Normalized to: Symmes, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.5387 [pdf] - 1521919
ALMA Nutator Design and Preliminary Performance
Martin-Cocher, Pierre;
Ford, John;
Koch, Patrick M.;
Ni, Chih-Wen;
Chen, Wei-Long;
Chen, Ming-Tang;
Raffin, Philippe;
Ong, Chin-Long;
Ho, Paul T. P.;
Symmes, Arthur
Submitted: 2013-07-20
We report the past two years of collaboration between the different actors on
the ALMA nutator. Building on previous developments, the nutator has seen
changes in much of the design. A high-modulus carbon fiber structure has been
added on the back of the mirror in order to transfer the voice coils forces
with less deformation, thus reducing delay problems due to flexing. The
controller is now an off-the-shelf National Instrument NI-cRIO, and the
amplifier a class D servo drive from Advanced Motion Controls, with high peak
power able to drive the coils at 300 Volts DC. The stow mechanism has been
totally redesigned to improve on the repeatability and precision of the stow
position, which is also the reference for the 26 bits Heidenhain encoders. This
also improves on the accuracy of the stow position with wind loading. Finally,
the software, written largely with National Instrument's LabView, has been
developed. We will discuss these changes and the preliminary performances
achieved to date. Keywords: ALMA, nutator, class D, high-modulus carbon fiber.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0908.3826 [pdf] - 27641
Large Instrument Development for Radio Astronomy
Fisher, J. R.;
Bradley, R. F.;
Brisken, W. F.;
Cotton, W. D.;
Emerson, D. T.;
Kerr, A. R.;
Lacasse, R. J.;
Morgan, M. A.;
Napier, P. J.;
Norrod, R. D.;
Payne, J. M.;
Pospieszalski, M. W.;
Symmes, A.;
Thompson, A. R.;
Webber, J. C.
Submitted: 2009-08-26
This white paper offers cautionary observations about the planning and
development of new, large radio astronomy instruments. Complexity is a strong
cost driver so every effort should be made to assign differing science
requirements to different instruments and probably different sites. The appeal
of shared resources is generally not realized in practice and can often be
counterproductive. Instrument optimization is much more difficult with longer
lists of requirements, and the development process is longer and less
efficient. More complex instruments are necessarily further behind the
technology state of the art because of longer development times. Including
technology R&D in the construction phase of projects is a growing trend that
leads to higher risks, cost overruns, schedule delays, and project de-scoping.
There are no technology breakthroughs just over the horizon that will suddenly
bring down the cost of collecting area. Advances come largely through careful
attention to detail in the adoption of new technology provided by industry and
the commercial market. Radio astronomy instrumentation has a very bright
future, but a vigorous long-term R&D program not tied directly to specific
projects needs to be restored, fostered, and preserved.