Normalized to: Stanbro, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.06818 [pdf] - 1912849
A Search for High-Energy Counterparts to Fast Radio Bursts
Cunningham, Virginia;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
Burns, Eric;
Goldstein, Adam;
Lien, Amy;
Kocevski, Daniel;
Briggs, Michael;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Miller, M. Coleman;
Racusin, Judith;
Stanbro, Matthew
Submitted: 2019-05-16
We report on a search for high-energy counterparts to fast radio bursts
(FRBs) with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM), Fermi Large Area Telescope
(LAT), and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory Burst Alert Telescope (BAT). We
find no significant associations for any of the 23 FRBs in our sample, but
report upper limits to the high-energy fluence for each on timescales of 0.1,
1, 10, and 100 s. We report lower limits on the ratio of the radio to
high-energy fluence, $\frac{f_{r}}{f_{\gamma}}$, for timescales of 0.1 and 100
s. We discuss the implications of our non-detections on various proposed
progenitor models for FRBs, including analogs of giant pulses from the Crab
pulsar and hyperflares from magnetars. This work demonstrates the utility of
analyses of high-energy data for FRBs in tracking down the nature of these
elusive sources.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.02866 [pdf] - 1740032
Fermi GBM Observations of GRB 150101B: A Second Nearby Event with a
Short Hard Spike and a Soft Tail
Burns, E.;
Veres, P.;
Connaughton, V.;
Racusin, J.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Christensen, N.;
Goldstein, A.;
Hamburg, R.;
Kocevski, D.;
McEnery, J.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Hui, C. M.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Mailyan, B.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Siellez, K.;
Stanbro, M.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2018-07-08, last modified: 2018-08-06
In light of the joint multimessenger detection of a binary neutron star
merger as the gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A and in gravitational waves as
GW170817, we reanalyze the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data of one of the
closest short gamma-ray bursts: GRB 150101B. We find this burst is composed of
a short hard spike followed by a comparatively long soft tail. This apparent
two-component nature is phenomenologically similar to that of GRB 170817A.
While GRB 170817A was distinct from the previously known population of short
gamma-ray bursts in terms of its prompt intrinsic energetics, GRB 150101B is
not. Despite these differences, GRB 150101B can be modeled as a more on-axis
version of GRB 170817A. Identifying a similar signature in two of the closest
short gamma-ray bursts suggests the soft tail is common, but generally
undetectable in more distant events. If so, it will be possible to identify
nearby short gamma-ray bursts from the prompt gamma-ray emission alone, aiding
the search for kilonovae.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.02305 [pdf] - 1630338
On the interpretation of the Fermi GBM transient observed in coincidence
with LIGO Gravitational Wave Event GW150914
Connaughton, V.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Blackburn, L.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Christensen, N.;
Hui, C. M.;
Kocevski, D.;
Littenberg, T.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Racusin, J.;
Shawhan, P.;
Veitch, J.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Cleveland, W.;
Giles, M. M.;
Gibby, M. H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kippen, R. M.;
McBreen, S.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Stanbro, M.;
Veres, P.
Submitted: 2018-01-07
The weak transient detected by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) 0.4 s
after GW150914 has generated much speculation regarding its possible
association with the black-hole binary merger. Investigation of the GBM data by
Connaughton et al. (2016) revealed a source location consistent with GW150914
and a spectrum consistent with a weak, short Gamma-Ray Burst.
Greiner et al. (2016) present an alternative technique for fitting
background-limited data in the low-count regime, and call into question the
spectral analysis and the significance of the detection of GW150914-GBM
presented in Connaughton et al. (2016). The spectral analysis of Connaughton et
al. (2016) is not subject to the limitations of the low-count regime noted by
Greiner et al. (2016). We find Greiner et al. (2016) used an inconsistent
source position and did not follow the steps taken in Connaughton et al. (2016)
to mitigate the statistical shortcomings of their software when analyzing this
weak event. We use the approach of Greiner et al. (2016) to verify that our
original spectral analysis is not biased.
The detection significance of GW150914-GBM is established empirically, with a
False Alarm Rate (FAR) of $\sim 10^{-4}$~Hz. A post-trials False Alarm
Probability (FAP) of $2.2 \times 10^{-3}$ ($2.9 \sigma$) of this transient
being associated with GW150914 is based on the proximity in time to the GW
event of a transient with that FAR. The FAR and the FAP are unaffected by the
spectral analysis that is the focus of Greiner et al. (2016).
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05446 [pdf] - 1589764
An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications:
Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A
Goldstein, A.;
Veres, P.;
Burns, E.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Hamburg, R.;
Kocevski, D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Preece, R. D.;
Poolakkil, S.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Hui, C. M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Racusin, J.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Christensen, N.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Siellez, K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Broida, J.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Giles, M. M.;
Kippen, R. M.;
McBreen, S.;
McEnery, J.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Stanbro, M.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
On August 17, 2017 at 12:41:06 UTC the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM)
detected and triggered on the short gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A. Approximately
1.7 s prior to this GRB, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave
Observatory (LIGO) triggered on a binary compact merger candidate associated
with the GRB. This is the first unambiguous coincident observation of
gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation from a single astrophysical
source and marks the start of gravitational-wave multi-messenger astronomy. We
report the GBM observations and analysis of this ordinary short GRB, which
extraordinarily confirms that at least some short GRBs are produced by binary
compact mergers.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.04901 [pdf] - 1530839
Searching the Gamma-ray Sky for Counterparts to Gravitational Wave
Sources: Fermi GBM and LAT Observations of LVT151012 and GW151226
Racusin, J. L.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Connaughton, V.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Jenke, P.;
Blackburn, L.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Broida, J.;
Camp, J.;
Christensen, N.;
Hui, C. M.;
Littenberg, T.;
Shawhan, P.;
Singer, L.;
Veitch, J.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Cleveland, W.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Gibby, M. H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
McBreen, S.;
Mailyan, B.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Stanbro, M.;
Veres, P.;
Zhang, B. -B.;
Ackermann, M.;
Albert, A.;
Atwood, W. B.;
Axelsson, M.;
Baldini, L.;
Ballet, J.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Baring, M. G.;
Bastieri, D.;
Bellazzini, R.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Blandford, R. D.;
Bloom, E. D.;
Bonino, R.;
Bregeon, J.;
Bruel, P.;
Buson, S.;
Caliandro, G. A.;
Cameron, R. A.;
Caputo, R.;
Caragiulo, M.;
Caraveo, P. A.;
Cavazzuti, E.;
Charles, E.;
Chiang, J.;
Ciprini, S.;
Costanza, F.;
Cuoco, A.;
Cutini, S.;
D'Ammando, F.;
de Palma, F.;
Desiante, R.;
Digel, S. W.;
Di Lalla, N.;
Di Mauro, M.;
Di Venere, L.;
Drell, P. S.;
Favuzzi, C.;
Ferrara, E. C.;
Focke, W. B.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Gasparrini, D.;
Giglietto, N.;
Gill, R.;
Giroletti, M.;
Glanzman, T.;
Granot, J.;
Green, D.;
Grove, J. E.;
Guillemot, L.;
Guiriec, S.;
Harding, A. K.;
Jogler, T.;
Johannesson, G.;
Kamae, T.;
Kensei, S.;
Kocevski, D.;
Kuss, M.;
Larsson, S.;
Latronico, L.;
Li, J.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lubrano, P.;
Magill, J. D.;
Maldera, S.;
Malyshev, D.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Michelson, P. F.;
Mizuno, T.;
Morselli, A.;
Moskalenko, I. V.;
Negro, M.;
Nuss, E.;
Omodei, N.;
Orienti, M.;
Orlando, E.;
Ormes, J. F.;
Paneque, D.;
Perkins, J. S.;
Pesce-Rollins, M.;
Piron, F.;
Pivato, G.;
Porter, T. A.;
Principe, G.;
Raino, S.;
Rando, R.;
Razzano, M.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Parkinson, P. M. Saz;
Scargle, J. D.;
Sgro, C.;
Simone, D.;
Siskind, E. J.;
Smith, D. A.;
Spada, F.;
Spinelli, P.;
Suson, D. J.;
Tajima, H.;
Thayer, J. B.;
Torres, D. F.;
Troja, E.;
Uchiyama, Y.;
Vianello, G.;
Wood, K. S.;
Wood, M.
Submitted: 2016-06-15
We present the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) and Large Area Telescope
(LAT) observations of the LIGO binary black hole merger event GW151226 and
candi- date LVT151012. No candidate electromagnetic counterparts were detected
by either the GBM or LAT. We present a detailed analysis of the GBM and LAT
data over a range of timescales from seconds to years, using automated
pipelines and new techniques for char- acterizing the upper limits across a
large area of the sky. Due to the partial GBM and LAT coverage of the large
LIGO localization regions at the trigger times for both events, dif- ferences
in source distances and masses, as well as the uncertain degree to which
emission from these sources could be beamed, these non-detections cannot be
used to constrain the variety of theoretical models recently applied to explain
the candidate GBM counterpart to GW150914.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.03920 [pdf] - 1439752
Fermi GBM Observations of LIGO Gravitational Wave event GW150914
Connaughton, V.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Blackburn, L.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Zhang, B. -B.;
Camp, J.;
Christensen, N.;
Hui, C. M.;
Jenke, P.;
Littenberg, T.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Racusin, J.;
Shawhan, P.;
Singer, L.;
Veitch, J.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Cleveland, W.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Giles, M. M.;
Gibby, M. H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kippen, R. M.;
McBreen, S.;
Mailyan, B.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O.;
Sparke, L.;
Stanbro, M.;
Toelge, K.;
Veres, P.
Submitted: 2016-02-11, last modified: 2016-06-01
With an instantaneous view of 70% of the sky, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst
Monitor (GBM) is an excellent partner in the search for electromagnetic
counterparts to gravitational wave (GW) events. GBM observations at the time of
the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) event GW150914
reveal the presence of a weak transient above 50 keV, 0.4~s after the GW event,
with a false alarm probability of 0.0022 (2.9$\sigma$). This weak transient
lasting 1 s was not detected by any other instrument and does not appear
connected with other previously known astrophysical, solar, terrestrial, or
magnetospheric activity. Its localization is ill-constrained but consistent
with the direction of GW150914. The duration and spectrum of the transient
event are consistent with a weak short Gamma-Ray Burst arriving at a large
angle to the direction in which Fermi was pointing, where the GBM detector
response is not optimal. If the GBM transient is associated with GW150914, this
electromagnetic signal from a stellar mass black hole binary merger is
unexpected. We calculate a luminosity in hard X-ray emission between 1~keV and
10~MeV of $1.8^{+1.5}_{-1.0} \times 10^{49}$~erg~s$^{-1}$. Future joint
observations of GW events by LIGO/Virgo and Fermi GBM could reveal whether the
weak transient reported here is a plausible counterpart to GW150914 or a chance
coincidence, and will further probe the connection between compact binary
mergers and short Gamma-Ray Bursts.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.07612 [pdf] - 1400531
The 3rd Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: The First Six Years
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Meegan, Charles A.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Paciesas, William S.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Burns, Eric;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Cleveland, William H.;
Collazzi, Andrew C.;
Connaughto, Valerie;
Diekmann, Anne M.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Gibby, Melissa H.;
Giles, Misty M.;
Goldstein, Adam M.;
Greiner, Jochen;
Jenke, Peter A.;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Mailyan, Bagrat;
McBreen, Sheila;
Pelassa, Veronique;
Preece, Robert D.;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
Sparke, Linda S.;
Stanbro, Matthew;
Veres, Peter;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Xiong, Shaolin;
Younes, George;
Yu, Hoi-Fung;
Zhang, Binbin
Submitted: 2016-03-24
Since its launch in 2008, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has
triggered and located on average approximately two gamma-ray bursts (GRB) every
three days. Here we present the third of a series of catalogs of GRBs detected
by GBM, extending the second catalog by two more years, through the middle of
July 2014. The resulting list includes 1405 triggers identified as GRBs. The
intention of the GBM GRB catalog is to provide information to the community on
the most important observables of the GBM detected GRBs. For each GRB the
location and main characteristics of the prompt emission, the duration, peak
flux and fluence are derived. The latter two quantities are calculated for the
50-300~keV energy band, where the maximum energy release of GRBs in the
instrument reference system is observed, and also for a broader energy band
from 10-1000 keV, exploiting the full energy range of GBM's low-energy NaI(Tl)
detectors. Using statistical methods to assess clustering, we find that the
hardness and duration of GRBs are better fitted by a two-component model with
short-hard and long-soft bursts, than by a model with three components.
Furthermore, information is provided on the settings and modifications of the
triggering criteria and exceptional operational conditions during years five
and six in the mission. This third catalog is an official product of the Fermi
GBM science team, and the data files containing the complete results are
available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center
(HEASARC).
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.02962 [pdf] - 1392918
Which $E_{\rm peak}$? - The Characteristic Energy of Gamma-Ray Burst
Spectra
Submitted: 2016-03-09, last modified: 2016-03-21
A characteristic energy of individual gamma-ray burst (GRB) spectra can in
most cases be determined from the peak energy of the energy density spectra
($\nu{\cal F}_{\nu}$), called '$E_{\rm peak}$'. Distributions of $E_{\rm peak}$
have been compiled for time-resolved spectra from bright GRBs, and also
time-averaged spectra and peak flux spectra for nearly every burst observed by
CGRO-BATSE and Fermi-GBM. Even when determined by an instrument with a broad
energy band, such as GBM (8 keV to 40 MeV), the distributions themselves peak
at around 240 keV in the observer's frame, with a spread of roughly a decade in
energy. $E_{\rm peak}$ can have considerable evolution (sometimes greater than
one decade) within any given burst, as amply demonstrated by single pulses in
GRB110721A and GRB130427A. Meanwhile, several luminosity or energy relations
have been proposed to correlate with either the time-integrated or peak flux
$E_{\rm peak}$. Thus, when discussing correlations with $E_{\rm peak}$, the
question arises, "Which $E_{\rm peak}$?". A single burst may be characterized
by any one of a number of values for $E_{\rm peak}$ that are associated with
it. Using a single pulse simulation model with spectral evolution as a proxy
for the type of spectral evolution observed in many bursts, we investigate how
the time-averaged $E_{\rm peak}$ emerges from the spectral evolution within a
single pulse, how this average naturally correlates with the peak flux derived
$E_{\rm peak}$ in a burst and how the distribution in $E_{\rm peak}$ values
from many bursts derives its surprisingly narrow width.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.02961 [pdf] - 1005759
Compton scattering in terrestrial gamma-ray flashes detected with the
Fermi gamma-ray burst monitor
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Cramer, Eric;
McBreen, Sheila;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Foley, Suzanne;
Tierney, David;
Chaplin, Vandiver L.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Stanbro, Matthew;
Xiong, Shaolin;
Dwyer, Joseph;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
von Kienlin, Andreas
Submitted: 2015-05-12
Terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs) are short intense flashes of gamma rays
associated with lightning activity in thunderstorms. Using Monte Carlo
simulations of the relativistic runaway electron avalanche (RREA) process,
theoretical predictions for the temporal and spectral evolution of TGFs are
compared to observations made with the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board
the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. Assuming a single source altitude of 15
km, a comparison of simulations to data is performed for a range of empirically
chosen source electron variation time scales. The data exhibit a clear
softening with increased source distance, in qualitative agreement with
theoretical predictions. The simulated spectra follow this trend in the data,
but tend to underestimate the observed hardness. Such a discrepancy may imply
that the basic RREA model is not sufficient. Alternatively, a TGF beam that is
tilted with respect to the zenith could produce an evolution with source
distance that is compatible with the data. Based on these results, we propose
that the source electron distributions of TGFs observed by GBM vary on time
scales of at least tens of microseconds, with an upper limit of approx. 100
microseconds.
