Normalized to: Sirri, G.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.04997 [pdf] - 2131947
Planck intermediate results. LVII. Joint Planck LFI and HFI data
processing
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Andersen, K. J.;
Ashdown, M.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Svalheim, T. L.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Thommesen, H.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2020-07-09
We present the NPIPE processing pipeline, which produces calibrated frequency
maps in temperature and polarization from data from the Planck Low Frequency
Instrument (LFI) and High Frequency Instrument (HFI) using high-performance
computers. NPIPE represents a natural evolution of previous Planck analysis
efforts, and combines some of the most powerful features of the separate LFI
and HFI analysis pipelines. The net effect of the improvements is lower levels
of noise and systematics in both frequency and component maps at essentially
all angular scales, as well as notably improved internal consistency between
the various frequency channels. Based on the NPIPE maps, we present the first
estimate of the Solar dipole determined through component separation across all
nine Planck frequencies. The amplitude is ($3366.6 \pm 2.7$)$\mu$K, consistent
with, albeit slightly higher than, earlier estimates. From the large-scale
polarization data, we derive an updated estimate of the optical depth of
reionization of $\tau = 0.051 \pm 0.006$, which appears robust with respect to
data and sky cuts. There are 600 complete signal, noise and systematics
simulations of the full-frequency and detector-set maps. As a Planck first,
these simulations include full time-domain processing of the beam-convolved CMB
anisotropies. The release of NPIPE maps and simulations is accompanied with a
complete suite of raw and processed time-ordered data and the software,
scripts, auxiliary data, and parameter files needed to improve further on the
analysis and to run matching simulations.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.02631 [pdf] - 2128527
Euclid preparation: VIII. The Complete Calibration of the
Colour-Redshift Relation survey: VLT/KMOS observations and data release
Euclid Collaboration;
Guglielmo, V.;
Saglia, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Galametz, A.;
Paltani, S.;
Bender, R.;
Bolzonella, M.;
Capak, P.;
Ilbert, O.;
Masters, D. C.;
Stern, D.;
Andreon, S.;
Auricchio, N.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Biviano, A.;
Bodendorf, C.;
Bonino, D.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brau-Nogue, S.;
Brescia, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabanac, R. A.;
Camera, S.;
Capobianco, V.;
Cappi, A.;
Carbone, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Casas, R.;
Casas, S.;
Castellano, M.;
Castignani, G.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Cledassou, R.;
Colodro-Conde, C.;
Congedo, G.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Costille, A.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
de la Torre, S.;
Di Ferdinando, D.;
Dubath, F.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabricius, M.;
Farrens, S.;
Ferreira, P. G.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Garilli, B.;
Gillis, B.;
Giocoli, C.;
Gozaliasl, G.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hildebrandt, H.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Keihanen, E.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kitching, T.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maino, D.;
Maiorano, E.;
Maraston, C.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Maurogordato, S.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Metcalf, R. Benton;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Nakajima, R.;
Neissner, C.;
Niemi, S.;
Nucita, A. A.;
Padilla, C.;
Pasian, F.;
Patrizii, L.;
Pocino, A.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Riccio, G.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Sanchez, A. G.;
Sapone, D.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespi, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Tramacere, A.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Wang, Y.;
Welikala, N.;
Wetzstein, M.;
Whittaker, L.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zamorani, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2020-07-06
The Complete Calibration of the Colour-Redshift Relation survey (C3R2) is a
spectroscopic effort involving ESO and Keck facilities designed to empirically
calibrate the galaxy colour-redshift relation - P(z|C) to the Euclid depth
(i_AB=24.5) and is intimately linked to upcoming Stage IV dark energy missions
based on weak lensing cosmology. The aim is to build a spectroscopic
calibration sample that is as representative as possible of the galaxies of the
Euclid weak lensing sample. In order to minimise the number of spectroscopic
observations to fill the gaps in current knowledge of the P(z|C),
self-organising map (SOM) representations of the galaxy colour space have been
constructed. Here we present the first results of an ESO@ VLT Large Programme
approved in the context of C3R2, which makes use of the two VLT optical and
near-infrared multi-object spectrographs, FORS2 and KMOS. This paper focuses on
high-quality spectroscopic redshifts of high-z galaxies observed with the KMOS
spectrograph in the H- and K-bands. A total of 424 highly-reliable z are
measured in the 1.3<=z<=2.5 range, with total success rates of 60.7% in the
H-band and 32.8% in the K-band. The newly determined z fill 55% of high and 35%
of lower priority empty SOM grid cells. We measured Halpha fluxes in a 1."2
radius aperture from the spectra of the spectroscopically confirmed galaxies
and converted them into star formation rates. In addition, we performed an SED
fitting analysis on the same sample in order to derive stellar masses, E(B-V),
total magnitudes, and SFRs. We combine the results obtained from the spectra
with those derived via SED fitting, and we show that the spectroscopic failures
come from either weakly star-forming galaxies (at z<1.7, i.e. in the H-band) or
low S/N spectra (in the K-band) of z>2 galaxies.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.00055 [pdf] - 2087525
Euclid: The importance of galaxy clustering and weak lensing
cross-correlations within the photometric Euclid survey
Tutusaus, I.;
Martinelli, M.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Camera, S.;
Yahia-Cherif, S.;
Casas, S.;
Blanchard, A.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Sakr, Z.;
Ilić, S.;
Kunz, M.;
Carbone, C.;
Castander, F. J.;
Dournac, F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Kitching, T.;
Markovic, K.;
Mangilli, A.;
Pettorino, V.;
Sapone, D.;
Yankelevich, V.;
Auricchio, N.;
Bender, R.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Brescia, M.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Costille, A.;
Cropper, M.;
Dubath, F.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Garilli, B.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kubik, B.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Mei, S.;
Merlin, E.;
Meylan, G.;
Moscardini, L.;
Ntelis, P.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pires, S.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Starck, J.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2020-04-30
The data from the Euclid mission will enable the measurement of the
photometric redshifts, angular positions, and weak lensing shapes for over a
billion galaxies. This large dataset will allow for cosmological analyses using
the angular clustering of galaxies and cosmic shear. The cross-correlation (XC)
between these probes can tighten constraints and it is therefore important to
quantify their impact for Euclid. In this study we carefully quantify the
impact of XC not only on the final parameter constraints for different
cosmological models, but also on the nuisance parameters. In particular, we aim
at understanding the amount of additional information that XC can provide for
parameters encoding systematic effects, such as galaxy bias or intrinsic
alignments (IA). We follow the formalism presented in Euclid Collaboration:
Blanchard et al. (2019) and make use of the codes validated therein. We show
that XC improves the dark energy Figure of Merit (FoM) by a factor $\sim 5$,
whilst it also reduces the uncertainties on galaxy bias by $\sim 17\%$ and the
uncertainties on IA by a factor $\sim 4$. We observe that the role of XC on the
final parameter constraints is qualitatively the same irrespective of the
galaxy bias model used. We also show that XC can help in distinguishing between
different IA models, and that if IA terms are neglected then this can lead to
significant biases on the cosmological parameters. We find that the XC terms
are necessary to extract the full information content from the data in future
analyses. They help in better constraining the cosmological model, and lead to
a better understanding of the systematic effects that contaminate these probes.
Furthermore, we find that XC helps in constraining the mean of the
photometric-redshift distributions, but it requires a more precise knowledge of
this mean in order not to degrade the final FoM. [Abridged]
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.07326 [pdf] - 2085090
Euclid: The reduced shear approximation and magnification bias for Stage
IV cosmic shear experiments
Deshpande, A. C.;
Kitching, T. D.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Taylor, P. L.;
Casas, S.;
Camera, S.;
Carbone, C.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Sakr, Z.;
Sapone, D.;
Tutusaus, I.;
Auricchio, N.;
Bodendorf, C.;
Bonino, D.;
Brescia, M.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Cropper, M.;
Dubath, F.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fumana, M.;
Garilli, B.;
Grupp, F.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Mei, S.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Meylan, G.;
Moscardini, L.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirri, G.;
Starck, J. L.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2019-12-16, last modified: 2020-04-01
Stage IV weak lensing experiments will offer more than an order of magnitude
leap in precision. We must therefore ensure that our analyses remain accurate
in this new era. Accordingly, previously ignored systematic effects must be
addressed. In this work, we evaluate the impact of the reduced shear
approximation and magnification bias, on the information obtained from the
angular power spectrum. To first-order, the statistics of reduced shear, a
combination of shear and convergence, are taken to be equal to those of shear.
However, this approximation can induce a bias in the cosmological parameters
that can no longer be neglected. A separate bias arises from the statistics of
shear being altered by the preferential selection of galaxies and the dilution
of their surface densities, in high-magnification regions. The corrections for
these systematic effects take similar forms, allowing them to be treated
together. We calculated the impact of neglecting these effects on the
cosmological parameters that would be determined from Euclid, using cosmic
shear tomography. To do so, we employed the Fisher matrix formalism, and
included the impact of the super-sample covariance. We also demonstrate how the
reduced shear correction can be calculated using a lognormal field forward
modelling approach. These effects cause significant biases in Omega_m, sigma_8,
n_s, Omega_DE, w_0, and w_a of -0.53 sigma, 0.43 sigma, -0.34 sigma, 1.36
sigma, -0.68 sigma, and 1.21 sigma, respectively. We then show that these
lensing biases interact with another systematic: the intrinsic alignment of
galaxies. Accordingly, we develop the formalism for an intrinsic
alignment-enhanced lensing bias correction. Applying this to Euclid, we find
that the additional terms introduced by this correction are sub-dominant.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.12646 [pdf] - 2071919
Planck intermediate results. LVI. Detection of the CMB dipole through
modulation of the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect: Eppur si muove II
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sullivan, R. M.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2020-03-27
The largest temperature anisotropy in the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
is the dipole, which has been measured with increasing accuracy for more than
three decades, particularly with the Planck satellite. The simplest
interpretation of the dipole is that it is due to our motion with respect to
the rest frame of the CMB. Since current CMB experiments infer temperature
anisotropies from angular intensity variations, the dipole modulates the
temperature anisotropies with the same frequency dependence as the thermal
Sunyaev-Zeldovich (tSZ) effect. We present the first (and significant)
detection of this signal in the tSZ maps, and find that it is consistent with
direct measurements of the CMB dipole, as expected. The signal contributes
power in the tSZ maps, modulated in a quadrupolar pattern, and we estimate its
contribution to the tSZ bispectrum, noting that it contributes negligible noise
to the bispectrum at relevant scales.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06205 [pdf] - 2009439
Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-12-03
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, which was dedicated to studying
the early Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched on 14 May 2009.
It scanned the microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12 August
2009 and 23 October 2013, producing deep, high-resolution, all-sky maps in nine
frequency bands from 30 to 857GHz. This paper presents the cosmological legacy
of Planck, which currently provides our strongest constraints on the parameters
of the standard cosmological model and some of the tightest limits available on
deviations from that model. The 6-parameter LCDM model continues to provide an
excellent fit to the cosmic microwave background data at high and low redshift,
describing the cosmological information in over a billion map pixels with just
six parameters. With 18 peaks in the temperature and polarization angular power
spectra constrained well, Planck measures five of the six parameters to better
than 1% (simultaneously), with the best-determined parameter (theta_*) now
known to 0.03%. We describe the multi-component sky as seen by Planck, the
success of the LCDM model, and the connection to lower-redshift probes of
structure formation. We also give a comprehensive summary of the major changes
introduced in this 2018 release. The Planck data, alone and in combination with
other probes, provide stringent constraints on our models of the early Universe
and the large-scale structure within which all astrophysical objects form and
evolve. We discuss some lessons learned from the Planck mission, and highlight
areas ripe for further experimental advances.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.04310 [pdf] - 1994125
Euclid preparation: V. Predicted yield of redshift 7<z<9 quasars from
the wide survey
Euclid Collaboration;
Barnett, R.;
Warren, S. J.;
Mortlock, D. J.;
Cuby, J. -G.;
Conselice, C.;
Hewett, P. C.;
Willott, C. J.;
Auricchio, N.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bellagamba, F.;
Bender, R.;
Biviano, A.;
Bonino, D.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brescia, M.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Camera, S.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carbone, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Clédassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dusini, S.;
Ealet, A.;
Farrens, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Garilli, B.;
Gillard, W.;
Gillis, B. R.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kitching, T.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Mansutti, O.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Mauri, N.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Metcalf, R. B.;
Metge, J. J.;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Neissner, C.;
Niemi, S. M.;
Nutma, T.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Paykari, P.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pettorino, V.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Rix, H. -W.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Sapone, D.;
Scaramella, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespí, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Wang, Y.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zamorani, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2019-08-12, last modified: 2019-11-05
We provide predictions of the yield of $7<z<9$ quasars from the Euclid wide
survey, updating the calculation presented in the Euclid Red Book in several
ways. We account for revisions to the Euclid near-infrared filter wavelengths;
we adopt steeper rates of decline of the quasar luminosity function (QLF;
$\Phi$) with redshift, $\Phi\propto10^{k(z-6)}$, $k=-0.72$, and a further
steeper rate of decline, $k=-0.92$; we use better models of the contaminating
populations (MLT dwarfs and compact early-type galaxies); and we use an
improved Bayesian selection method, compared to the colour cuts used for the
Red Book calculation, allowing the identification of fainter quasars, down to
$J_{AB}\sim23$. Quasars at $z>8$ may be selected from Euclid $OYJH$ photometry
alone, but selection over the redshift interval $7<z<8$ is greatly improved by
the addition of $z$-band data from, e.g., Pan-STARRS and LSST. We calculate
predicted quasar yields for the assumed values of the rate of decline of the
QLF beyond $z=6$. For the case that the decline of the QLF accelerates beyond
$z=6$, with $k=-0.92$, Euclid should nevertheless find over 100 quasars with
$7.0<z<7.5$, and $\sim25$ quasars beyond the current record of $z=7.5$,
including $\sim8$ beyond $z=8.0$. The first Euclid quasars at $z>7.5$ should be
found in the DR1 data release, expected in 2024. It will be possible to
determine the bright-end slope of the QLF, $7<z<8$, $M_{1450}<-25$, using 8m
class telescopes to confirm candidates, but follow-up with JWST or E-ELT will
be required to measure the faint-end slope. Contamination of the candidate
lists is predicted to be modest even at $J_{AB}\sim23$. The precision with
which $k$ can be determined over $7<z<8$ depends on the value of $k$, but
assuming $k=-0.72$ it can be measured to a 1 sigma uncertainty of 0.07.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.10521 [pdf] - 2068949
Euclid preparation: VI. Verifying the Performance of Cosmic Shear
Experiments
Euclid Collaboration;
Paykari, P.;
Kitching, T. D.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Azzollini, R.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Cropper, M.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Kannawadi, A.;
Miller, L.;
Aussel, H.;
Conti, I. F.;
Auricchio, N.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Biviano, A.;
Bonino, D.;
Borsato, E.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brau-Nogue, S.;
Brescia, M.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Camera, S.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carbone, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Charles, Y.;
Cledassou, R.;
Colodro-Conde, C.;
Congedo, G.;
Conselice, C.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Fabbian, G.;
Farrens, S.;
Ferreira, P. G.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Garilli, B.;
Gillard, W.;
Gillis, B. R.;
Giocoli, C.;
Gracia-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Hormuth, F.;
Ilic, S.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Keihanen, E.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Laureijs, R.;
Mignant, D. Le;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maciaszek, T.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martinet, N.;
Massey, F. Marulli R.;
Mauri, N.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Metcalf, R. B.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Neissner, C.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Niemi, S.;
Nutma, T.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Pourtsidou, A.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Sánchez, A. G.;
Sapone, D.;
Scaramella, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Schrabback, T.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespí, P.;
Taylor, A.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Tutusaus, I.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vannier, M.;
Vassallo, T.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2019-10-23
Our aim is to quantify the impact of systematic effects on the inference of
cosmological parameters from cosmic shear. We present an end-to-end approach
that introduces sources of bias in a modelled weak lensing survey on a
galaxy-by-galaxy level. Residual biases are propagated through a pipeline from
galaxy properties (one end) through to cosmic shear power spectra and
cosmological parameter estimates (the other end), to quantify how imperfect
knowledge of the pipeline changes the maximum likelihood values of dark energy
parameters. We quantify the impact of an imperfect correction for charge
transfer inefficiency (CTI) and modelling uncertainties of the point spread
function (PSF) for Euclid, and find that the biases introduced can be corrected
to acceptable levels.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.09273 [pdf] - 1983218
Euclid preparation: VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological
probes
Euclid Collaboration;
Blanchard, A.;
Camera, S.;
Carbone, C.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Casas, S.;
Ilić, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kitching, T.;
Kunz, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Linder, E.;
Majerotto, E.;
Markovič, K.;
Martinelli, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pourtsidou, A.;
Sakr, Z.;
Sánchez, A. G.;
Sapone, D.;
Tutusaus, I.;
Yahia-Cherif, S.;
Yankelevich, V.;
Andreon, S.;
Aussel, H.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bender, R.;
Biviano, A.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brau-Nogue, S.;
Brescia, M.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabanac, R.;
Capobianco, V.;
Cappi, A.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Casas, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Cledassou, R.;
Colodro-Conde, C.;
Congedo, G.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
de la Torre, S.;
Di Ferdinando, D.;
Dubath, F.;
Ducret, F.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Fabricius, M.;
Farrens, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Franzetti, P.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gillard, W.;
Gillis, B.;
Giocoli, C.;
Gómez-Alvarez, P.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Keihanen, E.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maino, D.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Metcalf, B.;
Metge, J. J.;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Niemi, S.;
Nucita, A. A.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Racca, G. D.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespí, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Kleijn, G. A. Verdoes;
Viel, M.;
Wang, Y.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2019-10-21
The Euclid space telescope will measure the shapes and redshifts of galaxies
to reconstruct the expansion history of the Universe and the growth of cosmic
structures. Estimation of the expected performance of the experiment, in terms
of predicted constraints on cosmological parameters, has so far relied on
different methodologies and numerical implementations, developed for different
observational probes and for their combination. In this paper we present
validated forecasts, that combine both theoretical and observational expertise
for different cosmological probes. This is presented to provide the community
with reliable numerical codes and methods for Euclid cosmological forecasts. We
describe in detail the methodology adopted for Fisher matrix forecasts, applied
to galaxy clustering, weak lensing and their combination. We estimate the
required accuracy for Euclid forecasts and outline a methodology for their
development. We then compare and improve different numerical implementations,
reaching uncertainties on the errors of cosmological parameters that are less
than the required precision in all cases. Furthermore, we provide details on
the validated implementations that can be used by the reader to validate their
own codes if required. We present new cosmological forecasts for Euclid. We
find that results depend on the specific cosmological model and remaining
freedom in each setup, i.e. flat or non-flat spatial cosmologies, or different
cuts at nonlinear scales. The validated numerical implementations can now be
reliably used for any setup. We present results for an optimistic and a
pessimistic choice of such settings. We demonstrate that the impact of
cross-correlations is particularly relevant for models beyond a cosmological
constant and may allow us to increase the dark energy Figure of Merit by at
least a factor of three.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06209 [pdf] - 1965163
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lemos, P.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-09-20
We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck
measurements of the CMB anisotropies. We find good consistency with the
standard spatially-flat 6-parameter $\Lambda$CDM cosmology having a power-law
spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted "base $\Lambda$CDM" in this
paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in
combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density $\Omega_c h^2 =
0.120\pm 0.001$, baryon density $\Omega_b h^2 = 0.0224\pm 0.0001$, scalar
spectral index $n_s = 0.965\pm 0.004$, and optical depth $\tau = 0.054\pm
0.007$ (in this abstract we quote $68\,\%$ confidence regions on measured
parameters and $95\,\%$ on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is
measured to $0.03\,\%$ precision, with $100\theta_*=1.0411\pm 0.0003$. These
results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable,
with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions.
Assuming the base-$\Lambda$CDM cosmology, the inferred late-Universe parameters
are: Hubble constant $H_0 = (67.4\pm 0.5)$km/s/Mpc; matter density parameter
$\Omega_m = 0.315\pm 0.007$; and matter fluctuation amplitude $\sigma_8 =
0.811\pm 0.006$. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the
base-$\Lambda$CDM model. Combining with BAO we constrain the effective extra
relativistic degrees of freedom to be $N_{\rm eff} = 2.99\pm 0.17$, and the
neutrino mass is tightly constrained to $\sum m_\nu< 0.12$eV. The CMB spectra
continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base
-$\Lambda$CDM at over $2\,\sigma$, which pulls some parameters that affect the
lensing amplitude away from the base-$\Lambda$CDM model; however, this is not
supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the
background geometry) BAO data. (Abridged)
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06211 [pdf] - 1927941
Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Hooper, D. C.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
Lpez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-08-02
We report on the implications for cosmic inflation of the 2018 Release of the
Planck CMB anisotropy measurements. The results are fully consistent with the
two previous Planck cosmological releases, but have smaller uncertainties
thanks to improvements in the characterization of polarization at low and high
multipoles. Planck temperature, polarization, and lensing data determine the
spectral index of scalar perturbations to be $n_\mathrm{s}=0.9649\pm 0.0042$ at
68% CL and show no evidence for a scale dependence of $n_\mathrm{s}.$ Spatial
flatness is confirmed at a precision of 0.4% at 95% CL with the combination
with BAO data. The Planck 95% CL upper limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio,
$r_{0.002}<0.10$, is further tightened by combining with the BICEP2/Keck Array
BK15 data to obtain $r_{0.002}<0.056$. In the framework of single-field
inflationary models with Einstein gravity, these results imply that: (a)
slow-roll models with a concave potential, $V" (\phi) < 0,$ are increasingly
favoured by the data; and (b) two different methods for reconstructing the
inflaton potential find no evidence for dynamics beyond slow roll.
Non-parametric reconstructions of the primordial power spectrum consistently
confirm a pure power law. A complementary analysis also finds no evidence for
theoretically motivated parameterized features in the Planck power spectrum, a
result further strengthened for certain oscillatory models by a new combined
analysis that includes Planck bispectrum data. The new Planck polarization data
provide a stringent test of the adiabaticity of the initial conditions. The
polarization data also provide improved constraints on inflationary models that
predict a small statistically anisotropic quadrupolar modulation of the
primordial fluctuations. However, the polarization data do not confirm physical
models for a scale-dependent dipolar modulation.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.12875 [pdf] - 1925231
Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2019-07-30
This paper describes the 2018 Planck CMB likelihoods, following a hybrid
approach similar to the 2015 one, with different approximations at low and high
multipoles, and implementing several methodological and analysis refinements.
With more realistic simulations, and better correction and modelling of
systematics, we can now make full use of the High Frequency Instrument
polarization data. The low-multipole 100x143 GHz EE cross-spectrum constrains
the reionization optical-depth parameter $\tau$ to better than 15% (in
combination with with the other low- and high-$\ell$ likelihoods). We also
update the 2015 baseline low-$\ell$ joint TEB likelihood based on the Low
Frequency Instrument data, which provides a weaker $\tau$ constraint. At high
multipoles, a better model of the temperature-to-polarization leakage and
corrections for the effective calibrations of the polarization channels
(polarization efficiency or PE) allow us to fully use the polarization spectra,
improving the constraints on the $\Lambda$CDM parameters by 20 to 30% compared
to TT-only constraints. Tests on the modelling of the polarization demonstrate
good consistency, with some residual modelling uncertainties, the accuracy of
the PE modelling being the main limitation. Using our various tests,
simulations, and comparison between different high-$\ell$ implementations, we
estimate the consistency of the results to be better than the 0.5$\sigma$
level. Minor curiosities already present before (differences between $\ell$<800
and $\ell$>800 parameters or the preference for more smoothing of the $C_\ell$
peaks) are shown to be driven by the TT power spectrum and are not
significantly modified by the inclusion of polarization. Overall, the legacy
Planck CMB likelihoods provide a robust tool for constraining the cosmological
model and represent a reference for future CMB observations. (Abridged)
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.04707 [pdf] - 1905883
Euclid preparation III. Galaxy cluster detection in the wide photometric
survey, performance and algorithm selection
Euclid Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Vannier, M.;
Maurogordato, S.;
Biviano, A.;
Adami, C.;
Ascaso, B.;
Bellagamba, F.;
Benoist, C.;
Cappi, A.;
Díaz-Sánchez, A.;
Durret, F.;
Farrens, S.;
Gonzalez, A. H.;
Iovino, A.;
Licitra, R.;
Maturi, M.;
Mei, S.;
Merson, A.;
Munari, E.;
Pelló, R.;
Ricci, M.;
Rocci, P. F.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Sarron, F.;
Amoura, Y.;
Andreon, S.;
Apostolakos, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bartlett, J.;
Baugh, C. M.;
Borgani, S.;
Brodwin, M.;
Castander, F.;
Castignani, G.;
Cucciati, O.;
De Lucia, G.;
Dubath, P.;
Fosalba, P.;
Giocoli, C.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Mamon, G. A.;
Melin, J. B.;
Moscardini, L.;
Paltani, S.;
Radovich, M.;
Sartoris, B.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sereno, M.;
Weller, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Corcione, L.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Sirri, G.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Zamorani, G.
Submitted: 2019-06-11, last modified: 2019-06-19
Galaxy cluster counts in bins of mass and redshift have been shown to be a
competitive probe to test cosmological models. This method requires an
efficient blind detection of clusters from surveys with a well-known selection
function and robust mass estimates. The Euclid wide survey will cover 15000
deg$^2$ of the sky in the optical and near-infrared bands, down to magnitude 24
in the $H$-band. The resulting data will make it possible to detect a large
number of galaxy clusters spanning a wide-range of masses up to redshift $\sim
2$. This paper presents the final results of the Euclid Cluster Finder
Challenge (CFC). The objective of these challenges was to select the cluster
detection algorithms that best meet the requirements of the Euclid mission. The
final CFC included six independent detection algorithms, based on different
techniques, such as photometric redshift tomography, optimal filtering,
hierarchical approach, wavelet and friend-of-friends algorithms. These
algorithms were blindly applied to a mock galaxy catalog with representative
Euclid-like properties. The relative performance of the algorithms was assessed
by matching the resulting detections to known clusters in the simulations.
Several matching procedures were tested, thus making it possible to estimate
the associated systematic effects on completeness to $<3$%. All the tested
algorithms are very competitive in terms of performance, with three of them
reaching $>80$% completeness for a mean purity of 80% down to masses of
$10^{14}$ M$_{\odot}$ and up to redshift $z=2$. Based on these results, two
algorithms were selected to be implemented in the Euclid pipeline, the AMICO
code, based on matched filtering, and the PZWav code, based on an adaptive
wavelet approach. [abridged]
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.05697 [pdf] - 1882757
Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Jung, G.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Oppizzi, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Smith, K.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stanco, L.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2019-05-14
We analyse the Planck full-mission cosmic microwave background (CMB)
temperature and E-mode polarization maps to obtain constraints on primordial
non-Gaussianity (NG). We compare estimates obtained from separable
template-fitting, binned, and modal bispectrum estimators, finding consistent
values for the local, equilateral, and orthogonal bispectrum amplitudes. Our
combined temperature and polarization analysis produces the following results:
f_NL^local = -0.9 +\- 5.1; f_NL^equil = -26 +\- 47; and f_NL^ortho = - 38 +\-
24 (68%CL, statistical). These results include the low-multipole (4 <= l < 40)
polarization data, not included in our previous analysis, pass an extensive
battery of tests, and are stable with respect to our 2015 measurements.
Polarization bispectra display a significant improvement in robustness; they
can now be used independently to set NG constraints. We consider a large number
of additional cases, e.g. scale-dependent feature and resonance bispectra,
isocurvature primordial NG, and parity-breaking models, where we also place
tight constraints but do not detect any signal. The non-primordial lensing
bispectrum is detected with an improved significance compared to 2015,
excluding the null hypothesis at 3.5 sigma. We present model-independent
reconstructions and analyses of the CMB bispectrum. Our final constraint on the
local trispectrum shape is g_NLl^local = (-5.8 +\-6.5) x 10^4 (68%CL,
statistical), while constraints for other trispectra are also determined. We
constrain the parameter space of different early-Universe scenarios, including
general single-field models of inflation, multi-field and axion field
parity-breaking models. Our results provide a high-precision test for
structure-formation scenarios, in complete agreement with the basic picture of
the LambdaCDM cosmology regarding the statistics of the initial conditions
(abridged).
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.04695 [pdf] - 1835470
Euclid preparation: II. The EuclidEmulator -- A tool to compute the
cosmology dependence of the nonlinear matter power spectrum
Euclid Collaboration;
Knabenhans, Mischa;
Stadel, Joachim;
Marelli, Stefano;
Potter, Doug;
Teyssier, Romain;
Legrand, Laurent;
Schneider, Aurel;
Sudret, Bruno;
Blot, Linda;
Awan, Saeeda;
Burigana, Carlo;
Carvalho, Carla Sofia;
Kurki-Suonio, Hannu;
Sirri, Gabriele
Submitted: 2018-09-12, last modified: 2019-02-20
We present a new power spectrum emulator named EuclidEmulator that estimates
the nonlinear correction to the linear dark matter power spectrum. It is based
on a spectral decomposition method called polynomial chaos expansion. All steps
in the construction of the emulator have been tested and optimized: the large
high-resolution N-body simulations carried out with PKDGRAV3 were validated
using a simulation from the Euclid Flagship campaign and demonstrated to have
converged up to wavenumbers $k\approx 5\,h\,{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ for redshifts
$z\leq 5$. The emulator is constructed using the uncertainty quantification
software UQLab and it has been optimized first by creating mock emulators based
on Takahashi's HALOFIT. We show that it is possible to successfully predict the
performance of the final emulator in this way prior to performing any N-body
simulations. We provide a C-code to calculate the nonlinear correction at a
relative accuracy of $\sim0.3\%$ with respect to N-body simulations within 50
ms. The absolute accuracy of the final nonlinear power spectrum is comparable
to one obtained with N-body simulations, i.e. $\sim 1\%$ for $k\lesssim
1\,h\,{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ and $z\lesssim 3.5$. This enables efficient forward
modeling in the nonlinear regime allowing for maximum likelihood estimation of
cosmological parameters. EuclidEmulator has been compared to HALOFIT and
CosmicEmu, an alternative emulator based on the Mira-Titan Universe, and shown
to be more accurate than these other approaches. This work paves a new way for
optimal construction of future emulators that also consider other cosmological
observables, use higher resolution input simulations and investigate higher
dimensional cosmological parameter spaces.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06206 [pdf] - 1747982
Planck 2018 results. II. Low Frequency Instrument data processing
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Argüeso, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Peel, M.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Seljebotn, D. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2018-09-11
We present a final description of the data-processing pipeline for the
Planck, Low Frequency Instrument (LFI), implemented for the 2018 data release.
Several improvements have been made with respect to the previous release,
especially in the calibration process and in the correction of instrumental
features such as the effects of nonlinearity in the response of the
analogue-to-digital converters. We provide a brief pedagogical introduction to
the complete pipeline, as well as a detailed description of the important
changes implemented. Self-consistency of the pipeline is demonstrated using
dedicated simulations and null tests. We present the final version of the LFI
full sky maps at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, both in temperature and polarization,
together with a refined estimate of the Solar dipole and a final assessment of
the main LFI instrumental parameters.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.00132 [pdf] - 1755826
Planck intermediate results. LIII. Detection of velocity dispersion from
the kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gerbino, M.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stanco, L.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2017-07-01, last modified: 2018-08-23
Using the ${\it Planck}$ full-mission data, we present a detection of the
temperature (and therefore velocity) dispersion due to the kinetic
Sunyaev-Zeldovich (kSZ) effect from clusters of galaxies. To suppress the
primary CMB and instrumental noise we derive a matched filter and then convolve
it with the ${\it Planck}$ foreground-cleaned `${\tt 2D-ILC\,}$' maps. By using
the Meta Catalogue of X-ray detected Clusters of galaxies (MCXC), we determine
the normalized ${\it rms}$ dispersion of the temperature fluctuations at the
positions of clusters, finding that this shows excess variance compared with
the noise expectation. We then build an unbiased statistical estimator of the
signal, determining that the normalized mean temperature dispersion of $1526$
clusters is $\langle \left(\Delta T/T \right)^{2} \rangle = (1.64 \pm 0.48)
\times 10^{-11}$. However, comparison with analytic calculations and
simulations suggest that around $0.7\,\sigma$ of this result is due to cluster
lensing rather than the kSZ effect. By correcting this, the temperature
dispersion is measured to be $\langle \left(\Delta T/T \right)^{2} \rangle =
(1.35 \pm 0.48) \times 10^{-11}$, which gives a detection at the $2.8\,\sigma$
level. We further convert uniform-weight temperature dispersion into a
measurement of the line-of-sight velocity dispersion, by using estimates of the
optical depth of each cluster (which introduces additional uncertainty into the
estimate). We find that the velocity dispersion is $\langle v^{2} \rangle
=(123\,000 \pm 71\,000)\,({\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1})^{2}$, which is consistent
with findings from other large-scale structure studies, and provides direct
evidence of statistical homogeneity on scales of $600\,h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$. Our
study shows the promise of using cross-correlations of the kSZ effect with
large-scale structure in order to constrain the growth of structure.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06207 [pdf] - 1717310
Planck 2018 results. III. High Frequency Instrument data processing and
frequency maps
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Couchot, F.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17
This paper presents the High Frequency Instrument (HFI) data processing
procedures for the Planck 2018 release. Major improvements in mapmaking have
been achieved since the previous 2015 release. They enabled the first
significant measurement of the reionization optical depth parameter using HFI
data. This paper presents an extensive analysis of systematic effects,
including the use of simulations to facilitate their removal and characterize
the residuals. The polarized data, which presented a number of known problems
in the 2015 Planck release, are very significantly improved. Calibration, based
on the CMB dipole, is now extremely accurate and in the frequency range 100 to
353 GHz reduces intensity-to-polarization leakage caused by calibration
mismatch. The Solar dipole direction has been determined in the three lowest
HFI frequency channels to within one arc minute, and its amplitude has an
absolute uncertainty smaller than $0.35\mu$K, an accuracy of order $10^{-4}$.
This is a major legacy from the HFI for future CMB experiments. The removal of
bandpass leakage has been improved by extracting the bandpass-mismatch
coefficients for each detector as part of the mapmaking process; these values
in turn improve the intensity maps. This is a major change in the philosophy of
"frequency maps", which are now computed from single detector data, all
adjusted to the same average bandpass response for the main foregrounds.
Simulations reproduce very well the relative gain calibration of detectors, as
well as drifts within a frequency induced by the residuals of the main
systematic effect. Using these simulations, we measure and correct the small
frequency calibration bias induced by this systematic effect at the $10^{-4}$
level. There is no detectable sign of a residual calibration bias between the
first and second acoustic peaks in the CMB channels, at the $10^{-3}$ level.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.02487 [pdf] - 1580129
Planck intermediate results. LI. Features in the cosmic microwave
background temperature power spectrum and shifts in cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Narimani, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-08-08, last modified: 2017-04-21
The six parameters of the standard $\Lambda$CDM model have best-fit values
derived from the Planck temperature power spectrum that are shifted somewhat
from the best-fit values derived from WMAP data. These shifts are driven by
features in the Planck temperature power spectrum at angular scales that had
never before been measured to cosmic-variance level precision. We investigate
these shifts to determine whether they are within the range of expectation and
to understand their origin in the data. Taking our parameter set to be the
optical depth of the reionized intergalactic medium $\tau$, the baryon density
$\omega_{\rm b}$, the matter density $\omega_{\rm m}$, the angular size of the
sound horizon $\theta_*$, the spectral index of the primordial power spectrum,
$n_{\rm s}$, and $A_{\rm s}e^{-2\tau}$ (where $A_{\rm s}$ is the amplitude of
the primordial power spectrum), we examine the change in best-fit values
between a WMAP-like large angular-scale data set (with multipole moment
$\ell<800$ in the Planck temperature power spectrum) and an all angular-scale
data set ($\ell<2500$ Planck temperature power spectrum), each with a prior on
$\tau$ of $0.07\pm0.02$. We find that the shifts, in units of the 1$\sigma$
expected dispersion for each parameter, are $\{\Delta \tau, \Delta A_{\rm s}
e^{-2\tau}, \Delta n_{\rm s}, \Delta \omega_{\rm m}, \Delta \omega_{\rm b},
\Delta \theta_*\} = \{-1.7, -2.2, 1.2, -2.0, 1.1, 0.9\}$, with a $\chi^2$ value
of 8.0. We find that this $\chi^2$ value is exceeded in 15% of our simulated
data sets, and that a parameter deviates by more than 2.2$\sigma$ in 9% of
simulated data sets, meaning that the shifts are not unusually large. Comparing
$\ell<800$ instead to $\ell>800$, or splitting at a different multipole, yields
similar results. We examine the $\ell<800$ model residuals in the $\ell>800$
power spectrum data and find that the features there... [abridged]
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.07151 [pdf] - 1593486
Planck intermediate results. LII. Planet flux densities
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lellouch, E.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moreno, R.;
Morgante, G.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Romelli, E.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.
Submitted: 2016-12-21
Measurements of flux density are described for five planets, Mars, Jupiter,
Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, across the six Planck High Frequency Instrument
frequency bands (100-857 GHz) and these are then compared with models and
existing data. In our analysis, we have also included estimates of the
brightness of Jupiter and Saturn at the three frequencies of the Planck Low
Frequency Instrument (30, 44, and 70 GHz). The results provide constraints on
the intrinsic brightness and the brightness time-variability of these planets.
The majority of the planet flux density estimates are limited by systematic
errors, but still yield better than 1% measurements in many cases. Applying
data from Planck HFI, the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), and the
Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) to a model that incorporates contributions
from Saturn's rings to the planet's total flux density suggests a best fit
value for the spectral index of Saturn's ring system of $\beta _\mathrm{ring} =
2.30\pm0.03$ over the 30-1000 GHz frequency range. The average ratio between
the Planck-HFI measurements and the adopted model predictions for all five
planets (excluding Jupiter observations for 353 GHz) is 0.997, 0.997, 1.018,
and 1.032 for 100, 143, 217, and 353 GHz, respectively. Model predictions for
planet thermodynamic temperatures are therefore consistent with the absolute
calibration of Planck-HFI detectors at about the three-percent-level. We
compare our measurements with published results from recent cosmic microwave
background experiments. In particular, we observe that the flux densities
measured by Planck HFI and WMAP agree to within 2%. These results allow
experiments operating in the mm-wavelength range to cross-calibrate against
Planck and improve models of radiative transport used in planetary science.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.03507 [pdf] - 1530686
Planck intermediate results. XLVII. Planck constraints on reionization
history
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Ili_, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirri, G.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-11, last modified: 2016-09-05
We investigate constraints on cosmic reionization extracted from the Planck
cosmic microwave background (CMB) data. We combine the Planck CMB anisotropy
data in temperature with the low-multipole polarization data to fit LCDM models
with various parameterizations of the reionization history. We obtain a Thomson
optical depth tau=0.058 +/- 0.012 for the commonly adopted instantaneous
reionization model. This confirms, with only data from CMB anisotropies, the
low value suggested by combining Planck 2015 results with other data sets and
also reduces the uncertainties. We reconstruct the history of the ionization
fraction using either a symmetric or an asymmetric model for the transition
between the neutral and ionized phases. To determine better constraints on the
duration of the reionization process, we also make use of measurements of the
amplitude of the kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich (kSZ) effect using additional
information from the high resolution Atacama Cosmology Telescope and South Pole
Telescope experiments. The average redshift at which reionization occurs is
found to lie between z=7.8 and 8.8, depending on the model of reionization
adopted. Using kSZ constraints and a redshift-symmetric reionization model, we
find an upper limit to the width of the reionization period of Dz < 2.8. In all
cases, we find that the Universe is ionized at less than the 10% level at
redshifts above z~10. This suggests that an early onset of reionization is
strongly disfavoured by the Planck data. We show that this result also reduces
the tension between CMB-based analyses and constraints from other astrophysical
sources.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.09387 [pdf] - 1530762
Planck intermediate results. XLVIII. Disentangling Galactic dust
emission and cosmic infrared background anisotropies
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Soler, J. D.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-30, last modified: 2016-08-09
Using the Planck 2015 data release (PR2) temperature maps, we separate
Galactic thermal dust emission from cosmic infrared background (CIB)
anisotropies. For this purpose, we implement a specifically tailored
component-separation method, the so-called generalized needlet internal linear
combination (GNILC) method, which uses spatial information (the angular power
spectra) to disentangle the Galactic dust emission and CIB anisotropies. We
produce significantly improved all-sky maps of Planck thermal dust emission,
with reduced CIB contamination, at 353, 545, and 857 GHz. By reducing the CIB
contamination of the thermal dust maps, we provide more accurate estimates of
the local dust temperature and dust spectral index over the sky with reduced
dispersion, especially at high Galactic latitudes above $b = \pm 20{\deg}$. We
find that the dust temperature is $T = (19.4 \pm 1.3)$ K and the dust spectral
index is $\beta = 1.6 \pm 0.1$ averaged over the whole sky, while $T = (19.4
\pm 1.5)$ K and $\beta = 1.6 \pm 0.2$ on 21 % of the sky at high latitudes.
Moreover, subtracting the new CIB-removed thermal dust maps from the
CMB-removed Planck maps gives access to the CIB anisotropies over 60 % of the
sky at Galactic latitudes $|b| > 20{\deg}$. Because they are a significant
improvement over previous Planck products, the GNILC maps are recommended for
thermal dust science. The new CIB maps can be regarded as indirect tracers of
the dark matter and they are recommended for exploring cross-correlations with
lensing and large-scale structure optical surveys. The reconstructed GNILC
thermal dust and CIB maps are delivered as Planck products.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.08633 [pdf] - 1530749
Planck intermediate results. XLIX. Parity-violation constraints from
polarization data
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-27, last modified: 2016-08-05
Parity violating extensions of the standard electromagnetic theory cause in
vacuo rotation of the plane of polarization of propagating photons. This
effect, also known as cosmic birefringence, impacts the cosmic microwave
background (CMB) anisotropy angular power spectra, producing non-vanishing
$T$--$B$ and $E$--$B$ correlations that are otherwise null when parity is a
symmetry. Here we present new constraints on an isotropic rotation,
parametrized by the angle $\alpha$, derived from Planck 2015 CMB polarization
data. To increase the robustness of our analyses, we employ two complementary
approaches, in harmonic space and in map space, the latter based on a peak
stacking technique. The two approaches provide estimates for $\alpha$ that are
in agreement within statistical uncertainties and very stable against several
consistency tests. Considering the $T$--$B$ and $E$--$B$ information jointly,
we find $\alpha = 0.31^{\circ} \pm 0.05^{\circ} \, ({\rm stat.})\, \pm
0.28^{\circ} \, ({\rm syst.})$ from the harmonic analysis and $\alpha =
0.35^{\circ} \pm 0.05^{\circ} \, ({\rm stat.})\, \pm 0.28^{\circ} \, ({\rm
syst.})$ from the stacking approach. These constraints are compatible with no
parity violation and are dominated by the systematic uncertainty in the
orientation of Planck's polarization-sensitive bolometers.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.07335 [pdf] - 1538905
Planck intermediate results. L. Evidence for spatial variation of the
polarized thermal dust spectral energy distribution and implications for CMB
$B$-mode analysis
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bracco, A.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-06-23
The characterization of the Galactic foregrounds has been shown to be the
main obstacle in the challenging quest to detect primordial B-modes in the
polarized microwave sky. We make use of the Planck-HFI 2015 data release at
high frequencies to place new constraints on the properties of the polarized
thermal dust emission at high Galactic latitudes. Here, we specifically study
the spatial variability of the dust polarized spectral energy distribution, and
its potential impact on the determination of the tensor-to-scalar ratio. We use
the correlation ratio of the $C_\ell^{BB}$ angular power spectra between the
217- and 353-GHz channels as a tracer of these potential variations, computed
on different high Galactic latitude regions, ranging from 80% to 20% of the
sky. The new insight from Planck data is a departure of the correlation ratio
from unity that cannot be attributed to a spurious decorrelation due to the
cosmic microwave background, instrumental noise, or instrumental systematics.
The effect is marginally detected on each region, but the statistical
combination of all the regions gives more than 99% confidence for this
variation in polarized dust properties. In addition, we show that the
decorrelation increases when there is a decrease in the mean column density of
the region of the sky being considered, and we propose a simple power-law
empirical model for this dependence, which matches what is seen in the Planck
data. We explore the effect that this measured decorrelation has on simulations
of the BICEP2-Keck Array/Planck analysis and show that the 2015 constraints
from those data still allow a decorrelation between the dust at 150 and 353GHz
of the order of the one we measure. Finally we show that either spatial
variation of the dust SED or of the dust polarization angle could produce
decorrelations between 217- and 353-GHz data similar to those we observe in the
data.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.02985 [pdf] - 1530681
Planck intermediate results. XLVI. Reduction of large-scale systematic
effects in HFI polarization maps and estimation of the reionization optical
depth
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Ilic, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirri, G.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-10, last modified: 2016-05-26
This paper describes the identification, modelling, and removal of previously
unexplained systematic effects in the polarization data of the Planck High
Frequency Instrument (HFI) on large angular scales, including new mapmaking and
calibration procedures, new and more complete end-to-end simulations, and a set
of robust internal consistency checks on the resulting maps. These maps, at
100, 143, 217, and 353 GHz, are early versions of those that will be released
in final form later in 2016.
The improvements allow us to determine the cosmic reionization optical depth
$\tau$ using, for the first time, the low-multipole $EE$ data from HFI,
reducing significantly the central value and uncertainty, and hence the upper
limit. Two different likelihood procedures are used to constrain $\tau$ from
two estimators of the CMB $E$- and $B$-mode angular power spectra at 100 and
143 GHz, after debiasing the spectra from a small remaining systematic
contamination. These all give fully consistent results.
A further consistency test is performed using cross-correlations derived from
the Low Frequency Instrument maps of the Planck 2015 data release and the new
HFI data. For this purpose, end-to-end analyses of systematic effects from the
two instruments are used to demonstrate the near independence of their dominant
systematic error residuals.
The tightest result comes from the HFI-based $\tau$ posterior distribution
using the maximum likelihood power spectrum estimator from $EE$ data only,
giving a value $0.055\pm 0.009$. In a companion paper these results are
discussed in the context of the best-fit Planck $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model
and recent models of reionization.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.3500 [pdf] - 1018413
Meaurement of Cosmic Ray elemental composition from the CAKE balloon
experiment
Submitted: 2009-11-18, last modified: 2009-12-04
CAKE (Cosmic Abundances below Knee Energies) was a prototype balloon
experiment for the determination of the charge spectra and of abundances of the
primary cosmic-rays (CR) with Z$>$10. It was a passive instrument made of
layers of CR39 and Lexan nuclear track detectors; it had a geometric acceptance
of $\sim$0.7 m$^2$sr for Fe nuclei. Here, the scanning and analysis strategies,
the algorithms used for the off-line filtering and for the tracking in
automated mode of the primary cosmic rays are presented, together with the
resulting CR charge distribution and their abundances.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510187 [pdf] - 1468999
Time variations in the deep underground muon flux measured by MACRO
Becherini, Y.;
Cecchini, S.;
Cozzi, M.;
Dekhissi, H.;
Derkaoui, J.;
Giacomelli, G.;
Giorgini, M.;
Maaroufi, F.;
Mandrioli, G.;
Margiotta, A.;
Manzoor, S.;
Moussa, A.;
Patrizii, L.;
Popa, V.;
Sioli, M.;
Sirri, G.;
Spurio, M.;
Togo, V.
Submitted: 2005-10-06
More than 30 million of high-energy muons collected with the MACRO detector
at the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory have been used to search for flux
variations of different natures. Two kinds of studies were carried out: search
for periodic variations and for the occurrence of clusters of events. Different
analysis methods, including Lomb-Scargle spectral analysis and Scan Test
statistics have been applied to the data.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0502251 [pdf] - 880821
Time correlations of high energy muons in an underground detector
Becherini, Y.;
Cecchini, S.;
Chiarusi, T.;
Cozzi, M.;
Dekhissi, H.;
Derkaoui, J.;
Esposito, L. S.;
Giacomelli, G.;
Giorgini, M.;
Giglietto, N.;
Maaroufi, F.;
Mandrioli, G.;
Margiotta, A.;
Manzoor, S.;
Moussa, A.;
Patrizii, L.;
Popa, V.;
Sioli, M.;
Sirri, G.;
Spurio, M.;
Togo, V.
Submitted: 2005-02-12, last modified: 2005-02-16
We present the result of a search for correlations in the arrival times of
high energy muons collected from 1995 till 2000 with the streamer tube system
of the complete MACRO detector at the underground Gran Sasso Lab. Large samples
of single muons (8.6 million), double muons (0.46 million) and multiple muons
with multiplicities from 3 to 6 (0.08 million) were selected. These samples
were used to search for time correlations of cosmic ray particles coming from
the whole upper hemisphere or from selected space cones. The results of our
analyses confirm with high statistics a random arrival time distribution of
high energy cosmic rays.