Normalized to: Silverio, K.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1207.2811 [pdf] - 1124779
The Red Supergiant Progenitor of Supernova 2012aw (PTF12bvh) in Messier
95
Van Dyk, Schuyler D.;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
Poznanski, Dovi;
Arcavi, Iair;
Gal-Yam, Avishay;
Filippenko, Alexei V.;
Silverio, Kathryn;
Stockton, Alan;
Cuillandre, Jean-Charles;
Marcy, Geoffrey W.;
Howard, Andrew W.;
Isaacson, Howard
Submitted: 2012-07-11
We report on the direct detection and characterization of the probable red
supergiant progenitor of the intermediate-luminosity Type II-Plateau (II-P)
supernova (SN) 2012aw in the nearby (10.0 Mpc) spiral galaxy Messier 95 (M95;
NGC 3351). We have identified the star in both Hubble Space Telescope images of
the host galaxy, obtained 17-18 yr prior to the explosion, and near-infrared
ground-based images, obtained 6-12 yr prior to the SN. The luminous supergiant
showed evidence for substantial circumstellar dust, manifested as excess
line-of-sight extinction. The effective total-to-selective ratio of extinction
to the star was R'_V \approx 4.35, which is significantly different from that
of diffuse interstellar dust (i.e., R_V=3.1), and the total extinction to the
star was therefore, on average, A_V \approx 3.1 mag. We find that the observed
spectral energy distribution for the progenitor star is consistent with an
effective temperature of 3600 K (spectral type M3), and that the star therefore
had a bolometric magnitude of -8.29. Through comparison with recent theoretical
massive-star evolutionary tracks we can infer that the red supergiant
progenitor had an initial mass 15 \lesssim M_{ini} (M_sun) < 20. Interpolating
by eye between the available tracks, we surmise that the star had initial mass
~17-18 M_sun. The circumstellar dust around the progenitor must have been
destroyed in the explosion, as the visual extinction to the SN is found to be
low (A_V=0.24 mag with R_V=3.1).
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1112.4514 [pdf] - 1092505
Kepler-20: A Sun-like Star with Three Sub-Neptune Exoplanets and Two
Earth-size Candidates
Gautier, Thomas N.;
Charbonneau, David;
Rowe, Jason F.;
Marcy, Geoffrey W.;
Isaacson, Howard;
Torres, Guillermo;
Fressin, Francois;
Rogers, Leslie A.;
Désert, Jean-Michel;
Buchhave, Lars A.;
Latham, David W.;
Quinn, Samuel N.;
Ciardi, David R.;
Fabrycky, Daniel C.;
Ford, Eric B.;
Gilliland, Ronald L.;
Walkowicz, Lucianne M.;
Bryson, Stephen T.;
Cochran, William D.;
Endl, Michael;
Fischer, Debra A.;
Howel, Steve B.;
Horch, Elliott P.;
Barclay, Thomas;
Batalha, Natalie;
Borucki, William J.;
Christiansen, Jessie L.;
Geary, John C.;
Henze, Christopher E.;
Holman, Matthew J.;
Ibrahim, Khadeejah;
Jenkins, Jon M.;
Kinemuchi, Karen;
Koch, David G.;
Lissauer, Jack J.;
Sanderfer, Dwight T.;
Sasselov, Dimitar D.;
Seager, Sara;
Silverio, Kathryn;
Smith, Jeffrey C.;
Still, Martin;
Stumpe, Martin C.;
Tenenbaum, Peter;
Van Cleve, Jeffrey
Submitted: 2011-12-19, last modified: 2012-01-31
We present the discovery of the Kepler-20 planetary system, which we
initially identified through the detection of five distinct periodic transit
signals in the Kepler light curve of the host star 2MASSJ19104752+4220194. We
find a stellar effective temperature Teff=5455+-100K, a metallicity of
[Fe/H]=0.01+-0.04, and a surface gravity of log(g)=4.4+-0.1. Combined with an
estimate of the stellar density from the transit light curves we deduce a
stellar mass of Mstar=0.912+-0.034 Msun and a stellar radius of
Rstar=0.944^{+0.060}_{-0.095} Rsun. For three of the transit signals, our
results strongly disfavor the possibility that these result from astrophysical
false positives. We conclude that the planetary scenario is more likely than
that of an astrophysical false positive by a factor of 2e5 (Kepler-20b), 1e5
(Kepler-20c), and 1.1e3 (Kepler-20d), sufficient to validate these objects as
planetary companions. For Kepler-20c and Kepler-20d, the blend scenario is
independently disfavored by the achromaticity of the transit: From Spitzer data
gathered at 4.5um, we infer a ratio of the planetary to stellar radii of
0.075+-0.015 (Kepler-20c) and 0.065+-0.011 (Kepler-20d), consistent with each
of the depths measured in the Kepler optical bandpass. We determine the orbital
periods and physical radii of the three confirmed planets to be 3.70d and
1.91^{+0.12}_{-0.21} Rearth for Kepler-20b, 10.85 d and 3.07^{+0.20}_{-0.31}
Rearth for Kepelr-20c, and 77.61 d and 2.75^{+0.17}_{-0.30} Rearth for
Kepler-20d. From multi-epoch radial velocities, we determine the masses of
Kepler-20b and Kepler-20c to be 8.7\+-2.2 Mearth and 16.1+-3.5 Mearth,
respectively, and we place an upper limit on the mass of Kepler-20d of 20.1
Mearth (2 sigma).
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0902.3995 [pdf] - 21678
Can TiO Explain Thermal Inversions in the Upper Atmospheres of
Irradiated Giant Planets?
Submitted: 2009-02-23, last modified: 2009-04-23
Spitzer Space Telescope infrared observations indicate that several
transiting extrasolar giant planets have thermal inversions in their upper
atmospheres. Above a relative minimum, the temperature appears to increase with
altitude. Such an inversion probably requires a species at high altitude that
absorbs a significant amount of incident optical/UV radiation. Some authors
have suggested that the strong optical absorbers titanium oxide (TiO) and
vanadium oxide (VO) could provide the needed additional opacity. However, if
regions of the atmosphere are cold enough for Ti and V to be sequestered into
solids they might rain out and be severely depleted. With a model of the
vertical distribution of a refractory species in gaseous and condensed form, we
address the question of whether enough TiO (or VO) could survive aloft in an
irradiated planet's atmosphere to produce a thermal inversion. We find that,
without significant macroscopic mixing, a heavy species such as TiO --
especially one that can condense in a cold-trap region -- cannot persist in a
planet's upper atmosphere. In our model, the amount of macroscopic mixing that
would be required to loft TiO to millibar pressures ranges from ~10^7 to
~10^{11} cm^2/s on HD 209458b, HD 149026b, TrES-4, OGLE-TR-56b, and WASP-12b,
depending on the planet and on assumed condensate sizes. Such large values may
be problematic for the TiO hypothesis. [Abridged]