hardening of the cosmic-ray energy spectrum at TeV energies. In our recent work (Thoudam & H\"orandel 2012a), we showed that the hardening can be due to the effect of nearby supernova remnants. We showed it for the case of proton and helium. In this paper, we present an improved and detailed version of our previous work, and extend our study to heavier cosmic-ray species such as boron, carbon, oxygen, and iron nuclei. Unlike our previous study, the present work involves a detailed calculation of the background cosmic rays and follows a consistent treatment of cosmic-ray source parameters between the background and the nearby components. Moreover, we also present a detailed comparison of our results on the secondary-to-primary ratios, secondary spectra, and the diffuse gamma-ray spectrum with the results expected from other existing models, which can be checked by future measurements at high energies.
[56]  oai:arXiv.org:1305.3550  [pdf] - 1166656
LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray
van Haarlem, M. P.; Wise, M. W.; Gunst, A. W.; Heald, G.; McKean, J. P.; Hessels, J. W. T.; de Bruyn, A. G.; Nijboer, R.; Swinbank, J.; Fallows, R.; Brentjens, M.; Nelles, A.; Beck, R.; Falcke, H.; Fender, R.; Hörandel, J.; Koopmans, L. V. E.; Mann, G.; Miley, G.; Röttgering, H.; Stappers, B. W.; Wijers, R. A. M. J.; Zaroubi, S.; Akker, M. van den; Alexov, A.; Anderson, J.; Anderson, K.; van Ardenne, A.; Arts, M.; Asgekar, A.; Avruch, I. M.; Batejat, F.; Bähren, L.; Bell, M. E.; Bell, M. R.; van Bemmel, I.; Bennema, P.; Bentum, M. J.; Bernardi, G.; Best, P.; Bîrzan, L.; Bonafede, A.; Boonstra, A. -J.; Braun, R.; Bregman, J.; Breitling, F.; van de Brink, R. H.; Broderick, J.; Broekema, P. C.; Brouw, W. N.; Brüggen, M.; Butcher, H. R.; van Cappellen, W.; Ciardi, B.; Coenen, T.; Conway, J.; Coolen, A.; Corstanje, A.; Damstra, S.; Davies, O.; Deller, A. T.; Dettmar, R. -J.; van Diepen, G.; Dijkstra, K.; Donker, P.; Doorduin, A.; Dromer, J.; Drost, M.; van Duin, A.; Eislöffel, J.; van Enst, J.; Ferrari, C.; Frieswijk, W.; Gankema, H.; Garrett, M. A.; de Gasperin, F.; Gerbers, M.; de Geus, E.; Grießmeier, J. -M.; Grit, T.; Gruppen, P.; Hamaker, J. P.; Hassall, T.; Hoeft, M.; Holties, H.; Horneffer, A.; van der Horst, A.; van Houwelingen, A.; Huijgen, A.; Iacobelli, M.; Intema, H.; Jackson, N.; Jelic, V.; de Jong, A.; Juette, E.; Kant, D.; Karastergiou, A.; Koers, A.; Kollen, H.; Kondratiev, V. I.; Kooistra, E.; Koopman, Y.; Koster, A.; Kuniyoshi, M.; Kramer, M.; Kuper, G.; Lambropoulos, P.; Law, C.; van Leeuwen, J.; Lemaitre, J.; Loose, M.; Maat, P.; Macario, G.; Markoff, S.; Masters, J.; McKay-Bukowski, D.; Meijering, H.; Meulman, H.; Mevius, M.; Middelberg, E.; Millenaar, R.; Miller-Jones, J. C. A.; Mohan, R. N.; Mol, J. D.; Morawietz, J.; Morganti, R.; Mulcahy, D. D.; Mulder, E.; Munk, H.; Nieuwenhuis, L.; van Nieuwpoort, R.; Noordam, J. E.; Norden, M.; Noutsos, A.; Offringa, A. R.; Olofsson, H.; Omar, A.; Orrú, E.; Overeem, R.; Paas, H.; Pandey-Pommier, M.; Pandey, V. N.; Pizzo, R.; Polatidis, A.; Rafferty, D.; Rawlings, S.; Reich, W.; de Reijer, J. -P.; Reitsma, J.; Renting, A.; Riemers, P.; Rol, E.; Romein, J. W.; Roosjen, J.; Ruiter, M.; Scaife, A.; van der Schaaf, K.; Scheers, B.; Schellart, P.; Schoenmakers, A.; Schoonderbeek, G.; Serylak, M.; Shulevski, A.; Sluman, J.; Smirnov, O.; Sobey, C.; Spreeuw, H.; Steinmetz, M.; Sterks, C. G. M.; Stiepel, H. -J.; Stuurwold, K.; Tagger, M.; Tang, Y.; Tasse, C.; Thomas, I.; Thoudam, S.; Toribio, M. C.; van der Tol, B.; Usov, O.; van Veelen, M.; van der Veen, A. -J.; ter Veen, S.; Verbiest, J. P. W.; Vermeulen, R.; Vermaas, N.; Vocks, C.; Vogt, C.; de Vos, M.; van der Wal, E.; van Weeren, R.; Weggemans, H.; Weltevrede, P.; White, S.; Wijnholds, S. J.; Wilhelmsson, T.; Wucknitz, O.; Yatawatta, S.; Zarka, P.; Zensus, A.; van Zwieten, J.
Comments: 56 pages, 34 figures, accepted for publication by A&A
Submitted: 2013-05-15, last modified: 2013-05-19
LOFAR, the LOw-Frequency ARray, is a new-generation radio interferometer constructed in the north of the Netherlands and across europe. Utilizing a novel phased-array design, LOFAR covers the largely unexplored low-frequency range from 10-240 MHz and provides a number of unique observing capabilities. Spreading out from a core located near the village of Exloo in the northeast of the Netherlands, a total of 40 LOFAR stations are nearing completion. A further five stations have been deployed throughout Germany, and one station has been built in each of France, Sweden, and the UK. Digital beam-forming techniques make the LOFAR system agile and allow for rapid repointing of the telescope as well as the potential for multiple simultaneous observations. With its dense core array and long interferometric baselines, LOFAR achieves unparalleled sensitivity and angular resolution in the low-frequency radio regime. The LOFAR facilities are jointly operated by the International LOFAR Telescope (ILT) foundation, as an observatory open to the global astronomical community. LOFAR is one of the first radio observatories to feature automated processing pipelines to deliver fully calibrated science products to its user community. LOFAR's new capabilities, techniques and modus operandi make it an important pathfinder for the Square Kilometre Array (SKA). We give an overview of the LOFAR instrument, its major hardware and software components, and the core science objectives that have driven its design. In addition, we present a selection of new results from the commissioning phase of this new radio observatory.
[57]  oai:arXiv.org:1304.0976  [pdf] - 1165706
Detecting Radio Emission from Air Showers with LOFAR
Comments: Accepted for AIP Conference Proceedings, ARENA 2012, Erlangen, Germany
Submitted: 2013-04-03
LOFAR (the Low Frequency Array) is the largest radio telescope in the world for observing low frequency radio emission from 10 to 240 MHz. In addition to its use as an interferometric array, LOFAR is now routinely used to detect cosmic ray induced air showers by their radio emission. The LOFAR core in the Netherlands has a higher density of antennas than any dedicated cosmic ray experiment in radio. On an area of $12 \mathrm{km}^2$ more than 2300 antennas are installed. They measure the radio emission from air showers with unprecedented precision and, therefore, give the perfect opportunity to disentangle the physical processes which cause the radio emission in air showers. In parallel to ongoing astronomical observations LOFAR is triggered by an array of particle detectors to record time-series containing cosmic-ray pulses. Cosmic rays have been measured with LOFAR since June 2011. We present the results of the first year of data.
[58]  oai:arXiv.org:1301.5185  [pdf] - 1159200
Searching for Neutrino Radio Flashes from the Moon with LOFAR
Comments: Proceedings of the ARENA 2012 workshop (Erlangen, Germany), AIP Conference Proceedings, to be published
Submitted: 2013-01-22
Ultra-high-energy neutrinos and cosmic rays produce short radio flashes through the Askaryan effect when they impact on the Moon. Earthbound radio telescopes can search the Lunar surface for these signals. A new generation of low- frequency, digital radio arrays, spearheaded by LOFAR, will allow for searches with unprecedented sensitivity. In the first stage of the NuMoon project, low-frequency observations were carried out with the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope, leading to the most stringent limit on the cosmic neutrino flux above 10$^{23}$ eV. With LOFAR we will be able to reach a sensitivity of over an order of magnitude better and to decrease the threshold energy.
[59]  oai:arXiv.org:1112.3020  [pdf] - 1092352
Nearby supernova remnants and the cosmic-ray spectral hardening at high energies
Comments: 6 pages, MNRAS accepted, minor text corrections
Submitted: 2011-12-13, last modified: 2011-12-16
Recent measurements of cosmic-ray spectra of several individual nuclear species by the CREAM, TRACER, and ATIC experiments indicate a change in the spectral index of the power laws at TeV energies. Possible explanations among others include non linear diffusive shock acceleration of cosmic-rays, different cosmic-ray propagation properties at higher and lower energies in the Galaxy and the presence of nearby sources. In this paper, we show that if supernova remnants are the main sources of cosmic rays in our Galaxy, the effect of the nearby remnants can be responsible for the observed spectral changes. Using a rigidity dependent escape of cosmic-rays from the supernova remnants, we explain the apparent observed property that the hardening of the helium spectrum occurs at relatively lower energies as compared to the protons and also that the spectral hardening does not persist beyond $\sim (20-30)$ TeV energies.
[60]  oai:arXiv.org:1109.5805  [pdf] - 416894
LOFAR: Detecting Cosmic Rays with a Radio Telescope
Comments: Contribution to the 32nd International Cosmic Ray Conference (Beijing, China, 11-18 Aug. 2011); 4 pages, 4 figures
Submitted: 2011-09-27
LOFAR (the Low Frequency Array), a distributed digital radio telescope with stations in the Netherlands, Germany, France, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, is designed to enable full-sky monitoring of transient radio sources. These capabilities are ideal for the detection of broadband radio pulses generated in cosmic ray air showers. The core of LOFAR consists of 24 stations within 4 square kilometers, and each station contains 96 low-band antennas and 48 high-band antennas. This dense instrumentation will allow detailed studies of the lateral distribution of the radio signal in a frequency range of 10-250 MHz. Such studies are key to understanding the various radio emission mechanisms within the air shower, as well as for determining the potential of the radio technique for primary particle identification. We present the status of the LOFAR cosmic ray program, including the station design and hardware, the triggering and filtering schemes, and our initial observations of cosmic-ray-induced radio pulses.
[61]  oai:arXiv.org:1109.5588  [pdf] - 1084382
On the point source approximation of nearby cosmic-ray sources
Comments: 14 pages, To appear in MNRAS
Submitted: 2011-09-26
In this paper, we check in detail the validity of the widely adopted point source approximation for nearby cosmic-ray (CR) sources. Under an energy independent escape model for CRs from the sources, we show that for young nearby sources, the point source approximation breaks down at lower energies and the CR spectrum depends on the size and the morphology of the source. When applied to the nearby supernova remnants (SNRs), we find that the approximation breaks down for some of the individual remnants like the Vela, but interestingly it still holds good for their combined total spectrum at the Earth. Moreover, we also find that the results obtained under this simple approximation are quite different from those calculated under an energy dependent escape model which is favored by diffusive shock acceleration models inside SNRs. Our study suggests that if SNRs are the main sources of CRs in our Galaxy, then the commonly adopted point source model (with an energy independent escape scenario) appears flawed for CR studies from the nearby SNRs.
[62]  oai:arXiv.org:1102.0946  [pdf] - 1051897
An air shower array for LOFAR: LORA
Comments: 10 pages (using article.cls), 6 figures, accepted for the proceedings of 22nd European Cosmic Ray Symposium, 3-6 August 2010, Finland
Submitted: 2011-02-04
LOFAR is a new form of radio telescope which can detect radio emission from air showers induced by very high-energy cosmic rays. It can also look for radio emission from particle cascades on the Moon induced by ultra high-energy cosmic rays or neutrinos. To complement the radio detection, we are setting up a small particle detector array LORA (LOfar Radboud Air shower array) within an area of $\sim 300$ m diameter in the LOFAR core. It will help in triggering and confirming the radio detection of air showers with the LOFAR antennas. In this paper, we present a short overview about LORA and discuss its current status.
[63]  oai:arXiv.org:1102.0978  [pdf] - 1051902
A possible correlation between the high energy electron spectrum and the cosmic-ray secondary-to-primary ratios
Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures, Accepted by MNRAS
Submitted: 2011-02-04
Recent observations of high energy cosmic-ray electrons by the Fermi-LAT and the HESS experiments between $20$ GeV and $5$ TeV have found that the energy spectrum closely follow a broken power-law with a break at around $1$ TeV. On the other hand, measurements of cosmic-ray secondary-to-primary ratios like the boron-to-carbon ratio seem to indicate a possible change in the slope at energies around $100$ GeV/n. In this paper, we discuss one possible explanation for the observed break in the electron spectrum and its possible correlation with the flattening in the secondary-to-primary ratios at higher energies. In our model, we assume that cosmic-rays after acceleration by supernova remnant shock waves, escape downstream of the shock and remain confined within the remnant until the shock slows down. During this time, the high-energy electrons suffer from radiative energy losses and the cosmic-ray nuclei undergo nuclear fragmentations due to their interactions with the matter. Once the cosmic-rays are released from the supernova remnants, they follow diffusive propagation in the Galaxy where they further suffer from radiative or fragmentation losses.
[64]  oai:arXiv.org:0905.3994  [pdf] - 386740
Search for TeV $\gamma$ -rays from H1426+428 during 2004-07 with the TACTIC telescope
Comments: 11 pages, 5 figures accepted for publication in Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics
Submitted: 2009-05-25
The BL Lac object H1426+428 ($z\equiv 0.129$) is an established source of TeV $\gamma$-rays and detections of these photons from this object also have important implications for estimating the Extragalactic Background Light (EBL) in addition to the understanding of the particle acceleration and $\gamma$-ray production mechanisms in the AGN jets. We have observed this source for about 244h in 2004, 2006 and 2007 with the TACTIC $\gamma$-ray telescope located at Mt. Abu, India. Detailed analysis of these data do not indicate the presence of any statistically significant TeV $\gamma$-ray signal from the source direction. Accordingly, we have placed an upper limit of $\leq1.18\times10^{-12}$ $photons$ $cm^{-2}$ $s^{-1}$ on the integrated $\gamma$-ray flux at 3$\sigma$ significance level.
[65]  oai:arXiv.org:0804.4730  [pdf] - 12207
On the contribution of nearby sources to the observed cosmic-ray nuclei
Comments: 12 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2008-04-29
The presence of nearby discrete cosmic-ray (CR) sources can lead to many interesting effects on the observed properties of CRs. In this paper, we study about the possible effects on the CR primary and secondary spectra and also the subsequent effects on the CR secondary-to-primary ratios. For the study, we assume that CRs undergo diffusive propagation in the Galaxy and we neglect the effect of convection, energy losses and reacceleration. In our model, we assume that there exists a uniform and continuous distribution of CR sources in the Galaxy generating a stationary CR background at the Earth. In addition, we also consider the existence of some nearby sources which inject CRs in a discrete space-time model. Assuming a constant CR source power throughout the Galaxy, our study has found that the presence of nearby supernova remnants (SNRs) produces noticeable variations in the primary fluxes mainly above ~ 100 GeV/n, if CRs are assumed to be released instantaneously after the supernova explosion. The variation reaches a value of ~ 45% at around 10^5 GeV/n. Respect to earlier studies, the variation in the case of the secondaries is found to be almost negligible. We also discuss about the possible effects of the different particle release times from the SNRs. For the particle release time of ~ 10^5 yr, predicted by the diffusive shock acceleration theories in SNRs, we have found that the presence of the nearby SNRs hardly produces any significant effects on the CRs at the Earth.
[66]  oai:arXiv.org:0804.1473  [pdf] - 11620
Very High Energy gamma-ray observations of Mrk 501 using TACTIC imaging gamma-ray telescope during 2005-06
Comments: 16 pages and 8 Figures Accepted for publication in the Journal of Physics G
Submitted: 2008-04-09
In this paper we report on the Markarian 501 results obtained during our TeV $\gamma$-ray observations from March 11 to May 12, 2005 and February 28 to May 7, 2006 for 112.5 hours with the TACTIC $\gamma$-ray telescope. During 2005 observations for 45.7 hours, the source was found to be in a low state and we have placed an upper limit of 4.62 $\times$ 10$^{-12}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ at 3$\sigma$ level on the integrated TeV $\gamma$-ray flux above 1 TeV from the source direction. However, during the 2006 observations for 66.8h, detailed data analysis revealed the presence of a TeV $\gamma$-ray signal from the source with a statistical significance of 7.5$\sigma$ above $E_{\gamma}\geq$ 1 TeV. The time averaged differential energy spectrum of the source in the energy range 1-11 TeV is found to match well with the power law function of the form ($d\Phi/dE=f_0 E^{-\Gamma}$) with $f_0=(1.66\pm0.52)\times 10^{-11}cm^{-2}s^{-1}TeV^{-1}$ and $\Gamma=2.80\pm0.27$.
[67]  oai:arXiv.org:0704.3336  [pdf] - 750
Revisiting the effect of nearby supernova remnants on local cosmic rays
Comments: 5 pages, 2 figures, accepted in MNRAS Letters, minor text corrections
Submitted: 2007-04-25, last modified: 2007-06-18
In an earlier paper, the effect of the nearby known supernova remnants (SNRs) on the local cosmic-rays (CRs) was studied, considering different possible forms of the particle injection time. The present work is a continuation of the previous work, but assumes a more realistic model of CR propagation in the Galaxy. The previous work assumed an unbounded three-dimensional diffusion region, whereas the present one considers a flat cylindrical disc bounded in both the radial and vertical directions. The study has found that the effect of the vertical halo boundary $H$ on the local SNR contribution to the observed CR anisotropy is negligible as long as $H\gtrsim 2kpc$. Considering the values of the halo height $H\gtrsim 2kpc$ obtained by different authors, the present work suggests that the study of the effect of local sources on the CR anisotropy can be carried out without having much information on $H$ and hence, using the much simpler three-dimentional unbounded solution. Finally, the present work discusses about the possibility of explaining the observed anisotropy below the knee by a single dominant source with properly chosen source parameters, and claims that the source may be an \textit{undetected} old SNR with a characteristic age of $\sim 1.5\times 10^5 yr$ located at a distance of $\sim 0.57 kpc$ from the Sun.
[68]  oai:arXiv.org:0706.2055  [pdf] - 2215
The TACTIC atmospheric Cherenkov Imaging telescope
Comments: 27 pages, 13 figures, accepted for publication in NIM A
Submitted: 2007-06-14
The TACTIC $\gamma$-ray telescope, equipped with a light collector of area $\sim$9.5m$^2$ and a medium resolution imaging camera of 349-pixels, has been in operation at Mt.Abu, India since 2001. This paper describes the main features of its various subsystems and its overall performance with regard to (a) tracking accuracy of its 2-axes drive system, (b) spot size of the light collector, (c) back-end signal processing electronics and topological trigger generation scheme, (d) data acquisition and control system and (e) relative and absolute gain calibration methodology. Using a trigger field of view of 11$\times$11 pixels ($\sim$ 3.4$^\circ$$\times3.4^\circ$), the telescope records a cosmic ray event rate of $\sim$2.5 Hz at a typical zenith angle of 15$^\circ$. Monte Carlo simulation results are also presented in the paper for comparing the expected performance of the telescope with actual observational results. The consistent detection of a steady signal from the Crab Nebula above $\sim$1.2 TeV energy, at a sensitivity level of $\sim5.0\sigma$ in $\sim$25 h, alongwith excellent matching of its energy spectrum with that obtained by other groups, reassures that the performance of the TACTIC telescope is quite stable and reliable. Furthermore, encouraged by the detection of strong $\gamma$-ray signals from Mrk 501 (during 1997 and 2006 observations) and Mrk 421 (during 2001 and 2005-2006 observations), we believe that there is considerable scope for the TACTIC telescope to monitor similar TeV $\gamma$-ray emission activity from other active galactic nuclei on a long term basis.
[69]  oai:arXiv.org:0704.3533  [pdf] - 790
Very High Energy $\gamma$-ray and Near Infrared observations of 1ES2344+514 during 2004-05
Comments: 15 pages, 6 figures, 4 tables, accepted for publication in Journal of Physics G
Submitted: 2007-04-26
We have observed the BL Lac object 1ES2344+514 (z = 0.044) in Very High Energy (VHE) gamma-ray and near-infrared wavelength bands with TACTIC and MIRO telescopes respectively. The observations were made from 18th October to 9th December 2004 and 27th October 2005 to 1st January 2006. Detailed analysis of the TACTIC data indicates absence of a statistically significant gamma-ray signal both in overall data and on a nightly basis from the source direction. We estimate an upper limit of I($\geq$1.5 TeV)$\leq 3.84 \times 10^{-12}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ at a 3$\sigma$ confidence level on the integrated $\gamma$-ray flux. In addition, we have also compared TACTIC TeV light curves with those of the RXTE ASM (2-12keV) for the contemporary period and find that there are no statistically significant increases in the signal strengths from the source in both these energy regions. During 2004 IR observations, 1ES2344+514 shows low level (~0.06 magnitude) day-to-day variation in both, J & H bands. However, during 2005 observation epoch, the source brightens up by about 0.41 magnitude from its October 2005 level J magnitude= 12.64 to J = 12.23 on December 6, 2005. It then fades by about 0.2 magnitude during 6 to 10 December, 2005. The variation is seen in both, J & H, bands simultaneously. The light travel time arguments suggest that the emission region size is of the order of $10^{17}$ cms.
[70]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0703176  [pdf] - 89985
Effect of nearby supernova remnants on local Cosmic-Rays
Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures, MNRAS accepted, minor text corrections
Submitted: 2007-03-08, last modified: 2007-04-13
We study in detail the effect of different particle release times from sources on the cosmic-ray (CR) spectrum below $10^{15}eV$ in the Galaxy. We discuss different possible forms of particle injection such as burst-like injection, continuous injection for a finite time, injection from a stationary source and energy dependent injection. When applied to the nearby known supernova remnants, we find that the observed CR anisotropy data favour the burst-like particle injection model for the CR diffusion coefficient $D(E)\propto E^a$ with $a=0.3-0.6$ in the local region. In the study we have also found that the contribution of the sources G114.3+0.3 and Monogem dominate if the observed anisotropy is a result of the effect of the nearby sources. Further study shows that we should not neglect the contribution of the undetected old sources to the local CR anisotropy.
[71]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0701890  [pdf] - 89019
Observations of TeV gamma-rays from Mrk 421 during Dec. 2005 to Apr. 2006 with the TACTIC telescope
Comments: 13pages,4figures; Accepted for publication in Astroparticle Physics
Submitted: 2007-01-31
The TACTIC $\gamma$-ray telescope has observed Mrk 421 on 66 clear nights from Dec. 07, 2005 to Apr. 30, 2006, totalling $\sim$ 202 hours of on-source observations. Here, we report the detection of flaring activity from the source at $\geq$ 1 TeV energy and the time-averaged differential $\gamma$-ray spectrum in the energy range 1-11 TeV for the data taken between Dec. 27, 2005 to Feb. 07, 2006 when the source was in a relatively higher state as compared to the rest of the observation period. Analysis of this data spell, comprising about $\sim$97h reveals the presence of a $\sim 12.0 \sigma$ $\gamma$-ray signal with daily flux of $>$ 1 Crab unit on several days. A pure power law spectrum with exponent $-3.11\pm0.11$ as well as a power law spectrum with an exponential cutoff $(\Gamma = -2.51\pm0.26$ and $E_0=(4.7\pm2.1) TeV)$ are found to provide reasonable fits to the inferred differential spectrum within statistical uncertainties. We believe that the TeV light curve presented here, for nearly 5 months of extensive coverage, as well as the spectral information at $\gamma$-ray energies of $>$ 5 TeV provide a useful input for other groups working in the field of $\gamma$-ray astronomy.