Normalized to: Thommesen, H.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.06250 [pdf] - 2132067
A Monte Carlo comparison between template-based and Wiener-filter CMB
dipole estimators
Thommesen, H.;
Andersen, K. J.;
Aurlien, R.;
Banerji, R.;
Brilenkov, M.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fuskeland, U.;
Galloway, M.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Svalheim, T. L.;
Wehus, I. K.
Submitted: 2020-07-13
We review and compare two different CMB dipole estimators discussed in the
literature, and assess their performances through Monte Carlo simulations. The
first method amounts to simple template regression with partial sky data, while
the second method is an optimal Wiener filter (or Gibbs sampling)
implementation. The main difference between the two methods is that the latter
approach takes into account correlations with higher-order CMB temperature
fluctuations that arise from non-orthogonal spherical harmonics on an
incomplete sky, which for recent CMB data sets (such as Planck) is the dominant
source of uncertainty. For an accepted sky fraction of 81% and an angular CMB
power spectrum corresponding to the best-fit Planck 2018 $\Lambda$CDM model, we
find that the uncertainty on the recovered dipole amplitude is about six times
smaller for the Wiener filter approach than for the template approach,
corresponding to 0.5 and 3$~\mu$K, respectively. Similar relative differences
are found for the corresponding directional parameters and other sky fractions.
We note that the Wiener filter algorithm is generally applicable to any dipole
estimation problem on an incomplete sky, as long as a statistical and
computationally tractable model is available for the unmasked higher-order
fluctuations. The methodology described in this paper forms the numerical basis
for the most recent determination of the CMB solar dipole from Planck, as
summarized by arXiv:2007.04997.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.04997 [pdf] - 2131947
Planck intermediate results. LVII. Joint Planck LFI and HFI data
processing
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Andersen, K. J.;
Ashdown, M.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Svalheim, T. L.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Thommesen, H.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2020-07-09
We present the NPIPE processing pipeline, which produces calibrated frequency
maps in temperature and polarization from data from the Planck Low Frequency
Instrument (LFI) and High Frequency Instrument (HFI) using high-performance
computers. NPIPE represents a natural evolution of previous Planck analysis
efforts, and combines some of the most powerful features of the separate LFI
and HFI analysis pipelines. The net effect of the improvements is lower levels
of noise and systematics in both frequency and component maps at essentially
all angular scales, as well as notably improved internal consistency between
the various frequency channels. Based on the NPIPE maps, we present the first
estimate of the Solar dipole determined through component separation across all
nine Planck frequencies. The amplitude is ($3366.6 \pm 2.7$)$\mu$K, consistent
with, albeit slightly higher than, earlier estimates. From the large-scale
polarization data, we derive an updated estimate of the optical depth of
reionization of $\tau = 0.051 \pm 0.006$, which appears robust with respect to
data and sky cuts. There are 600 complete signal, noise and systematics
simulations of the full-frequency and detector-set maps. As a Planck first,
these simulations include full time-domain processing of the beam-convolved CMB
anisotropies. The release of NPIPE maps and simulations is accompanied with a
complete suite of raw and processed time-ordered data and the software,
scripts, auxiliary data, and parameter files needed to improve further on the
analysis and to run matching simulations.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06208 [pdf] - 1717311
Planck 2018 results. IV. Diffuse component separation
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Natoli, P.;
Oppizzi, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Peel, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Seljebotn, D. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Thommesen, H.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17
We present full-sky maps of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and
polarized synchrotron and thermal dust emission, derived from the third set of
Planck frequency maps. These products have significantly lower contamination
from instrumental systematic effects than previous versions. The methodologies
used to derive these maps follow closely those described in earlier papers,
adopting four methods (Commander, NILC, SEVEM, and SMICA) to extract the CMB
component, as well as three methods (Commander, GNILC, and SMICA) to extract
astrophysical components. Our revised CMB temperature maps agree with
corresponding products in the Planck 2015 delivery, whereas the polarization
maps exhibit significantly lower large-scale power, reflecting the improved
data processing described in companion papers; however, the noise properties of
the resulting data products are complicated, and the best available end-to-end
simulations exhibit relative biases with respect to the data at the few percent
level. Using these maps, we are for the first time able to fit the spectral
index of thermal dust independently over 3 degree regions. We derive a
conservative estimate of the mean spectral index of polarized thermal dust
emission of beta_d = 1.55 +/- 0.05, where the uncertainty marginalizes both
over all known systematic uncertainties and different estimation techniques.
For polarized synchrotron emission, we find a mean spectral index of beta_s =
-3.1 +/- 0.1, consistent with previously reported measurements. We note that
the current data processing does not allow for construction of unbiased
single-bolometer maps, and this limits our ability to extract CO emission and
correlated components. The foreground results for intensity derived in this
paper therefore do not supersede corresponding Planck 2015 products. For
polarization the new results supersede the corresponding 2015 products in all
respects.