sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

T, Su J. T. Song M.

Normalized to: T, S.

3 article(s) in total. 7 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 3,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1510.07743  [pdf] - 1319714
Investigating AGN Black Hole Masses and the M-$\sigma_e$ relation for Low Surface Brightness Galaxies
Comments: 23 pages, 11 figures, Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2015-10-26
We present an analysis of the optical nuclear spectra from the active galactic nuclei (AGN) in a sample of low surface brightness (LSB) galaxies. Using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), we derived the virial black hole (BH) masses of 24 galaxies from their broad H$\alpha$ parameters. We find that our estimates of nuclear BH masses lie in the range $10^{5}-10^{7}~M_{\odot}$, with a median mass of 5.62 x 10$^{6}~M_{\odot}$. The bulge stellar velocity dispersion $\sigma_{e}$ was determined from the underlying stellar spectra. We compared our results with the existing BH mass - velocity dispersion ($M_{BH}-\sigma_{e}$) correlations and found that the majority of our sample lie in the low BH mass regime and below the $M_{BH}-\sigma_{e}$ correlation. We analysed the effects of any systematic bias in the M$_{BH}$ estimates, the effects of galaxy orientation in the measurement of $\sigma_e$ and the increase of $\sigma_e$ due to the presence of bars and found that these effects are insufficient to explain the observed offset in M$_{BH}$ - $\sigma_e$ correlation. Thus the LSB galaxies tend to have low mass BHs which probably are not in co-evolution with the host galaxy bulges. A detailed study of the nature of the bulges and the role of dark matter in the growth of the BHs is needed to further understand the BH-bulge co-evolution in these poorly evolved and dark matter dominated systems.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1405.2158  [pdf] - 821782
Study on two Methods for Nonlinear Force-free Extrapolation Based on Semi-Analytical Field
Comments: 19 pages, 11 figures. solar physics 2011
Submitted: 2014-05-09
In this paper, two semi-analytical solutions of force free fields (\citeauthor{low90}, \citeyear{low90}) have been used to test two nonlinear force-free extrapolation methods. One is the boundary integral equation (BIE) method developed by \citeauthor{yan00} (\citeyear{yan00}), and another is the approximate vertical integration (AVI) method developed by \citeauthor{son06} (\citeyear{son06}). Some improvements for the AVI method have been taken to avoid the singular points in the process of calculation. It is found that the correlation coefficients between the first semi-analytical field and extrapolated field by BIE, and also that by improved AVI, are greater than $90\%$ below a height 10 of the $64 \times 64$ lower boundary. While for the second semi-analytical field, these correlation coefficients are greater than $80\%$ below the same relative height. Although the differences between the semi-analytical solutions and the extrapolated fields exist for both BIE and AVI methods, these two methods can give reliable results for the height of about 15$\%$ of the extent of the lower boundary.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1405.2159  [pdf] - 821783
Comparison of Nonlinear Force-free Field and Potential Field in the Quiet Sun
Comments: 20 pages, 9 figures. solar physics 2011
Submitted: 2014-05-09
In this paper, a potential field extrapolation and three nonlinear force-free (NLFF) field extrapolations (optimization, direct boundary integral (DBIE) and approximate vertical integration (AVI) methods) are used to study the spatial configuration of magnetic field in the quiet Sun. It is found that the strength differences between the three NLFF and potential fields exist in the low layers. However, they tend to disappear as the height increases, which are of the order of 0.1 G when the height exceeds $\sim$ 2000 km above the photosphere. The absolute azimuth difference between one NLFF field and the potential field is as follows: for the optimization field, it decreases evidently as the height increases; for the DBIE field, it almost keeps constant and shows no significant change as the height increases; for the AVI field, it increases slowly as the height increases. The analysis shows that the reconstructed NLFF fields deviate significantly from the potential field in the quiet Sun.