This paper shows that the inclinations of bodies captured into mean motion resonances in the Kuiper belt have remained very nearly unchanged, being only slightly increased from initial lower values by migration and/or by long-term planetary perturbations. Thus the observed maximum as high as ~ 30 deg of the i's of bodies in resonance must reflect either a broad initial range at least to that level for capturable bodies or an elevating process possibly exemplified by the sweeping of secular resonances. We have obtained capture probabilities for 2 well-populated resonances, showing reduced but finite values for i's up to 35 deg. Whatever led to the present distribution must have produced increases in i for some, but not for all, resonant bodies in the belt.

In this paper on mean motion resonances in the Kuiper belt we consider effects on resonant bodies captured in an earlier migration by determining levels of chaos as a function of eccentricity, e, at the most stable orbital configuration. We find the the maximum observed e's at resonance very closely correspond to orbits with Lyapunov times ~ 1000 orbital periods of Neptune--much the same number as applies in the asteroid belt with Neptune's period replaced by Jupiter's. The fact that this number caps the e's of markedly chaotic but still existing bodies, implies that the great majority of escapes at equal and larger e's have already occurred. Yet escapes must continue at some level if the small population in the outermost belt is to be maintained because typical lifetimes of bodies there are only ~ 1/10 of the solar system's age. A study of stability at resonance also reinforces the claim that the post-migration boundary of the inner Kuiper belt lies near 34 AU and that the primordial, or pre-migration, outer one near 46 AU.

Our concern here is the nature of secondary resonances--commensurabilities between apsidal and libration periods lying within first-order mean motion resonances [mmr] in the solar system. At the 4/3 and 3/2 mmr in the asteroid belt, we find in general that it is possible to identify the positions of their considerably large number and to determine the degree of chaos that they develop. The severity of the latter corresponds to the absence of observed asteroids at low eccentricity, e, in both of these mmr and even more so at 2/1. Chaos at higher e is present but weaker so that real bodies can remain over the age of the solar system. This reduced chaos, we suggest, arises because the denser though weaker secondaries have widths that allow them to overlap and so provide a continuous quite constant level of chaos over a broad eccentricity range. We also consider the similar first-order 1/2 mmr with Neptune in the Kuiper belt at 47.8 AU and find considerable chaos, probably once again induced by secondary resonances, among the many orbits with e < 0.10. The instability so generated seems very likely to correspond in realistic models to the slow escape from 1/2 of a fair number of its once captured bodies over the solar system's age.

It often seems as though papers bearing titles in the form of a question end with ambiguous answers. Here the situation is different: the outer Kuiper belt does have a definite future, although one of uncertain duration. Simulations provide two distinct, compelling reasons. First, mean motion resonances in the outer belt [i.e., beyond the 1/2 resonance at 47.76 AU] are amazingly "sticky": in almost all cases bodies captured in them from regions closer to Neptune during that planet's outward migration remain trapped for 4.6 byr. Most captured orbits are chaotic and so will eventually escape, but there is no reason to believe that all outer belt resonances will empty in the near future. Second, in determining capture probabilities for various resonances, we find that the first order 1/2 resonance is quite efficient, but, in clear contrast to higher order ones in the outer belt, nearly half of its victims have escaped during 4.6 byr. These bodies typically remain in unstable orbits in the outer belt, usually for several hundred million years before being expelled well beyond 100 AU. Other inner belt resonances, although capturing less efficiently than 1/2, behave in the same fashion. Thus the outer belt has a two component, long-term population: one with members lying semi-permanently in one of about 6 resonances and another that is far more temporary, but whose source provides a continuous and ready resupply. The resulting eccentricity distribution of this combined population closely matches the observed one, as Hahn and Malhotra have made clear but the inclination distribution is a better approximation to it than is often claimed, a fact that probably should not be ignored when considering an origin for what has been labeled "the scattered disk".