Normalized to: Sulaiman, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.01932 [pdf] - 1985756
Enceladus and Titan: Emerging Worlds of the Solar System (ESA Voyage
2050 White Paper)
Sulaiman, Ali;
Achilleos, Nicholas;
Atreya, Sushil;
Bertucci, Cesar;
Coates, Andrew;
Dougherty, Michele;
Hadid, Lina;
Hansen, Candice;
Holmberg, Mika;
Hsu, Hsiang-Wen;
Kimura, Tomoki;
Kurth, William;
Gall, Alice Le;
McKevitt, James;
Morooka, Michiko;
Murakami, Go;
Regoli, Leonardo;
Roussos, Elias;
Saur, Joachim;
Shebanits, Oleg;
Solomonidou, Anezina;
Wahlund, Jan-Erik;
Waite, J. Hunter
Submitted: 2019-08-05, last modified: 2019-10-24
Some of the major discoveries of the recent Cassini-Huygens mission have put
Titan and Enceladus firmly on the Solar System map. The mission has
revolutionised our view of Solar System satellites, arguably matching their
scientific importance with that of their planet. While Cassini-Huygens has made
big surprises in revealing Titan's organically rich environment and Enceladus'
cryovolcanism, the mission's success naturally leads us to further probe these
findings. We advocate the acknowledgement of Titan and Enceladus science as
highly relevant to ESA's long-term roadmap, as logical follow-on to
Cassini-Huygens. In this white paper, we will outline important science
questions regarding these satellites and identify the pertinent science themes
we recommend ESA cover during the Voyage 2050 planning cycle. Addressing these
science themes would make major advancements to the present knowledge we have
about the Solar System, its formation, evolution and likelihood that other
habitable environments exist outside the Earth's biosphere.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.02339 [pdf] - 1931007
The in-situ exploration of Jupiter's radiation belts (A White Paper
submitted in response to ESA's Voyage 2050 Call)
Roussos, Elias;
Allanson, Oliver;
André, Nicolas;
Bertucci, Bruna;
Branduardi-Raymont, Graziella;
Clark, George;
Dialynas, Kostantinos;
Dandouras, Iannis;
Desai, Ravindra;
Futaana, Yoshifumi;
Gkioulidou, Matina;
Jones, Geraint;
Kollmann, Peter;
Kotova, Anna;
Kronberg, Elena;
Krupp, Norbert;
Murakami, Go;
Nénon, Quentin;
Nordheim, Tom;
Palmaerts, Benjamin;
Plainaki, Christina;
Rae, Jonathan;
Santos-Costa, Daniel;
Sarris, Theodore;
Shprits, Yuri;
Sulaiman, Ali;
Woodfield, Emma;
Wu, Xin;
Yao, Zhonghua
Submitted: 2019-08-06
Jupiter has the most energetic and complex radiation belts in our solar
system. Their hazardous environment is the reason why so many spacecraft avoid
rather than investigate them, and explains how they have kept many of their
secrets so well hidden, despite having been studied for decades. In this White
Paper we argue why these secrets are worth unveiling. Jupiter's radiation belts
and the vast magnetosphere that encloses them constitute an unprecedented
physical laboratory, suitable for both interdisciplinary and novel scientific
investigations: from studying fundamental high energy plasma physics processes
which operate throughout the universe, such as adiabatic charged particle
acceleration and nonlinear wave-particle interactions; to exploiting the
astrobiological consequences of energetic particle radiation. The in-situ
exploration of the uninviting environment of Jupiter's radiation belts present
us with many challenges in mission design, science planning, instrumentation
and technology development. We address these challenges by reviewing the
different options that exist for direct and indirect observation of this unique
system. We stress the need for new instruments, the value of synergistic Earth
and Jupiter-based remote sensing and in-situ investigations, and the vital
importance of multi-spacecraft, in-situ measurements. While simultaneous,
multi-point in-situ observations have long become the standard for exploring
electromagnetic interactions in the inner solar system, they have never taken
place at Jupiter or any strongly magnetized planet besides Earth. We conclude
that a dedicated multi-spacecraft mission to Jupiter's radiation belts is an
essential and obvious way forward and deserves to be given a high priority in
ESA's Voyage 2050 programme.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.03573 [pdf] - 1663501
Solar System Ice Giants: Exoplanets in our Backyard
Rymer, Abigail;
Mandt, Kathleen;
Hurley, Dana;
Lisse, Carey;
Izenberg, Noam;
Smith, H. Todd;
Westlake, Joseph;
Bunce, Emma;
Arridge, Christopher;
Masters, Adam;
Hofstadter, Mark;
Simon, Amy;
Brandt, Pontus;
Clark, George;
Cohen, Ian;
Allen, Robert;
Vine, Sarah;
Hansen, Kenneth;
Hospodarsky, George;
Kurth, William;
Romani, Paul;
Lamy, Laurent;
Zarka, Philippe;
Cao, Hao;
Paty, Carol;
Hedman, Matthew;
Roussos, Elias;
Cruikshank, Dale;
Farrell, William;
Fieseler, Paul;
Coates, Andrew;
Yelle, Roger;
Parkinson, Christopher;
Militzer, Burkhard;
Grodent, Denis;
Kollmann, Peter;
McNutt, Ralph;
André, Nicolas;
Strange, Nathan;
Barnes, Jason;
Dones, Luke;
Denk, Tilmann;
Rathbun, Julie;
Lunine, Jonathan;
Desai, Ravi;
Cochrane, Corey;
Sayanagi, Kunio M.;
Postberg, Frank;
Ebert, Robert;
Hill, Thomas;
Mueller-Wodarg, Ingo;
Regoli, Leonardo;
Pontius, Duane;
Stanley, Sabine;
Greathouse, Thomas;
Saur, Joachim;
Marouf, Essam;
Bergman, Jan;
Higgins, Chuck;
Johnson, Robert;
Thomsen, Michelle;
Soderlund, Krista;
Jia, Xianzhe;
Wilson, Robert;
Englander, Jacob;
Burch, Jim;
Nordheim, Tom;
Grava, Cesare;
Baines, Kevin;
Quick, Lynnae;
Russell, Christopher;
Cravens, Thomas;
Cecconi, Baptiste;
Aslam, Shahid;
Bray, Veronica;
Garcia-Sage, Katherine;
Richardson, John;
Clark, John;
Hsu, Sean;
Achterberg, Richard;
Sergis, Nick;
Paganelli, Flora;
Kempf, Sasha;
Orton, Glenn;
Portyankina, Ganna;
Jones, Geraint;
Economou, Thanasis;
Livengood, Timothy;
Krimigi, Stamatios;
Szalay, James;
Jackman, Catriona;
Valek, Phillip;
Lecacheux, Alain;
Colwell, Joshua;
Jasinski, Jamie;
Tosi, Federico;
Sulaiman, Ali;
Galand, Marina;
Kotova, Anna;
Khurana, Krishan;
Kivelson, Margaret;
Strobel, Darrell;
Radiota, Aikaterina;
Estrada, Paul;
Livi, Stefano;
Azari, Abigail;
Yates, Japheth;
Allegrini, Frederic;
Vogt, Marissa;
Felici, Marianna;
Luhmann, Janet;
Filacchione, Gianrico;
Moore, Luke
Submitted: 2018-04-10
Future remote sensing of exoplanets will be enhanced by a thorough
investigation of our solar system Ice Giants (Neptune-size planets). What can
the configuration of the magnetic field tell us (remotely) about the interior,
and what implications does that field have for the structure of the
magnetosphere; energy input into the atmosphere, and surface geophysics (for
example surface weathering of satellites that might harbour sub-surface
oceans). How can monitoring of auroral emission help inform future remote
observations of emission from exoplanets? Our Solar System provides the only
laboratory in which we can perform in-situ experiments to understand exoplanet
formation, dynamos, systems and magnetospheres.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.11096 [pdf] - 1584091
An in situ comparison of electron acceleration at collisionless shocks
under differing upstream magnetic field orientations
Submitted: 2017-05-31
A leading explanation for the origin of Galactic cosmic rays is acceleration
at high-Mach number shock waves in the collisionless plasma surrounding young
supernova remnants. Evidence for this is provided by multi-wavelength
non-thermal emission thought to be associated with ultrarelativistic electrons
at these shocks. However, the dependence of the electron acceleration process
on the orientation of the upstream magnetic field with respect to the local
normal to the shock front (quasi-parallel/quasi-perpendicular) is debated.
Cassini spacecraft observations at Saturn's bow shock has revealed examples of
electron acceleration under quasi-perpendicular conditions, and the first in
situ evidence of electron acceleration at a quasi-parallel shock. Here we use
Cassini data to make the first comparison between energy spectra of locally
accelerated electrons under these differing upstream magnetic field regimes. We
present data taken during a quasi-perpendicular shock crossing on 2008 March 8
and during a quasi-parallel shock crossing on 2007 February 3, highlighting
that both were associated with electron acceleration to at least MeV energies.
The magnetic signature of the quasi-perpendicular crossing has a relatively
sharp upstream-downstream transition, and energetic electrons were detected
close to the transition and immediately downstream. The magnetic transition at
the quasi-parallel crossing is less clear, energetic electrons were encountered
upstream and downstream, and the electron energy spectrum is harder above ~100
keV. We discuss whether the acceleration is consistent with diffusive shock
acceleration theory in each case, and suggest that the quasi-parallel spectral
break is due to an energy-dependent interaction between the electrons and
short, large-amplitude magnetic structures.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.01685 [pdf] - 1444048
Suprathermal electrons at Saturn's bow shock
Submitted: 2016-06-06
The leading explanation for the origin of galactic cosmic rays is particle
acceleration at the shocks surrounding young supernova remnants (SNRs),
although crucial aspects of the acceleration process are unclear. The similar
collisionless plasma shocks frequently encountered by spacecraft in the solar
wind are generally far weaker (lower Mach number) than these SNR shocks.
However, the Cassini spacecraft has shown that the shock standing in the solar
wind sunward of Saturn (Saturn's bow shock) can occasionally reach this
high-Mach number astrophysical regime. In this regime Cassini has provided the
first in situ evidence for electron acceleration under quasi-parallel upstream
magnetic conditions. Here we present the full picture of suprathermal electrons
at Saturn's bow shock revealed by Cassini. The downstream thermal electron
distribution is resolved in all data taken by the low-energy electron detector
(CAPS-ELS, <28 keV) during shock crossings, but the higher energy channels were
at (or close to) background. The high-energy electron detector (MIMI-LEMMS, >18
keV) measured a suprathermal electron signature at 31 of 508 crossings, where
typically only the lowest energy channels (<100 keV) were above background. We
show that these results are consistent with theory in which the "injection" of
thermal electrons into an acceleration process involves interaction with
whistler waves at the shock front, and becomes possible for all upstream
magnetic field orientations at high Mach numbers like those of the strong
shocks around young SNRs. A future dedicated study will analyze the rare
crossings with evidence for relativistic electrons (up to ~1 MeV).
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1509.06273 [pdf] - 1280162
Quasiperpendicular high Mach number Shocks
Submitted: 2015-09-17
Shock waves exist throughout the universe and are fundamental to
understanding the nature of collisionless plasmas. Reformation is a process,
driven by microphysics, which typically occurs at high Mach number
supercritical shocks. While ongoing studies have investigated this process
extensively both theoretically and via simulations, their observations remain
few and far between. In this letter we present a study of very high Mach number
shocks in a parameter space that has been poorly explored and we identify
reformation using in situ magnetic field observations from the Cassini
spacecraft at 10 AU. This has given us an insight into quasi-perpendicular
shocks across two orders of magnitude in Alfven Mach number (MA) which could
potentially bridge the gap between modest terrestrial shocks and more exotic
astrophysical shocks. For the first time, we show evidence for cyclic
reformation controlled by specular ion reflection occurring at the predicted
timescale of ~0.3 {\tau}c, where {\tau}c is the ion gyroperiod. In addition, we
experimentally reveal the relationship between reformation and MA and focus on
the magnetic structure of such shocks to further show that for the same MA, a
reforming shock exhibits stronger magnetic field amplification than a shock
that is not reforming.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.05504 [pdf] - 937801
The magnetic structure of Saturn's magnetosheath
Submitted: 2015-02-19
A planet's magnetosheath extends from downstream of its bow shock up to the
magnetopause where the solar wind flow is deflected around the magnetosphere
and the solar wind embedded magnetic field lines are draped. This makes the
region an important site for plasma turbulence, instabilities, reconnection and
plasma depletion layers. A relatively high Alfv\'en Mach number solar wind and
a polar-flattened magnetosphere make the magnetosheath of Saturn both
physically and geometrically distinct from the Earth's. The polar flattening is
predicted to affect the magnetosheath magnetic field structure and thus the
solar wind-magnetosphere interaction. Here we investigate the magnetic field in
the magnetosheath with the expectation that polar flattening is manifested in
the overall draping pattern. We compare an accumulation of Cassini data between
2004 and 2010 with global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations and an
analytical model representative of a draped field between axisymmetric
boundaries. The draping patterns measured are well captured and in broad
agreement for given upstream conditions with those of the MHD simulations
(which include polar flattening). The deviations from the analytical model,
based on no polar flattening, suggest that non-axisymmetry is invariably a key
feature of the magnetosphere's global structure. Our results show a
comprehensive overview of the configuration of the magnetic field in a
non-axisymmetric magnetosheath as revealed by Cassini. We anticipate our
assessment to provide an insight to this barely studied interface between a
high Alfv\'enic bow shock and a dynamic magnetosphere.