Normalized to: Splettstoesser, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.06637 [pdf] - 1971149
Chandra Follow-Up of the SDSS DR8 redMaPPer Catalog Using the MATCha
Pipeline
Hollowood, Devon L.;
Jeltema, Tesla;
Chen, Xinyi;
Farahi, Arya;
Evrard, August;
Everett, Spencer;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Rykoff, Eli;
Bernstein, Rebecca;
Bermeo, Alberto;
Eiger, Lena;
Giles, Paul;
Israel, Holger;
Michel, Renee;
Noorali, Raziq;
Romer, Kathy;
Rooney, Philip;
Splettstoesser, Megan
Submitted: 2018-08-20, last modified: 2019-08-13
In order to place constraints on cosmology through optical surveys of galaxy
clusters, one must first understand the properties of those clusters. To this
end, we introduce the Mass Analysis Tool for Chandra (MATCha), a pipeline which
uses a parallellized algorithm to analyze archival Chandra data. MATCha
simultaneously calculates X-ray temperatures and luminosities and performs
centering measurements for hundreds of potential galaxy clusters using archival
X-ray exposures. We run MATCha on the redMaPPer SDSS DR8 cluster catalog and
use MATCha's output X-ray temperatures and luminosities to analyze the galaxy
cluster temperature-richness, luminosity-richness, luminosity-temperature, and
temperature-luminosity scaling relations. We detect 447 clusters and determine
246 r2500 temperatures across all redshifts. Within 0.1 < z < 0.35 we find that
r2500 Tx scales with optical richness as ln(kB Tx / 1.0 keV) = (0.52 \pm 0.05)
ln({\lambda}/70) + (1.85 \pm 0.03) with intrinsic scatter of 0.27 \pm 0.02 (1
{\sigma}). We investigate the distribution of offsets between the X-ray center
and redMaPPer center within 0.1 < z < 0.35, finding that 68.3 \pm 6.5% of
clusters are well-centered. However, we find a broad tail of large offsets in
this distribution, and we explore some of the causes of redMaPPer miscentering.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.07119 [pdf] - 1893322
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of Cluster Mis-centering
in the redMaPPer Catalogs
Zhang, Y.;
Jeltema, T.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Everett, S.;
Rozo, E.;
Farahi, A.;
Bermeo, A.;
Bhargava, S.;
Giles, P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Wilkinson, R.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Mantz, A.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Stern, C.;
Gruen, D.;
von der Linden, A.;
Splettstoesser, M.;
Chen, X.;
Costanzi, M.;
Allen, S.;
Collins, C.;
Hilton, M.;
Klein, M.;
Mann, R. G.;
Manolopoulou, M.;
Morris, G.;
Mayers, J.;
Sahlen, M.;
Stott, J.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Viana, P. T. P.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
GarcĂa-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2019-01-21, last modified: 2019-06-01
The center determination of a galaxy cluster from an optical cluster finding
algorithm can be offset from theoretical prescriptions or $N$-body definitions
of its host halo center. These offsets impact the recovered cluster statistics,
affecting both richness measurements and the weak lensing shear profile around
the clusters. This paper models the centering performance of the \RM~cluster
finding algorithm using archival X-ray observations of \RM-selected clusters.
Assuming the X-ray emission peaks as the fiducial halo centers, and through
analyzing their offsets to the \RM~centers, we find that $\sim 75\pm 8 \%$ of
the \RM~clusters are well centered and the mis-centered offset follows a Gamma
distribution in normalized, projected distance. These mis-centering offsets
cause a systematic underestimation of cluster richness relative to the
well-centered clusters, for which we propose a descriptive model. Our results
enable the DES Y1 cluster cosmology analysis by characterizing the necessary
corrections to both the weak lensing and richness abundance functions of the
DES Y1 redMaPPer cluster catalog.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.01049 [pdf] - 1562437
Synchrotron Emission from Dark Matter Annihilation: Predictions for
Constraints from Non-detections of Galaxy Clusters with New Radio Surveys
Submitted: 2016-07-04, last modified: 2017-03-21
The annihilation of dark matter particles is expected to yield a broad
radiation spectrum via the production of Standard Model particles in
astrophysical environments. In particular, electrons and positrons from dark
matter annihilation produce synchrotron radiation in the presence of magnetic
fields. Galaxy clusters are the most massive collapsed structures in the
universe, and are known to host $\sim\mu$G-scale magnetic fields. They are
therefore ideal targets to search for, or to constrain the synchrotron signal
from dark matter annihilation. In this work we use the expected sensitivities
of several planned surveys from the next generation of radio telescopes to
predict the constraints on dark matter annihilation models which will be
achieved in the case of non-detections of diffuse radio emission from galaxy
clusters. Specifically, we consider the Tier 1 survey planned for the Low
Frequency Array (LOFAR) at 120 MHz, the EMU survey planned for the Australian
Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) at 1.4 GHz, and planned surveys for
APERTIF at 1.4 GHz. We find that, for massive clusters and dark matter masses
$\lesssim 100$ GeV, the predicted limits on the annihilation cross section
would rule out vanilla thermal relic models for even the shallow LOFAR Tier 1,
ASKAP, and APERTIF surveys.