Normalized to: Sumner, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0610717 [pdf] - 170560
Radio observations of comet 9P/Tempel 1 before and after Deep Impact
Biver, N.;
Bockelée-Morvan, D.;
Boissier, J.;
Crovisier, J.;
Colom, P.;
Lecacheux, A.;
Moreno, R.;
Paubert, G.;
Lis, D.;
Sumner, M.;
Frisk, U.;
Hjalmarson, A.;
Olberg, M.;
Winnberg, A.;
Florén, H. -G.;
Sandqvist, Aa.;
Kwok, Sun
Submitted: 2006-10-24
Comet 9P/Tempel 1 was the target of a multi-wavelength worldwide
investigation in 2005. The NASA Deep Impact mission reached the comet on 4.24
July 2005, delivering a 370 kg impactor which hit the comet at 10.3 km/s.
Following this impact, a cloud of gas and dust was excavated from the comet
nucleus. The comet was observed in 2005 prior to and after the impact, at 18-cm
wavelength with the Nan\c{c}ay radio telescope, in the millimetre range with
the IRAM and CSO radio telescopes, and at 557 GHz with the Odin satellite.
Post-impact observations at IRAM and CSO did not reveal a significant change
of the outgassing rates and relative abundances, with the exception of CH_3OH
which may have been more abundant by up to one order of magnitude in the
ejecta. Most other variations are linked to the intrinsic variability of the
comet. The Odin satellite monitored nearly continuously the H_2O line at 557
GHz during the 38 hours following the impact on the 4th of July, in addition to
weekly monitoring. Once the periodic variations related to the nucleus rotation
are removed, a small increase of outgassing related to the impact is present,
which corresponds to the release of \approx 5000+/-2000 tons of water. Two
other bursts of activity, also observed at other wavelengths, were seen on 23
June and 7 July; they correspond to even larger releases of gas.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9802200 [pdf] - 100371
Gamma-Ray Burst and Relativistic Shells: The Surface Filling Factor
Submitted: 1998-02-13, last modified: 1998-10-31
The variability observed in many complex gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is
inconsistent with causally connected variations in a single, symmetric,
relativistic shell interacting with the ambient material ("external shocks").
Rather, the symmetry of the shell must be broken on an angular scale much
smaller than Gamma^{-1} where Gamma is the bulk Lorentz factor for the shell.
The observed variability in the external shock models arises from the number of
causally connected regions that (randomly) become active. We define the
"surface filling factor" to be the ratio of the area of causally connected
regions that become active to the observable area of the shell. From the
observed variability in 52 BATSE bursts, we estimate the surface filling factor
to be typically 0.005 although some values are near unity. We find that the
surface filling factor is about 0.1 Delta T/T in both the constant Gamma phase
(which probably produces the GRB) and the deaccelerating phase (which probably
produces the x-ray afterglows). Here, \Delta T is a typical time scale of
variability and T is the time since the initial signal. We analyze the 2 hr
flare seen by ASCA 36 hr after the GRB and conclude that the surface filling
factor must be small (0.001) in the x-ray afterglow phase as well. Explanations
for low surface filling factor can either require more or less energy (by a
factor of about 1000) compared to that expected for a symmetric shell.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9803199 [pdf] - 100734
The Polarizing Power of the Interstellar Medium in Taurus
Submitted: 1998-03-17
We present a study of the polarizing power of the dust in cold dense regions
(dark clouds) compared to that of dust in the general interstellar medium
(ISM). Our study uses new polarimetric, optical, and spectral classification
data for 36 stars to carefully study the relation between polarization
percentage (p) and extinction (A_V) in the Taurus dark cloud complex. We find
two trends in our p-A_V study: (1) stars background to the warm ISM show an
increase in p with A_V; and (2) the percentage of polarization of stars
background to cold dark clouds does not increase with extinction. We detect a
break in the p-A_V relation at an extinction 1.3 +/- 0.2 mag, which we expect
corresponds to a set of conditions where the polarizing power of the dust
associated with the Taurus dark clouds drops precipitously. This breakpoint
places important restrictions on the use of polarimetry in studying
interstellar magnetic fields.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9712302 [pdf] - 99791
Variability in Shell Models of Gamma-Ray Bursts
Submitted: 1997-12-23
Many cosmological models of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) assume that a single
relativistic shell carries kinetic energy away from the source and later
converts it into gamma rays, perhaps by interactions with the interstellar
medium or by shocks within the shell. We investigate methods of achieving the
observed variability using symmetry. Since our model emphasizes geometric and
statistical considerations, rather than the detailed physics of the shell, it
is applicable to any theory that relies on relativistic shells. In order to
achieve the observed variability in GRBs using a single-shell model, we have
found that the gamma-ray emission must occur from small patches on the shell
(entities). We have derived two significant characteristics of the time
histories expected from such a model. First, the average number of entities
contributing to the signal remains constant throughout much of the time
history, although the overall photon flux decreases due to relativistic
effects. Second, the "peaks" in a time history can be ascribed to Poisson
variations in the actual number of entities contributing to the signal at any
given time. Taken together, these properties imply that the relative variations
in a GRB (i.e. the heights of the peaks relative to the average envelope of the
signal) should remain constant throughout a time history.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9712303 [pdf] - 99792
Kinematic Arguments Against Single Relativistic Shell Models for
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Submitted: 1997-12-22
Two main types of models have been suggested to explain the long durations
and multiple peaks of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs). In one, there is a very quick
release of energy at a central site resulting in a single relativistic shell
that produces peaks in the time history through its interactions with the
ambient material. In the other, the central site sporadically releases energy
over hundreds of seconds forming a peak with each burst of energy. We present
three kinematic arguments against a single relativistic shell. These arguments
are based only on symmetry. We show that the average envelope of emission of
GRBs is a linear function rather than the power law expected for a single
relativistic shell. We show that presence of gaps in GRBs is the strongest
argument against a single relativistic shell. We estimate that the fraction of
a single shell that can produce gamma-rays in a GRB with multiple peaks is
about 0.001, implying that single relativistic shells require 1000 times more
energy than previously thought. We conclude that either the central site of a
GRB must produce 10^{51} erg/s for hundreds of seconds, or the relativistic
shell must have structure on a scales the order of sqrt(epsilon)/Gamma, where
Gamma is the bulk Lorentz factor and epsilon is the efficiency.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9705052 [pdf] - 97314
Relativistic Shells and Gamma-Ray Bursts
Submitted: 1997-05-07
In many models of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) relativistic shells are responsible
for the overall envelope of emission. We use kinematics and symmetry to
calculate the time history and spectral evolution expected from a relativistic
shell including effects from intrinsic variations in the shell's intensity and
spectra. We find that the decay phase of an envelope is produced by photons
delayed by the shell's curvature. These delayed photons are produced by regions
that are off-axis such that the spectra evolve according to a universal
function (T^{-1}) regardless of intrinsic variations in the rest frame of the
shell. We compare our predictions to the overall envelope of emission of GRBs.
The observed spectra evolve faster. Intrinsic variations cannot make the
spectra evolve that fast, which adds strength to the ``shell symmetry''
problem: models, in particular, the external shock model, that involve
relativistic shells must either confine the material to narrow pencil beams, be
very inefficient, or break the local spherical symmetry so that the shell acts
like a parallel slab. In the case of the internal shock models involving winds
(i.e., central engines), it will probably be easier to break the local
spherical symmetry, but then one must postulate nearly continuous energy
generation at 10^{51} erg s^{-1} lasting up to hundreds of seconds at the
central site.