Normalized to: The XENON Collaboration.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.00769 [pdf] - 1542876
Search for Electronic Recoil Event Rate Modulation with 4 Years of
XENON100 Data
The XENON collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Butikofer, L.;
Calven, J.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Diglio, S.;
Eurin, G.;
Fei, J.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Rosso, A. Gallo;
Galloway, M.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Manfredini, A.;
Maris, I.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Pizzella, V.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Silva, M.;
Simgen, H.;
Sivers, M. v.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Wang, H.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Ye, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-01-03
We report on a search for electronic recoil event rate modulation signatures
in the XENON100 data accumulated over a period of 4 years, from January 2010 to
January 2014. A profile likelihood method, which incorporates the stability of
the XENON100 detector and the known electronic recoil background model, is used
to quantify the significance of periodicity in the time distribution of events.
There is a weak modulation signature at a period of $431^{+16}_{-14}$ days in
the low energy region of $(2.0-5.8)$ keV in the single scatter event sample,
with a global significance of $1.9\,\sigma$, however no other more significant
modulation is observed. The expected annual modulation of a dark matter signal
is not compatible with this result. Single scatter events in the low energy
region are thus used to exclude the DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation as being due
to dark matter electron interactions via axial vector coupling at
$5.7\,\sigma$.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.07501 [pdf] - 1395004
Physics reach of the XENON1T dark matter experiment
The XENON collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arneodo, F.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P.;
Breskin, A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Galloway, M.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Hasterok, C.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Manfredini, A.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Mayani, D.;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
von Sivers, M.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2015-12-23, last modified: 2016-04-15
The XENON1T experiment is currently in the commissioning phase at the
Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy. In this article we study the
experiment's expected sensitivity to the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon
interaction cross section, based on Monte Carlo predictions of the electronic
and nuclear recoil backgrounds.
The total electronic recoil background in $1$ tonne fiducial volume and ($1$,
$12$) keV electronic recoil equivalent energy region, before applying any
selection to discriminate between electronic and nuclear recoils, is $(1.80 \pm
0.15) \cdot 10^{-4}$ ($\rm{kg} \cdot day \cdot keV)^{-1}$, mainly due to the
decay of $^{222}\rm{Rn}$ daughters inside the xenon target. The nuclear recoil
background in the corresponding nuclear recoil equivalent energy region ($4$,
$50$) keV, is composed of $(0.6 \pm 0.1)$ ($\rm{t} \cdot y)^{-1}$ from
radiogenic neutrons, $(1.8 \pm 0.3) \cdot 10^{-2}$ ($\rm{t} \cdot y)^{-1}$ from
coherent scattering of neutrinos, and less than $0.01$ ($\rm{t} \cdot y)^{-1}$
from muon-induced neutrons.
The sensitivity of XENON1T is calculated with the Profile Likelihood Ratio
method, after converting the deposited energy of electronic and nuclear recoils
into the scintillation and ionization signals seen in the detector. We take
into account the systematic uncertainties on the photon and electron emission
model, and on the estimation of the backgrounds, treated as nuisance
parameters. The main contribution comes from the relative scintillation
efficiency $\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{eff}$, which affects both the signal from WIMPs
and the nuclear recoil backgrounds. After a $2$ y measurement in $1$ t fiducial
volume, the sensitivity reaches a minimum cross section of $1.6 \cdot 10^{-47}$
cm$^2$ at m$_\chi$=$50$ GeV/$c^2$.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.07747 [pdf] - 1264865
Exclusion of Leptophilic Dark Matter Models using XENON100 Electronic
Recoil Data
The XENON Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Auger, M.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Behrens, A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buetikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Paras, D. Mayani;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Morana, G.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pantic, E.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Vitells, O.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.
Submitted: 2015-07-28
Laboratory experiments searching for galactic dark matter particles
scattering off nuclei have so far not been able to establish a discovery. We
use data from the XENON100 experiment to search for dark matter interacting
with electrons. With no evidence for a signal above the low background of our
experiment, we exclude a variety of representative dark matter models that
would induce electronic recoils. For axial-vector couplings to electrons, we
exclude cross-sections above 6x10^(-35) cm^2 for particle masses of m_chi = 2
GeV/c^2. Independent of the dark matter halo, we exclude leptophilic models as
explanation for the long-standing DAMA/LIBRA signal, such as couplings to
electrons through axial-vector interactions at a 4.4 sigma confidence level,
mirror dark matter at 3.6 sigma, and luminous dark matter at 4.6 sigma.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.07748 [pdf] - 1268647
Search for Event Rate Modulation in XENON100 Electronic Recoil Data
The XENON Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Anthony, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buetikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Hasterok, C.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Mayani, D.;
Meng, A. J. Melgarejo Fernandez. Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2015-07-28
We have searched for periodic variations of the electronic recoil event rate
in the (2-6) keV energy range recorded between February 2011 and March 2012
with the XENON100 detector, adding up to 224.6 live days in total. Following a
detailed study to establish the stability of the detector and its background
contributions during this run, we performed an un-binned profile likelihood
analysis to identify any periodicity up to 500 days. We find a global
significance of less than 1 sigma for all periods suggesting no statistically
significant modulation in the data. While the local significance for an annual
modulation is 2.8 sigma, the analysis of a multiple-scatter control sample and
the phase of the modulation disfavor a dark matter interpretation. The
DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation interpreted as a dark matter signature with
axial-vector coupling of WIMPs to electrons is excluded at 4.8 sigma.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1208.5762 [pdf] - 555466
Comment on "On the subtleties of searching for dark matter with liquid
xenon detectors"
The XENON Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Balan, C.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Behrens, A.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bokeloh, K.;
Brown, E.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Chen, W. -T.;
Choi, B.;
Cline, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Ghag, C.;
Giboni, K. -L.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Kaether, F.;
Kish, A.;
Lamblin, J.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Levy, C.;
Lim, K. E.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lung, K.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Massoli, F. V.;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Molinario, A.;
Nativ, E.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pantic, E.;
Persiani, R.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Scovell, P. R.;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Vitells, O.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.
Submitted: 2012-08-28
In a recent manuscript (arXiv:1208.5046) Peter Sorensen claims that
XENON100's upper limits on spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross sections for
WIMP masses below 10 GeV "may be understated by one order of magnitude or
more". Having performed a similar, though more detailed analysis prior to the
submission of our new result (arXiv:1207.5988), we do not confirm these
findings. We point out the rationale for not considering the described effect
in our final analysis and list several potential problems with his study.