Normalized to: Stinson, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.10539 [pdf] - 1584026
The 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko observation campaign in support of the
Rosetta mission
Snodgrass, C.;
A'Hearn, M. F.;
Aceituno, F.;
Afanasiev, V.;
Bagnulo, S.;
Bauer, J.;
Bergond, G.;
Besse, S.;
Biver, N.;
Bodewits, D.;
Boehnhardt, H.;
Bonev, B. P.;
Borisov, G.;
Carry, B.;
Casanova, V.;
Cochran, A.;
Conn, B. C.;
Davidsson, B.;
Davies, J. K.;
de León, J.;
de Mooij, E.;
de Val-Borro, M.;
Delacruz, M.;
DiSanti, M. A.;
Drew, J. E.;
Duffard, R.;
Edberg, N. J. T.;
Faggi, S.;
Feaga, L.;
Fitzsimmons, A.;
Fujiwara, H.;
Gibb, E. L.;
Gillon, M.;
Green, S. F.;
Guijarro, A.;
Guilbert-Lepoutre, A.;
Gutiérrez, P. J.;
Hadamcik, E.;
Hainaut, O.;
Haque, S.;
Hedrosa, R.;
Hines, D.;
Hopp, U.;
Hoyo, F.;
Hutsemékers, D.;
Hyland, M.;
Ivanova, O.;
Jehin, E.;
Jones, G. H.;
Keane, J. V.;
Kelley, M. S. P.;
Kiselev, N.;
Kleyna, J.;
Kluge, M.;
Knight, M. M.;
Kokotanekova, R.;
Koschny, D.;
Kramer, E.;
López-Moreno, J. J.;
Lacerda, P.;
Lara, L. M.;
Lasue, J.;
Lehto, H. J.;
Levasseur-Regourd, A. C.;
Licandro, J.;
Lin, Z. Y.;
Lister, T.;
Lowry, S. C.;
Mainzer, A.;
Manfroid, J.;
Marchant, J.;
McKay, A. J.;
McNeill, A.;
Meech, K. J.;
Micheli, M.;
Mohammed, I.;
Monguió, M.;
Moreno, F.;
Muñoz, O.;
Mumma, M. J.;
Nikolov, P.;
Opitom, C.;
Ortiz, J. L.;
Paganini, L.;
Pajuelo, M.;
Pozuelos, F. J.;
Protopapa, S.;
Pursimo, T.;
Rajkumar, B.;
Ramanjooloo, Y.;
Ramos, E.;
Ries, C.;
Riffeser, A.;
Rosenbush, V.;
Rousselot, P.;
Ryan, E. L.;
Santos-Sanz, P.;
Schleicher, D. G.;
Schmidt, M.;
Schulz, R.;
Sen, A. K.;
Somero, A.;
Sota, A.;
Stinson, A.;
Sunshine, J.;
Thompson, A.;
Tozzi, G. P.;
Tubiana, C.;
Villanueva, G. L.;
Wang, X.;
Wooden, D. H.;
Yagi, M.;
Yang, B.;
Zaprudin, B.;
Zegmott, T. J.
Submitted: 2017-05-30
We present a summary of the campaign of remote observations that supported
the European Space Agency's Rosetta mission. Telescopes across the globe (and
in space) followed comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from before Rosetta's
arrival until nearly the end of mission in September 2016. These provided
essential data for mission planning, large-scale context information for the
coma and tails beyond the spacecraft, and a way to directly compare 67P with
other comets. The observations revealed 67P to be a relatively `well behaved'
comet, typical of Jupiter family comets and with activity patterns that repeat
from orbit-to-orbit. Comparison between this large collection of telescopic
observations and the in situ results from Rosetta will allow us to better
understand comet coma chemistry and structure. This work is just beginning as
the mission ends -- in this paper we present a summary of the ground-based
observations and early results, and point to many questions that will be
addressed in future studies.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.05192 [pdf] - 1501965
Polarimetry of comets 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, 74P/Smirnova-Chernykh,
and 152P/Helin-Lawrence
Submitted: 2016-06-16
Aims. Polarimetric characteristics of comets at large heliocentric distances
is a relatively unexplored area; we extend the idea by adding and analysing the
data for three Jupiter family comets (JFCs).
Methods. With the FORS2 instrument of the ESO VLT, we performed
quasi-simultaneous photometry and polarimetry of three active JFCs
67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, 74P/Smirnova-Chernykh, and 152P/Helin-Lawrence.
Results. We obtained in total 23 polarimetric measurements at different
epochs, covering a phase-angle range ~1 -16 degrees and heliocentric distances
from 3 to 4.6 au. From our observations we obtained both colour and
polarimetric maps to look for structures in the comae and tails of the comets.
Conclusions. 74P/Smirnova-Chernykh and 152P/Helin-Lawrence exhibit enough
activity at large heliocentric distances to be detectable in polarimetric
measurements. Polarimetric and colour maps indicate no evidence of dust
particle
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.09271 [pdf] - 1339056
Broadband Linear Polarization of Jupiter Trojans
Submitted: 2015-11-30
Trojan asteroids orbit in the Lagrange points of the system
Sun-planet-asteroid. Their dynamical stability make their physical properties
important proxies for the early evolution of our solar system. To study their
origin, we want to characterize the surfaces of Jupiter Trojan asteroids and
check possible similarities with objects of the main belt and of the Kuiper
Belt. We have obtained high-accuracy broad-band linear polarization
measurements of six Jupiter Trojans of the L4 population and tried to estimate
the main features of their polarimetric behaviour. We have compared the
polarimetric properties of our targets among themselves, and with those of
other atmosphere-less bodies of our solar system. Our sample show approximately
homogeneous polarimetric behaviour, although some distinct features are found
between them. In general, the polarimetric properties of Trojan asteroids are
similar to those of D- and P-type main-belt asteroids. No sign of coma activity
is detected in any of the observed objects. An extended polarimetric survey may
help to further investigate the origin and the surface evolution of Jupiter
Trojans.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1209.6025 [pdf] - 1151672
Polarimetry of transneptunian objects (136472) Makemake and (90482)
Orcus
Submitted: 2012-09-26
Context. We study the surface properties of transneptunian populations of
Solar-system bodies. Aims. We investigate the surface characteristics of the
dwarf planet (136472) Makemake and the resonant object (90482) Orcus. Methods.
Using the FORS2 instrument of the ESO-VLT we have carried out linear
polarisation measurements of Makemake and Orcus. Results. Polarisation of Orcus
is similar to that of smaller size objects. The polarimetric properties of
Makemake are very close to those of Eris and Pluto. We have not found any
significant differences in the polarisation properties of objects from
different dynamical classes. However, there are significant differences in
polarisation of large and smaller size objects, and between large TNOs with
water-ice and methane-ice dominated surfaces. Conclusions. We confirm the
different types of polarisation phase behavior for the largest and smaller size
TNOs. To explain subtle surface polarisation of Pluto, Makemake and Eris we
assume that their surfaces are covered by a thin layer of hoarfrost masking the
surface structure.