Normalized to: Teyssandier, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.3360 [pdf] - 906475
Range, Doppler and astrometric observables computed from Time Transfer
Functions: a survey
Submitted: 2014-12-10
Determining range, Doppler and astrometric observables is of crucial interest
for modelling and analyzing space observations. We recall how these observables
can be computed when the travel time of a light ray is known as a function of
the positions of the emitter and the receiver for a given instant of reception
(or emission). For a long time, such a function--called a reception (or
emission) time transfer function--has been almost exclusively calculated by
integrating the null geodesic equations describing the light rays. However,
other methods avoiding such an integration have been considerably developped in
the last twelve years. We give a survey of the analytical results obtained with
these new methods up to the third order in the gravitational constant $G$ for a
mass monopole. We briefly discuss the case of quasi-conjunctions, where
higher-order enhanced terms must be taken into account for correctly
calculating the effects. We summarize the results obtained at the first order
in $G$ when the multipole structure and the motion of an axisymmetric body is
taken into account. We present some applications to on-going or future missions
like Gaia and Juno. We give a short review of the recent works devoted to the
numerical estimates of the time transfer functions and their derivatives.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1012.5402 [pdf] - 422565
Post-post-Newtonian light propagation without integrating the geodesic
equations
Submitted: 2010-12-24, last modified: 2011-10-07
A new derivation of the propagation direction of light is given for a
3-parameter family of static, spherically symmetric space-times within the
post-post-Newtonian framework. The emitter and the observer are both located at
a finite distance. The case of a ray emitted at infinity is also treated.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0206056 [pdf] - 396304
Quantum phase shift and neutrino oscillations in a stationary, weak
gravitational field
Submitted: 2002-06-19, last modified: 2011-08-09
A new method based on Synge's world function is developed for determining
within the WKB approximation the gravitationally induced quantum phase shift of
a particle propagating in a stationary spacetime. This method avoids any
calculation of geodesics. A detailed treatment is given for relativistic
particles within the weak field, linear approximation of any metric theory. The
method is applied to the calculation of the oscillation terms governing the
interference of neutrinos considered as a superposition of two eigenstates
having different masses. It is shown that the neutrino oscillations are not
sensitive to the gravitomagnetic components of the metric as long as the spin
contributions can be ignored. Explicit calculations are performed when the
source of the field is a spherical, homogeneous body. A comparison is made with
previous results obtained in Schwarzschild spacetime.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:0711.4292 [pdf] - 900228
Influence of mass multipole moments on the deflection of a light ray by
an isolated axisymmetric body
Submitted: 2007-11-27
Future space astrometry missions are planned to measure positions and/or
parallaxes of celestial objects with an accuracy of the order of the
microarcsecond. At such a level of accuracy, it will be indispensable to take
into account the influence of the mass multipole structure of the giant planets
on the bending of light rays. Within the parametrized post-Newtonian formalism,
we present an algorithmic procedure enabling to determine explicitly this
influence on a light ray connecting two points located at a finite distance.
Then we specialize our formulae in the cases where 1) the light source is
located at space infinity, 2) both the light source and the observer are
located at space infinity. We examine in detail the cases where the unperturbed
ray is in the equatorial plane or in a meridian plane.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0610462 [pdf] - 85886
Relativistic astrometry and Synge's world function
Submitted: 2006-10-16
Almost all of the studies devoted to relativistic astrometry are based on the
integration of the null geodesic differential equations. However, the
gravitational deflection of light rays can be calculated by a different method,
based on the determination of the bifunction giving half the squared geodesic
distance between two arbitrary points-events, the so-called Synge's world
function. We give a brief review of the main results obtained by this method.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0403094 [pdf] - 111484
World function and time transfer: general post-Minkowskian expansions
Submitted: 2004-03-23, last modified: 2004-08-03
In suitably chosen domains of space-time, the world function may be a
powerful tool for modelling the deflection of light and the time/frequency
transfer. In this paper we work out a recursive procedure for expanding the
world function into a perturbative series of ascending powers of the Newtonian
gravitational constant G. We show rigorously that each perturbation term is
given by a line integral taken along the unperturbed geodesic between two
points. Once the world function is known, it becomes possible to determine the
time transfer functions giving the propagation time of a photon between its
emission and its reception. We establish that the direction of a light ray as
measured in the 3-space relative to a given observer can be derived from these
time transfer functions, even if the metric is not stationary. We show how to
deduce these functions up to any given order in G from the perturbative
expansion of the world function. To illustrate the method, we carry out the
calculation of the world function and of the time transfer function outside a
static, spherically symmetric body up to the order G^2, the metric containing
three arbitrary parameters.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0204009 [pdf] - 110958
Time transfer and frequency shift to the order 1/c^4 in the field of an
axisymmetric rotating body
Submitted: 2002-04-02, last modified: 2002-06-11
Within the weak-field, post-Newtonian approximation of the metric theories of
gravity, we determine the one-way time transfer up to the order 1/c^4, the
unperturbed term being of order 1/c, and the frequency shift up to the order
1/c^4. We adapt the method of the world-function developed by Synge to the
Nordtvedt-Will PPN formalism. We get an integral expression for the
world-function up to the order 1/c^3 and we apply this result to the field of
an isolated, axisymmetric rotating body. We give a new procedure enabling to
calculate the influence of the mass and spin multipole moments of the body on
the time transfer and the frequency shift up to the order 1/c^4. We obtain
explicit formulas for the contributions of the mass, of the quadrupole moment
and of the intrinsic angular momentum. In the case where the only PPN
parameters different from zero are beta and gamma, we deduce from these results
the complete expression of the frequency shift up to the order 1/c^4. We
briefly discuss the influence of the quadrupole moment and of the rotation of
the Earth on the frequency shifts in the ACES mission.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9610207 [pdf] - 95731
Detailed lensing properties of the MS2137-2353 core and reconstruction
of sources
Submitted: 1996-10-25
A deep HST image of the MS 2137-2353 core has revealed detailed morphological
structures in two arc systems, which are modelled and well reproduced after a
complete analysis of the lensing properties of the dark matter component.
Latter could have a simple elliptical mass distribution with ellipticity and
angular orientation similar to those of the visible and X-ray light, which
suggests that the MS 2137-2353 is a relaxed cluster at z=0.313. The predicted
density profile ($\rho$ $\sim$ $r^{-1.56\pm0.1}$ with $r_{c}$ $\le$
22.5$h_{50}^{-1}$ kpc) within 150$h_{50}^{-1}$ kpc implies increasing M/L ratio
with the radius, and could be in agreement with predictions from standard CDM
simulations. At least two faint sources (unlensed magnitude, R=23.9 and 26,
respectively) are aligned with the cluster core and are responsible of the arc
systems. They have been reconstructed with details as small as 0".02 (or
160$h_{50}^{-1}$ pc in the source assumed at z= 1), one could be a nearly
edge-on barred spiral galaxy, and the other has a more complex morphology,
which could be related to a close interacting pair and/or to dust. They show
strong signs of star formation indicated by compact HII regions well off their
center. The observation of giant luminous arcs by HST could even resolve the
size of giant HII regions at z$\sim$ 1.