sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Tallada-Crespí, P.

Normalized to: Tallada-Crespí, P.

4 article(s) in total. 199 co-authors, from 1 to 4 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 118,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2006.07177  [pdf] - 2113432
The PAU survey: Ly$\alpha$ intensity mapping forecast
Comments: 18 pages, 14 figures, 4 tables. To be submitted to MNRAS
Submitted: 2020-06-12
In this work, we explore the application of intensity mapping to detect extended Ly$\alpha$ emission from the IGM via cross-correlation of PAUS images with Ly$\alpha$ forest data from eBOSS and DESI. Seven narrow-band (FWHM=13nm) PAUS filters have been considered, ranging from 455 to 515 nm in steps of 10 nm, which allows the observation of Ly$\alpha$ emission in a range $2.7<z<3.3$. The cross-correlation is simulated first in an area of 100 deg$^2$ (PAUS projected coverage), and second in two hypothetical scenarios: a deeper PAUS (complete up to $i_{\rm AB}<24$ instead of $i_{\rm AB}<23$, observation time x6), and an extended PAUS coverage of 225 deg$^2$ (observation time x2.25), both cross-correlated only with DESI. A hydrodynamic simulation of size 400 Mpc/h has been used to simulate both extended Ly$\alpha$ emission and absorption in the Ly$\alpha$ forest, while the foregrounds in PAUS images have been simulated using a lightcone mock catalogue. The total probability of detection is estimated to be 23% and 33% for PAUS-eBOSS and PAUS-DESI respectively, from a run of 1000 simulated cross-correlations with different realisations of instrumental noise and quasar positions. The hypothetical PAUS scenarios increase this probability to 58% (deeper PAUS) and 60% (extended PAUS), with the extension of angular coverage being far more time-efficient for Ly$\alpha$ intensity mapping than the increase of exposure time. These findings seem to indicate that this methodology could also be applied to broad-band surveys.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1908.04310  [pdf] - 1994125
Euclid preparation: V. Predicted yield of redshift 7<z<9 quasars from the wide survey
Euclid Collaboration; Barnett, R.; Warren, S. J.; Mortlock, D. J.; Cuby, J. -G.; Conselice, C.; Hewett, P. C.; Willott, C. J.; Auricchio, N.; Balaguera-Antolínez, A.; Baldi, M.; Bardelli, S.; Bellagamba, F.; Bender, R.; Biviano, A.; Bonino, D.; Bozzo, E.; Branchini, E.; Brescia, M.; Brinchmann, J.; Burigana, C.; Camera, S.; Capobianco, V.; Carbone, C.; Carretero, J.; Carvalho, C. S.; Castander, F. J.; Castellano, M.; Cavuoti, S.; Cimatti, A.; Clédassou, R.; Congedo, G.; Conversi, L.; Copin, Y.; Corcione, L.; Coupon, J.; Courtois, H. M.; Cropper, M.; Da Silva, A.; Duncan, C. A. J.; Dusini, S.; Ealet, A.; Farrens, S.; Fosalba, P.; Fotopoulou, S.; Fourmanoit, N.; Frailis, M.; Fumana, M.; Galeotta, S.; Garilli, B.; Gillard, W.; Gillis, B. R.; Graciá-Carpio, J.; Grupp, F.; Hoekstra, H.; Hormuth, F.; Israel, H.; Jahnke, K.; Kermiche, S.; Kilbinger, M.; Kirkpatrick, C. C.; Kitching, T.; Kohley, R.; Kubik, B.; Kunz, M.; Kurki-Suonio, H.; Laureijs, R.; Ligori, S.; Lilje, P. B.; Lloro, I.; Maiorano, E.; Mansutti, O.; Marggraf, O.; Martinet, N.; Marulli, F.; Massey, R.; Mauri, N.; Medinaceli, E.; Mei, S.; Mellier, Y.; Metcalf, R. B.; Metge, J. J.; Meylan, G.; Moresco, M.; Moscardini, L.; Munari, E.; Neissner, C.; Niemi, S. M.; Nutma, T.; Padilla, C.; Paltani, S.; Pasian, F.; Paykari, P.; Percival, W. J.; Pettorino, V.; Polenta, G.; Poncet, M.; Pozzetti, L.; Raison, F.; Renzi, A.; Rhodes, J.; Rix, H. -W.; Romelli, E.; Roncarelli, M.; Rossetti, E.; Saglia, R.; Sapone, D.; Scaramella, R.; Schneider, P.; Scottez, V.; Secroun, A.; Serrano, S.; Sirri, G.; Stanco, L.; Sureau, F.; Tallada-Crespí, P.; Tavagnacco, D.; Taylor, A. N.; Tenti, M.; Tereno, I.; Toledo-Moreo, R.; Torradeflot, F.; Valenziano, L.; Vassallo, T.; Wang, Y.; Zacchei, A.; Zamorani, G.; Zoubian, J.; Zucca, E.
Comments: Published in A&A. Updated to match accepted version
Submitted: 2019-08-12, last modified: 2019-11-05
We provide predictions of the yield of $7<z<9$ quasars from the Euclid wide survey, updating the calculation presented in the Euclid Red Book in several ways. We account for revisions to the Euclid near-infrared filter wavelengths; we adopt steeper rates of decline of the quasar luminosity function (QLF; $\Phi$) with redshift, $\Phi\propto10^{k(z-6)}$, $k=-0.72$, and a further steeper rate of decline, $k=-0.92$; we use better models of the contaminating populations (MLT dwarfs and compact early-type galaxies); and we use an improved Bayesian selection method, compared to the colour cuts used for the Red Book calculation, allowing the identification of fainter quasars, down to $J_{AB}\sim23$. Quasars at $z>8$ may be selected from Euclid $OYJH$ photometry alone, but selection over the redshift interval $7<z<8$ is greatly improved by the addition of $z$-band data from, e.g., Pan-STARRS and LSST. We calculate predicted quasar yields for the assumed values of the rate of decline of the QLF beyond $z=6$. For the case that the decline of the QLF accelerates beyond $z=6$, with $k=-0.92$, Euclid should nevertheless find over 100 quasars with $7.0<z<7.5$, and $\sim25$ quasars beyond the current record of $z=7.5$, including $\sim8$ beyond $z=8.0$. The first Euclid quasars at $z>7.5$ should be found in the DR1 data release, expected in 2024. It will be possible to determine the bright-end slope of the QLF, $7<z<8$, $M_{1450}<-25$, using 8m class telescopes to confirm candidates, but follow-up with JWST or E-ELT will be required to measure the faint-end slope. Contamination of the candidate lists is predicted to be modest even at $J_{AB}\sim23$. The precision with which $k$ can be determined over $7<z<8$ depends on the value of $k$, but assuming $k=-0.72$ it can be measured to a 1 sigma uncertainty of 0.07.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.10521  [pdf] - 2068949
Euclid preparation: VI. Verifying the Performance of Cosmic Shear Experiments
Euclid Collaboration; Paykari, P.; Kitching, T. D.; Hoekstra, H.; Azzollini, R.; Cardone, V. F.; Cropper, M.; Duncan, C. A. J.; Kannawadi, A.; Miller, L.; Aussel, H.; Conti, I. F.; Auricchio, N.; Baldi, M.; Bardelli, S.; Biviano, A.; Bonino, D.; Borsato, E.; Bozzo, E.; Branchini, E.; Brau-Nogue, S.; Brescia, M.; Brinchmann, J.; Burigana, C.; Camera, S.; Capobianco, V.; Carbone, C.; Carretero, J.; Castander, F. J.; Castellano, M.; Cavuoti, S.; Charles, Y.; Cledassou, R.; Colodro-Conde, C.; Congedo, G.; Conselice, C.; Conversi, L.; Copin, Y.; Coupon, J.; Courtois, H. M.; Da Silva, A.; Dupac, X.; Fabbian, G.; Farrens, S.; Ferreira, P. G.; Fosalba, P.; Fourmanoit, N.; Frailis, M.; Fumana, M.; Galeotta, S.; Garilli, B.; Gillard, W.; Gillis, B. R.; Giocoli, C.; Gracia-Carpio, J.; Grupp, F.; Hormuth, F.; Ilic, S.; Israel, H.; Jahnke, K.; Keihanen, E.; Kermiche, S.; Kilbinger, M.; Kirkpatrick, C. C.; Kubik, B.; Kunz, M.; Kurki-Suonio, H.; Lacasa, F.; Laureijs, R.; Mignant, D. Le; Ligori, S.; Lilje, P. B.; Lloro, I.; Maciaszek, T.; Maiorano, E.; Marggraf, O.; Martinelli, M.; Martinet, N.; Massey, F. Marulli R.; Mauri, N.; Medinaceli, E.; Mei, S.; Mellier, Y.; Meneghetti, M.; Metcalf, R. B.; Moresco, M.; Moscardini, L.; Munari, E.; Neissner, C.; Nichol, R. C.; Niemi, S.; Nutma, T.; Padilla, C.; Paltani, S.; Pasian, F.; Pettorino, V.; Pires, S.; Polenta, G.; Pourtsidou, A.; Raison, F.; Renzi, A.; Rhodes, J.; Romelli, E.; Roncarelli, M.; Rossetti, E.; Saglia, R.; Sánchez, A. G.; Sapone, D.; Scaramella, R.; Schneider, P.; Schrabback, T.; Scottez, V.; Secroun, A.; Serrano, S.; Sirignano, C.; Sirri, G.; Stanco, L.; Starck, J. -L.; Sureau, F.; Tallada-Crespí, P.; Taylor, A.; Tenti, M.; Tereno, I.; Toledo-Moreo, R.; Torradeflot, F.; Tutusaus, I.; Valenziano, L.; Vannier, M.; Vassallo, T.; Zoubian, J.; Zucca, E.
Comments: 18 pages. Submitted to A&A. Comments Welcome
Submitted: 2019-10-23
Our aim is to quantify the impact of systematic effects on the inference of cosmological parameters from cosmic shear. We present an end-to-end approach that introduces sources of bias in a modelled weak lensing survey on a galaxy-by-galaxy level. Residual biases are propagated through a pipeline from galaxy properties (one end) through to cosmic shear power spectra and cosmological parameter estimates (the other end), to quantify how imperfect knowledge of the pipeline changes the maximum likelihood values of dark energy parameters. We quantify the impact of an imperfect correction for charge transfer inefficiency (CTI) and modelling uncertainties of the point spread function (PSF) for Euclid, and find that the biases introduced can be corrected to acceptable levels.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.09273  [pdf] - 1983218
Euclid preparation: VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological probes
Euclid Collaboration; Blanchard, A.; Camera, S.; Carbone, C.; Cardone, V. F.; Casas, S.; Ilić, S.; Kilbinger, M.; Kitching, T.; Kunz, M.; Lacasa, F.; Linder, E.; Majerotto, E.; Markovič, K.; Martinelli, M.; Pettorino, V.; Pourtsidou, A.; Sakr, Z.; Sánchez, A. G.; Sapone, D.; Tutusaus, I.; Yahia-Cherif, S.; Yankelevich, V.; Andreon, S.; Aussel, H.; Balaguera-Antolínez, A.; Baldi, M.; Bardelli, S.; Bender, R.; Biviano, A.; Bonino, D.; Boucaud, A.; Bozzo, E.; Branchini, E.; Brau-Nogue, S.; Brescia, M.; Brinchmann, J.; Burigana, C.; Cabanac, R.; Capobianco, V.; Cappi, A.; Carretero, J.; Carvalho, C. S.; Casas, R.; Castander, F. J.; Castellano, M.; Cavuoti, S.; Cimatti, A.; Cledassou, R.; Colodro-Conde, C.; Congedo, G.; Conselice, C. J.; Conversi, L.; Copin, Y.; Corcione, L.; Coupon, J.; Courtois, H. M.; Cropper, M.; Da Silva, A.; de la Torre, S.; Di Ferdinando, D.; Dubath, F.; Ducret, F.; Duncan, C. A. J.; Dupac, X.; Dusini, S.; Fabbian, G.; Fabricius, M.; Farrens, S.; Fosalba, P.; Fotopoulou, S.; Fourmanoit, N.; Frailis, M.; Franceschi, E.; Franzetti, P.; Fumana, M.; Galeotta, S.; Gillard, W.; Gillis, B.; Giocoli, C.; Gómez-Alvarez, P.; Graciá-Carpio, J.; Grupp, F.; Guzzo, L.; Hoekstra, H.; Hormuth, F.; Israel, H.; Jahnke, K.; Keihanen, E.; Kermiche, S.; Kirkpatrick, C. C.; Kohley, R.; Kubik, B.; Kurki-Suonio, H.; Ligori, S.; Lilje, P. B.; Lloro, I.; Maino, D.; Maiorano, E.; Marggraf, O.; Martinet, N.; Marulli, F.; Massey, R.; Medinaceli, E.; Mei, S.; Mellier, Y.; Metcalf, B.; Metge, J. J.; Meylan, G.; Moresco, M.; Moscardini, L.; Munari, E.; Nichol, R. C.; Niemi, S.; Nucita, A. A.; Padilla, C.; Paltani, S.; Pasian, F.; Percival, W. J.; Pires, S.; Polenta, G.; Poncet, M.; Pozzetti, L.; Racca, G. D.; Raison, F.; Renzi, A.; Rhodes, J.; Romelli, E.; Roncarelli, M.; Rossetti, E.; Saglia, R.; Schneider, P.; Scottez, V.; Secroun, A.; Sirri, G.; Stanco, L.; Starck, J. -L.; Sureau, F.; Tallada-Crespí, P.; Tavagnacco, D.; Taylor, A. N.; Tenti, M.; Tereno, I.; Toledo-Moreo, R.; Torradeflot, F.; Valenziano, L.; Vassallo, T.; Kleijn, G. A. Verdoes; Viel, M.; Wang, Y.; Zacchei, A.; Zoubian, J.; Zucca, E.
Comments: 75 pages, 13 figures, 18 tables. Acknowledgements include Authors' contributions. Abstract abridged
Submitted: 2019-10-21
The Euclid space telescope will measure the shapes and redshifts of galaxies to reconstruct the expansion history of the Universe and the growth of cosmic structures. Estimation of the expected performance of the experiment, in terms of predicted constraints on cosmological parameters, has so far relied on different methodologies and numerical implementations, developed for different observational probes and for their combination. In this paper we present validated forecasts, that combine both theoretical and observational expertise for different cosmological probes. This is presented to provide the community with reliable numerical codes and methods for Euclid cosmological forecasts. We describe in detail the methodology adopted for Fisher matrix forecasts, applied to galaxy clustering, weak lensing and their combination. We estimate the required accuracy for Euclid forecasts and outline a methodology for their development. We then compare and improve different numerical implementations, reaching uncertainties on the errors of cosmological parameters that are less than the required precision in all cases. Furthermore, we provide details on the validated implementations that can be used by the reader to validate their own codes if required. We present new cosmological forecasts for Euclid. We find that results depend on the specific cosmological model and remaining freedom in each setup, i.e. flat or non-flat spatial cosmologies, or different cuts at nonlinear scales. The validated numerical implementations can now be reliably used for any setup. We present results for an optimistic and a pessimistic choice of such settings. We demonstrate that the impact of cross-correlations is particularly relevant for models beyond a cosmological constant and may allow us to increase the dark energy Figure of Merit by at least a factor of three.