Normalized to: Taktakishvili, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.10695 [pdf] - 1855665
Benchmarking CME Arrival Time and Impact: Progress on Metadata, Metrics,
and Events
Verbeke, C.;
Mays, M. L.;
Temmer, M.;
Bingham, S.;
Steenburgh, R.;
Dumbović, M.;
Núñez, M.;
Jian, L. K.;
Hess, P.;
Wiegand, C.;
Taktakishvili, A.;
Andries, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-26
Accurate forecasting of the arrival time and subsequent geomagnetic impacts
of Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) at Earth is an important objective for space
weather forecasting agencies. Recently, the CME Arrival and Impact working team
has made significant progress towards defining community-agreed metrics and
validation methods to assess the current state of CME modeling capabilities.
This will allow the community to quantify our current capabilities and track
progress in models over time. Firstly, it is crucial that the community focuses
on the collection of the necessary metadata for transparency and
reproducibility of results. Concerning CME arrival and impact we have
identified 6 different metadata types: 3D CME measurement, model description,
model input, CME (non-)arrival observation, model output data and metrics and
validation methods. Secondly, the working team has also identified a validation
time period, where all events within the following two periods will be
considered: 1 January 2011-31 December 2012 and January 2015-31 December 2015.
Those two periods amount to a total of about 100 hit events at Earth and a
large amount of misses. Considering a time period will remove any bias in
selecting events and the event set will represent a sample set that will not be
biased by user selection. Lastly, we have defined the basic metrics and skill
scores that the CME Arrival and Impact working team will focus on.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.07818 [pdf] - 1623904
Verification of real-time WSA-ENLIL+Cone simulations of CME arrival-time
at the CCMC from 2010-2016
Submitted: 2018-01-23
The Wang-Sheeley-Arge (WSA)-ENLIL+Cone model is used extensively in space
weather operations world-wide to model CME propagation. As such, it is
important to assess its performance. We present validation results of the
WSA-ENLIL+Cone model installed at the Community Coordinated Modeling Center
(CCMC) and executed in real-time by the CCMC space weather team. CCMC uses the
WSA-ENLIL+Cone model to predict CME arrivals at NASA missions throughout the
inner heliosphere. In this work we compare model predicted CME arrival-times to
in-situ ICME leading edge measurements at STEREO-A, STEREO-B, and Earth (Wind
and ACE) for simulations completed between March 2010-December 2016 (over 1,800
CMEs). We report hit, miss, false alarm, and correct rejection statistics for
all three locations. For all predicted CME arrivals, the hit rate is 0.5, and
the false alarm rate is 0.1. For the 273 events where the CME was predicted to
arrive at Earth, STEREO-A, or STEREO-B, and was actually observed (hit event),
the mean absolute arrival-time prediction error was 10.4 +/- 0.9 hours, with a
tendency to early prediction error of -4.0 hours. We show the dependence of the
arrival-time error on CME input parameters. We also explore the impact of the
multi-spacecraft observations used to initialize the model CME inputs by
comparing model verification results before and after the STEREO-B
communication loss (since September 2014) and STEREO-A sidelobe operations
(August 2014-December 2015). There is an increase of 1.7 hours in the CME
arrival time error during single, or limited two-viewpoint periods, compared to
the three-spacecraft viewpoint period. This trend would apply to a future space
weather mission at L5 or L4 as another coronagraph viewpoint to reduce CME
arrival time errors compared to a single L1 viewpoint.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04379 [pdf] - 1572664
Threaded-Field-Lines Model for the Low Solar Corona Powered by the
Alfven Wave Turbulence
Submitted: 2016-09-08, last modified: 2017-05-03
We present an updated global model of the solar corona, including the
transition region. We simulate the realistic tree-dimensional (3D) magnetic
field using the data from the photospheric magnetic field measurements and
assume the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Alfv\'en wave turbulence and its
non-linear dissipation to be the only source for heating the coronal plasma and
driving the solar wind. In closed field regions the dissipation efficiency in a
balanced turbulence is enhanced. In the coronal holes we account for a
reflection of the outward propagating waves, which is accompanied by generation
of weaker counter-propagating waves. The non-linear cascade rate degrades in
strongly imbalanced turbulence, thus resulting in colder coronal holes.
The distinctive feature of the presented model is the description of the low
corona as almost-steady-state low-beta plasma motion and heat flux transfer
along the magnetic field lines. We trace the magnetic field lines through each
grid point of the lower boundary of the global corona model, chosen at some
heliocentric distance, $R=R_{b}\sim1.1\ R_\odot$ well above the transition
region. One can readily solve the plasma parameters along the magnetic field
line from 1D equations for the plasma motion and heat transport together with
the Alfv\'en wave propagation, which adequately describe physics within the
heliocentric distances range, $R_{\odot}<R<R_{b}$, in the low solar corona. By
interfacing this threaded-field-lines model with the full MHD global corona
model at $r=R_{b}$, we find the global solution and achieve a
faster-than-real-time performance of the model on $\sim200$ cores.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.05360 [pdf] - 1530715
Data Constrained Coronal Mass Ejections in A Global Magnetohydrodynamics
Model
Submitted: 2016-05-17, last modified: 2016-11-27
We present a first-principles-based coronal mass ejection (CME) model
suitable for both scientific and operational purposes by combining a global
magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) solar wind model with a flux rope-driven CME model.
Realistic CME events are simulated self-consistently with high fidelity and
forecasting capability by constraining initial flux rope parameters with
observational data from GONG, SOHO/LASCO, and STEREO/COR. We automate this
process so that minimum manual intervention is required in specifying the CME
initial state. With the newly developed data-driven Eruptive Event Generator
Gibson-Low (EEGGL), we present a method to derive Gibson-Low (GL) flux rope
parameters through a handful of observational quantities so that the modeled
CMEs can propagate with the desired CME speeds near the Sun. A test result with
CMEs launched with different Carrington rotation magnetograms are shown. Our
study shows a promising result for using the first-principles-based MHD global
model as a forecasting tool, which is capable of predicting the CME direction
of propagation, arrival time, and ICME magnetic field at 1 AU (see companion
paper by Jin et al. 2016b).
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1509.06477 [pdf] - 1300336
Propagation of the 7 January 2014 CME and Resulting Geomagnetic
Non-Event
Mays, M. L.;
Thompson, B. J.;
Jian, L. K.;
Colaninno, R. C.;
Odstrcil, D.;
Möstl, C.;
Temmer, M.;
Savani, N. P.;
Taktakishvili, A.;
MacNeice, P. J.;
Zheng, Y.
Submitted: 2015-09-22
On 7 January 2014 an X1.2 flare and CME with a radial speed $\approx$2500 km
s$^{-1}$ was observed from near an active region close to disk center. This led
many forecasters to estimate a rapid arrival at Earth ($\approx$36 hours) and
predict a strong geomagnetic storm. However, only a glancing CME arrival was
observed at Earth with a transit time of $\approx$49 hours and a $K_{\rm P}$
geomagnetic index of only $3-$. We study the interplanetary propagation of this
CME using the ensemble Wang-Sheeley-Arge (WSA)-ENLIL+Cone model, that allows a
sampling of CME parameter uncertainties. We explore a series of simulations to
isolate the effects of the background solar wind solution, CME shape, tilt,
location, size, and speed, and the results are compared with observed in-situ
arrivals at Venus, Earth, and Mars. Our results show that a tilted ellipsoid
CME shape improves the initial real-time prediction to better reflect the
observed in-situ signatures and the geomagnetic storm strength. CME parameters
from the Graduated Cylindrical Shell model used as input to WSA--ENLIL+Cone,
along with a tilted ellipsoid cloud shape, improve the arrival-time error by
14.5, 18.7, 23.4 hours for Venus, Earth, and Mars respectively. These results
highlight that CME orientation and directionality with respect to observatories
play an important role in understanding the propagation of this CME, and for
forecasting other glancing CME arrivals. This study also demonstrates the
importance of three-dimensional CME fitting made possible by multiple viewpoint
imaging.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.04402 [pdf] - 1005697
Ensemble modeling of CMEs using the WSA-ENLIL+Cone model
Mays, M. L.;
Taktakishvili, A.;
Pulkkinen, A. A.;
MacNeice, P. J.;
Rastaetter, L.;
Odstrcil, D.;
Jian, L. K.;
Richardson, I. G.;
LaSota, J. A.;
Zheng, Y.;
Kuznetsova, M. M.
Submitted: 2015-04-16, last modified: 2015-05-11
Ensemble modeling of CMEs provides a probabilistic forecast of CME arrival
time which includes an estimation of arrival time uncertainty from the spread
and distribution of predictions and forecast confidence in the likelihood of
CME arrival. The real-time ensemble modeling of CME propagation uses the
WSA-ENLIL+Cone model installed at the CCMC and executed in real-time. The
current implementation evaluates the sensitivity of WSA-ENLIL+Cone model
simulations of CME propagation to initial CME parameters. We discuss the
results of real-time ensemble simulations for a total of 35 CME events between
January 2013 - July 2014. For the 17 events where the CME was predicted to
arrive at Earth, the mean absolute arrival time prediction error was 12.3
hours, which is comparable to the errors reported in other studies. For
predictions of CME arrival at Earth the correct rejection rate is 62% and the
false-alarm rate is 38%. The arrival time was within the range of the ensemble
arrival predictions for 8 out of 17 events. The Brier Score for CME arrival
predictions is 0.15 (where 1 is a perfect forecast), indicating that on
average, the predicted likelihood of CME arrival is fairly accurate. The
reliability of ensemble CME arrival predictions is heavily dependent on the
initial distribution of CME input parameters, particularly the median and
spread. Preliminary analysis of the probabilistic forecasts suggests
undervariability, indicating that these ensembles do not sample a wide enough
spread in CME input parameters. Prediction errors can also arise from ambient
model parameters, the accuracy of the solar wind background derived from
coronal maps, or other model limitations. Finally, predictions of the Kp
geomagnetic index differ from observed values by less than one for 11 out of 17
of the ensembles and Kp prediction errors computed from the mean predicted Kp
show a mean absolute error of 1.3.