Normalized to: Spinelli, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.02242 [pdf] - 2061569
The atomic Hydrogen content of the post-reionization Universe
Submitted: 2019-09-05
We present a comprehensive analysis of atomic hydrogen (HI) properties using
a semi-analytical model of galaxy formation and N-body simulations covering a
large cosmological volume at high resolution. We examine the HI mass function
and the HI density, characterizing both their redshift evolution and their
dependence on hosting halo mass. We analyze the HI content of dark matter
haloes in the local Universe and up to redshift $z=5$, discussing the
contribution of different galaxy properties. We find that different assembly
history plays a crucial role in the scatter of this relation. We propose new
fitting functions useful for constructing mock HI maps with HOD techniques. We
investigate the HI clustering properties relevant for future $21$~cm Intensity
Mapping (IM) experiments, including the HI bias and the shot noise level. The
HI bias increases with redshift and it is roughly flat on the largest scales
probed. The scale dependency is found at progressively larger scales with
increasing redshift, apart from a dip feature at $z=0$. The shot-noise values
are consistent with the ones inferred by independent studies, confirming that
shot-noise will not be a limiting factor for IM experiments. We detail the
contribution from various galaxy properties on the HI power spectrum and their
relation to the halo bias. We find that HI poor satellite galaxies play an
important role at the scales of the 1-halo term. Finally, we present the
$21$~cm signal in redshift space, a fundamental prediction to be tested against
data from future radio telescopes such as SKA.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.05303 [pdf] - 1966959
On the contamination of the global 21~cm signal from polarized
foregrounds
Submitted: 2019-08-14
Global (i.e. sky-averaged) $21$~cm signal experiments can measure the
evolution of the universe from the Cosmic Dawn to the Epoch of Reionization.
These measurements are challenged by the presence of bright foreground emission
that can be separated from the cosmological signal if its spectrum is smooth.
This assumption fails in the case of single polarization antennas as they
measure linearly polarized foreground emission - which is inevitably Faraday
rotated through the interstellar medium. We investigate the impact of Galactic
polarized foregrounds on the extraction of the global 21~cm signal through
realistic sky and dipole simulations both in a low frequency band from $50$ to
$100$~MHz, where a 21~cm absorption profile is expected, and in a higher
frequency band ($100-200$~MHz). We find that the presence of a polarized
contaminant with complex frequency structure can bias the amplitude and the
shape of the reconstructed signal parameters in both bands. We investigate if
polarized foregrounds can explain the unexpected $21$~cm Cosmic Dawn signal
recently reported by the EDGES collaboration. We find that unaccounted
polarized foreground contamination can produce an enhanced and distorted
$21$~cm absorption trough similar to the anomalous profile reported by Bowman
et al. (2018), and whose amplitude is in mild tension with the assumed input
Gaussian profile (at $\sim 1.5 \sigma$ level). Moreover, we note that, under
the hypothesis of contamination from polarized foreground, the amplitude of the
reconstructed EDGES signal can be overestimated by around $30\%$, mitigating
the requirement for an explanation based on exotic physics.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.03060 [pdf] - 1698035
Simulations of Galactic polarized synchrotron emission for Epoch of
Reionization observations
Submitted: 2018-02-08
The detection of the redshifted cosmological $21$~cm line signal requires the
removal of the Galactic and extragalactic foreground emission, which is orders
of magnitude brighter anywhere in the sky. Foreground cleaning methods
currently used are efficient in removing spectrally smooth components. However,
they struggle in the presence of not spectrally smooth contamination that is,
therefore, potentially the most dangerous one. An example of this is the
polarized synchrotron emission, which is Faraday rotated by the interstellar
medium and leaks into total intensity due to instrumental imperfections. In
this work we present new full-sky simulations of this polarized synchrotron
emission in the $50-200$~MHz range, obtained from the observed properties of
diffuse polarized emission at low frequencies. The simulated polarized maps are
made publicly available, aiming to provide more realistic templates to simulate
the effect of instrumental leakage and the effectiveness of foreground
separation techniques.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.02179 [pdf] - 1674750
Model-independent curvature determination with 21cm intensity mapping
experiments
Submitted: 2017-11-06, last modified: 2018-01-17
Recent precision cosmological parameter constraints imply that the spatial
curvature of the Universe is essentially dynamically negligible - but only if
relatively strong assumptions are made about the equation of state of dark
energy (DE). When these assumptions are relaxed, strong degeneracies arise that
make it hard to disentangle DE and curvature, degrading the constraints. We
show that forthcoming 21cm intensity mapping experiments such as HIRAX are
ideally designed to carry out model-independent curvature measurements, as they
can measure the clustering signal at high redshift with sufficient precision to
break many of the degeneracies. We consider two different model-independent
methods, based on `avoiding' the DE-dominated regime and non-parametric
modelling of the DE equation of state respectively. Our forecasts show that
HIRAX will be able to improve upon current model-independent constraints by
around an order of magnitude, reaching percent-level accuracy even when an
arbitrary DE equation of state is assumed. In the same model-independent
analysis, the sample variance limit for a similar survey is another order of
magnitude better.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.10829 [pdf] - 1582270
Cosmological constraints on the neutrino mass including systematic
uncertainties
Submitted: 2017-03-31, last modified: 2017-08-11
When combining cosmological and oscillations results to constrain the
neutrino sector, the question of the propagation of systematic uncertainties is
often raised. We address this issue in the context of the derivation of an
upper bound on the sum of the neutrino masses ($\Sigma m_\nu$) with recent
cosmological data. This work is performed within the
${{\mathrm{\Lambda{CDM}}}}$ model extended to $\Sigma m_\nu$, for which we
advocate the use of three mass-degenerate neutrinos. We focus on the study of
systematic uncertainties linked to the foregrounds modelling in CMB data
analysis, and on the impact of the present knowledge of the reionisation
optical depth. This is done through the use of different likelihoods built from
Planck data. Limits on $\Sigma m_\nu$ are derived with various combinations of
data, including the latest Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Type Ia
Supernovae (SN) results. We also discuss the impact of the preference for
current CMB data for amplitudes of the gravitational lensing distortions higher
than expected within the ${{\mathrm{\Lambda{CDM}}}}$ model, and add the Planck
CMB lensing. We then derive a robust upper limit: $\Sigma m_\nu< 0.17\hbox{ eV
at }95\% \hbox{CL}$, including 0.01 eV of foreground systematics. We also
discuss the neutrino mass repartition and show that today's data do not allow
one to disentangle normal from inverted hierarchy. The impact on the other
cosmological parameters is also reported, for different assumptions on the
neutrino mass repartition, and different high and low multipole CMB
likelihoods.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.09730 [pdf] - 1580303
Cosmology with the CMB temperature-polarization correlation
Submitted: 2016-09-30, last modified: 2017-02-24
We demonstrate that the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
temperature-polarization cross-correlation provides accurate and robust
constraints on cosmological parameters. We compare them with the results from
temperature or polarization and investigate the impact of foregrounds, cosmic
variance, and instrumental noise. This analysis makes use of the Planck
high-multipole HiLLiPOP likelihood based on angular power spectra, which takes
into account systematics from the instrument and foreground residuals directly
modelled using Planck measurements. The temperature-polarization correlation
(TE) spectrum is less contaminated by astrophysical emissions than the
temperature power spectrum (TT), allowing constraints that are less sensitive
to foreground uncertainties to be derived. For {\Lambda}CDM parameters, TE
gives very competitive results compared to TT. For basic {\Lambda}CDM model
extensions (such as AL, {\Sigma}m{\nu}, or Neff ), it is still limited by the
instrumental noise level in the polarization maps.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.07600 [pdf] - 1530349
Relieving tensions related to the lensing of CMB temperature power
spectra
Submitted: 2015-10-26, last modified: 2016-10-19
The angular power spectra of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
temperature anisotropies reconstructed from Planck data seem to present too
much gravitational lensing distortion. This is quantified by the control
parameter $A_L$ that should be compatible with unity for a standard cosmology.
With the Class Boltzmann solver and the profile-likelihood method, for this
parameter we measure a 2.6$\sigma$ shift from 1 using the Planck public
likelihoods. We show that, owing to strong correlations with the reionization
optical depth $\tau$ and the primordial perturbation amplitude $A_s$, a
$\sim2\sigma$ tension on $\tau$ also appears between the results obtained with
the low ($\ell\leq 30$) and high ($30<\ell\lesssim 2500$) multipoles
likelihoods. With Hillipop, another high-$\ell$ likelihood built from Planck
data, this difference is lowered to $1.3\sigma$. In this case, the $A_L$ value
is still in disagreement with unity by $2.2\sigma$, suggesting a non-trivial
effect of the correlations between cosmological and nuisance parameters. To
better constrain the nuisance foregrounds parameters, we include the very high
$\ell$ measurements of the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and South Pole
Telescope (SPT) experiments and obtain $A_L = 1.03 \pm 0.08$. The
Hillipop+ACT+SPT likelihood estimate of the optical depth is
$\tau=0.052\pm{0.035,}$ which is now fully compatible with the low $\ell$
likelihood determination. After showing the robustness of our results with
various combinations, we investigate the reasons for this improvement that
results from a better determination of the whole set of foregrounds parameters.
We finally provide estimates of the $\Lambda$CDM parameters with our combined
CMB data likelihood.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.02964 [pdf] - 1435798
Agnostic cosmology in the CAMEL framework
Submitted: 2016-07-11
Cosmological parameter estimation is traditionally performed in the Bayesian
context. By adopting an "agnostic" statistical point of view, we show the
interest of confronting the Bayesian results to a frequentist approach based on
profile-likelihoods. To this purpose, we have developed the Cosmological
Analysis with a Minuit Exploration of the Likelihood ("CAMEL") software.
Written from scratch in pure C++, emphasis was put in building a clean and
carefully-designed project where new data and/or cosmological computations can
be easily included.
CAMEL incorporates the latest cosmological likelihoods and gives access from
the very same input file to several estimation methods: (i) A high quality
Maximum Likelihood Estimate (a.k.a "best fit") using MINUIT ; (ii) profile
likelihoods, (iii) a new implementation of an Adaptive Metropolis MCMC
algorithm that relieves the burden of reconstructing the proposal distribution.
We present here those various statistical techniques and roll out a full
use-case that can then used as a tutorial. We revisit the $\Lambda$CDM
parameters determination with the latest Planck data and give results with both
methodologies. Furthermore, by comparing the Bayesian and frequentist
approaches, we discuss a "likelihood volume effect" that affects the optical
reionization depth when analyzing the high multipoles part of the Planck data.
The software, used in several Planck data analyzes, is available from
http://camel.in2p3.fr. Using it does not require advanced C++ skills.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.02704 [pdf] - 1483210
Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness
of parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Gerbino, M.;
Giard, M.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Mottet, S.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Narimani, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Serra, P.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-07-09, last modified: 2016-06-30
This paper presents the Planck 2015 likelihoods, statistical descriptions of
the 2-point correlations of CMB data, using the hybrid approach employed
previously: pixel-based at $\ell<30$ and a Gaussian approximation to the
distribution of spectra at higher $\ell$. The main improvements are the use of
more and better processed data and of Planck polarization data, and more
detailed foreground and instrumental models, allowing further checks and
enhanced immunity to systematics. Progress in foreground modelling enables a
larger sky fraction. Improvements in processing and instrumental models further
reduce uncertainties. For temperature, we perform an analysis of end-to-end
instrumental simulations fed into the data processing pipeline; this does not
reveal biases from residual instrumental systematics. The $\Lambda$CDM
cosmological model continues to offer a very good fit to Planck data. The slope
of primordial scalar fluctuations, $n_s$, is confirmed smaller than unity at
more than 5{\sigma} from Planck alone. We further validate robustness against
specific extensions to the baseline cosmology. E.g., the effective number of
neutrino species remains compatible with the canonical value of 3.046. This
first detailed analysis of Planck polarization concentrates on E modes. At low
$\ell$ we use temperature at all frequencies and a subset of polarization. The
frequency range improves CMB-foreground separation. Within the baseline model
this requires a reionization optical depth $\tau=0.078\pm0.019$, significantly
lower than without high-frequency data for explicit dust monitoring. At high
$\ell$ we detect residual errors in E, typically O($\mu$K$^2$); we recommend
temperature alone as the high-$\ell$ baseline. Nevertheless, Planck high-$\ell$
polarization allows a separate determination of $\Lambda$CDM parameters
consistent with those from temperature alone.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01589 [pdf] - 1483195
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit, A.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Desert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Ensslin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Farhang, M.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Heraud, Y.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gjerlow, E.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vornle, M.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prezeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouille;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Said, N.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Turler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2016-06-17
We present results based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature
and polarization anisotropies of the CMB. These data are consistent with the
six-parameter inflationary LCDM cosmology. From the Planck temperature and
lensing data, for this cosmology we find a Hubble constant, H0= (67.8 +/- 0.9)
km/s/Mpc, a matter density parameter Omega_m = 0.308 +/- 0.012 and a scalar
spectral index with n_s = 0.968 +/- 0.006. (We quote 68% errors on measured
parameters and 95% limits on other parameters.) Combined with Planck
temperature and lensing data, Planck LFI polarization measurements lead to a
reionization optical depth of tau = 0.066 +/- 0.016. Combining Planck with
other astrophysical data we find N_ eff = 3.15 +/- 0.23 for the effective
number of relativistic degrees of freedom and the sum of neutrino masses is
constrained to < 0.23 eV. Spatial curvature is found to be |Omega_K| < 0.005.
For LCDM we find a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio of r <0.11 consistent
with the B-mode constraints from an analysis of BICEP2, Keck Array, and Planck
(BKP) data. Adding the BKP data leads to a tighter constraint of r < 0.09. We
find no evidence for isocurvature perturbations or cosmic defects. The equation
of state of dark energy is constrained to w = -1.006 +/- 0.045. Standard big
bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the Planck LCDM cosmology are in excellent
agreement with observations. We investigate annihilating dark matter and
deviations from standard recombination, finding no evidence for new physics.
The Planck results for base LCDM are in agreement with BAO data and with the
JLA SNe sample. However the amplitude of the fluctuations is found to be higher
than inferred from rich cluster counts and weak gravitational lensing. Apart
from these tensions, the base LCDM cosmology provides an excellent description
of the Planck CMB observations and many other astrophysical data sets.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01582 [pdf] - 1486774
Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Arnaud, M.;
Arroja, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaglia, P.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eisenhardt, P. R. M.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Feeney, S.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Feroz, F.;
Finelli, F.;
Florido, E.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschet, C.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Grainge, K. J. B.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jin, T.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
Liu, H.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mak, D. S. Y.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moreno, R.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Müenchmeyer, M.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Narimani, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nastasi, A.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Olamaie, M.;
Oppermann, N.;
Orlando, E.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Pelkonen, V. -M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrott, Y. C.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Romelli, E.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rotti, A.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rumsey, C.;
Rusholme, B.;
Said, N.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanghera, H. S.;
Santos, D.;
Saunders, R. D. E.;
Sauvé, A.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schammel, M. P.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shimwell, T. W.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Smith, K.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stanford, S. A.;
Stern, D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Strong, A. W.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Troja, A.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vassallo, T.;
Vidal, M.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Walter, B.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2015-08-09
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early
Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched 14~May 2009 and scanned the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12~August 2009 and
23~October 2013. In February~2015, ESA and the Planck Collaboration released
the second set of cosmology products based on data from the entire Planck
mission, including both temperature and polarization, along with a set of
scientific and technical papers and a web-based explanatory supplement. This
paper gives an overview of the main characteristics of the data and the data
products in the release, as well as the associated cosmological and
astrophysical science results and papers. The science products include maps of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect,
and diffuse foregrounds in temperature and polarization, catalogues of compact
Galactic and extragalactic sources (including separate catalogues of
Sunyaev-Zeldovich clusters and Galactic cold clumps), and extensive simulations
of signals and noise used in assessing the performance of the analysis methods
and assessment of uncertainties. The likelihood code used to assess
cosmological models against the Planck data are described, as well as a CMB
lensing likelihood. Scientific results include cosmological parameters deriving
from CMB power spectra, gravitational lensing, and cluster counts, as well as
constraints on inflation, non-Gaussianity, primordial magnetic fields, dark
energy, and modified gravity.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.5299 [pdf] - 1216470
Improved constraint on the primordial gravitational-wave density using
recent cosmological data and its impact on cosmic string models
Henrot-Versillé, Sophie;
Robinet, Florent;
Leroy, Nicolas;
Plaszczynski, Stéphane;
Arnaud, Nicolas;
Bizouard, Marie-Anne;
Cavalier, Fabien;
Christensen, Nelson;
Couchot, François;
Franco, Samuel;
Hello, Patrice;
Huet, Dominique;
Kasprzack, Marie;
Perdereau, Olivier;
Spinelli, Marta;
Tristram, Matthieu
Submitted: 2014-08-22, last modified: 2015-01-11
The production of a primordial stochastic gravitational-wave background by
processes occuring in the early Universe is expected in a broad range of
models. Observing this background would open a unique window onto the
Universe's evolutionary history. Probes like the Cosmic Microwave Background
(CMB) or the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) can be used to set upper limits
on the stochastic gravitational-wave background energy density $\Omega_{GW}$
for frequencies above $10^{-15}$ Hz. We perform a profile likelihood analysis
of the Planck CMB temperature anisotropies and gravitational lensing data
combined with WMAP low-$\ell$ polarization, BAO, South Pole Telescope and
Atacama Cosmology Telescope data. We find that $\Omega_{GW}h_{0}^{2} < 3.8
\times 10^{-6}$ at 95\% confidence level for adiabatic initial conditions which
improves over the previous limit by a factor 2.3. Assuming that the primordial
gravitational waves have been produced by a network of cosmic strings, we have
derived exclusion limits in the cosmic string parameter space. If the size of
the loops is determined by gravitational back-reaction, string tension values
greater than $\sim 4 \times 10^{-9}$ are excluded for a reconnection
probability of $10^{-3}$.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.1657 [pdf] - 840463
Planck intermediate results. XVI. Profile likelihoods for cosmological
parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Couchot, F.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Leonardi, R.;
Liddle, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
White, M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-11-07, last modified: 2013-12-06
We explore the 2013 Planck likelihood function with a high-precision
multi-dimensional minimizer (Minuit). This allows a refinement of the
Lambda-cdm best-fit solution with respect to previously-released results, and
the construction of frequentist confidence intervals using profile likelihoods.
The agreement with the cosmological results from the Bayesian framework is
excellent, demonstrating the robustness of the Planck results to the
statistical methodology. We investigate the inclusion of neutrino masses, where
more significant differences may appear due to the non-Gaussian nature of the
posterior mass distribution. By applying the Feldman--Cousins prescription, we
again obtain results very similar to those of the Bayesian methodology.
However, the profile-likelihood analysis of the CMB combination
(Planck+WP+highL) reveals a minimum well within the unphysical negative-mass
region. We show that inclusion of the Planck CMB-lensing information
regularizes this issue, and provide a robust frequentist upper limit $M_\nu <
0.26 eV$ ($95%$ confidence) from the CMB+lensing+BAO data combination.