Sunhede, Daniel
Normalized to: Sunhede, D.
4 article(s) in total. 3 co-authors, from 1 to 4 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,5.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0803.0867 [pdf] - 10727
On the stability of spherically symmetric spacetimes in metric f(R)
gravity
Submitted: 2008-03-06, last modified: 2008-09-09
We consider stability properties of spherically symmetric spacetimes of stars
in metric f(R) gravity. We stress that these not only depend on the particular
model, but also on the specific physical configuration. Typically
configurations giving the desired $\gamma_{\rm PPN} \approx 1$ are strongly
constrained, while those corresponding to $\gamma_{\rm PPN} \approx 1/2$ are
less affected. Furthermore, even when the former are found strictly stable in
time, the domain of acceptable static spherical solutions typically shrinks to
a point in the phase space. Unless a physical reason to prefer such a
particular configuration can be found, this poses a naturalness problem for the
currently known metric f(R) models for accelerating expansion of the Universe.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0704.2729 [pdf] - 612
Spherically symmetric spacetimes in f(R) gravity theories
Submitted: 2007-04-20, last modified: 2008-03-07
We study both analytically and numerically the gravitational fields of stars
in f(R) gravity theories. We derive the generalized Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkov
equations for these theories and show that in metric f(R) models the
Parameterized Post-Newtonian parameter $\gamma_{\rm PPN} = 1/2$ is a robust
outcome for a large class of boundary conditions set at the center of the star.
This result is also unchanged by introduction of dark matter in the Solar
System. We find also a class of solutions with $\gamma_{\rm PPN} \approx 1$ in
the metric $f(R)=R-\mu^4/R$ model, but these solutions turn out to be unstable
and decay in time. On the other hand, the Palatini version of the theory is
found to satisfy the Solar System constraints. We also consider compact stars
in the Palatini formalism, and show that these models are not inconsistent with
polytropic equations of state. Finally, we comment on the equivalence between
f(R) gravity and scalar-tensor theories and show that many interesting Palatini
f(R) gravity models can not be understood as a limiting case of a
Jordan-Brans-Dicke theory with $\omega \to -3/2$.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0611132 [pdf] - 112381
The interior spacetimes of stars in Palatini f(R) gravity
Submitted: 2006-11-25, last modified: 2008-03-07
We study the interior spacetimes of stars in the Palatini formalism of f(R)
gravity and derive a generalized Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff and mass equation
for a static, spherically symmetric star. We show that matching the interior
solution with the exterior Schwarzschild-De Sitter solution in general gives a
relation between the gravitational mass and the density profile of a star,
which is different from the one in General Relativity. These modifications
become neglible in models for which $\delta F(R) \equiv \partial f/\partial R -
1$ is a decreasing function of R however. As a result, both Solar System
constraints and stellar dynamics are perfectly consistent with $f(R) = R -
\mu^4/R$.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0412609 [pdf] - 70013
Dark Energy, Scalar-Tensor Gravity and Large Extra Dimensions
Submitted: 2004-12-23, last modified: 2006-03-03
We explore in detail a dilatonic scalar-tensor theory of gravity inspired by
large extra dimensions, where a radion field from compact extra dimensions
gives rise to quintessence in our 4-dimensional world. We show that the model
can give rise to other types of cosmologies as well, some more akin to
$k$-essence and possibly variants of phantom dark energy. In our model the
field (or radius) stabilization arises from quantum corrections to the
effective 4D Ricci scalar. We then show that various constraints nearly
determine the model parameters, and give an example of a quintessence-type
cosmology consistent with observations. We show that the upcoming
SNAP-experiment would easily distinguish the present model from a constant
$\Lambda$ model with an \emph{equal} amount of dark energy, but that the
SNAP-data alone will not be able distinguish it from a $\Lambda$ model with
about 5% less dark energy.