Normalized to: Stoss, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.01893 [pdf] - 1590799
Photometric survey, modelling, and scaling of long-period and
low-amplitude asteroids
Marciniak, A.;
Bartczak, P.;
Müller, T.;
Sanabria, J. J.;
Alí-Lagoa, V.;
Antonini, P.;
Behrend, R.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Bronikowska, M.;
Bąk, M. Butkiewicz -;
Cikota, A.;
Crippa, R.;
Ditteon, R.;
Dudziński, G.;
Duffard, R.;
Dziadura, K.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Geier, S.;
Hirsch, R.;
Horbowicz, J.;
Hren, M.;
Jerosimic, L.;
Kamiński, K.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Konstanciak, I.;
Korlevic, P.;
Kosturkiewicz, E.;
Kudak, V.;
Manzini, F.;
Morales, N.;
Murawiecka, M.;
Ogłoza, W.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Pilcher, F.;
Polakis, T.;
Poncy, R.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Siwak, M.;
Skiff, B.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Stoss, R.;
Żejmo, M.;
Żukowski, K.
Submitted: 2017-11-06
The available set of spin and shape modelled asteroids is strongly biased
against slowly rotating targets and those with low lightcurve amplitudes. As a
consequence of these selection effects, the current picture of asteroid spin
axis distribution, rotation rates, or radiometric properties, might be affected
too.
To counteract these selection effects, we are running a photometric campaign
of a large sample of main belt asteroids omitted in most previous studies. We
determined synodic rotation periods and verified previous determinations. When
a dataset for a given target was sufficiently large and varied, we performed
spin and shape modelling with two different methods.
We used the convex inversion method and the non-convex SAGE algorithm,
applied on the same datasets of dense lightcurves. Unlike convex inversion, the
SAGE method allows for the existence of valleys and indentations on the shapes
based only on lightcurves.
We obtained detailed spin and shape models for the first five targets of our
sample: (159) Aemilia, (227) Philosophia, (329) Svea, (478) Tergeste, and (487)
Venetia. When compared to stellar occultation chords, our models obtained an
absolute size scale and major topographic features of the shape models were
also confirmed. When applied to thermophysical modelling, they provided a very
good fit to the infrared data and allowed their size, albedo, and thermal
inertia to be determined.
Convex and non-convex shape models provide comparable fits to lightcurves.
However, some non-convex models fit notably better to stellar occultation
chords and to infrared data in sophisticated thermophysical modelling (TPM). In
some cases TPM showed strong preference for one of the spin and shape
solutions. Also, we confirmed that slowly rotating asteroids tend to have
higher-than-average values of thermal inertia.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.07422 [pdf] - 1449873
New and updated convex shape models of asteroids based on optical data
from a large collaboration network
Hanuš, J.;
Ďurech, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D. A.;
Behrend, R.;
Carry, B.;
Delbo', M.;
Adam, O.;
Afonina, V.;
Anquetin, R.;
Antonini, P.;
Arnold, L.;
Audejean, M.;
Aurard, P.;
Bachschmidt, M.;
Badue, B.;
Barbotin, E.;
Barroy, P.;
Baudouin, P.;
Berard, L.;
Berger, N.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Bosch, J-G.;
Bouley, S.;
Bozhinova, I.;
Brinsfield, J.;
Brunetto, L.;
Canaud, G.;
Caron, J.;
Carrier, F.;
Casalnuovo, G.;
Casulli, S.;
Cerda, M.;
Chalamet, L.;
Charbonnel, S.;
Chinaglia, B.;
Cikota, A.;
Colas, F.;
Coliac, J-F.;
Collet, A.;
Coloma, J.;
Conjat, M.;
Conseil, E.;
Costa, R.;
Crippa, R.;
Cristofanelli, M.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Debackere, A.;
Decock, A.;
Déhais, Q.;
Déléage, T.;
Delmelle, S.;
Demeautis, C.;
Dróżdż, M.;
Dubos, G.;
Dulcamara, T.;
Dumont, M.;
Durkee, R.;
Dymock, R.;
del Valle, A. Escalante;
Esseiva, N.;
Esseiva, R.;
Esteban, M.;
Fauchez, T.;
Fauerbach, M.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Forné, E.;
Fournel, C.;
Fradet, D.;
Garlitz, J.;
Gerteis, O.;
Gillier, C.;
Gillon, M.;
Giraud, R.;
Godard, J-P.;
Goncalves, R.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hay, K.;
Hellmich, S.;
Heterier, S.;
Higgins, D.;
Hirsch, R.;
Hodosan, G.;
Hren, M.;
Hygate, A.;
Innocent, N.;
Jacquinot, H.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jehin, E.;
Jerosimic, L.;
Klotz, A.;
Koff, W.;
Korlevic, P.;
Kosturkiewicz, E.;
Krafft, P.;
Krugly, Y.;
Kugel, F.;
Labrevoir, O.;
Lecacheux, J.;
Lehký, M.;
Leroy, A.;
Lesquerbault, B.;
Lopez-Gonzales, M. J.;
Lutz, M.;
Mallecot, B.;
Manfroid, J.;
Manzini, F.;
Marciniak, A.;
Martin, A.;
Modave, B.;
Montaigut, R.;
Montier, J.;
Morelle, E.;
Morton, B.;
Mottola, S.;
Naves, R.;
Nomen, J.;
Oey, J.;
Ogłoza, W.;
Paiella, M.;
Pallares, H.;
Peyrot, A.;
Pilcher, F.;
Pirenne, J-F.;
Piron, P.;
Polinska, M.;
Polotto, M.;
Poncy, R.;
Previt, J. P.;
Reignier, F.;
Renauld, D.;
Ricci, D.;
Richard, F.;
Rinner, C.;
Risoldi, V.;
Robilliard, D.;
Romeuf, D.;
Rousseau, G.;
Roy, R.;
Ruthroff, J.;
Salom, P. A.;
Salvador, L.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Scholz, A.;
Séné, G.;
Skiff, B.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Sogorb, P.;
Soldán, F.;
Spiridakis, A.;
Splanska, E.;
Sposetti, S.;
Starkey, D.;
Stephens, R.;
Stiepen, A.;
Stoss, R.;
Strajnic, J.;
Teng, J-P.;
Tumolo, G.;
Vagnozzi, A.;
Vanoutryve, B.;
Vugnon, J. M.;
Warner, B. D.;
Waucomont, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Winiarski, M.;
Wolf, M.
Submitted: 2015-10-26
Asteroid modeling efforts in the last decade resulted in a comprehensive
dataset of almost 400 convex shape models and their rotation states. This
amount already provided a deep insight into physical properties of main-belt
asteroids or large collisional families. We aim to increase the number of
asteroid shape models and rotation states. Such results are an important input
for various further studies such as analysis of asteroid physical properties in
different populations, including smaller collisional families, thermophysical
modeling, and scaling shape models by disk-resolved images, or stellar
occultation data. This provides, in combination with known masses, bulk density
estimates, but constrains also theoretical collisional and evolutional models
of the Solar System. We use all available disk-integrated optical data (i.e.,
classical dense-in-time photometry obtained from public databases and through a
large collaboration network as well as sparse-in-time individual measurements
from a few sky surveys) as an input for the convex inversion method, and derive
3D shape models of asteroids, together with their rotation periods and
orientations of rotation axes. The key ingredient is the support of more that
one hundred observers who submit their optical data to publicly available
databases. We present updated shape models for 36 asteroids, for which mass
estimates are currently available in the literature or their masses will be
most likely determined from their gravitational influence on smaller bodies,
which orbital deflection will be observed by the ESA Gaia astrometric mission.
This was achieved by using additional optical data from recent apparitions for
the shape optimization. Moreover, we also present new shape model
determinations for 250 asteroids, including 13 Hungarias and 3 near-Earth
asteroids.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.6943 [pdf] - 620042
Asteroids' physical models from combined dense and sparse photometry and
scaling of the YORP effect by the observed obliquity distribution
Hanuš, J.;
Ďurech, J.;
Brož, M.;
Marciniak, A.;
Warner, B. D.;
Pilcher, F.;
Stephens, R.;
Behrend, R.;
Carry, B.;
Čapek, D.;
Antonini, P.;
Audejean, M.;
Augustesen, K.;
Barbotin, E.;
Baudouin, P.;
Bayol, A.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Borczyk, W.;
Bosch, J. -G.;
Brochard, E.;
Brunetto, L.;
Casulli, S.;
Cazenave, A.;
Charbonnel, S.;
Christophe, B.;
Colas, F.;
Coloma, J.;
Conjat, M.;
Cooney, W.;
Correira, H.;
Cotrez, V.;
Coupier, A.;
Crippa, R.;
Cristofanelli, M.;
Dalmas, Ch.;
Danavaro, C.;
Demeautis, C.;
Droege, T.;
Durkee, R.;
Esseiva, N.;
Esteban, M.;
Fagas, M.;
Farroni, G.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Del Freo, F.;
Garcia, L.;
Geier, S.;
Godon, C.;
Grangeon, K.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Heck, N.;
Hellmich, S.;
Higgins, D.;
Hirsch, R.;
Husarik, M.;
Itkonen, T.;
Jade, O.;
Kamiński, K.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Klotz, A.;
Koff, R. A.;
Kryszczyńska, A.;
Kwiatkowski, T.;
Laffont, A.;
Leroy, A.;
Lecacheux, J.;
Leonie, Y.;
Leyrat, C.;
Manzini, F.;
Martin, A.;
Masi, G.;
Matter, D.;
Michałowski, J.;
Michałowski, M. J.;
Michałowski, T.;
Michelet, J.;
Michelsen, R.;
Morelle, E.;
Mottola, S.;
Naves, R.;
Nomen, J.;
Oey, J.;
Ogloza, W.;
Oksanen, A.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Pääkkönen, P.;
Paiella, M.;
Pallares, H.;
Paulo, J.;
Pavic, M.;
Payet, B.;
Polińska, M.;
Polishook, D.;
Poncy, R.;
Revaz, Y.;
Rinner, C.;
Rocca, M.;
Roche, A.;
Romeuf, D.;
Roy, R.;
Saguin, H.;
Salom, P. A.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santacana, G.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sareyan, J. -P.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Sposetti, S.;
Starkey, D.;
Stoss, R.;
Strajnic, J.;
Teng, J. -P.;
Tregon, B.;
Vagnozzi, A.;
Velichko, F. P.;
Waelchli, N.;
Wagrez, K.;
Wücher, H.
Submitted: 2013-01-29
The larger number of models of asteroid shapes and their rotational states
derived by the lightcurve inversion give us better insight into both the nature
of individual objects and the whole asteroid population. With a larger
statistical sample we can study the physical properties of asteroid
populations, such as main-belt asteroids or individual asteroid families, in
more detail. Shape models can also be used in combination with other types of
observational data (IR, adaptive optics images, stellar occultations), e.g., to
determine sizes and thermal properties. We use all available photometric data
of asteroids to derive their physical models by the lightcurve inversion method
and compare the observed pole latitude distributions of all asteroids with
known convex shape models with the simulated pole latitude distributions. We
used classical dense photometric lightcurves from several sources and
sparse-in-time photometry from the U.S. Naval Observatory in Flagstaff,
Catalina Sky Survey, and La Palma surveys (IAU codes 689, 703, 950) in the
lightcurve inversion method to determine asteroid convex models and their
rotational states. We also extended a simple dynamical model for the spin
evolution of asteroids used in our previous paper. We present 119 new asteroid
models derived from combined dense and sparse-in-time photometry. We discuss
the reliability of asteroid shape models derived only from Catalina Sky Survey
data (IAU code 703) and present 20 such models. By using different values for a
scaling parameter cYORP (corresponds to the magnitude of the YORP momentum) in
the dynamical model for the spin evolution and by comparing synthetics and
observed pole-latitude distributions, we were able to constrain the typical
values of the cYORP parameter as between 0.05 and 0.6.