Normalized to: Takalo, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.03855 [pdf] - 2077290
Comparison of the shape and temporal evolution of even and odd solar
cycles
Submitted: 2020-04-08
Results. The PCA confirms the existence of the Gnevyshev gap (GG) for solar
cycles at about 40% from the start of the cycle. The temporal evolution of
sunspot area data for even cycles shows that the GG exists at least at the 95%
confidence level for all sizes of sunspots. On the other hand, the GG is
shorter and statistically insignificant for the odd cycles of aerial sunspot
data. Furthermore, the analysis of sunspot area sizes for even and odd cycles
of SC12-SC23 shows that the greatest difference is at 4.2-4.6 years, where even
cycles have a far smaller total area than odd cycles. The average area of the
individual sunspots of even cycles is also smaller in this interval. The
statistical analysis of the temporal evolution shows that northern sunspot
groups maximise earlier than southern groups for even cycles, but are
concurrent for odd cycles. Furthermore, the temporal distributions of odd
cycles are slightly more leptokurtic than distributions of even cycles. The
skewnesses are 0.37 and 0.49 and the kurtoses 2.79 and 2.94 for even and odd
cycles, respectively. The correlation coefficient between skewness and kurtosis
for even cycles is 0.69, and for odd cycles, it is 0.90. Conclusions. The
separate PCAs for even and odd sunspot cycles show that odd cycles are more
inhomogeneous than even cycles, especially in GSN data. Even cycles, however,
have two anomalous cycles: SC4 and SC6. According to the analysis of the
sunspot area size data, the GG is more distinct in even than odd cycles. We
also present another Waldmeier-type rule, that is, we find a correlation
between skewness and kurtosis of the sunspot group cycles.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.14262 [pdf] - 2072854
Comparison of Latitude Distribution and Evolution of Even and Odd
Sunspot Cycles
Submitted: 2020-03-31
We study the latitudinal distribution and evolution of sunspot areas from
Solar Cycle 12 to Solar Cycle 23 (SC12-SC23) and sunspot-groups of from Solar
Cycle 8 to Solar Cycle 23 (SC8-SC23) for even and odd cycles. The Rician
distribution is the best-fit function for both even and odd sunspots group
latitudinal occurrence. The mean and variance for even northern/southern
butterfly wing sunspots are 14.94/14.76 and 58.62/56.08, respectively, and the
mean and variance for odd northern/southern wing sunspots are 15.52/15.58 and
61.77/58.00, respectively. Sunspot groups of even cycle wings are thus at
somewhat lower latitudes on the average than sunspot groups of the odd cycle
wings, i.e., about 0.6 degrees for northern hemisphere wings and 0.8 degrees
for southern hemisphere wings. The spatial analysis of sunspot areas between
SC12-SC23 shows that the small sunspots are at lower solar latitudes of the sun
than the large sunspots for both odd and even cycles, and also for both
hemispheres. Temporal evolution of sunspot areas shows a lack of large sunspots
after four years (exactly between 4.2-4.5 years), i.e., about 40\% after the
start of the cycle, especially for even cycles. This is related to the
Gnevyshev gap and is occurring at the time when the evolution of the average
sunspot latitudes cross about 15 degrees. The gap is, however, clearer for even
cycles than odd ones. Gnevyshev gap divides the cycle into two disparate parts:
the ascending phase/cycle maximum and the declining phase of the sunspot cycle.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.08583 [pdf] - 1795837
Principal component analysis of sunspot cycle shape
Submitted: 2018-10-19
We study the shape of sunspot cycles using the Wolf sunspot numbers and group
sunspot numbers of solar cycles 1-23. We determine the most typical "model"
cycles and the most asymmetric cycles, and test the validity of the two
Waldmeier rules: the anti-correlation between cycle height and the length of
its ascending phase (rule 1), and between cycle height and the length of the
preceding cycle (rule 2). We applied the principal component analysis to
sunspot cycles and studied the first two components, which describe the average
cycle shape and cycle asymmetry, respectively. We also calculated their
autocorrelation in order to study their recurrence properties. The best model
cycles for Wolf numbers are SC12, SC14, and SC16, the successive even cycles
from a long period of rather low overall solar activity. We find that the model
cycles in eight different analyses using both sunspot series are almost
exclusively even cycles. Correspondingly, the most asymmetric cycles are odd
cycles. We find that both Waldmeier rules are valid for the whole Wolf number
series of 23 cycles. Waldmeier rule 2 is also valid for group number series
although its significance is weaker. Waldmeier rule 1 is not significant for
the original group number series, but becomes significant for the proxy series.
For separate centuries, Waldmeier rules are not always valid for Wolf numbers
and very rarely for group numbers. Our results also offer a new interpretation
for the Gnevyshev gap. In addition to being a local depression of solar
activity, the Gnevyshev gap is a separatrix that divides cycles into two parts
whose relative intensities determine the cycle asymmetry. The Gnevyshev gap is
the zero value time of PC2, located approximately 33-42% into the cycle after
its start.