Normalized to: Silver, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.6995 [pdf] - 1453148
XIPE: the X-ray Imaging Polarimetry Explorer
Soffitta, Paolo;
Barcons, Xavier;
Bellazzini, Ronaldo;
Braga, João;
Costa, Enrico;
Fraser, George W.;
Gburek, Szymon;
Huovelin, Juhani;
Matt, Giorgio;
Pearce, Mark;
Poutanen, Juri;
Reglero, Victor;
Santangelo, Andrea;
Sunyaev, Rashid A.;
Tagliaferri, Gianpiero;
Weisskopf, Martin;
Aloisio, Roberto;
Amato, Elena;
Attiná, Primo;
Axelsson, Magnus;
Baldini, Luca;
Basso, Stefano;
Bianchi, Stefano;
Blasi, Pasquale;
Bregeon, Johan;
Brez, Alessandro;
Bucciantini, Niccoló;
Burderi, Luciano;
Burwitz, Vadim;
Casella, Piergiorgio;
Churazov, Eugene;
Civitani, Marta;
Covino, Stefano;
da Silva, Rui Miguel Curado;
Cusumano, Giancarlo;
Dadina, Mauro;
D'Amico, Flavio;
De Rosa, Alessandra;
Di Cosimo, Sergio;
Di Persio, Giuseppe;
Di Salvo, Tiziana;
Dovciak, Michal;
Elsner, Ronald;
Eyles, Chris J.;
Fabian, Andrew C.;
Fabiani, Sergio;
Feng, Hua;
Giarrusso, Salvatore;
Goosmann, René W.;
Grandi, Paola;
Grosso, Nicolas;
Israel, Gianluca;
Jackson, Miranda;
Kaaret, Philip;
Karas, Vladimir;
Kuss, Michael;
Lai, Dong;
La Rosa, Giovanni;
Larsson, Josefin;
Larsson, Stefan;
Latronico, Luca;
Maggio, Antonio;
Maia, Jorge;
Marin, Frédéric;
Massai, Marco Maria;
Mineo, Teresa;
Minuti, Massimo;
Moretti, Elena;
Muleri, Fabio;
O'Dell, Stephen L.;
Pareschi, Giovanni;
Peres, Giovanni;
Pesce, Melissa;
Petrucci, Pierre-Olivier;
Pinchera, Michele;
Porquet, Delphine;
Ramsey, Brian;
Rea, Nanda;
Reale, Fabio;
Rodrigo, Juana Maria;
Różańska, Agata;
Rubini, Alda;
Rudawy, Pawel;
Ryde, Felix;
Salvati, Marco;
Júnior, Valdivino Alexandre de Santiago;
Sazonov, Sergey;
Sgró, Carmelo;
Silver, Eric;
Spandre, Gloria;
Spiga, Daniele;
Stella, Luigi;
Tamagawa, Toru;
Tamborra, Francesco;
Tavecchio, Fabrizio;
Dias, Teresa Teixeira;
van Adelsberg, Matthew;
Wu, Kinwah;
Zane, Silvia
Submitted: 2013-09-26
X-ray polarimetry, sometimes alone, and sometimes coupled to spectral and
temporal variability measurements and to imaging, allows a wealth of physical
phenomena in astrophysics to be studied. X-ray polarimetry investigates the
acceleration process, for example, including those typical of magnetic
reconnection in solar flares, but also emission in the strong magnetic fields
of neutron stars and white dwarfs. It detects scattering in asymmetric
structures such as accretion disks and columns, and in the so-called molecular
torus and ionization cones. In addition, it allows fundamental physics in
regimes of gravity and of magnetic field intensity not accessible to
experiments on the Earth to be probed. Finally, models that describe
fundamental interactions (e.g. quantum gravity and the extension of the
Standard Model) can be tested. We describe in this paper the X-ray Imaging
Polarimetry Explorer (XIPE), proposed in June 2012 to the first ESA call for a
small mission with a launch in 2017 but not selected. XIPE is composed of two
out of the three existing JET-X telescopes with two Gas Pixel Detectors (GPD)
filled with a He-DME mixture at their focus and two additional GPDs filled with
pressurized Ar-DME facing the sun. The Minimum Detectable Polarization is 14 %
at 1 mCrab in 10E5 s (2-10 keV) and 0.6 % for an X10 class flare. The Half
Energy Width, measured at PANTER X-ray test facility (MPE, Germany) with JET-X
optics is 24 arcsec. XIPE takes advantage of a low-earth equatorial orbit with
Malindi as down-link station and of a Mission Operation Center (MOC) at INPE
(Brazil).
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.3194 [pdf] - 1084102
The Extreme Physics Explorer and Large Area Micro-Channel Plate Optics
Garcia, Michael;
Elvis, Martin;
Chappell, Jon;
Brenneman, Laura;
Patnaude, Daniel;
Evans, Ian;
Bruni, Ricardo;
Romaine, Suzanne;
Silver, Eric;
Willingale, Richard;
Fraser, George;
Turner, T. J.;
Ramsey, Brian
Submitted: 2011-09-14
The Extreme Physics Explorer (EPE) is a concept timing/spectroscopy mission
that would use micro-channel plate optics (MCPO) to provide 4 square meters
effective area focused to ~1 arc-min onto an X-ray calorimeter. We describe
science drivers for such a mission, possible designs for the large area MCPO
needed for EPE, and the challenges of the large area MCPO design.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1106.2782 [pdf] - 372586
Fe XVII X-ray Line Ratios for Accurate Astrophysical Plasma Diagnostics
Submitted: 2011-06-14
New laboratory measurements using an Electron Beam Ion Trap (EBIT) and an
x-ray microcalorimeter are presented for the n=3 to n=2 Fe XVII emission lines
in the 15 {\AA} to 17 {\AA} range, along with new theoretical predictions for a
variety of electron energy distributions. This work improves upon our earlier
work on these lines by providing measurements at more electron impact energies
(seven values from 846 to 1185 eV), performing an in situ determination of the
x-ray window transmission, taking steps to minimize the ion impurity
concentrations, correcting the electron energies for space charge shifts, and
estimating the residual electron energy uncertainties. The results for the
3C/3D and 3s/3C line ratios are generally in agreement with the closest theory
to within 10%, and in agreement with previous measurements from an independent
group to within 20%. Better consistency between the two experimental groups is
obtained at the lowest electron energies by using theory to interpolate, taking
into account the significantly different electron energy distributions.
Evidence for resonance collision effects in the spectra is discussed.
Renormalized values for the absolute cross sections of the 3C and 3D lines are
obtained by combining previously published results, and shown to be in
agreement with the predictions of converged R-matrix theory. This work
establishes consistency between results from independent laboratories and
improves the reliability of these lines for astrophysical diagnostics. Factors
that should be taken into account for accurate diagnostics are discussed,
including electron energy distribution, polarization, absorption/scattering,
and line blends.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.3383 [pdf] - 30772
A Vigorous Explorer Program
Elvis, Martin;
Beasley, Matthew;
Brissenden, Roger;
Chakrabarti, Supriya;
Cherry, Michael;
Devlin, Mark;
Edelstein, Jerry;
Eisenhardt, Peter;
Feldman, Paul;
Ford, Holland;
Gehrels, Neil;
Golub, Leon;
Marshall, Herman;
Martin, Christopher;
Mather, John;
McCandliss, Stephan;
McConnell, Mark;
McDowell, Jonathan;
Meier, David;
Millan, Robyn;
Mitchell, John;
Moos, Warren;
Murray, Steven S.;
Nousek, John;
Oegerle, William;
Ramsey, Brian;
Green, James;
Grindlay, Jonathan;
Kaaret, Philip;
Kaiser, Mary Elizabeth;
Kaltenegger, Lisa;
Kasper, Justin;
Krolik, Julian;
Kruk, Jeffrey W.;
Latham, David;
MacKenty, John;
Mainzer, Amanda;
Ricker, George;
Rinehart, Stephen;
Romaine, Suzanne;
Scowen, Paul;
Silver, Eric;
Sonneborn, George;
Stern, Daniel;
Swain, Mark;
Swank, Jean;
Traub, Wesley;
Weisskopf, Martin;
Werner, Michael;
Wright, Edward
Submitted: 2009-11-17
Explorers have made breakthroughs in many fields of astrophysics. The science
from both these missions contributed to three Nobel Prizes - Giacconi (2002),
Mather, and Smoot (2006). Explorers have: marked the definitive beginning of
precision cosmology, discovered that short gamma-ray bursts are caused by
compact star mergers and have measured metalicity to redshifts z>6. NASA
Explorers do cutting-edge science that cannot be done by facility-class
instruments. The Explorer program provides a rapid response to changing science
and technology, to enable cutting-edge science at moderate cost. Explorers also
enable innovation, and engage & train scientists, managers and engineers,
adding human capital to NASA and the nation. The astrophysics Explorer launch
rate now being achieved is 1 per 3 years, and budget projections are in the
$150M/year range for the next five years. A newly Vigorous Explorer Program
should be created to: 1. Reach the long-stated goal of annual astrophysics
launches; 2. Find additional launch options for Explorers and actively
encourage cost savings in launchers and spacecraft, such as new commercial
vehicles and innovative partnerships. 3. Mitigate risk via stronger technical
development and sub-orbital programs, and through longer, more thorough, Phase
A programs, potentially reducing the need for a 30% contingency; 4. Strive to
protect the funding for missions that have reached Phase B, to prevent
significant launch slips and cancellations, with a goal of 4 to 5 years from
Phase B to launch; 5. Review the project management procedures and requirements
to seek cost reductions, including the risk management strategy and the review
and reporting process; 6. Review and possibly modify the cost caps for all
Explorer classes to optimize scientific returns per dollar. [ABRIDGED]
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:physics/0603131 [pdf] - 1456485
Visible, EUV, and X-ray Spectroscopy at the NIST EBIT Facility
Gillaspy, J. D.;
Blagojevic, B.;
Dalgarno, A.;
Fahey, K.;
Kharchenko, V.;
Laming, J. M.;
Bigot, E. -O. Le;
Lugosi, L.;
Makonyi, K.;
Ratliff, L. P.;
Schnopper, H. W.;
Silver, E. H.;
Takacs, E.;
Tan, J. N.;
Tawara, H.;
Tokési, K.
Submitted: 2006-03-16
After a brief introduction to the NIST EBIT facility, we present the results
of three different types of experiments that have been carried out there
recently: EUV and visible spectroscopy in support of the microelectronics
industry, laboratory astrophysics using an x-ray microcalorimeter, and charge
exchange studies using extracted beams of highly charged ions.