In 2007, a joint IERS/IVS Working Group has been established to consider practical issues of creating the next ICRF generation, ICRF-2. The goal of the WG is to seek after ways to improve the existing ICRF. In this study we investigate a possibility of ICRF improvement by means of using combined ICRF catalogue instead of a catalogue computed in a single analysis centre, even though using most advanced models and software. In this work, we present a new version of Pulkovo combined catalogue of radio source positions computed using the method proposed in \cite{SokMal07}. Radio source catalogues that were submitted in 2007 in the framework of the WG activity were used as input for mutual comparison and combination. Four combined catalogues have been calculated: Two first of them provide a stochastic improvement of the ICRF, and last two of them allow us to account also for systematic errors in the current ICRF version.

A new international Pilot Project for the re-determination of the ICRF was initiated by the International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry (IVS) in January 2005. The purpose of this project is to compare the individual CRF solutions and to analyze their systematic and random errors with focus on the selection of the optimal strategy for the next ICRF realization. Eight radio source catalogues provided by the IVS Analysis Centers GA, SHAO, DGFI, GIUB-BKG, JPL, MAO NANU, GSFC, USNO were analyzed. In present study, four analytical models were used to investigate the systematic differences between solutions: solid rotation, rotation and deformation (IERS method), and expansion in orthogonal functions: Legendre-Fourier polynomials and spherical functions. It was found that expansions by orthogonal function describe the differences between individual catalogues better than the two former models. Finally, the combined CRF was generated. Using the radio source positions from this combined catalogue for estimation of EOP has shown improvement of the uncertainty of the celestial pole offset time series.