Normalized to: Socker, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.01755 [pdf] - 1760667
Modeling Inner Boundary Values at 18 Solar Radii During Solar Quiet time
for Global Three-dimensional Time-Dependent Magnetohydrodynamic Numerical
Simulation
Submitted: 2018-10-02
The solar wind speed plays a key role in the transport of CME out of the Sun
and ultimately determines the arrival time of CME-driven shocks in the
heliosphere. Here, we develop an empirical model of the solar wind parameters
at the inner boundary (18 solar radii, Rs) used in our global, 3D MHD model
(G3DMHD) or other equivalent ones. The model takes solar magnetic field maps at
2.5 Rs (which is based on the Potential Field Source Surface, PFSS model) and
interpolates the solar wind plasma and field out to 18 Rs using the algorithm
of Wang and Sheeley [1990a]. A formula V_{18Rs} = V1 + V2 fs^{\alpha} is used
to calculate the solar wind speed at 18 Rs, where V1 is in a range of 150-350
km/s, V2 is in the range of 250-500 km/s, and fs is an expansion factor, which
was derived from the Wang and Sheeley (WS) algorithm at 2.5 Rs. To estimate the
solar wind density and temperature at 18 Rs, we assume an incompressible solar
wind and a constant total pressure. The three free parameters are obtained by
adjusting simulation results to match in-situ observations (Wind) for more than
54 combination of V1, V2 and {\alpha} during a quiet solar wind interval,
CR2082. We found V18Rs = (150 +/- 50) + (500 +/- 100) fs^-0.4 km/s performs
reasonably well in predicting solar wind parameters at 1 AU not just for CR
2082 but other quiet solar period. Comparing results from the present study
with those from WSA [Arge et al. 2000; 2004] we conclude that i) Results of
using V_{18Rs} with the full rotation data (FR) as input to drive G3DMHD model
is better than the results of WSA using FR, or daily updated. ii) When using a
modified daily updated 4-day-advanced solar wind speed predictions WSA performs
slightly better than our G3DMHD. iii) When using V_{18Rs} as input, G3DMHD
model performs much better than the WSA formula. We argue the necessity of the
extra angular width ({\theta}b) parameter used in WSA.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.01682 [pdf] - 1557823
A STEREO Survey of Magnetic Cloud Coronal Mass Ejections Observed at
Earth in 2008--2012
Submitted: 2017-01-06
We identify coronal mass ejections (CMEs) associated with magnetic clouds
(MCs) observed near Earth by the Wind spacecraft from 2008 to mid-2012, a time
period when the two STEREO spacecraft were well positioned to study
Earth-directed CMEs. We find 31 out of 48 Wind MCs during this period can be
clearly connected with a CME that is trackable in STEREO imagery all the way
from the Sun to near 1 AU. For these events, we perform full 3-D
reconstructions of the CME structure and kinematics, assuming a flux rope
morphology for the CME shape, considering the full complement of STEREO and
SOHO imaging constraints. We find that the flux rope orientations and sizes
inferred from imaging are not well correlated with MC orientations and sizes
inferred from the Wind data. However, velocities within the MC region are
reproduced reasonably well by the image-based reconstruction. Our kinematic
measurements are used to provide simple prescriptions for predicting CME
arrival times at Earth, provided for a range of distances from the Sun where
CME velocity measurements might be made. Finally, we discuss the differences in
the morphology and kinematics of CME flux ropes associated with different
surface phenomena (flares, filament eruptions, or no surface activity).
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.3584 [pdf] - 1124158
A Coronal Hole's Effects on CME Shock Morphology in the Inner
Heliosphere
Submitted: 2012-06-15
We use STEREO imagery to study the morphology of a shock driven by a fast
coronal mass ejection (CME) launched from the Sun on 2011 March 7. The source
region of the CME is located just to the east of a coronal hole. The CME ejecta
is deflected away from the hole, in contrast with the shock, which readily
expands into the fast outflow from the coronal hole. The result is a CME with
ejecta not well centered within the shock surrounding it. The shock shape
inferred from the imaging is compared with in situ data at 1 AU, where the
shock is observed near Earth by the Wind spacecraft, and at STEREO-A. Shock
normals computed from the in situ data are consistent with the shock morphology
inferred from imaging.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:0811.3226 [pdf] - 315337
Comprehensive Observations of a Solar Minimum CME with STEREO
Submitted: 2008-11-19
We perform the first kinematic analysis of a CME observed by both imaging and
in situ instruments on board STEREO, namely the SECCHI, PLASTIC, and IMPACT
experiments. Launched on 2008 February 4, the CME is tracked continuously from
initiation to 1 AU using the SECCHI imagers on both STEREO spacecraft, and is
then detected by the PLASTIC and IMPACT particle and field detectors on board
STEREO-B. The CME is also detected in situ by ACE and SOHO/CELIAS at Earth's L1
Lagrangian point. The CME hits STEREO-B, ACE, and SOHO on 2008 February 7, but
misses STEREO-A entirely. This event provides a good example of just how
different the same event can look when viewed from different perspectives. We
also demonstrate many ways in which the comprehensive and continuous coverage
of this CME by STEREO improves confidence in our assessment of its kinematic
behavior, with potential ramifications for space weather forecasting. The
observations provide several lines of evidence in favor of the observable part
of the CME being narrow in angular extent, a determination crucial for deciding
how best to convert observed CME elongation angles from Sun-center to actual
Sun-center distances.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.4389 [pdf] - 13025
POLAR Investigation of the Sun - POLARIS
Appourchaux, T.;
Liewer, P.;
Watt, M.;
Alexander, D.;
Andretta, V.;
Auchere, F.;
D'Arrigo, P.;
Ayon, J.;
Corbard, T.;
Fineschi, S.;
Finsterle, W.;
Floyd, L.;
Garbe, G.;
Gizon, L.;
Hassler, D.;
Harra, L.;
Kosovichev, A.;
Leibacher, J.;
Leipold, M.;
Murphy, N.;
Maksimovic, M.;
Martinez-Pillet, V.;
Matthews, B. S. A.;
Mewaldt, R.;
Moses, D.;
Newmark, J.;
Regnier, S.;
Schmutz, W.;
Socker, D.;
Spadaro, D.;
Stuttard, M.;
Trosseille, C.;
Ulrich, R.;
Velli, M.;
Vourlidas, A.;
Wimmer-Schweingruber, C. R.;
Zurbuchen, T.
Submitted: 2008-05-28, last modified: 2008-06-23
The POLAR Investigation of the Sun (POLARIS) mission uses a combination of a
gravity assist and solar sail propulsion to place a spacecraft in a 0.48 AU
circular orbit around the Sun with an inclination of 75 degrees with respect to
solar equator. This challenging orbit is made possible by the challenging
development of solar sail propulsion. This first extended view of the
high-latitude regions of the Sun will enable crucial observations not possible
from the ecliptic viewpoint or from Solar Orbiter. While Solar Orbiter would
give the first glimpse of the high latitude magnetic field and flows to probe
the solar dynamo, it does not have sufficient viewing of the polar regions to
achieve POLARIS' primary objective : determining the relation between the
magnetism and dynamics of the Sun's polar regions and the solar cycle.