We investigate local environmental effects from dark matter (DM) on thermonuclear supernovae (SNe Ia) using publicly available archival data of 224 low-redshift events, in an attempt to shed light on the SN Ia progenitor systems. SNe Ia are explosions of carbon-oxygen (CO) white dwarfs (WDs) that have recently been shown to explode at sub-Chandrasekhar masses; the ignition mechanism remains, however, unknown. Recently, it has been shown that both weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) and macroscopic DM candidates such as primordial black holes (PBHs) are capable of triggering the ignition. Here, we present a method to estimate the DM density and velocity dispersion in the vicinity of SN Ia events and nearby WDs; we argue that (i) WIMP ignition is highly unlikely, and that (ii) DM in the form of PBHs distributed according to a (quasi-) log-normal mass distribution with peak $\log_{10}(m_0/1$g$)=24.9\pm 0.9$ and width $\sigma= 3.3\pm 1.0$ is consistent with SN Ia data, the nearby population of WDs and roughly consistent with other constraints from the literature.

We present and discuss an asynchronous coordinate system covering de Sitter spacetime, notably in a complete way in 1+1 dimensions. The new coordinates have several interesting cosmological properties: the worldlines of comoving ($x^i=const$) observers are geodesics, cosmic time is finite in the past, and the coordinates asymptotically tend to that of a flat Robertson & Walker model at large times. This analysis also provides an argument in favor of the natural emergence of an equation of state of the type $p=-\rho$ in the context of the standard cosmological model.

We use the effective field theory of dark energy to explore the space of modified gravity models which are capable of driving the present cosmic acceleration. We identify five universal functions of cosmic time that are enough to describe a wide range of theories containing a single scalar degree of freedom in addition to the metric. The first function (the effective equation of state) uniquely controls the expansion history of the universe. The remaining four functions appear in the linear cosmological perturbation equations, but only three of them regulate the growth history of large scale structures. We propose a specific parameterization of such functions in terms of characteristic coefficients that serve as coordinates in the space of modified gravity theories and can be effectively constrained by the next generation of cosmological experiments. We address in full generality the problem of the soundness of the theory against ghost-like and gradient instabilities and show how the space of non-pathological models shrinks when a more negative equation of state parameter is considered. This analysis allows us to locate a large class of stable theories that violate the null energy condition (i.e. super-acceleration models) and to recover, as particular subsets, various models considered so far. Finally, under the assumption that the true underlying cosmological model is the $\Lambda$ Cold Dark Matter ($\Lambda$CDM) scenario, and relying on the figure of merit of EUCLID-like observations, we demonstrate that the theoretical requirement of stability significantly narrows the empirical likelihood, increasing the discriminatory power of data. We also find that the vast majority of these non-pathological theories generating the same expansion history as the $\Lambda$CDM model predict a different, lower, growth rate of cosmic structures.

Measurements of the growth index $\gamma(z)$ provide a clue as to whether Einstein's field equations encompass gravity also on large cosmic scales, those where the expansion of the universe accelerates. We show that the information encoded in this function can be satisfactorily parameterized using a small set of coefficients $\gamma_i$ in such a way that the true scaling of the growth index is recovered to better than $1\%$ in most dark energy and dark gravity models. We find that the likelihood of current data is maximal for $\gamma_0=0.74\pm 0.44$ and $\gamma_1=0.01\pm0.46$, a measurement compatible with the $\Lambda$CDM predictions. Moreover data favor models predicting slightly less growth of structures than the Planck LambdaCDM scenario. The main aim of the paper is to provide a prescription for routinely calculating, in an analytic way, the amplitude of the growth indices $\gamma_i$ in relevant cosmological scenarios, and to show that these parameters naturally define a space where predictions of alternative theories of gravity can be compared against growth data in a manner which is independent from the expansion history of the cosmological background. As the standard $\Omega$-plane provides a tool to identify different expansion histories $H(t)$ and their relation to various cosmological models, the $\gamma$-plane can thus be used to locate different growth rate histories $f(t)$ and their relation to alternatives model of gravity. As a result, we find that the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati gravity model is rejected with a $95\%$ confidence level. By simulating future data sets, such as those that a Euclid-like mission will provide, we also show how to tell apart LambdaCDM predictions from those of more extreme possibilities, such as smooth dark energy models, clustering quintessence or parameterized post-Friedmann cosmological models.

We use a sample of about 22,000 galaxies at $0.65<z<1.2$ from the VIPERS PDR-1 catalogue, to constrain the cosmological model through a measurement of the galaxy {\it clustering ratio} $\eta_{g,R}$. This statistic has favourable properties, being defined as the ratio of two quantities characterizing the smoothed density field in spheres of given radius $R$: the value of its correlation function on a multiple of this scale, $\xi(nR)$, and its variance $\sigma^2(R)$. For sufficiently large values of $R$, this is a universal number, capturing 2-point clustering information independently of the linear bias and linear redshift-space distortions of the specific galaxy tracers. In this paper we discuss in detail how to extend the application of $\eta_{g,R}$ to quasi-linear scales and how to control and remove observational selection effects which are typical of redshift surveys as VIPERS. We verify the accuracy and efficiency of these procedures using mock catalogues that match the survey selection process. These results evidence the robustness of $\eta_{g,R}$ to non-linearities and observational effects, which is related to its very definition as a ratio of quantities that are similarly affected. We measure $\Omega_{m,0}=0.270_{-0.025}^{+0.029}$. In addition to the great precision achieved on our estimation of $\Omega_m$ using VIPERS PDR-1, this result is remarkable because it appears to be in good agreement with a recent estimate $z\simeq 0.3$, obtained applying the same technique to the SDSS-LRG catalogue. It, therefore, suports the robustness of the present analysis. Moreover, the combination of these two measurements at $z\sim 0.3$ and $z\sim 0.9$ provides us with a very precise estimate $\Omega_{m,0}=0.274\pm0.017$ which highlights the great consistency between our estimation and other cosmological probes such as BAOs, CMB and Supernovae.