Normalized to: Sutherland, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1211.3781 [pdf] - 1157841
Asymmetry in the Outburst of SN 1987A Detected Using Light Echo
Spectroscopy
Submitted: 2012-11-15, last modified: 2013-02-21
We report direct evidence for asymmetry in the early phases of SN 1987A via
optical spectroscopy of five fields of its light echo system. The light echoes
allow the first few hundred days of the explosion to be reobserved, with
different position angles providing different viewing angles to the supernova.
Light echo spectroscopy therefore allows a direct spectroscopic comparison of
light originating from different regions of the photosphere during the early
phases of SN 1987A. Gemini multi-object spectroscopy of the light echo fields
shows fine-structure in the H-alpha line as a smooth function of position angle
on the near-circular light echo rings. H-alpha profiles originating from the
northern hemisphere of SN 1987A show an excess in redshifted emission and a
blue knee, while southern hemisphere profiles show an excess of blueshifted
H-alpha emission and a red knee. This fine-structure is reminiscent of the
"Bochum event" originally observed for SN 1987A, but in an exaggerated form.
Maximum deviation from symmetry in the H-alpha line is observed at position
angles 16 and 186 degrees, consistent with the major-axis of the expanding
elongated ejecta. The asymmetry signature observed in the H-alpha line smoothly
diminishes as a function of viewing angle away from the poles of the elongated
ejecta. We propose an asymmetric two-sided distribution of 56Ni most dominant
in the southern far quadrant of SN 1987A as the most probable explanation of
the observed light echo spectra. This is evidence that the asymmetry of
high-velocity 56Ni in the first few hundred days after explosion is correlated
to the geometry of the ejecta some 25 years later.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9501005 [pdf] - 92201
Gamma-Ray Transfer and Energy Deposition in Supernovae
Submitted: 1995-01-03
Solutions to the energy-independent (gray) radiative transfer equations are
compared to results of Monte Carlo simulations of the \Ni and \Co radioactive
decay \GR energy deposition in supernovae. The comparison shows that an
effective, purely absorptive, gray opacity, \KG $\sim (0.06 \pm 0.01)Y_e$
cm$^2$ g$^{-1}$, where $Y_e$ is the total number of electrons per baryon,
accurately describes the interaction of \GRs with the cool supernova gas and
the local \GR energy deposition within the gas. The nature of the \GR\
interaction process (dominated by Compton scattering in the relativistic
regime) creates a weak dependence of \KG on the optical thickness of the
(spherically symmetric) supernova atmosphere: The maximum value of \KG applies
during optically thick conditions when individual \GRs undergo multiple
scattering encounters and the lower bound is reached at the phase characterized
by a total Thomson optical depth to the center of the atmosphere \te \LA 1. Our
results quantitatively confirm that the quick and efficient solution to the
gray transfer problem provides an accurate representation of \GR energy
deposition for a broad range of supernova conditions.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9309015 [pdf] - 90928
A New Radiation Hydrodynamics Code and Application to the Calculation of
Type Ia Supernovae Light Curves and Continuum Spectra
Submitted: 1993-09-10
A new, fully dynamic and self-consistent radiation hydrodynamics code,
suitable for the calculation of supernovae light curves and continuum spectra,
is described. It is a multigroup (frequency-dependent) code and includes all
important $O(v/c)$ effects. It is applied to the model W7 of Nomoto,
Thielemann, \& Yokoi (1984) for supernovae of type Ia. Radioactive energy
deposition is incorporated through use of tables based upon Monte Carlo
results. Effects of line opacity (both static or line blanketing and expansion
or line blocking) are neglected, although these may prove to be important. At
maximum light, models based upon different treatments of the opacity lead to
values for $M_{B,max}$ in the range of -19.0 to -19.4. This range falls between
the values for observed supernova claimed by Leibundgut \& Tammann (1990) and
by Pierce, Ressler, \& Shure (1992).