Normalized to: Stabell, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0308398 [pdf] - 58677
Five nights of intensive R- and V-band photometry of QSO 0957+561A,B
Submitted: 2003-08-22
We present R- and V-band photometry of the gravitational lens system QSO
0957+561 from five nights (one in 2000 January and four in 2001 March,
corresponding to the approximate time-delay for the system) of uninterrupted
monitoring at the Nordic Optical Telescope. In the photometry scheme we have
stressed careful magnitude calibration as well as corrections for the lens
galaxy contamination and the crosstalk between the twin (A and B) quasar
images. The resulting, very densely sampled light curves are quite stable, in
conflict with earlier claims derived from the same data material. We estimate
high-precision timelag-corrected B/A flux ratios in both colour bands, as well
as V-R colour indices for A and B, and discuss the short time-scale variability
of the system.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0308397 [pdf] - 58676
New aperture photometry of QSO 0957+561; application to time delay and
microlensing
Submitted: 2003-08-22
We present a re-reduction of archival CCD frames of the doubly imaged quasar
0957+561 using a new photometry code. Aperture photometry with corrections for
both cross contamination between the quasar images and galaxy contamination is
performed on about 2650 R-band images from a five year period (1992-1997). From
the brightness data a time delay of 424.9 +/- 1.2 days is derived using two
different statistical techniques. The amount of gravitational microlensing in
the quasar light curves is briefly investigated, and we find unambiguous
evidence of both long term and short term microlensing. We also note the
unusual circumstance regarding time delay estimates for this gravitational
lens. Estimates by different observers from different data sets or even with
the same data sets give lag estimates differing by typically 8 days, and error
bars of only a day or two. This probably indicates several complexities where
the result of each estimate depends upon the details of the calculation.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0210400 [pdf] - 52438
Around the Clock Observations of the Q0957+561 A,B Gravitationally
Lensed Quasar II: Results for the second observing season
Colley, Wesley N.;
Schild, Rudolph E.;
Abajas, Cristina;
Alcalde, David;
Aslan, Zeki;
Bikmaev, Ilfan;
Chavushyan, Vahram;
Chinarro, Luis;
Cournoyer, Jean-Philippe;
Crowe, Richard;
Dudinov, Vladimir;
Kathinka, Anna;
Evans, Dalland;
Jeon, Young-Beom;
Goicoechea, Luis J.;
Golbasi, Orhan;
Khamitov, Irek;
Kjernsmo, Kjetil;
Lee, Hyun Ju;
Lee, Jonghwan;
Lee, Ki Won;
Lee, Myung Gyoon;
Lopez-Cruz, Omar;
Mediavilla, Evencio;
Moffatt, Anthony F. J.;
Mujica, Raul;
Ullan, Aurora M.;
Oscoz, Alexander;
Park, Myeong-Gu;
Purves, Norman;
Sakhibullin, Nail;
Sinelnikov, Igor;
Stabell, Rolf;
Stockton, Alan;
Teuber, Jan;
Thompson, Roy;
Woo, Hwa-Sung;
Zheleznyak, Alexander
Submitted: 2002-10-17
We report on an observing campaign in March 2001 to monitor the brightness of
the later arriving Q0957+561 B image in order to compare with the previously
published brightness observations of the (first arriving) A image. The 12
participating observatories provided 3543 image frames which we have analyzed
for brightness fluctuations. From our classical methods for time delay
determination, we find a 417.09 +/- 0.07 day time delay which should be free of
effects due to incomplete sampling. During the campaign period, the quasar
brightness was relatively constant and only small fluctuations were found; we
compare the structure function for the new data with structure function
estimates for the 1995--6 epoch, and show that the structure function is
statistically non-stationary. We also examine the data for any evidence of
correlated fluctuations at zero lag. We discuss the limits to our ability to
measure the cosmological time delay if the quasar's emitting surface is time
resolved, as seems likely.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0205424 [pdf] - 49498
Bias and consistency in time delay estimation methods: case of the
double quasar HE 1104-1805
Submitted: 2002-05-24
We present a short re-evaluation of a recently published time delay estimate
for the gravitational lens system HE 1104-1805 with emphasis on important
methodological aspects: bias of the statistics, inconsistency of the methods
and use of the purposeful selection of data points(or so-called "cleaning") at
the preprocessing stage. We show how the inadequate use of simple analysis
methods can lead to too strong conclusions. Our analysis shows that there are
indications for the time delay in HE 1104-1805 to be between -0.9 and -0.7
years, but still with a large uncertainty.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0103146 [pdf] - 41363
'Round the Clock Observations of the Q0957+561 A,B Gravitationally
Lensed Quasar
Colley, Wesley N.;
Schild, Rudolph E.;
Abajas, Cristina;
Alcalde, David;
Aslan, Zeki;
Barrena, Rafael;
Dudinov, Vladimir;
Khamitov, Irek;
Kjernsmo, Kjetil;
Lee, Hyun Ju;
Lee, Jonghwan;
Lee, Myung Gyoon;
Licandro, Javier;
Maoz, Dan;
Mediavilla, Evencio;
Motta, Veronica;
Munoz, Jose;
Oscoz, Alex;
Serra-Ricart, Miquel;
Sinelnikov, Igor;
Stabell, Rolf;
Teuber, Jan;
Zheleznyak, Alexander
Submitted: 2001-03-09
An observing campaign with 10 participating observatories has undertaken to
monitor the optical brightness of the Q0957 gravitationally lensed quasar for
10 consecutive nights in January 2000. The resulting A image brightness curve
has significant brightness fluctuations and makes a photometric prediction for
the B image light curve for a second campaign planned for 12-21 March 2001. The
ultimate purpose is to determine the gravitational lens time delay to a
fraction of an hour, and to seek evidence for rapid microlensing.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0005371 [pdf] - 36142
Constraints on source and lens parameters from microlensing variability
in QSO 0957+561 A,B
Submitted: 2000-05-18
From regular monitoring of the Double Quasar QSO 0957+561 A,B there is now
general agreement on a time delay of about 416 days. This has made it possible
to determine the microlensing residual in the light-curve, see Pelt et al.
(1998). We have used two significant microlensing features: 1) A ``quiet''
period with a variability less than 0.05 mag lasting about 8 years, and 2) A
change in the residual of 0.25 mag during a time interval of about 5 years. The
first feature gives a lower limit for the lens mass, 'M', for a given
normalized source radius, 'r', whereas the second feature gives an upper limit.
We have considered the amount of mass in a continuum to be a free parameter
with possible values between 0% (all mass in lenses) and 90%. At a significance
level of 1% the mass can only be constrained within a rather wide range (1e-06
M_solar to 5 M_solar). For the radius 'R' of the source an upper limit of 1e16
cm is found, whereas the normalized source radius 'r' is restricted to be
smaller than 30. At a level of 10%, however, the range of possible masses is
much narrower (2e-03 M_solar to 0.5 M_solar), and the upper limit of R is about
6e15 cm, whereas the value of 'r' is restricted to be less than 2. We have used
an effective transverse velocity 'V' equal to 600 km/s.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9809107 [pdf] - 102811
Three photometric methods tested on ground-based data of Q 2237+0305
Submitted: 1998-09-09
The Einstein Cross, Q~2237+0305, has been photometrically observed in four
bands on two successive nights at NOT (La Palma, Spain) in October 1995. Three
independent algorithms have been used to analyse the data: an automatic image
decomposition technique, a CLEAN algorithm and the new MCS deconvolution code.
The photometric and astrometric results obtained with the three methods are
presented. No photometric variations were found in the four quasar images.
Comparison of the photometry from the three techniques shows that both
systematic and random errors affect each method. When the seeing is worse than
1.0", the errors from the automatic image decomposition technique and the Clean
algorithm tend to be large (0.04-0.1 magnitudes) while the deconvolution code
still gives accurate results (1{sigma} error below 0.04) even for frames with
seeing as bad as 1.7". Reddening is observed in the quasar images and is found
to be compatible with either extinction from the lensing galaxy or colour
dependent microlensing. The photometric accuracy depends on the light
distribution used to model the lensing galaxy. In particular, using a numerical
galaxy model, as done with the MCS algorithm, makes the method less seeing
dependent. Another advantage of using a numerical model is that eventual
non-homogeneous structures in the galaxy can be modeled. Finally, we propose an
observational strategy for a future photometric monitoring of the Einstein
Cross.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9803175 [pdf] - 100710
High resolution optical and near-IR imaging of the quadruple quasar RX
J0911.4+0551
Burud, I.;
Courbin, F.;
Lidman, C.;
Jaunsen, A.;
Hjorth, J.;
Ostensen, R.;
Andersen, M.;
Clasen, J.;
Wucknitz, O.;
Meylan, G.;
Magain, P.;
Stabell, R.;
Refsdal, S.
Submitted: 1998-03-16, last modified: 1998-05-10
We report the detection of four images in the recently discovered lensed QSO
RX J0911.4+0551. With a maximum angular separation of 3.1", it is the quadruply
imaged QSO with the widest known angular separation. Raw and deconvolved data
reveal an elongated lens galaxy. The observed reddening in at least two of the
four QSO images suggests differential extinction by this lensing galaxy. We
show that both an ellipticity of the galaxy (epsilon_{min}=0.075) and an
external shear (gamma_{min}=0.15) from a nearby mass has to be included in the
lensing potential in order to reproduce the complex geometry observed in RX
J0911.4+0551. A possible galaxy cluster is detected about 38", from RX
J0911.4+0551 and could contribute to the X-ray emission observed by ROSAT in
this field. The color of these galaxies indicates a plausible redshift in the
range of 0.6-0.8.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9512103 [pdf] - 93787
Monitoring of the Einstein Cross with the Nordic Optical Telscope
Oestensen, R.;
Refsdal, S.;
Stabell, R.;
Teuber, J.;
Emanuelsen, P. I.;
Festin, L.;
Florentin-Nielsen, R.;
Gahm, G.;
Gullbring, E.;
Hjorth, J.;
Jablonski, M.;
Jaunsen, A. O.;
Kaas, A. A.;
Karttunen, H.;
Kotilainen, J.;
Laurikainen, E.;
Lindgren, H.;
Maehoenen, P.;
Nilsson, K.;
Olofsson, G.;
Olsen, Oe.;
Pettersen, B. R.;
Piirola, V.;
Soerensen, A. N.;
Takalo, L.;
Thomsen, B.;
Valtaoja, E.;
Vestergaard, M.;
Vianborg, T. av
Submitted: 1995-12-15
We report results from five years of monitoring of the Einstein Cross (Q
2237+0305) with the Nordic Optical Telescope. The photometry, mainly in the R
and I bands, has been performed by a PSF fitting and `cleaning' procedure, in
which the four image components as well as the lens galaxy and its nucleus are
iteratively removed. The resulting lightcurves exhibit several microlensing
features; one event may have a timescale as short as 14 days. Variations of
timescales of several years are found in all four images. This becomes even
more convincing when our data are combined with data published for 1986-89. No
clear high amplification event was observed during the period. A brightening of
all four components during 1994 is interpreted as intrinsic variation.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9501107 [pdf] - 1469148
The NOT GL survey for multiply imaged quasars
Submitted: 1995-01-31
A gravitational lens (GL)-search program, initiated in 1990 at the Nordic
Optical Telescope (NOT), has revealed several possible GL-candidates among a
sample of 168 quasars (QSOs), chosen from three lists compiled by C. Hazard, D.
Reimers and J. Surdej, respectively. Some of these candidates, selected for
having close companions (within 5 arcseconds), were imaged in several filters
and their colours compared. Low dispersion spectra of the most promising
candidates were also obtained at the NOT and ESO New Technology Telescope
(NTT). None of these has proved to be strong candidates of gravitational
lensing effects. We present this new sample of QSOs and combine it with
previously published optical QSO samples in a statistical analysis to yield
constraints on flat cosmologies and galaxy velocity dispersions. Finally, by
simulating larger samples of quasars and gravitational lenses, we discuss how
the uncertainties affecting our present results would be changed.