Normalized to: Sirignano, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.04997 [pdf] - 2131947
Planck intermediate results. LVII. Joint Planck LFI and HFI data
processing
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Andersen, K. J.;
Ashdown, M.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Svalheim, T. L.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Thommesen, H.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2020-07-09
We present the NPIPE processing pipeline, which produces calibrated frequency
maps in temperature and polarization from data from the Planck Low Frequency
Instrument (LFI) and High Frequency Instrument (HFI) using high-performance
computers. NPIPE represents a natural evolution of previous Planck analysis
efforts, and combines some of the most powerful features of the separate LFI
and HFI analysis pipelines. The net effect of the improvements is lower levels
of noise and systematics in both frequency and component maps at essentially
all angular scales, as well as notably improved internal consistency between
the various frequency channels. Based on the NPIPE maps, we present the first
estimate of the Solar dipole determined through component separation across all
nine Planck frequencies. The amplitude is ($3366.6 \pm 2.7$)$\mu$K, consistent
with, albeit slightly higher than, earlier estimates. From the large-scale
polarization data, we derive an updated estimate of the optical depth of
reionization of $\tau = 0.051 \pm 0.006$, which appears robust with respect to
data and sky cuts. There are 600 complete signal, noise and systematics
simulations of the full-frequency and detector-set maps. As a Planck first,
these simulations include full time-domain processing of the beam-convolved CMB
anisotropies. The release of NPIPE maps and simulations is accompanied with a
complete suite of raw and processed time-ordered data and the software,
scripts, auxiliary data, and parameter files needed to improve further on the
analysis and to run matching simulations.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.02631 [pdf] - 2128527
Euclid preparation: VIII. The Complete Calibration of the
Colour-Redshift Relation survey: VLT/KMOS observations and data release
Euclid Collaboration;
Guglielmo, V.;
Saglia, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Galametz, A.;
Paltani, S.;
Bender, R.;
Bolzonella, M.;
Capak, P.;
Ilbert, O.;
Masters, D. C.;
Stern, D.;
Andreon, S.;
Auricchio, N.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Biviano, A.;
Bodendorf, C.;
Bonino, D.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brau-Nogue, S.;
Brescia, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabanac, R. A.;
Camera, S.;
Capobianco, V.;
Cappi, A.;
Carbone, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Casas, R.;
Casas, S.;
Castellano, M.;
Castignani, G.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Cledassou, R.;
Colodro-Conde, C.;
Congedo, G.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Costille, A.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
de la Torre, S.;
Di Ferdinando, D.;
Dubath, F.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabricius, M.;
Farrens, S.;
Ferreira, P. G.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Garilli, B.;
Gillis, B.;
Giocoli, C.;
Gozaliasl, G.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hildebrandt, H.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Keihanen, E.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kitching, T.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maino, D.;
Maiorano, E.;
Maraston, C.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Maurogordato, S.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Metcalf, R. Benton;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Nakajima, R.;
Neissner, C.;
Niemi, S.;
Nucita, A. A.;
Padilla, C.;
Pasian, F.;
Patrizii, L.;
Pocino, A.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Riccio, G.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Sanchez, A. G.;
Sapone, D.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespi, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Tramacere, A.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Wang, Y.;
Welikala, N.;
Wetzstein, M.;
Whittaker, L.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zamorani, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2020-07-06
The Complete Calibration of the Colour-Redshift Relation survey (C3R2) is a
spectroscopic effort involving ESO and Keck facilities designed to empirically
calibrate the galaxy colour-redshift relation - P(z|C) to the Euclid depth
(i_AB=24.5) and is intimately linked to upcoming Stage IV dark energy missions
based on weak lensing cosmology. The aim is to build a spectroscopic
calibration sample that is as representative as possible of the galaxies of the
Euclid weak lensing sample. In order to minimise the number of spectroscopic
observations to fill the gaps in current knowledge of the P(z|C),
self-organising map (SOM) representations of the galaxy colour space have been
constructed. Here we present the first results of an ESO@ VLT Large Programme
approved in the context of C3R2, which makes use of the two VLT optical and
near-infrared multi-object spectrographs, FORS2 and KMOS. This paper focuses on
high-quality spectroscopic redshifts of high-z galaxies observed with the KMOS
spectrograph in the H- and K-bands. A total of 424 highly-reliable z are
measured in the 1.3<=z<=2.5 range, with total success rates of 60.7% in the
H-band and 32.8% in the K-band. The newly determined z fill 55% of high and 35%
of lower priority empty SOM grid cells. We measured Halpha fluxes in a 1."2
radius aperture from the spectra of the spectroscopically confirmed galaxies
and converted them into star formation rates. In addition, we performed an SED
fitting analysis on the same sample in order to derive stellar masses, E(B-V),
total magnitudes, and SFRs. We combine the results obtained from the spectra
with those derived via SED fitting, and we show that the spectroscopic failures
come from either weakly star-forming galaxies (at z<1.7, i.e. in the H-band) or
low S/N spectra (in the K-band) of z>2 galaxies.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.00055 [pdf] - 2087525
Euclid: The importance of galaxy clustering and weak lensing
cross-correlations within the photometric Euclid survey
Tutusaus, I.;
Martinelli, M.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Camera, S.;
Yahia-Cherif, S.;
Casas, S.;
Blanchard, A.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Sakr, Z.;
Ilić, S.;
Kunz, M.;
Carbone, C.;
Castander, F. J.;
Dournac, F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Kitching, T.;
Markovic, K.;
Mangilli, A.;
Pettorino, V.;
Sapone, D.;
Yankelevich, V.;
Auricchio, N.;
Bender, R.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Brescia, M.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Costille, A.;
Cropper, M.;
Dubath, F.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Garilli, B.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kubik, B.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Mei, S.;
Merlin, E.;
Meylan, G.;
Moscardini, L.;
Ntelis, P.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pires, S.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Starck, J.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2020-04-30
The data from the Euclid mission will enable the measurement of the
photometric redshifts, angular positions, and weak lensing shapes for over a
billion galaxies. This large dataset will allow for cosmological analyses using
the angular clustering of galaxies and cosmic shear. The cross-correlation (XC)
between these probes can tighten constraints and it is therefore important to
quantify their impact for Euclid. In this study we carefully quantify the
impact of XC not only on the final parameter constraints for different
cosmological models, but also on the nuisance parameters. In particular, we aim
at understanding the amount of additional information that XC can provide for
parameters encoding systematic effects, such as galaxy bias or intrinsic
alignments (IA). We follow the formalism presented in Euclid Collaboration:
Blanchard et al. (2019) and make use of the codes validated therein. We show
that XC improves the dark energy Figure of Merit (FoM) by a factor $\sim 5$,
whilst it also reduces the uncertainties on galaxy bias by $\sim 17\%$ and the
uncertainties on IA by a factor $\sim 4$. We observe that the role of XC on the
final parameter constraints is qualitatively the same irrespective of the
galaxy bias model used. We also show that XC can help in distinguishing between
different IA models, and that if IA terms are neglected then this can lead to
significant biases on the cosmological parameters. We find that the XC terms
are necessary to extract the full information content from the data in future
analyses. They help in better constraining the cosmological model, and lead to
a better understanding of the systematic effects that contaminate these probes.
Furthermore, we find that XC helps in constraining the mean of the
photometric-redshift distributions, but it requires a more precise knowledge of
this mean in order not to degrade the final FoM. [Abridged]
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.12646 [pdf] - 2071919
Planck intermediate results. LVI. Detection of the CMB dipole through
modulation of the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect: Eppur si muove II
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sullivan, R. M.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2020-03-27
The largest temperature anisotropy in the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
is the dipole, which has been measured with increasing accuracy for more than
three decades, particularly with the Planck satellite. The simplest
interpretation of the dipole is that it is due to our motion with respect to
the rest frame of the CMB. Since current CMB experiments infer temperature
anisotropies from angular intensity variations, the dipole modulates the
temperature anisotropies with the same frequency dependence as the thermal
Sunyaev-Zeldovich (tSZ) effect. We present the first (and significant)
detection of this signal in the tSZ maps, and find that it is consistent with
direct measurements of the CMB dipole, as expected. The signal contributes
power in the tSZ maps, modulated in a quadrupolar pattern, and we estimate its
contribution to the tSZ bispectrum, noting that it contributes negligible noise
to the bispectrum at relevant scales.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06205 [pdf] - 2009439
Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-12-03
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, which was dedicated to studying
the early Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched on 14 May 2009.
It scanned the microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12 August
2009 and 23 October 2013, producing deep, high-resolution, all-sky maps in nine
frequency bands from 30 to 857GHz. This paper presents the cosmological legacy
of Planck, which currently provides our strongest constraints on the parameters
of the standard cosmological model and some of the tightest limits available on
deviations from that model. The 6-parameter LCDM model continues to provide an
excellent fit to the cosmic microwave background data at high and low redshift,
describing the cosmological information in over a billion map pixels with just
six parameters. With 18 peaks in the temperature and polarization angular power
spectra constrained well, Planck measures five of the six parameters to better
than 1% (simultaneously), with the best-determined parameter (theta_*) now
known to 0.03%. We describe the multi-component sky as seen by Planck, the
success of the LCDM model, and the connection to lower-redshift probes of
structure formation. We also give a comprehensive summary of the major changes
introduced in this 2018 release. The Planck data, alone and in combination with
other probes, provide stringent constraints on our models of the early Universe
and the large-scale structure within which all astrophysical objects form and
evolve. We discuss some lessons learned from the Planck mission, and highlight
areas ripe for further experimental advances.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.10521 [pdf] - 2068949
Euclid preparation: VI. Verifying the Performance of Cosmic Shear
Experiments
Euclid Collaboration;
Paykari, P.;
Kitching, T. D.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Azzollini, R.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Cropper, M.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Kannawadi, A.;
Miller, L.;
Aussel, H.;
Conti, I. F.;
Auricchio, N.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Biviano, A.;
Bonino, D.;
Borsato, E.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brau-Nogue, S.;
Brescia, M.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Camera, S.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carbone, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Charles, Y.;
Cledassou, R.;
Colodro-Conde, C.;
Congedo, G.;
Conselice, C.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Fabbian, G.;
Farrens, S.;
Ferreira, P. G.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Garilli, B.;
Gillard, W.;
Gillis, B. R.;
Giocoli, C.;
Gracia-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Hormuth, F.;
Ilic, S.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Keihanen, E.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Laureijs, R.;
Mignant, D. Le;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maciaszek, T.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martinet, N.;
Massey, F. Marulli R.;
Mauri, N.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Metcalf, R. B.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Neissner, C.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Niemi, S.;
Nutma, T.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Pourtsidou, A.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Sánchez, A. G.;
Sapone, D.;
Scaramella, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Schrabback, T.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespí, P.;
Taylor, A.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Tutusaus, I.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vannier, M.;
Vassallo, T.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2019-10-23
Our aim is to quantify the impact of systematic effects on the inference of
cosmological parameters from cosmic shear. We present an end-to-end approach
that introduces sources of bias in a modelled weak lensing survey on a
galaxy-by-galaxy level. Residual biases are propagated through a pipeline from
galaxy properties (one end) through to cosmic shear power spectra and
cosmological parameter estimates (the other end), to quantify how imperfect
knowledge of the pipeline changes the maximum likelihood values of dark energy
parameters. We quantify the impact of an imperfect correction for charge
transfer inefficiency (CTI) and modelling uncertainties of the point spread
function (PSF) for Euclid, and find that the biases introduced can be corrected
to acceptable levels.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06209 [pdf] - 1965163
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lemos, P.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-09-20
We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck
measurements of the CMB anisotropies. We find good consistency with the
standard spatially-flat 6-parameter $\Lambda$CDM cosmology having a power-law
spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted "base $\Lambda$CDM" in this
paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in
combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density $\Omega_c h^2 =
0.120\pm 0.001$, baryon density $\Omega_b h^2 = 0.0224\pm 0.0001$, scalar
spectral index $n_s = 0.965\pm 0.004$, and optical depth $\tau = 0.054\pm
0.007$ (in this abstract we quote $68\,\%$ confidence regions on measured
parameters and $95\,\%$ on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is
measured to $0.03\,\%$ precision, with $100\theta_*=1.0411\pm 0.0003$. These
results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable,
with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions.
Assuming the base-$\Lambda$CDM cosmology, the inferred late-Universe parameters
are: Hubble constant $H_0 = (67.4\pm 0.5)$km/s/Mpc; matter density parameter
$\Omega_m = 0.315\pm 0.007$; and matter fluctuation amplitude $\sigma_8 =
0.811\pm 0.006$. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the
base-$\Lambda$CDM model. Combining with BAO we constrain the effective extra
relativistic degrees of freedom to be $N_{\rm eff} = 2.99\pm 0.17$, and the
neutrino mass is tightly constrained to $\sum m_\nu< 0.12$eV. The CMB spectra
continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base
-$\Lambda$CDM at over $2\,\sigma$, which pulls some parameters that affect the
lensing amplitude away from the base-$\Lambda$CDM model; however, this is not
supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the
background geometry) BAO data. (Abridged)
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06211 [pdf] - 1927941
Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Hooper, D. C.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
Lpez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-08-02
We report on the implications for cosmic inflation of the 2018 Release of the
Planck CMB anisotropy measurements. The results are fully consistent with the
two previous Planck cosmological releases, but have smaller uncertainties
thanks to improvements in the characterization of polarization at low and high
multipoles. Planck temperature, polarization, and lensing data determine the
spectral index of scalar perturbations to be $n_\mathrm{s}=0.9649\pm 0.0042$ at
68% CL and show no evidence for a scale dependence of $n_\mathrm{s}.$ Spatial
flatness is confirmed at a precision of 0.4% at 95% CL with the combination
with BAO data. The Planck 95% CL upper limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio,
$r_{0.002}<0.10$, is further tightened by combining with the BICEP2/Keck Array
BK15 data to obtain $r_{0.002}<0.056$. In the framework of single-field
inflationary models with Einstein gravity, these results imply that: (a)
slow-roll models with a concave potential, $V" (\phi) < 0,$ are increasingly
favoured by the data; and (b) two different methods for reconstructing the
inflaton potential find no evidence for dynamics beyond slow roll.
Non-parametric reconstructions of the primordial power spectrum consistently
confirm a pure power law. A complementary analysis also finds no evidence for
theoretically motivated parameterized features in the Planck power spectrum, a
result further strengthened for certain oscillatory models by a new combined
analysis that includes Planck bispectrum data. The new Planck polarization data
provide a stringent test of the adiabaticity of the initial conditions. The
polarization data also provide improved constraints on inflationary models that
predict a small statistically anisotropic quadrupolar modulation of the
primordial fluctuations. However, the polarization data do not confirm physical
models for a scale-dependent dipolar modulation.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.12875 [pdf] - 1925231
Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2019-07-30
This paper describes the 2018 Planck CMB likelihoods, following a hybrid
approach similar to the 2015 one, with different approximations at low and high
multipoles, and implementing several methodological and analysis refinements.
With more realistic simulations, and better correction and modelling of
systematics, we can now make full use of the High Frequency Instrument
polarization data. The low-multipole 100x143 GHz EE cross-spectrum constrains
the reionization optical-depth parameter $\tau$ to better than 15% (in
combination with with the other low- and high-$\ell$ likelihoods). We also
update the 2015 baseline low-$\ell$ joint TEB likelihood based on the Low
Frequency Instrument data, which provides a weaker $\tau$ constraint. At high
multipoles, a better model of the temperature-to-polarization leakage and
corrections for the effective calibrations of the polarization channels
(polarization efficiency or PE) allow us to fully use the polarization spectra,
improving the constraints on the $\Lambda$CDM parameters by 20 to 30% compared
to TT-only constraints. Tests on the modelling of the polarization demonstrate
good consistency, with some residual modelling uncertainties, the accuracy of
the PE modelling being the main limitation. Using our various tests,
simulations, and comparison between different high-$\ell$ implementations, we
estimate the consistency of the results to be better than the 0.5$\sigma$
level. Minor curiosities already present before (differences between $\ell$<800
and $\ell$>800 parameters or the preference for more smoothing of the $C_\ell$
peaks) are shown to be driven by the TT power spectrum and are not
significantly modified by the inclusion of polarization. Overall, the legacy
Planck CMB likelihoods provide a robust tool for constraining the cosmological
model and represent a reference for future CMB observations. (Abridged)
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06210 [pdf] - 1924023
Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-07-29
We present measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing
potential using the final $\textit{Planck}$ 2018 temperature and polarization
data. We increase the significance of the detection of lensing in the
polarization maps from $5\,\sigma$ to $9\,\sigma$. Combined with temperature,
lensing is detected at $40\,\sigma$. We present an extensive set of tests of
the robustness of the lensing-potential power spectrum, and construct a
minimum-variance estimator likelihood over lensing multipoles $8 \le L \le
400$. We find good consistency between lensing constraints and the results from
the $\textit{Planck}$ CMB power spectra within the $\rm{\Lambda CDM}$ model.
Combined with baryon density and other weak priors, the lensing analysis alone
constrains $\sigma_8 \Omega_{\rm m}^{0.25}=0.589\pm 0.020$ ($1\,\sigma$
errors). Also combining with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data, we find
tight individual parameter constraints, $\sigma_8=0.811\pm0.019$,
$H_0=67.9_{-1.3}^{+1.2}\,\text{km}\,\text{s}^{-1}\,\rm{Mpc}^{-1}$, and
$\Omega_{\rm m}=0.303^{+0.016}_{-0.018}$. Combining with $\textit{Planck}$ CMB
power spectrum data, we measure $\sigma_8$ to better than $1\,\%$ precision,
finding $\sigma_8=0.811\pm 0.006$. We find consistency with the lensing results
from the Dark Energy Survey, and give combined lensing-only parameter
constraints that are tighter than joint results using galaxy clustering. Using
$\textit{Planck}$ cosmic infrared background (CIB) maps we make a combined
estimate of the lensing potential over $60\,\%$ of the sky with considerably
more small-scale signal. We demonstrate delensing of the $\textit{Planck}$
power spectra, detecting a maximum removal of $40\,\%$ of the lensing-induced
power in all spectra. The improvement in the sharpening of the acoustic peaks
by including both CIB and the quadratic lensing reconstruction is detected at
high significance (abridged).
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.02552 [pdf] - 1896098
Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2019-06-06
Analysis of the Planck 2018 data set indicates that the statistical
properties of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies
are in excellent agreement with previous studies using the 2013 and 2015 data
releases. In particular, they are consistent with the Gaussian predictions of
the $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model, yet also confirm the presence of several
so-called "anomalies" on large angular scales. The novelty of the current
study, however, lies in being a first attempt at a comprehensive analysis of
the statistics of the polarization signal over all angular scales, using either
maps of the Stokes parameters, $Q$ and $U$, or the $E$-mode signal derived from
these using a new methodology (which we describe in an appendix). Although
remarkable progress has been made in reducing the systematic effects that
contaminated the 2015 polarization maps on large angular scales, it is still
the case that residual systematics (and our ability to simulate them) can limit
some tests of non-Gaussianity and isotropy. However, a detailed set of null
tests applied to the maps indicates that these issues do not dominate the
analysis on intermediate and large angular scales (i.e., $\ell \lesssim 400$).
In this regime, no unambiguous detections of cosmological non-Gaussianity, or
of anomalies corresponding to those seen in temperature, are claimed. Notably,
the stacking of CMB polarization signals centred on the positions of
temperature hot and cold spots exhibits excellent agreement with the
$\Lambda$CDM cosmological model, and also gives a clear indication of how
Planck provides state-of-the-art measurements of CMB temperature and
polarization on degree scales.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.05697 [pdf] - 1882757
Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Jung, G.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Oppizzi, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Smith, K.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stanco, L.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2019-05-14
We analyse the Planck full-mission cosmic microwave background (CMB)
temperature and E-mode polarization maps to obtain constraints on primordial
non-Gaussianity (NG). We compare estimates obtained from separable
template-fitting, binned, and modal bispectrum estimators, finding consistent
values for the local, equilateral, and orthogonal bispectrum amplitudes. Our
combined temperature and polarization analysis produces the following results:
f_NL^local = -0.9 +\- 5.1; f_NL^equil = -26 +\- 47; and f_NL^ortho = - 38 +\-
24 (68%CL, statistical). These results include the low-multipole (4 <= l < 40)
polarization data, not included in our previous analysis, pass an extensive
battery of tests, and are stable with respect to our 2015 measurements.
Polarization bispectra display a significant improvement in robustness; they
can now be used independently to set NG constraints. We consider a large number
of additional cases, e.g. scale-dependent feature and resonance bispectra,
isocurvature primordial NG, and parity-breaking models, where we also place
tight constraints but do not detect any signal. The non-primordial lensing
bispectrum is detected with an improved significance compared to 2015,
excluding the null hypothesis at 3.5 sigma. We present model-independent
reconstructions and analyses of the CMB bispectrum. Our final constraint on the
local trispectrum shape is g_NLl^local = (-5.8 +\-6.5) x 10^4 (68%CL,
statistical), while constraints for other trispectra are also determined. We
constrain the parameter space of different early-Universe scenarios, including
general single-field models of inflation, multi-field and axion field
parity-breaking models. Our results provide a high-precision test for
structure-formation scenarios, in complete agreement with the basic picture of
the LambdaCDM cosmology regarding the statistics of the initial conditions
(abridged).
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06212 [pdf] - 1844974
Planck 2018 results. XII. Galactic astrophysics using polarized dust
emission
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bracco, A.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Ferrière, K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Green, G.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Guillet, V.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-03-07
We present 353 GHz full-sky maps of the polarization fraction $p$, angle
$\psi$, and dispersion of angles $S$ of Galactic dust thermal emission produced
from the 2018 release of Planck data. We confirm that the mean and maximum of
$p$ decrease with increasing $N_H$. The uncertainty on the maximum polarization
fraction, $p_\mathrm{max}=22.0$% at 80 arcmin resolution, is dominated by the
uncertainty on the zero level in total intensity. The observed inverse
behaviour between $p$ and $S$ is interpreted with models of the polarized sky
that include effects from only the topology of the turbulent Galactic magnetic
field. Thus, the statistical properties of $p$, $\psi$, and $S$ mostly reflect
the structure of the magnetic field. Nevertheless, we search for potential
signatures of varying grain alignment and dust properties. First, we analyse
the product map $S \times p$, looking for residual trends. While $p$ decreases
by a factor of 3--4 between $N_H=10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ and $N_H=2\times 10^{22}$
cm$^{-2}$, $S \times p$ decreases by only about 25%, a systematic trend
observed in both the diffuse ISM and molecular clouds. Second, we find no
systematic trend of $S \times p$ with the dust temperature, even though in the
diffuse ISM lines of sight with high $p$ and low $S$ tend to have colder dust.
We also compare Planck data with starlight polarization in the visible at high
latitudes. The agreement in polarization angles is remarkable. Two polarization
emission-to-extinction ratios that characterize dust optical properties depend
only weakly on $N_H$ and converge towards the values previously determined for
translucent lines of sight. We determine an upper limit for the polarization
fraction in extinction of 13%, compatible with the $p_\mathrm{max}$ observed in
emission. These results provide strong constraints for models of Galactic dust
in diffuse gas.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06206 [pdf] - 1747982
Planck 2018 results. II. Low Frequency Instrument data processing
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Argüeso, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Peel, M.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Seljebotn, D. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2018-09-11
We present a final description of the data-processing pipeline for the
Planck, Low Frequency Instrument (LFI), implemented for the 2018 data release.
Several improvements have been made with respect to the previous release,
especially in the calibration process and in the correction of instrumental
features such as the effects of nonlinearity in the response of the
analogue-to-digital converters. We provide a brief pedagogical introduction to
the complete pipeline, as well as a detailed description of the important
changes implemented. Self-consistency of the pipeline is demonstrated using
dedicated simulations and null tests. We present the final version of the LFI
full sky maps at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, both in temperature and polarization,
together with a refined estimate of the Solar dipole and a final assessment of
the main LFI instrumental parameters.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.00132 [pdf] - 1755826
Planck intermediate results. LIII. Detection of velocity dispersion from
the kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gerbino, M.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stanco, L.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2017-07-01, last modified: 2018-08-23
Using the ${\it Planck}$ full-mission data, we present a detection of the
temperature (and therefore velocity) dispersion due to the kinetic
Sunyaev-Zeldovich (kSZ) effect from clusters of galaxies. To suppress the
primary CMB and instrumental noise we derive a matched filter and then convolve
it with the ${\it Planck}$ foreground-cleaned `${\tt 2D-ILC\,}$' maps. By using
the Meta Catalogue of X-ray detected Clusters of galaxies (MCXC), we determine
the normalized ${\it rms}$ dispersion of the temperature fluctuations at the
positions of clusters, finding that this shows excess variance compared with
the noise expectation. We then build an unbiased statistical estimator of the
signal, determining that the normalized mean temperature dispersion of $1526$
clusters is $\langle \left(\Delta T/T \right)^{2} \rangle = (1.64 \pm 0.48)
\times 10^{-11}$. However, comparison with analytic calculations and
simulations suggest that around $0.7\,\sigma$ of this result is due to cluster
lensing rather than the kSZ effect. By correcting this, the temperature
dispersion is measured to be $\langle \left(\Delta T/T \right)^{2} \rangle =
(1.35 \pm 0.48) \times 10^{-11}$, which gives a detection at the $2.8\,\sigma$
level. We further convert uniform-weight temperature dispersion into a
measurement of the line-of-sight velocity dispersion, by using estimates of the
optical depth of each cluster (which introduces additional uncertainty into the
estimate). We find that the velocity dispersion is $\langle v^{2} \rangle
=(123\,000 \pm 71\,000)\,({\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1})^{2}$, which is consistent
with findings from other large-scale structure studies, and provides direct
evidence of statistical homogeneity on scales of $600\,h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$. Our
study shows the promise of using cross-correlations of the kSZ effect with
large-scale structure in order to constrain the growth of structure.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06208 [pdf] - 1717311
Planck 2018 results. IV. Diffuse component separation
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Natoli, P.;
Oppizzi, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Peel, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Seljebotn, D. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Thommesen, H.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17
We present full-sky maps of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and
polarized synchrotron and thermal dust emission, derived from the third set of
Planck frequency maps. These products have significantly lower contamination
from instrumental systematic effects than previous versions. The methodologies
used to derive these maps follow closely those described in earlier papers,
adopting four methods (Commander, NILC, SEVEM, and SMICA) to extract the CMB
component, as well as three methods (Commander, GNILC, and SMICA) to extract
astrophysical components. Our revised CMB temperature maps agree with
corresponding products in the Planck 2015 delivery, whereas the polarization
maps exhibit significantly lower large-scale power, reflecting the improved
data processing described in companion papers; however, the noise properties of
the resulting data products are complicated, and the best available end-to-end
simulations exhibit relative biases with respect to the data at the few percent
level. Using these maps, we are for the first time able to fit the spectral
index of thermal dust independently over 3 degree regions. We derive a
conservative estimate of the mean spectral index of polarized thermal dust
emission of beta_d = 1.55 +/- 0.05, where the uncertainty marginalizes both
over all known systematic uncertainties and different estimation techniques.
For polarized synchrotron emission, we find a mean spectral index of beta_s =
-3.1 +/- 0.1, consistent with previously reported measurements. We note that
the current data processing does not allow for construction of unbiased
single-bolometer maps, and this limits our ability to extract CO emission and
correlated components. The foreground results for intensity derived in this
paper therefore do not supersede corresponding Planck 2015 products. For
polarization the new results supersede the corresponding 2015 products in all
respects.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06207 [pdf] - 1717310
Planck 2018 results. III. High Frequency Instrument data processing and
frequency maps
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Couchot, F.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17
This paper presents the High Frequency Instrument (HFI) data processing
procedures for the Planck 2018 release. Major improvements in mapmaking have
been achieved since the previous 2015 release. They enabled the first
significant measurement of the reionization optical depth parameter using HFI
data. This paper presents an extensive analysis of systematic effects,
including the use of simulations to facilitate their removal and characterize
the residuals. The polarized data, which presented a number of known problems
in the 2015 Planck release, are very significantly improved. Calibration, based
on the CMB dipole, is now extremely accurate and in the frequency range 100 to
353 GHz reduces intensity-to-polarization leakage caused by calibration
mismatch. The Solar dipole direction has been determined in the three lowest
HFI frequency channels to within one arc minute, and its amplitude has an
absolute uncertainty smaller than $0.35\mu$K, an accuracy of order $10^{-4}$.
This is a major legacy from the HFI for future CMB experiments. The removal of
bandpass leakage has been improved by extracting the bandpass-mismatch
coefficients for each detector as part of the mapmaking process; these values
in turn improve the intensity maps. This is a major change in the philosophy of
"frequency maps", which are now computed from single detector data, all
adjusted to the same average bandpass response for the main foregrounds.
Simulations reproduce very well the relative gain calibration of detectors, as
well as drifts within a frequency induced by the residuals of the main
systematic effect. Using these simulations, we measure and correct the small
frequency calibration bias induced by this systematic effect at the $10^{-4}$
level. There is no detectable sign of a residual calibration bias between the
first and second acoustic peaks in the CMB channels, at the $10^{-3}$ level.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00613 [pdf] - 1732522
Discovery potential for directional Dark Matter detection with nuclear
emulsions
Agafonova, N.;
Aleksandrov, A.;
Anokhina, A.;
Asada, T.;
Ashikhmin, V. V.;
Bodnarchuk, I.;
Buonaura, A.;
Chernyavskii, M.;
Chukanov, A.;
D'Ambrosio, N.;
De Lellis, G.;
Di Crescenzo, A.;
Di Marco, N.;
Dmitrievski, S.;
Enikeev, R. I.;
Fini, R. A.;
Galati, G.;
Gentile, V.;
Gorbunov, S.;
Gornushkin, Y.;
Guler, A. M.;
Ichiki, H.;
Katsuragawa, T.;
Konovalova, N.;
Kuge, K.;
Lauria, A.;
Lee, K. Y.;
Lista, L.;
Malgin, A. S.;
Managadze, A.;
Monacelli, P.;
Montesi, M. C.;
Naka, T.;
Okateva, N.;
Park, B. D.;
Podgrudkov, D.;
Polukhina, N.;
Pupilli, F.;
Roganova, T.;
Rogozhnikov, A.;
Rosa, G.;
Ryazhskaya, O. G.;
Sato, O.;
Shakiryanova, I. R.;
Shchedrina, T.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sohn, J. Y.;
Sotnikov, A.;
Starkov, N.;
Strolin, P.;
Tioukov, V.;
Umemoto, A.;
Ustyuzhanin, A.;
Yoon, C. S.;
Yoshimoto, M.;
Vasina, S.
Submitted: 2017-04-30, last modified: 2018-01-19
Direct Dark Matter searches are nowadays one of the most fervid research
topics with many experimental efforts devoted to the search for nuclear recoils
induced by the scattering of Weakly Interactive Massive Particles (WIMPs).
Detectors able to reconstruct the direction of the nucleus recoiling against
the scattering WIMP are opening a new frontier to possibly extend Dark Matter
searches beyond the neutrino background. Exploiting directionality would also
prove the galactic origin of Dark Matter with an unambiguous
signal-to-background separation. Indeed, the angular distribution of recoiled
nuclei is centered around the direction of the Cygnus constellation, while the
background distribution is expected to be isotropic. Current directional
experiments are based on gas TPC whose sensitivity is limited by the small
achievable detector mass. In this paper we present the discovery potential of a
directional experiment based on the use of a solid target made of newly
developed nuclear emulsions and of optical read-out systems reaching
unprecedented nanometric resolution.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.02487 [pdf] - 1580129
Planck intermediate results. LI. Features in the cosmic microwave
background temperature power spectrum and shifts in cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Narimani, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-08-08, last modified: 2017-04-21
The six parameters of the standard $\Lambda$CDM model have best-fit values
derived from the Planck temperature power spectrum that are shifted somewhat
from the best-fit values derived from WMAP data. These shifts are driven by
features in the Planck temperature power spectrum at angular scales that had
never before been measured to cosmic-variance level precision. We investigate
these shifts to determine whether they are within the range of expectation and
to understand their origin in the data. Taking our parameter set to be the
optical depth of the reionized intergalactic medium $\tau$, the baryon density
$\omega_{\rm b}$, the matter density $\omega_{\rm m}$, the angular size of the
sound horizon $\theta_*$, the spectral index of the primordial power spectrum,
$n_{\rm s}$, and $A_{\rm s}e^{-2\tau}$ (where $A_{\rm s}$ is the amplitude of
the primordial power spectrum), we examine the change in best-fit values
between a WMAP-like large angular-scale data set (with multipole moment
$\ell<800$ in the Planck temperature power spectrum) and an all angular-scale
data set ($\ell<2500$ Planck temperature power spectrum), each with a prior on
$\tau$ of $0.07\pm0.02$. We find that the shifts, in units of the 1$\sigma$
expected dispersion for each parameter, are $\{\Delta \tau, \Delta A_{\rm s}
e^{-2\tau}, \Delta n_{\rm s}, \Delta \omega_{\rm m}, \Delta \omega_{\rm b},
\Delta \theta_*\} = \{-1.7, -2.2, 1.2, -2.0, 1.1, 0.9\}$, with a $\chi^2$ value
of 8.0. We find that this $\chi^2$ value is exceeded in 15% of our simulated
data sets, and that a parameter deviates by more than 2.2$\sigma$ in 9% of
simulated data sets, meaning that the shifts are not unusually large. Comparing
$\ell<800$ instead to $\ell>800$, or splitting at a different multipole, yields
similar results. We examine the $\ell<800$ model residuals in the $\ell>800$
power spectrum data and find that the features there... [abridged]
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.09387 [pdf] - 1530762
Planck intermediate results. XLVIII. Disentangling Galactic dust
emission and cosmic infrared background anisotropies
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Soler, J. D.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-30, last modified: 2016-08-09
Using the Planck 2015 data release (PR2) temperature maps, we separate
Galactic thermal dust emission from cosmic infrared background (CIB)
anisotropies. For this purpose, we implement a specifically tailored
component-separation method, the so-called generalized needlet internal linear
combination (GNILC) method, which uses spatial information (the angular power
spectra) to disentangle the Galactic dust emission and CIB anisotropies. We
produce significantly improved all-sky maps of Planck thermal dust emission,
with reduced CIB contamination, at 353, 545, and 857 GHz. By reducing the CIB
contamination of the thermal dust maps, we provide more accurate estimates of
the local dust temperature and dust spectral index over the sky with reduced
dispersion, especially at high Galactic latitudes above $b = \pm 20{\deg}$. We
find that the dust temperature is $T = (19.4 \pm 1.3)$ K and the dust spectral
index is $\beta = 1.6 \pm 0.1$ averaged over the whole sky, while $T = (19.4
\pm 1.5)$ K and $\beta = 1.6 \pm 0.2$ on 21 % of the sky at high latitudes.
Moreover, subtracting the new CIB-removed thermal dust maps from the
CMB-removed Planck maps gives access to the CIB anisotropies over 60 % of the
sky at Galactic latitudes $|b| > 20{\deg}$. Because they are a significant
improvement over previous Planck products, the GNILC maps are recommended for
thermal dust science. The new CIB maps can be regarded as indirect tracers of
the dark matter and they are recommended for exploring cross-correlations with
lensing and large-scale structure optical surveys. The reconstructed GNILC
thermal dust and CIB maps are delivered as Planck products.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.08633 [pdf] - 1530749
Planck intermediate results. XLIX. Parity-violation constraints from
polarization data
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-27, last modified: 2016-08-05
Parity violating extensions of the standard electromagnetic theory cause in
vacuo rotation of the plane of polarization of propagating photons. This
effect, also known as cosmic birefringence, impacts the cosmic microwave
background (CMB) anisotropy angular power spectra, producing non-vanishing
$T$--$B$ and $E$--$B$ correlations that are otherwise null when parity is a
symmetry. Here we present new constraints on an isotropic rotation,
parametrized by the angle $\alpha$, derived from Planck 2015 CMB polarization
data. To increase the robustness of our analyses, we employ two complementary
approaches, in harmonic space and in map space, the latter based on a peak
stacking technique. The two approaches provide estimates for $\alpha$ that are
in agreement within statistical uncertainties and very stable against several
consistency tests. Considering the $T$--$B$ and $E$--$B$ information jointly,
we find $\alpha = 0.31^{\circ} \pm 0.05^{\circ} \, ({\rm stat.})\, \pm
0.28^{\circ} \, ({\rm syst.})$ from the harmonic analysis and $\alpha =
0.35^{\circ} \pm 0.05^{\circ} \, ({\rm stat.})\, \pm 0.28^{\circ} \, ({\rm
syst.})$ from the stacking approach. These constraints are compatible with no
parity violation and are dominated by the systematic uncertainty in the
orientation of Planck's polarization-sensitive bolometers.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.07335 [pdf] - 1538905
Planck intermediate results. L. Evidence for spatial variation of the
polarized thermal dust spectral energy distribution and implications for CMB
$B$-mode analysis
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bracco, A.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-06-23
The characterization of the Galactic foregrounds has been shown to be the
main obstacle in the challenging quest to detect primordial B-modes in the
polarized microwave sky. We make use of the Planck-HFI 2015 data release at
high frequencies to place new constraints on the properties of the polarized
thermal dust emission at high Galactic latitudes. Here, we specifically study
the spatial variability of the dust polarized spectral energy distribution, and
its potential impact on the determination of the tensor-to-scalar ratio. We use
the correlation ratio of the $C_\ell^{BB}$ angular power spectra between the
217- and 353-GHz channels as a tracer of these potential variations, computed
on different high Galactic latitude regions, ranging from 80% to 20% of the
sky. The new insight from Planck data is a departure of the correlation ratio
from unity that cannot be attributed to a spurious decorrelation due to the
cosmic microwave background, instrumental noise, or instrumental systematics.
The effect is marginally detected on each region, but the statistical
combination of all the regions gives more than 99% confidence for this
variation in polarized dust properties. In addition, we show that the
decorrelation increases when there is a decrease in the mean column density of
the region of the sky being considered, and we propose a simple power-law
empirical model for this dependence, which matches what is seen in the Planck
data. We explore the effect that this measured decorrelation has on simulations
of the BICEP2-Keck Array/Planck analysis and show that the 2015 constraints
from those data still allow a decorrelation between the dust at 150 and 353GHz
of the order of the one we measure. Finally we show that either spatial
variation of the dust SED or of the dust polarization angle could produce
decorrelations between 217- and 353-GHz data similar to those we observe in the
data.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1604.04199 [pdf] - 1390745
NEWS: Nuclear Emulsions for WIMP Search
Aleksandrov, A.;
Anokhina, A.;
Asada, T.;
Bender, D.;
Bodnarchuk, I.;
Buonaura, A.;
Buontempo, S.;
Chernyavskii, M.;
Chukanov, A.;
Consiglio, L.;
D'Ambrosio, N.;
De Lellis, G.;
De Serio, M.;
Di Crescenzo, A.;
Di Marco, N.;
Dmitrievski, S.;
Dzhatdoev, T.;
Fini, R. A.;
Furuya, S.;
Galati, G.;
Gentile, V.;
Gorbunov, S.;
Gornushkin, Y.;
Guler, A. M.;
Ichiki, H.;
Kamiscioglu, C.;
Kamiscioglu, M.;
Katsuragawa, T.;
Kimura, M.;
Konovalova, N.;
Kuge, K.;
Lauria, A.;
Loverre, P.;
Machii, S.;
Managadze, A.;
Monacelli, P.;
Montesi, M. C.;
Naka, T.;
Nakamura, M.;
Nakano, T.;
Pastore, A.;
Podgrudkov, D.;
Polukhina, N.;
Pupilli, F.;
Roganova, T.;
Rosa, G.;
Sato, O.;
Shchedrina, T.;
Simone, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sotnikov, A.;
Starkov, N.;
Strolin, P.;
Tawara, Y.;
Tioukov, V.;
Umemoto, A.;
Vladymyrov, M.;
Yoshimoto, M.;
Zemskova, S.
Submitted: 2016-04-14
Nowadays there is compelling evidence for the existence of dark matter in the
Universe. A general consensus has been expressed on the need for a directional
sensitive detector to confirm, with a complementary approach, the candidates
found in conventional searches and to finally extend their sensitivity beyond
the limit of neutrino-induced background. We propose here the use of a detector
based on nuclear emulsions to measure the direction of WIMP-induced nuclear
recoils. The production of nuclear emulsion films with nanometric grains is
established. Several measurement campaigns have demonstrated the capability of
detecting sub-micrometric tracks left by low energy ions in such emulsion
films. Innovative analysis technologies with fully automated optical
microscopes have made it possible to achieve the track reconstruction for path
lengths down to one hundred nanometers and there are good prospects to further
exceed this limit. The detector concept we propose foresees the use of a bulk
of nuclear emulsion films surrounded by a shield from environmental
radioactivity, to be placed on an equatorial telescope in order to cancel out
the effect of the Earth rotation, thus keeping the detector at a fixed
orientation toward the expected direction of galactic WIMPs. We report the
schedule and cost estimate for a one-kilogram mass pilot experiment, aiming at
delivering the first results on the time scale of six years.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1604.01029 [pdf] - 1530576
Planck intermediate results. XLIV. The structure of the Galactic
magnetic field from dust polarization maps of the southern Galactic cap
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Arzoumanian, D.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bracco, A.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Ferrière, K.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Guillet, V.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Neveu, J.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Oppermann, N.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Soler, J. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-04-04
We study the statistical properties of interstellar dust polarization at high
Galactic latitude, using the Stokes parameter Planck maps at 353 GHz. Our aim
is to advance the understanding of the magnetized interstellar medium (ISM),
and to provide a model of the polarized dust foreground for cosmic microwave
background component-separation procedures. Focusing on the southern Galactic
cap, we examine the statistical distributions of the polarization fraction
($p$) and angle ($\psi$) to characterize the ordered and turbulent components
of the Galactic magnetic field (GMF) in the solar neighbourhood. We relate
patterns at large angular scales in polarization to the orientation of the mean
(ordered) GMF towards Galactic coordinates $(l_0,b_0)=(70^\circ \pm
5^\circ,24^\circ \pm 5^\circ)$. The histogram of $p$ shows a wide dispersion up
to 25 %. The histogram of $\psi$ has a standard deviation of $12^\circ$ about
the regular pattern expected from the ordered GMF. We use these histograms to
build a phenomenological model of the turbulent component of the GMF, assuming
a uniform effective polarization fraction ($p_0$) of dust emission. To model
the Stokes parameters, we approximate the integration along the line of sight
(LOS) as a sum over a set of $N$ independent polarization layers, in each of
which the turbulent component of the GMF is obtained from Gaussian realizations
of a power-law power spectrum. We are able to reproduce the observed $p$ and
$\psi$ distributions using: a $p_0$ value of (26 $\pm$ 3)%; a ratio of 0.9
$\pm$ 0.1 between the strengths of the turbulent and mean components of the
GMF; and a small value of $N$. We relate the polarization layers to the density
structure and to the correlation length of the GMF along the LOS.