Normalized to: Sprenger, T.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.05955 [pdf] - 1878657
The promising future of a robust cosmological neutrino mass measurement
Submitted: 2018-08-17, last modified: 2019-05-06
We forecast the sensitivity of thirty-five different combinations of future
Cosmic Microwave Background and Large Scale Structure data sets to cosmological
parameters and to the total neutrino mass. We work under conservative
assumptions accounting for uncertainties in the modelling of systematics. In
particular, for galaxy redshift surveys, we remove the information coming from
non-linear scales. We use Bayesian parameter extraction from mock likelihoods
to avoid Fisher matrix uncertainties. Our grid of results allows for a direct
comparison between the sensitivity of different data sets. We find that future
surveys will measure the neutrino mass with high significance and will not be
substantially affected by potential parameter degeneracies between neutrino
masses, the density of relativistic relics, and a possible time-varying
equation of state of Dark Energy.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.08331 [pdf] - 1842297
Cosmology in the era of Euclid and the Square Kilometre Array
Submitted: 2018-01-25, last modified: 2019-02-05
Theoretical uncertainties on non-linear scales are among the main obstacles
to exploit the sensitivity of forthcoming galaxy and hydrogen surveys like
Euclid or the Square Kilometre Array (SKA). Here, we devise a new method to
model the theoretical error that goes beyond the usual cut-off on small scales.
The advantage of this more efficient implementation of the non-linear
uncertainties is tested through a Markov-Chain-Monte-Carlo (MCMC) forecast of
the sensitivity of Euclid and SKA to the parameters of the standard
$\Lambda$CDM model, including massive neutrinos with total mass $M_\nu$, and to
3 extended scenarios, including 1) additional relativistic degrees of freedom
($\Lambda$CDM + $M_\nu$ + $N_\mathrm{eff}$), 2) a deviation from the
cosmological constant ($\Lambda$CDM + $M_\nu$ + $w_0$), and 3) a time-varying
dark energy equation of state parameter ($\Lambda$CDM + $M_\nu$ +
$\left(w_0,w_a \right)$). We compare the sensitivity of 14 different
combinations of cosmological probes and experimental configurations. For Euclid
combined with Planck, assuming a plain cosmological constant, our method gives
robust predictions for a high sensitivity to the primordial spectral index
$n_{\rm s}$ ($\sigma(n_s)=0.00085$), the Hubble constant $H_0$
($\sigma(H_0)=0.141 \, {\rm km/s/Mpc}$), the total neutrino mass $M_\nu$
($\sigma(M_\nu)=0.020 \, {\rm eV}$). Assuming dynamical dark energy we get
$\sigma(M_\nu)=0.030 \, {\rm eV}$ for the mass and $(\sigma(w_0), \sigma(w_a))
= (0.0214, 0.071)$ for the equation of state parameters. The predicted
sensitivity to $M_\nu$ is mostly stable against the extensions of the
cosmological model considered here. Interestingly, a significant improvement of
the constraints on the extended model parameters is also obtained when
combining Euclid with a low redshift HI intensity mapping survey by SKA1,
demonstrating the importance of the synergy of Euclid and SKA.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.04672 [pdf] - 1797159
Bias due to neutrinos must not uncorrect'd go
Submitted: 2018-07-12, last modified: 2018-08-24
In cosmologies with massive neutrinos, the galaxy bias defined with respect
to the total matter field (cold dark matter, baryons, and non-relativistic
neutrinos) depends on the sum of the neutrino masses $M_{\nu}$, and becomes
scale-dependent even on large scales. This effect has been usually neglected
given the sensitivity of current surveys, but becomes a severe systematic for
future surveys aiming to provide the first detection of non-zero $M_{\nu}$. The
effect can be corrected for by defining the bias with respect to the density
field of cold dark matter and baryons instead of the total matter field. In
this work, we provide a simple prescription for correctly mitigating the
neutrino-induced scale-dependent bias effect in a practical way. We clarify a
number of subtleties regarding how to properly implement this correction in the
presence of redshift-space distortions and non-linear evolution of
perturbations. We perform a MCMC analysis on simulated galaxy clustering data
that match the expected sensitivity of the \textit{Euclid} survey. We find that
the neutrino-induced scale-dependent bias can lead to important shifts in both
the inferred mean value of $M_{\nu}$, as well as its uncertainty. We show how
these shifts propagate to other cosmological parameters correlated with
$M_{\nu}$, such as the cold dark matter physical density $\Omega_{cdm} h^2$ and
the scalar spectral index $n_s$. In conclusion, we find that correctly
accounting for the neutrino-induced scale-dependent bias will be of crucial
importance for future galaxy clustering analyses. We encourage the cosmology
community to correctly account for this effect using the simple prescription we
present in our work. The tools necessary to easily correct for the
neutrino-induced scale-dependent bias will be made publicly available in an
upcoming release of the Boltzmann solver \texttt{CLASS}.