Normalized to: Sinnhuber, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.02036 [pdf] - 2080076
Proxima Centauri b: A Strong Case for including Cosmic-Ray-induced
Chemistry in Atmospheric Biosignature Studies
Submitted: 2020-03-04
Due to its Earth-like minimum mass of 1.27 M$_{\text{E}}$ and its close
proximity to our Solar system, Proxima Centauri b is one of the most
interesting exoplanets for habitability studies. Its host star, Proxima
Centauri, is however a strongly flaring star, which is expected to provide a
very hostile environment for potentially habitable planets. We perform a
habitability study of Proxima Centauri b assuming an Earth-like atmosphere
under high stellar particle bombardment, with a focus on spectral transmission
features. We employ our extensive model suite calculating energy spectra of
stellar particles, their journey through the planetary magnetosphere,
ionosphere, and atmosphere, ultimately providing planetary climate and spectral
characteristics, as outlined in Herbst et al. (2019). Our results suggest that
together with the incident stellar energy flux, high particle influxes can lead
to efficient heating of the planet well into temperate climates, by limiting
CH$_4$ amounts, which would otherwise run into anti-greenhouse for such planets
around M-stars. We identify some key spectral features relevant for future
spectral observations: First, NO$_2$ becomes the major absorber in the visible,
which greatly impacts the Rayleigh slope. Second, H$_2$O features can be masked
by CH$_4$ (near infra-red) and CO$_2$ (mid to far infra-red), making them
non-detectable in transmission. Third, O$_3$ is destroyed and instead HNO$_3$
features become clearly visible in the mid to far infra-red. Lastly, assuming a
few percent of CO$_2$ in the atmosphere, CO$_2$ absorption at 5.3 $\mu$m
becomes significant (for flare and non-flare cases), strongly overlapping with
a flare related NO feature in Earth's atmosphere.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.11632 [pdf] - 1994255
A New Model Suite to Determine the Influence of Cosmic Rays on
(Exo)planetary Atmospheric Biosignatures -- Validation based on Modern Earth
Herbst, Konstantin;
Grenfell, John Lee;
Sinnhuber, Miriam;
Rauer, Heike;
Heber, Bernd;
Banjac, Saša;
Scheucher, Markus;
Schmidt, Vanessa;
Gebauer, Stefanie;
Lehmann, Ralph;
Schreier, Franz
Submitted: 2019-09-25
The first opportunity to detect indications for life outside the Solar System
may be provided already within the next decade with upcoming missions such as
the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the European Extremely Large Telescope
(E-ELT) and/or the Atmospheric Remote-sensing Infrared Exoplanet Large-survey
(ARIEL) mission, searching for atmospheric biosignatures on planets in the
habitable zone of cool K- and M-stars. Nevertheless, their harsh stellar
radiation and particle environment could lead to photochemical loss of
atmospheric biosignatures. We aim to study the influence of cosmic rays on
exoplanetary atmospheric biosignatures and the radiation environment
considering feedbacks between energetic particle precipitation, climate,
atmospheric ionization, neutral and ion chemistry, and secondary particle
generation. We describe newly-combined state-of-the-art modeling tools to study
the impact of the radiation and particle environment on atmospheric particle
interaction, the influence on the atmospheric chemistry, and the
climate-chemistry coupling in a self-consistent model suite. To this end,
models like the Atmospheric Radiation Interaction Simulator (AtRIS), the
Exoplanetary Terrestrial Ion Chemistry model (ExoTIC), and the updated coupled
climate-chemistry model are combined. Amongst others, we model the atmospheric
response during quiescent solar periods and during a strong solar energetic
particle event as well as the scenario-dependent terrestrial transit spectra,
as seen by the NIR-Spec infrared spectrometer onboard the JWST. We find that
the comparatively weak solar event drastically increases the spectral signal of
HNO$_3$, while significantly suppressing the spectral feature of ozone. Because
of the slow recovery after such events, the latter indicates that ozone might
not be a good biomarker for planets orbiting stars with high flaring rates.