Normalized to: Spoto, F.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.05696 [pdf] - 1920982
Yarkovsky effect detection and updated impact hazard assessment for
Near-Earth Asteroid (410777) 2009 FD
Submitted: 2019-06-12, last modified: 2019-07-10
Near-Earth asteroid (410777) 2009 FD is a potentially hazardous asteroid with
potential impacts on Earth at the end of the 22nd century. The astrometry
collected during the 2019 apparition provides information on the trajectory of
(410777) by constraining the Yarkovsky effect, which is the main source of
uncertainty for future predictions, and informing the impact hazard assessment.
We included the Yarkovsky effect in the force model and estimated its magnitude
from the fit to the (410777) optical and radar astrometric data. We performed
the (410777) hazard assessment over 200 years by using two independent
approaches: the NEODyS group adopted a generalisation of the Line Of Variations
method in a 7-dimensional space, whereas the JPL team resorted to the
Multilayer Clustered Sampling technique. We obtain a 4-sigma detection of the
Yarkovsky effect acting on (410777), which corresponds to a semimajor axis
drift of (3.6 +/- 0.9) x 10^{-3} au/Myr. As for the hazard results of both
teams, the main impact possibility in 2185 is ruled out and the only remaining
one is in 2190, but with a probability smaller than 10^{-8}.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.05790 [pdf] - 1901745
Completeness of Impact Monitoring
Submitted: 2018-09-15, last modified: 2019-06-17
The completeness limit is a key quantity to measure the reliability of an
impact monitoring system. It is the impact probability threshold above which
every virtual impactor has to be detected. A goal of this paper is to increase
the completeness without increasing the computational load. We propose a new
method to sample the Line Of Variations (LOV) with respect to the previously
one used in NEODyS. The step-size of the sampling is not uniform in the LOV
parameter, since the probability of each LOV segment between consecutive points
is kept constant. Moreover, the sampling interval has been extended to the
larger interval [-5,5] in the LOV parameter and a new decomposition scheme in
sub-returns is provided to deal with the problem of duplicated points in the
same return. The impact monitoring system CLOMON-2 has been upgraded with all
these features, resulting in a decrease of the generic completeness limit IP*
by a factor $\simeq 4$ and in an increase of the computational load by a factor
$\simeq 2$. Moreover, we statistically investigate the completeness actually
reached by the system with two different methods: a direct comparison with the
results of the independent system Sentry at JPL and an empirical power-law to
model the number of virtual impactors as a function of the impact probability.
We found empirically that the number of detected virtual impactors with
$IP>IP^*$ appears to grow according to a power-law, proportional to
$IP^{-2/3}$. An analytical model explaining this power-law is currently an open
problem, but we think it is related to the way the number of virtual impactors
within a time $t_{rel}$ from the first observed close approach accumulates, for
which we prove the existence of a power-law proportional to $t_{rel}^3$. The
power-law allows us to detect a loss of efficiency in the virtual impactors
search for impact probabilities near the generic completeness limit.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.07535 [pdf] - 1823045
Asteroid cratering families: recognition and collisional interpretation
Submitted: 2018-12-18
We continue our investigation of the bulk properties of asteroid dynamical
families identified using only asteroid proper elements (Milani et al. 2014) to
provide plausible collisional interpretations. We focus on cratering families
consisting of a substantial parent body and many small fragments. We propose a
quantitative definition of cratering families based on the fraction in volume
of the fragments with respect to the parent body; fragmentation families are
above this empirical boundary. We assess the compositional homogeneity of the
families and their shape in proper element space by computing the differences
of the proper elements of the fragments with respect to the ones of the major
body, looking for anomalous asymmetries produced either by post-formation
dynamical evolution, or by multiple collisional/cratering events, or by a
failure of the Hierarchical Clustering Method (HCM) for family identification.
We identified a total of 25 dynamical families with more than 100 members
ranging from moderate to heavy cratering. For three families (4, 15 and 283) we
confirm the occurrence of two separate cratering events. For family 20, we
propose a double collision origin, not previously identified. In four cases
(31, 480, 163 and 179) we performed a dedicated search for dynamical resonant
transport mechanisms that could have substantially changed the shape of the
family. By using a new synthetic method for computation of secular frequencies,
we found possible solutions for families 31, 480, and 163, but not for family
179, for which we propose a new interpretation, based on a secular resonance
contaminating this family: the family of 179 should be split into two separate
clusters, one containing (179) itself and the other, family (9506) Telramund,
of fragmentation type, for which we have computed an age.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.00607 [pdf] - 1791914
Simultaneous LSST and Euclid observations - advantages for Solar System
Objects
Snodgrass, C.;
Carry, B.;
Berthier, J.;
Eggl, S.;
Mommert, M.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Spoto, F.;
Granvik, M.;
Laureijs, R.;
Altieri, B.;
Vavrek, R.;
Conversi, L.;
Nucita, A.;
Popescu, M.;
Kleijn, G. Verdoes;
Kidger, M.;
Jones, G. H.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Juric, M.;
Jones, L.
Submitted: 2018-12-03
The ESA Euclid mission is a space telescope that will survey ~15,000 square
degrees of the sky, primarily to study the distant universe (constraining
cosmological parameters through the lensing of galaxies). It is also expected
to observe ~150,000 Solar System Objects (SSOs), primarily in poorly understood
high inclination populations, as it will mostly avoid +/-15 degrees from the
ecliptic plane. With a launch date of 2022 and a 6 year survey, Euclid and LSST
will operate at the same time, and have complementary capabilities. We propose
a LSST mini-survey to coordinate quasi-simultaneous observations between these
two powerful observatories, when possible, with the primary aim of greatly
improving the orbits of SSOs discovered by these facilities. As Euclid will
operate from a halo orbit around the Sun-Earth L2 Lagrangian point, there will
be significant parallax between observations from Earth and Euclid (0.01 AU).
This means that simultaneous observations will give an independent distance
measurement to SSOs, giving additional constraints on orbits compared to single
Euclid visits.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.05947 [pdf] - 1751826
Detecting the Yarkovsky effect among near-Earth asteroids from
astrometric data
Submitted: 2018-05-15
We present an updated set of near-Earth asteroids with a Yarkovsky-related
semimajor axis drift detected from the orbital fit to the astrometry. We find
87 reliable detections after filtering for the signal-to-noise ratio of the
Yarkovsky drift estimate and making sure the estimate is compatible with the
physical properties of the analyzed object. Furthermore, we find a list of 24
marginally significant detections, for which future astrometry could result in
a Yarkovsky detection. A further outcome of the filtering procedure is a list
of detections that we consider spurious because unrealistic or not explicable
with the Yarkovsky effect. Among the smallest asteroids of our sample, we
determined four detections of solar radiation pressure, in addition to the
Yarkovsky effect. As the data volume increases in the near future, our goal is
to develop methods to generate very long lists of asteroids with reliably
detected Yarkovsky effect, with limited amounts of case by case specific
adjustments. Furthermore, we discuss the improvements this work could bring to
impact monitoring. In particular, we exhibit two asteroids for which the
adoption of a non-gravitational model is needed to make reliable impact
predictions.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09379 [pdf] - 1732653
Gaia Data Release 2: Observations of solar system objects
Submitted: 2018-04-25
The Gaia spacecraft of the European Space Agency (ESA) has been securing
observations of solar system objects (SSOs) since the beginning of its
operations. Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2) contains the observations of a selected
sample of 14,099 SSOs. These asteroids have been already identified and have
been numbered by the Minor Planet Center. Positions are provided for each Gaia
observation at CCD level. As additional information, the apparent brightness of
SSOs in the unfiltered G band is also provided for selected observations. We
explain the processing of SSO data, and describe the criteria we used to select
the sample published in Gaia DR2. We then explore the data set to assess its
quality. To exploit the epoch astrometry of asteroids in Gaia DR2 it is
necessary to take into account the unusual properties of the uncertainty, as
the position information is nearly one-dimensional. When this aspect is handled
appropriately, an orbit fit can be obtained with post-fit residuals that are
overall consistent with the a-priori error model that was used to define
individual values of the astrometric uncertainty. The distribution of residuals
allowed us to identify possible contaminants in the data set. Photometry in the
G band was compared to computed values from reference asteroid shapes and to
the flux registered at the corresponding epochs by the red and blue photometers
(RP and BP). The overall astrometric performance is close to the expectations,
with an optimal range of brightness G~12-17. In this range, the typical
transit-level accuracy is well below 1 mas. For fainter asteroids, the growing
photon noise deteriorates the performance. Asteroids brighter than G~12 are
affected by a lower performance of the processing of their signals. The
dramatic improvement brought by Gaia DR2 astrometry of SSOs is demonstrated by
preliminary tests on the detection of subtle non-gravitational effects.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09375 [pdf] - 1736360
Gaia Data Release 2: Catalogue validation
Arenou, F.;
Luri, X.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Fabricius, C.;
Helmi, A.;
Muraveva, T.;
Robin, A. C.;
Spoto, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Antoja, T.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Jordi, C.;
Leclerc, N.;
Reylé, C.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Shih, I-C.;
Soria, S.;
Barache, C.;
Bossini, D.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Lambert, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Massari, D.;
Moitinho, A.;
Robichon, N.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sordo, R.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Eyer, L.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Pancino, E.;
Soubiran, C.;
Spagna, A.;
Tanga, P.;
Turon, C.;
Zurbach, C.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
The second Gaia data release (DR2), contains very precise astrometric and
photometric properties for more than one billion sources, astrophysical
parameters for dozens of millions, radial velocities for millions, variability
information for half a million of stellar sources and orbits for thousands of
solar system objects. Before the Catalogue publication, these data have
undergone dedicated validation processes. The goal of this paper is to describe
the validation results in terms of completeness, accuracy and precision of the
various Gaia DR2 data. The validation processes include a systematic analysis
of the Catalogue content to detect anomalies, either individual errors or
statistical properties, using statistical analysis, and comparisons to external
data or to models. Although the astrometric, photometric and spectroscopic data
are of unprecedented quality and quantity, it is shown that the data cannot be
used without a dedicated attention to the limitations described here, in the
Catalogue documentation and in accompanying papers. A particular emphasis is
put on the caveats for the statistical use of the data in scientific
exploitation.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.04004 [pdf] - 1698003
Short arc orbit determination and imminent impactors in the Gaia era
Submitted: 2018-01-11, last modified: 2018-02-16
Short-arc orbit determination is crucial when an asteroid is first
discovered. In these cases usually the observations are so few that the
differential correction procedure may not converge. We have developed an
initial orbit computation method, based on the systematic ranging, an orbit
determination techniques which systematically explores a raster in the
topocentric range and range-rate space region inside the admissible region. We
obtain a fully rigorous computation of the probability for the asteroid that
could impact the Earth within few days from the discovery, without any a priori
assumption. We test our method on the two past impactors 2008 TC3 and 2014 AA,
on some very well known cases, and on two particular objects observed by the
ESA Gaia mission.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.06471 [pdf] - 1588555
Ground-based astrometry calibrated by Gaia DR1: new perspectives in
asteroid orbit determination
Spoto, F.;
Tanga, P.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Desmars, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Mignard, F.;
Altmann, M.;
Herald, D.;
Marchant, J.;
Barache, C.;
Carlucci, T.;
Lister, T.;
Taris, F.
Submitted: 2017-09-19
The Gaia Data Release 1 (GDR1) is a first, important step on the path of
evolution of astrometric accuracy towards a much improved situation. Although
asteroids are not present in GDR1, this intermediate release already impacts
asteroid astrometry. Our goal is to investigate how the GDR1 can change the
approach to a few typical problems, including the determination of orbits from
short-arc astrometry, the exploitation of stellar occultations, and the impact
risk assessment. We employ optimised asteroid orbit determination tools, and
study the resulting orbit accuracy and post-fit residuals. For this goal, we
use selected ground-based asteroid astrometry, and occultation events observed
in the past. All measurements are calibrated by using GDR1 stars. We show that,
by adopting GDR1, very short measurement arcs can already provide interesting
orbital solutions, capable of correctly identifying Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs)
and providing a much more accurate risk rating. We also demonstrate that
occultations, previously used to derive asteroid size and shapes, now reach a
new level of accuracy at which they can be fruitfully used to obtain astrometry
at the level of accuracy of Gaia star positions.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.01998 [pdf] - 1530975
On the Ages of Resonant, Eroded and Fossil Asteroid Families
Submitted: 2016-07-07
In this work we have estimated 10 collisional ages of 9 families for which
for different reasons our previous attempts failed. In general, these are
difficult cases that required dedicated effort, such as a new family
classifications for asteroids in mean motion resonances, as well as a revision
of the classification inside the $3/2$ resonance. Of the families locked in
mean motion resonances, we succeeded in determining ages of the families of
(1911) Schubart and of the "super-Hilda" family, assuming this is actually a
severely eroded original family of (153) Hilda. In the Trojan region we found
families with almost no Yarkovsky evolution, for which we could compute only
physically implausible ages. Hence, we interpreted their modest dispersions of
proper eccentricities and inclinations as implying that the Trojan asteroid
families are fossil families, frozen at their proper elements determined by the
original ejection velocity field. We have found a new family, among the Griquas
locked in the 2/1 resonance with Jupiter: (11097) 1994 UD1. We have estimated
the ages of 6 families affected by secular resonances: families of (5) Astraea,
(25) Phocaea, (283) Emma, (363) Padua, (686) Gersuind, and (945) Barcelona. By
using a numerical calibration method, we have shown that the secular resonances
do not affect significanly the secular change of proper a. For the family of
(145) Adeona we could estimate the age only after removal of a number of
assumed interlopers. With the present paper we have concluded the series
dedicated to the determination of asteroid ages with a uniform method. We
computed the ages for a total of 57 families with $>100$ members. There remain
families too small at present to provide reliable estimates, as well as some
complex families (221, 135, 298) which may have more ages than we could
currently estimate.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.03221 [pdf] - 1342768
Shadowing Lemma and Chaotic Orbit Determination
Submitted: 2015-06-10
Orbit determination is possible for a chaotic orbit of a dynamical system,
given a finite set of observations, provided the initial conditions are at the
central time. In a simple discrete model, the standard map, we tackle the
problem of chaotic orbit determination when observations extend beyond the
predictability horizon. If the orbit is hyperbolic, a shadowing orbit is
computed by the least squares orbit determination. We test both the convergence
of the orbit determination iterative procedure and the behaviour of the
uncertainties as a function of the maximum number $n$ of map iterations
observed. When the initial conditions belong to a chaotic orbit, the orbit
determination is made impossible by numerical instability beyond a
computability horizon, which can be approximately predicted by a simple
formula. Moreover, the uncertainty of the results is sharply increased if a
dynamical parameter is added to the initial conditions as parameter to be
estimated. The uncertainty of the dynamical parameter decreases like $n^a$ with
$a<0$ but not large (of the order of unity). If only the initial conditions are
estimated, their uncertainty decreases exponentially with $n$. If they belong
to a non-chaotic orbit the computational horizon is much larger, if it exists
at all, and the decrease of the uncertainty is polynomial in all parameters,
like $n^a$ with $a\simeq 1/2$. The Shadowing Lemma does not dictate what the
asymptotic behaviour of the uncertainties should be. These phenomena have
significant implications, which remain to be studied, in practical problems of
orbit determination involving chaos, such as the chaotic rotation state of a
celestial body and a chaotic orbit of a planet-crossing asteroid undergoing
many close approaches.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.05461 [pdf] - 1154918
Asteroid family ages
Submitted: 2015-04-21, last modified: 2015-04-27
A new family classification, based on a catalog of proper elements with $\sim
384,000$ numbered asteroids and on new methods is available. For the $45$
dynamical families with $>250$ members identified in this classification, we
present an attempt to obtain statistically significant ages: we succeeded in
computing ages for $37$ collisional families. We used a rigorous method,
including a least squares fit of the two sides of a V-shape plot in the proper
semimajor axis, inverse diameter plane to determine the corresponding slopes,
an advanced error model for the uncertainties of asteroid diameters, an
iterative outlier rejection scheme and quality control. The best available
Yarkovsky measurement was used to estimate a calibration of the Yarkovsky
effect for each family. The results are presented separately for the families
originated in fragmentation or cratering events, for the young, compact
families and for the truncated, one-sided families. For all the computed ages
the corresponding uncertainties are provided. We found 2 cases where two
separate dynamical families form together a single V-shape with compatible
slopes, thus indicating a single collisional event. We have also found 3
examples of dynamical families containing multiple collisional families, plus a
dubious case. We have found 2 cases of families containing a conspicuous
subfamily, such that it is possible to measure the slope of a distinct V-shape,
thus the age of the secondary collision. We also provide data on the central
gaps appearing in some families.
The ages computed in this paper are obtained with a single and uniform
methodology, thus the ages of different families can be compared, providing a
first example of collisional chronology of the asteroid main belt.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.0736 [pdf] - 1216096
Non-gravitational Perturbations and Virtual Impactors: the case of
asteroid 2009 FD
Submitted: 2014-08-04, last modified: 2014-10-22
Asteroid 2009 FD could impact Earth between 2185 and 2196. The long term
propagation to the possible impacts and the intervening planetary encounters
make 2009 FD one of the most challenging asteroids in terms of hazard
assessment. To compute accurate impact probabilities we model the Yarkovsky
effect by using the available physical characterization of 2009 FD and general
properties of the Near Earth Asteroid population. We perform the hazard
assessment with two independent methods: the first method is a generalization
of the standard impact monitoring algorithms in use by NEODyS and Sentry, while
the second one is based on a Monte Carlo approach. Both methods generate
orbital samples in a 7 dimensional space that includes orbital elements and the
parameter characterizing the Yarkovsky effect. The highest impact probability
is $2.7 \times 10^{-3}$ for an impact during the 2185 Earth encounter. Impacts
after 2185 corresponding to resonant returns are possible, the most relevant
being in 2190 with a probability of $3 \times 10^{-4}$. Both numerical methods
can be used in the future to handle similar cases. The structure of resonant
returns and the list of the possible keyholes on the Target Plane of the
scattering encounter in 2185 can be predicted by an analytic theory.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.5573 [pdf] - 1203510
Orbit and Bulk Density of the OSIRIS-REx Target Asteroid (101955) Bennu
Chesley, Steven R.;
Farnocchia, Davide;
Nolan, Michael C.;
Vokrouhlicky, David;
Chodas, Paul W.;
Milani, Andrea;
Spoto, Federica;
Rozitis, Benjamin;
Benner, Lance A. M.;
Bottke, William F.;
Busch, Michael W.;
Emery, Joshua P.;
Howell, Ellen S.;
Lauretta, Dante S.;
Margot, Jean-Luc;
Taylor, Patrick A.
Submitted: 2014-02-22
The target asteroid of the OSIRIS-REx asteroid sample return mission,
(101955) Bennu (formerly 1999 RQ$_{36}$), is a half-kilometer near-Earth
asteroid with an extraordinarily well constrained orbit. An extensive data set
of optical astrometry from 1999--2013 and high-quality radar delay measurements
to Bennu in 1999, 2005, and 2011 reveal the action of the Yarkovsky effect,
with a mean semimajor axis drift rate $da/dt = (-19.0 \pm 0.1)\times 10^{-4}$
au/Myr or $284\pm 1.5\;\rm{m/yr}$. The accuracy of this result depends
critically on the fidelity of the observational and dynamical model. As an
example, neglecting the relativistic perturbations of the Earth during close
approaches affects the orbit with $3\sigma$ significance in $da/dt$.
The orbital deviations from purely gravitational dynamics allow us to deduce
the acceleration of the Yarkovsky effect, while the known physical
characterization of Bennu allows us to independently model the force due to
thermal emissions. The combination of these two analyses yields a bulk density
of $\rho = 1260\pm70\,\rm{kg/m^3}$, which indicates a macroporosity in the
range $40\pm10$% for the bulk densities of likely analog meteorites, suggesting
a rubble-pile internal structure. The associated mass estimate is
$(7.8\pm0.9)\times 10^{10}\, \rm{kg}$ and $GM = 5.2\pm0.6\,\rm{m^3/s^2}$.
Bennu's Earth close approaches are deterministic over the interval
1654--2135, beyond which the predictions are statistical in nature. In
particular, the 2135 close approach is likely within the lunar distance and
leads to strong scattering and therefore numerous potential impacts in
subsequent years, from 2175--2196. The highest individual impact probability is
$9.5\times 10^{-5}$ in 2196, and the cumulative impact probability is
$3.7\times 10^{-4}$, leading to a cumulative Palermo Scale of -1.70.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.2466 [pdf] - 1265596
The effect of parallax and cadence on asteroid impact probabilities and
warning times
Submitted: 2014-02-11
We study the time evolution of the impact probability for synthetic but
realistic impacting and close approaching asteroids detected in a simulated
all-sky survey. We use the impact probability to calculate the impact warning
time as the time interval between when an object reaches a Palermo Scale value
of -2 and when it impacts Earth. A simple argument shows that warning time ~
D^x with the exponent in the range [1.0,1.5] and our derived value was
$x=1.3\pm0.1$. The low-precision astrometry from the single simulated all-sky
survey could require many days or weeks to establish an imminent impact for
asteroids >100m diameter that are discovered far from Earth. Most close
approaching asteroids are quickly identified as not being impactors but a
size-dependent percentage, even for those >50m diameter, have a persistent
impact probability of >10^{-6} on the day of closest approach. Thus, a single
all-sky survey can be of tremendous value in identifying Earth impacting and
close approaching asteroids in advance of their closest approach but it can not
solve the problem on its own: high-precision astrometry from other optical or
radar systems is necessary to rapidly establish an object as an impactor or
close approacher. We show that the parallax afforded by surveying the sky from
two sites is only of benefit for a small fraction of the smallest objects
detected within a couple days before impact: probably not enough to justify the
increased operating costs of a 2-site survey. Finally, the survey cadence
within a fixed time span is relatively unimportant to the impact probability
calculation. We tested three different reasonable cadences and found that one
provided ~10x higher (better) value for the impact probability on the discovery
night for the smallest (10m diameter) objects but the consequences on the
overall impact probability calculation is negligible.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.7702 [pdf] - 1202480
Asteroid families classification: exploiting very large data sets
Submitted: 2013-12-30, last modified: 2014-01-14
The number of asteroids with accurately determined orbits increases fast. The
catalogs of asteroid physical observations have also increased, although the
number of objects is still smaller than in the orbital catalogs. We developed a
new approach to the asteroid family classification by combining the
Hierarchical Clustering Method (HCM) with a method to add new members to
existing families. This procedure makes use of the much larger amount of
information contained in the proper elements catalogs, with respect to
classifications using also physical observations for a smaller number of
asteroids. Our work is based on the large catalog of the high accuracy
synthetic proper elements (available from AstDyS). We first identify a number
of core families; to these we attribute the next layer of smaller objects.
Then, we remove all the family members from the catalog, and reapply the HCM to
the rest. This gives both halo families which extend the core families and new
independent families, consisting mainly of small asteroids. These two cases are
discriminated by another step of attribution of new members and by merging
intersecting families. By using information from absolute magnitudes, we take
advantage of the larger size range in some families to analyze their shape in
the proper semimajor axis vs. inverse diameter plane. This leads to a new
method to estimate the family age (or ages). The results from the previous
steps are then analyzed, using also auxiliary information on physical
properties including WISE albedos and SDSS color indexes. This allows to solve
some difficult cases of families overlapping in the proper elements space but
generated by different collisional events. We analyze some examples of
cratering families (Massalia, Vesta, Eunomia) which show internal structures,
interpreted as multiple collisions. We also discuss why Ceres has no family.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1212.4812 [pdf] - 1158620
Near Earth Asteroids with measurable Yarkovsky effect
Submitted: 2012-12-19
We seek evidence of the Yarkovsky effect among Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs) by
measuring the Yarkovsky-related orbital drift from the orbital fit. To prevent
the occurrence of unreliable detections we employ a high precision dynamical
model, including the Newtonian attraction of 16 massive asteroids and the
planetary relativistic terms, and a suitable astrometric data treatment. We
find 21 NEAs whose orbital fits show a measurable orbital drift with a signal
to noise ratio (SNR) greater than 3. The best determination is for asteroid
(101955) 1999 RQ36, resulting in the recovery of one radar apparition and an
orbit improvement by two orders of magnitude. In addition, we find 16 cases
with a lower SNR that, despite being less reliable, are good candidates for
becoming stronger detections in the future. In some cases it is possible to
constrain physical quantities otherwise unknown by means of the detected
orbital drift. Furthermore, the distribution of the detected orbital drifts
shows an excess of retrograde rotators that can be connected to the delivery
mechanism from the most important NEA feeding resonances and allows us to infer
the distribution for NEAs obliquity. We discuss the implications of the
Yarkovsky effect for impact predictions. In particular, for asteroid (29075)
1950 DA our results favor a retrograde rotation that would rule out an impact
in 2880.