Normalized to: Stanek, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0910.1599 [pdf] - 901997
Massive Halos in Millennium Gas Simulations: Multivariate Scaling
Relations
Submitted: 2009-10-08
The joint likelihood of observable cluster signals reflects the astrophysical
evolution of the coupled baryonic and dark matter components in massive halos,
and its knowledge will enhance cosmological parameter constraints in the coming
era of large, multi-wavelength cluster surveys. We present a computational
study of intrinsic covariance in cluster properties using halo populations
derived from Millennium Gas Simulations (MGS). The MGS are re-simulations of
the original 500 Mpc/h Millennium Simulation performed with gas dynamics under
two different physical treatments: shock heating driven by gravity only (GO)
and a second treatment with cooling and preheating (PH). We examine
relationships among structural properties and observable X-ray and
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) signals for samples of thousands of halos with M_200 >
5 \times 10^{13} Msun/h and z < 2. While the X-ray scaling behavior of PH model
halos at low-redshift offers a good match to local clusters, the model exhibits
non-standard features testable with larger surveys, including weakly running
slopes in hot gas observable--mass relations and ~10% departures from
self-similar redshift evolution for 10^14 Msun/h halos at redshift z ~ 1. We
find that the form of the joint likelihood of signal pairs is generally
well-described by a multivariate, log-normal distribution, especially in the PH
case which exhibits less halo substructure than the GO model. At fixed mass and
epoch, joint deviations of signal pairs display mainly positive correlations,
especially the thermal SZ effect paired with either hot gas fraction
(r=0.88/0.69 for PH/GO at z=0) or X-ray temperature (r=0.62/0.83). We discuss
halo mass selection by signal pairs, and find a minimum mass scatter of 4% in
the \PH model by combining thermal SZ and gas fraction measurements.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0809.2805 [pdf] - 16408
The Effect of Gas Physics on the Halo Mass Function
Submitted: 2008-09-16
Cosmological tests based on cluster counts require accurate calibration of
the space density of massive halos, but most calibrations to date have ignored
complex gas physics associated with halo baryons. We explore the sensitivity of
the halo mass function to baryon physics using two pairs of gas-dynamic
simulations that are likely to bracket the true behavior. Each pair consists of
a baseline model involving only gravity and shock heating, and a refined
physics model aimed at reproducing the observed scaling of the hot,
intracluster gas phase. One pair consists of billion-particle re-simulations of
the original 500 Mpc/h Millennium Simulation of Springel et al. (2005), run
with the SPH code Gadget-2 and using a refined physics treatment approximated
by preheating (PH) at high redshift. The other pair are high-resolution
simulations from the adaptive-mesh refinement code ART, for which the refined
treatment includes cooling, star formation, and supernova feedback (CSF). We
find that, although the mass functions of the gravity-only (GO) treatments are
consistent with the recent calibration of Tinker et al. (2008), both pairs of
simulations with refined baryon physics show significant deviations. Relative
to the GO case, the masses of ~10^{14} Msun/h halos in the PH and CSF
treatments are shifted by averages of -15 \pm 1 percent and +12 \pm 5 percent,
respectively. These mass shifts cause ~ 30% deviations in number density
relative to the Tinker function, significantly larger than the 5% statistical
uncertainty of that calibration.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0802.1069 [pdf] - 9868
The L_X--M relation of Clusters of Galaxies
Rykoff, E. S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
McKay, T. A.;
Becker, M. R.;
Johnston, D. E.;
Koester, B. P.;
Nord, B.;
Rozo, E.;
Sheldon, E. S.;
Stanek, R.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2008-02-07, last modified: 2008-03-27
We present a new measurement of the scaling relation between X-ray luminosity
and total mass for 17,000 galaxy clusters in the maxBCG cluster sample.
Stacking sub-samples within fixed ranges of optical richness, N_200, we measure
the mean 0.1-2.4 keV X-ray luminosity, <L_X>, from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey.
The mean mass, <M_200>, is measured from weak gravitational lensing of SDSS
background galaxies (Johnston et al. 2007). For 9 <= N_200 < 200, the data are
well fit by a power-law, <L_X>/10^42 h^-2 erg/s = (12.6+1.4-1.3 (stat) +/- 1.6
(sys)) (<M_200>/10^14 h^-1 M_sun)^1.65+/-0.13. The slope agrees to within 10%
with previous estimates based on X-ray selected catalogs, implying that the
covariance in L_X and N_200 at fixed halo mass is not large. The luminosity
intercent is 30%, or 2\sigma, lower than determined from the X-ray flux-limited
sample of Reiprich & Bohringer (2002), assuming hydrostatic equilibrium. This
difference could arise from a combination of Malmquist bias and/or systematic
error in hydrostatic mass estimates, both of which are expected. The intercept
agrees with that derived by Stanek et al. (2006) using a model for the
statistical correspondence between clusters and halos in a WMAP3 cosmology with
power spectrum normalization sigma_8 = 0.85. Similar exercises applied to
future data sets will allow constraints on the covariance among optical and hot
gas properties of clusters at fixed mass.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:0706.2189 [pdf] - 2240
Effects of Selection and Covariance on X-ray Scaling Relations of Galaxy
Clusters
Submitted: 2007-06-14
We explore how the behavior of galaxy cluster scaling relations are affected
by flux-limited selection biases and intrinsic covariance among observable
properties. Our models presume log-normal covariance between luminosity (L) and
temperature (T) at fixed mass (M), centered on evolving, power-law mean
relations as a function of host halo mass. Selection can mimic evolution; the
\lm and \lt relations from shallow X-ray flux-limited samples will deviate from
mass-limited expectations at nearly all scales while the relations from deep
surveys ($10^{-14} \cgsflux$) become complete, and therefore unbiased, at
masses above $\sims 2 \times 10^{14} \hinv \msol$. We derive expressions for
low-order moments of the luminosity distribution at fixed temperature, and show
that the slope and scatter of the \lt relation observed in flux-limited samples
is sensitive to the assumed \lt correlation coefficient. In addition, \lt
covariance affects the redshift behavior of halo counts and mean luminosity in
a manner that is nearly degenerate with intrinsic population evolution.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0602324 [pdf] - 79900
The X-Ray Luminosity--Mass Relation for Local Clusters of Galaxies
Submitted: 2006-02-14, last modified: 2006-05-30
We investigate the relationship between soft \xray luminosity and mass for
low redshift clusters of galaxies by comparing observed number counts to
expectations of $\Lambda$CDM cosmologies. We use a three-parameter model for
the conditional probability of luminosity given mass and epoch, described as a
log-normal distribution of fixed width centered on a power-law scaling
relation, $L \spropto M^p\rhoc^s(z)$. We use an ensemble of simulated clusters
to argue that the observed, intrinsic variance in the temperature--luminosity
relation is directly indicative of mass--luminosity variance, and derive $\sigm
\se 0.43 \pm 0.06$ from HIFLUGCS data. Adding this to the likelihood analysis
results in best-fit estimates $p \se 1.59 \pm 0.05$, $\lnlf \se 1.34 \pm 0.09$,
and $\sigm \se 0.37 \pm 0.05$ for self-similar redshift evolution in a
concordance ($\Omega_m \se 0.3$, $\Omega_\Lambda \se 0.7$, $\sigma_8 \se0.9$)
universe. We show that the present-epoch intercept is very sensitive to power
spectrum normalization, $\lnlf \spropto \sigate^{-4}$, and the slope is weakly
sensitive to the matter density, $p \spropto \Omega_m^{1/2}$. The intercept
derived here is dimmer by a factor 2, and slope slightly steeper, than the L-M
relation published using hydrostatic mass estimates of the HIFLUGCS sample. We
show that this discrepancy is largely due to Malmquist bias of the \xray\
flux-limited sample. In light of new WMAP constraints, we discuss the interplay
between parameters and sources of systematic error, and offer a compromise
model with $\Omega_m \se 0.24$, $\sigma_8 \se 0.85$, and somewhat lower scatter
$\sigm \se 0.25$, in which hydrostatic mass estimates remain accurate to $\ssim
15%$. We stress the need for independent calibration of the L-M relation via
weak gravitational lensing.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0212078 [pdf] - 53468
Searching for Bulges at the End of the Hubble Sequence
Submitted: 2002-12-03
We investigate the stellar disk properties of a sample of 19 nearby spiral
galaxies with low inclination and late Hubble type (Scd or later). We combine
our high-resolution HST I-band observations with existing ground-based optical
images to obtain surface brightness profiles that cover a high dynamic range of
galactic radius. Most of these galaxies contain a nuclear star cluster, as
discussed in a separate paper. The main goal of the present work is to
constrain the properties of stellar bulges at these extremely late Hubble
types. We find that the surface brightness profiles of the latest-type spirals
are complex, with a wide range in shapes. We have sorted our sample in a
sequence, starting with ``pure'' disk galaxies (approximately 30% of the
sample). These galaxies have exponential stellar disks that extend inwards to
within a few tens of pc from the nucleus, where the light from the nuclear
cluster starts to dominate. They appear to be truly bulge-less systems.
Progressing along the sequence, the galaxies show increasingly prominent
deviations from a simple exponential disk model on kpc scales. Traditionally,
such deviations have prompted ``bulge-disk'' decompositions. Indeed, the
surface brightness profiles of these galaxies are generally well fit by adding
a second (exponential) bulge component. However, we find that most surface
brightness profiles can be fit equally well (or better) with a single
Sersic-type R^{1/n} profile over the entire radial range of the galaxy, without
requiring a separate ``bulge'' component. We warn in a general sense against
identification of bulges solely on the basis of single-band surface brightness
profiles. (abridged)